Segmental upper mid-basilar artery sacrifice in a child using a Micro Vascular Plug device for treatment of a basilar arteriovenous fistula compressing the brainstem

Outcomes of manually modified microvascular plugs to pulmonary flow restrictors in various congenital heart lesions

Background

The development of microvascular plugs (MVPs) has enabled novel transcatheter deliverable endoluminal pulmonary flow restrictors (PFRs) with the potential to treat newborns and infants with life-threatening congenital heart diseases (CHDs) in a minimally invasive manner. We present our experience to evaluate the efficacy of this concept in controlling pulmonary blood flow in various CHDs.

Methods

Retrospective clinical data review of patients with CHD and pulmonary over-circulation who received bilateral PFRs percutaneously.

Results

Twenty-eight PFRs (7 MVP-5Q, 12 MVP-7Q, and 9 MVP-9Q) were finally implanted in 14 patients with a median age of 1.6 months (IQR, 0.9-2.3) and a median weight of 3.1 Kg (IQR, 2.7-3.6). Nine patients had large intra-cardiac left-to-right shunts (including 3 with fatal trisomy and palliative programs), 2 had borderline left ventricles, 2 had Taussig-Bing anomaly, and one had a hypoplastic left heart. Four patients had concomitant ductal stenting. Two MVP-5Qs were snare-removed and upsized to MVP-7Q. Patients experienced a significant drop in oxygen saturation and Qp/Qs. All patients were discharged from the ICU after a median of 3.5 days (IQR, 2-5.8) postoperative. Five patients had routine inter-stage catheterization and no device embolization or pulmonary branch distortion was seen. Fourteen (50%) PFRs were surgically explanted uneventfully on a median of 4.3 months (IQR, 1.2-6) post-implantation during biventricular repair in 6 patients and stage-2 palliation in one patient. The latter died 1 month post-operative from severe sepsis. Four patients are scheduled for surgical PFR removal and biventricular repair. Two patients with trisomy 18 died at 1 and 6.8 months post-procedure from non-cardiac causes. One patient with trisomy 13 is alive at 2.7 months post-procedure.

Conclusion

It is feasible to bespoke MVPs and implant them as effective PFRs in various CHDs. This approach enables staged left ventricular recruitment, comprehensive stage-2 or biventricular repair with lower risk by postponing surgeries to later infancy. Device explantation is uneventful, and the outcomes afterward are promising.

Embolization of vascular abnormalities in children with congenital heart diseases using medtronic micro vascular plugs

This study aimed at evaluating our experience with Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) for embolization of vascular abnormalities in children with congenital heart diseases (CHDs). MVP is one of the most recent additions to the armamentarium for peripheral embolization. Data on its use in congenital cardiology are scarce. Medical records of children with CHDs who had embolizations with MVPs between April 2015 and September 2020 were reviewed. Immediate and follow-up data were assessed. A total of 153 patients underwent 172 procedures during which 240 embolizations using 259 MVPs were attempted. Median age and weight were 34.9 months (IQR, 4-75 months) and 12.5 kg (IQR, 4.8-19.4 kg), respectively. Targets were abnormal systemic arteries (n = 163), patent arterial ducts (n = 26), venous (n = 45), and coronary-cameral fistulas (n = 6). Median vessel diameter was 3.3 mm (IQR, 2.5-4 mm). Veins were larger than arteries (2.3 mm > 2.1 mm, p < 0.01). MVPs were implanted in narrower diameters compared to manufacturer's recommendations. Compared to veins, solitary implanted MVPs in arteries were additionally oversized at 12.4%, 5.1%, and 7.9% for MVP-3Q, 5Q, and 7Q, respectively. Additional occlusion material (16.7%) and 2 MVPs (5.8%) were needed at the same site for complete closure. Implantation and procedure success rates were 99.2% and 96.7%, respectively. Five complications were treated percutaneously (n = 4) and surgically (n = 1). Efficacy of vascular embolization using MVPs was demonstrated in the largest cohort of children with CHDs and a variety of clinical settings. Immediate and stable closure is obtained with a single device in most cases. Detailed device selection chart according to vessel type and diameter is proposed to achieve intended outcomes.

Embolization with MVP (Micro Vascular Plug®): experience on 104 patients in emergent and elective scenarios

AIM

To describe a 3 years experience of peripheral arterial embolization with Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) (Medtronic, USA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The following parameters were investigated: type of vascular injury, anticoagulation therapy at time of procedure, anatomical district, caliper of the target artery, course of the landing zone, additional embolics, technical and clinical success, device related clinical complications. Technical success was defined as complete embolization without deployment of additional embolics after MVP release. Primary clinical success was considered as hemodynamic stability in emergency setting and resolution of the underlying vascular pathology in elective cases; secondary clinical success was considered clinical success after a second embolization session.

RESULTS

116 MVP have been released in 104 patients (67 males and 37 females; mean age 61.3 years). The pullback release technique was adopted in each case. 85 patients were treated in emergent settings while in 19 patients the procedure was scheduled. The overall technical success was 75%. Primary clinical success was 96.1%, secondary clinical success 3% and clinical failure 0.9%. No statistical differences in terms of effectiveness were observed among patients assuming anticoagulation (p-value = 0.6). A straight and longer landing zone were statistically associated with higher technical success compared to curved and shorter ones, (p-values < 0.001 and = 0.048 respectively). MVP-3 and MVP-5 were the most frequently adopted models in this sample, in 29.8% and 49% of the patients respectively. No clinically adverse events directly related to MVP occurred; in 3 cases device migration was registered without clinical complications.

CONCLUSION

MVP is a safe and effective embolic agent. While eventual concomitant anticoagulation therapy did not influence the technical outcome, straight course and length of the landing zone are essential parameters to evaluate before deployment.

MVP (Micro Vascular Plug®) embolization of severe renal hemorrhages after nephrostomic tube placement

Background

We report our experience in managing iatrogenic renal bleedings after nephrostomic procedures by transarterial embolization using Micro Vascular Plug (MVP) (Medtronic, USA) as single or complementary embolization device with parenchimal sparing.

Materials and methods

Five patients have been treated in a single center with transarterial embolization because of renal hemorrhages occurring after positioning of nephrostomic drainages.

All patients presented with back pain, severe hematuria and/or bright red blood into the nephrostomic bag, with fall in hemoglobin value.

After contrast enhanced CT scan confirming arterial active bleeding, rescue embolization was performed using MVP.

The renal parenchimal loss was estimated on final postembolization DSA. Creatinine values were monitored before and after the procedure.

Results

Technical and clinical successes were obtained in all patients.

Two patients presented with extraluminal blush, one with multiple pseudoaneurysms, one with pseudoaneurysm with arterovenous fistula, one with extraluminal blush with arterovenous fistula.

MVP models were choosen oversized because of vasospasm that would underestimate the effective caliber of target vessel; MVP 3Q and MVP 7Q were adopted in one patient each, while MVP 5Q was released in three cases.

MVP was the sole embolizing agent in four patients; in one patient, MVP was employed after microcoils failed to obtain complete embolization.

The percentage of renal parenchimal lost was lower than 20%; no increase in Creatinine values was detected at dismission.

Conclusions

According to proposed data, MVP seems to be a safe, effective and fast embolizing device that interventionalists could consider when facing renal bleedings, even as sole agent.