Comparison of PED and FRED flow diverters for posterior circulation aneurysms: a propensity score matched cohort study

Comparative Efficacy of Flow Diverter Devices in the Treatment of Carotid Sidewall Intracranial Aneurysms: a Retrospective, Multicenter Study

BACKGROUND

The comparative efficacy and safety of first-generation flow diverters (FDs), Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) (Medtronic, Irvine, California), Silk (Balt Extrusion, Montmorency, France), Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) (Microvention, Tustin, California), and Surpass Streamline (Stryker Neurovascular, Fremont, California), is not directly established and largely inferred.

PURPOSE

This study aimed to compare the efficacy of different FDs in treating sidewall ICA intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective review of prospectively maintained databases from eighteen academic institutions from 2009-2016, comprising 444 patients treated with one of four devices for sidewall ICA aneurysms. Data on demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment outcomes, and complications were analyzed. Angiographic and clinical outcomes were assessed using various imaging modalities and modified Rankin Scale (mRS). Propensity score weighting was employed to balance confounding variables. The data analysis used Kaplan-Meier curves, logistic regression, and Cox proportional-hazards regression.

RESULTS

While there were no significant differences in retreatment rates, functional outcomes (mRS 0-1), and thromboembolic complications between the four devices, the probability of achieving adequate occlusion at the last follow-up was highest in Surpass device (HR: 4.59; CI: 2.75-7.66, p < 0.001), followed by FRED (HR: 2.23; CI: 1.44-3.46, p < 0.001), PED (HR: 1.72; CI: 1.10-2.70, p = 0.018), and Silk (HR: 1.0 ref. standard). The only hemorrhagic complications were with Surpass (1%).

CONCLUSION

All the first-generation devices achieved good clinical outcomes and retreatment rates in treating ICA sidewall aneurysms. Prospective studies are needed to explore the nuanced differences between these devices in the long term.

Pipeline Embolization Device and Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device for Intracranial Aneurysms: A Comparative Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Study

BACKGROUND

When it comes to intracranial aneurysms, the quest for more effective treatments is ongoing. Flow diversion represents a growing advancement in this field. This review seeks to compare 2 variants of the endovascular flow diversion method: the Flow Re-Direction Endoluminal Device (FRED) and the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED).

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guideline using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase, using appropriate terms to compare PED and FRED in double-arm studies from conception until October 8th, 2023.

RESULTS

The meta-analysis encompassed 1769 patients, with a predominance of females (75.5%), among whom 973 patients underwent FRED procedures, while 651 received PED interventions. At 6 months, complete occlusion rates were 0.62 for FRED and 0.68 for PED (P = 0.68). At 1 year and the last follow-up, no significant differences were observed between FRED and PED, respectively. Adequate occlusion rates were similar between FRED and PED (0.82 vs. 0.79, P = 0.68). FRED showed a statistically significant higher rate of good mRS scores at follow-up (1.00 vs. 0.97, P = 0.03). Hemorrhage and re-treatment rates were higher in PED (P < 0.01) without considering the rupture status of the aneurysms due to the lack of data.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis suggests comparable efficacy but different safety profiles between FRED and PED in treating intracranial aneurysms. FRED demonstrated a higher rate of good modified Rankin scores, while PED showed increased hemorrhage and re-treatment rates. Understanding these differences is crucial for informed decision-making in clinical practice.

Circulation remodeling after flow diversion of an anterior communicating artery aneurysm: A case report

Anterior communicating artery aneurysms are the most common intracranial aneurysm and have a high risk of rupture which can lead to morbidity and mortality. Traditionally, intracranial aneurysms were treated by clipping with neurosurgical access. However, certain patients may prefer less invasive approaches or not represent open surgical candidates. Flow diverters, including flow-redirection endoluminal devices (FRED), are new-generation stents that are placed endovascularly by transfemoral or transradial access. Recent studies have demonstrated that FRED is both safe and effective, with complete occlusion of aneurysms in over 90% of patients. This case highlights an interesting phenomenon of post-flow diversion circulatory remodeling, where flow diverter treatment can alter the circle of Willis anatomy and physiology.

Pipeline versus Tubridge in the treatment of unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms

BACKGROUND

To compare the safety and efficacy of pipeline embolization device (PED) and Tubridge flow diverter (TFD) for unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms.

METHODS

Posterior aneurysm patients treated with PED or TFD between January, 2019, and December, 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographics, aneurysm characteristics, treatment details, complications, and follow-up information were collected. The procedural-related complications and angiographic and clinical outcome were compared.

RESULTS

A total of 107 patients were involved; PED was applied for 55 patients and TFD for 52 patients. A total of 9 (8.4%) procedural-related complications occurred, including 4 (7.3%) in PED group and 5 (9.6%) in TFD group. During a mean of 10.3-month angiographic follow-up for 81 patients, complete occlusion was achieved in 35 (85.4%) patients in PED group and 30 (75.0%) in TFD group. The occlusion rate of PED group is slightly higher than that of TFD group. A mean of 25.0-month clinical follow-up for 107 patients showed that favorable clinical outcome was achieved in 53 (96.4%) patients in PED group and 50 (96.2%) patients in TFD group, respectively. No statistical difference was found in terms of procedural-related complications (p = 0.737), occlusion rate (p = 0.241), and favorable clinical outcome (0.954) between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The current study found no difference in complication, occlusion, and clinical outcome between PED and TFD for unruptured PCAs.

Difference in the cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion by Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the treatment of unruptured internal carotid artery aneurysms: a propensity score-matched cohort study

The introduction of flow diverters (FDs) has represented a paradigm shift in the management of unruptured cerebral aneurysms (UCA). Flow Re-direction Endoluminal Devices (FREDs) and Pipeline Embolization Devices (PEDs) have gained widespread popularity. We aimed to investigate the cumulative incidence of aneurysm occlusion. A total of 195 patients with 199 UCAs were analyzed retrospectively. The outcomes were aneurysmal occlusion during the follow-up, a modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2 at 90 days, additional treatment, major stroke, and steno-occlusive events of FD. Propensity score-matched analysis was performed, controlling for age, sex, aneurysmal size, and location of the internal carotid artery (ICA) aneurysm. Non-ICA aneurysms were excluded from matching. During the follow-up period (median, 366 days), complete and satisfactory aneurysmal occlusions were observed in 128 (68%) and 148 (78%) of 189 UCAs in the unmatched cohort. The 142 (71 each) propensity score-matched cohort was complied. The FRED group had a higher cumulative incidence of ICA aneurysm occlusion (complete: HR 2.7, 95% CI 1.4-5.1, p = 0.0025; satisfactory: HR 2.4, 95% CI 1.1-5.2, p = 0.025). The proportion of additional treatment was significantly smaller in the FRED group (OR 0.077, 95% CI 0.010-0.57, p = 0.0007). Other outcomes showed no significant differences. Propensity score-matched analysis indicated that FRED might have a higher cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion in the treatment of unruptured ICA aneurysms. Whether a cumulative incidence of aneurysmal occlusion may differ by the type of FDs warrants further investigation.

Endovascular treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms with flow diverters: A retrospective long-term single center analysis

PURPOSE

The introduction of flow diverters (FDs) in 2007 greatly enhanced the treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Here, we present our long-term clinical experience in treating unruptured intracranial aneurysms with FDs.

METHODS

107 patients with unruptured aneurysms and treated with an FD between 2010 and 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Aneurysm occlusion, procedural complications, and clinical outcome were evaluated.

RESULTS

Angiographic follow-up was available for 93 patients with a mean long-term follow-up time of 28.4 ± 21.6 months. Additional coiling was performed in 15.1% of patients (n = 14). Adequate aneurysm occlusion (Kamran grades 3 and 4) at long-term follow-up was achieved in 94.6% of patients (n = 88). 3.2% (n = 3) required endovascular retreatment since the last follow-up showed a lack of aneurysm occlusion (Kamran grade 0) due to a foreshortening of the FD. Incomplete opening of the FD and parent vessel occlusion was seen in 1.1% (n = 1) and 3.2% (n = 3) of patients, respectively. In-stent stenosis was observed in 57% (n = 53) of cases at short-term follow-up and 22.6% (n = 21) at long-term, which were moderate and asymptomatic overall. In-stent stenosis decreased significantly between short- and long-term follow-ups (31.4 ± 17.0% vs 9.7 ± 13.6%, respectively; p ≤ 0.001). Thromboembolic and hemorrhagic events occurred in 7.5% (n = 7) and 1.1% (n = 1) of patients, respectively. Good clinical outcome (modified Rankin scale: 0-2) was obtained in 97.8% (n = 91) leading to an overall treatment-related morbidity of 2.2% (n = 2). There was no procedural mortality.

CONCLUSION

Our study shows that FD treatment of unruptured intracranial aneurysms is effective and safe with high occlusion rates and low rates of permanent morbidity at long-term follow-up.

Comparison of Flow-Redirection Endoluminal Device and Pipeline Embolization Device in the Treatment of Intracerebral Aneurysms

BACKGROUND

The use of flow diverters for treating intracranial aneurysms has been widely used in the past decade; however, data comparing pipeline embolization device (PED; Medtronic Inc) and flow-redirection endoluminal device (FRED; MicroVention) in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms remain scarce.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the outcomes of PED and FRED in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective review of aneurysms treated with PED and FRED devices. Patients treated with PED or FRED were included. Cases requiring multiple or adjunctive devices were excluded. Primary outcome was complete aneurysm occlusion at 6 months. Secondary outcomes included good functional outcome, need for retreatment, and any complication.

RESULTS

The study cohort comprised 150 patients, including 35 aneurysms treated with FRED and 115 treated with PED. Aneurysm characteristics including location and size were comparable between the 2 cohorts. 6-month complete occlusion rate was significantly higher in the PED cohort (74.7% vs 51.5%; P = .017) but lost significance after inverse probability weights. Patients in the PED cohort were associated with higher rates of periprocedural complications (3.5% vs 0%; P = .573), and the rate of in-stent stenosis was approximately double in the FRED cohort (15.2% vs 6.9%; P = .172).

CONCLUSION

Compared with PED, FRED offers modest 6-month occlusion rates, which may be due to aneurysmal and baseline patient characteristics differences between both cohorts. Although not significant, FRED was associated with a higher complication rate mostly because of in-stent stenosis. Additional studies with longer follow-up durations should be conducted to further evaluate FRED thrombogenicity.

Learning Curve for Flow Diversion of Posterior Circulation Aneurysms: A Long-Term International Multicenter Cohort Study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Flow diversion has gradually become a standard treatment for intracranial aneurysms of the anterior circulation. Recently, the off-label use of the flow diverters to treat posterior circulation aneurysms has also increased despite initial concerns of rupture and the suboptimal results. This study aimed to explore the change in complication rates and treatment outcomes across time for posterior circulation aneurysms treated using flow diversion and to further evaluate the mechanisms and variables that could potentially explain the change and outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective review using a standardized data set at multiple international academic institutions was performed to identify patients with ruptured and unruptured posterior circulation aneurysms treated with flow diversion during a decade spanning January 2011 to January 2020. This period was then categorized into 4 intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 378 procedures were performed during the study period. Across time, there was an increasing tendency to treat more vertebral artery and fewer large vertebrobasilar aneurysms (P = .05). Moreover, interventionalists have been increasingly using fewer overlapping flow diverters per aneurysm (P = .07). There was a trend toward a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic complications from 15.8% in 2011-13 to 8.9% in 2018-19 (P = .34).

CONCLUSIONS

This multicenter experience revealed a trend toward treating fewer basilar aneurysms, smaller aneurysms, and increased usage of a single flow diverter, leading to a decrease in the rate of thromboembolic and hemorrhagic complications.

North American multicenter experience with the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms

OBJECTIVE

Flow diverters have revolutionized the endovascular treatment of intracranial aneurysms. Here, the authors present the first large-scale North American multicenter experience using the Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) in the treatment of cerebral aneurysms.

METHODS

Consecutive cerebral aneurysms treated with FRED at 7 North American centers between June 2020 and November 2021 were included. Data collected included patient demographic characteristics, aneurysm characteristics, periprocedural and long-term complications, modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores, and radiological follow-up.

RESULTS

In total, 133 aneurysms in 116 patients were treated with 123 FRED deployment procedures and included in this study. One hundred twenty-six aneurysms (94.7%) were unruptured, 117 (88.0%) saccular, and 123 (92.5%) located in anterior circulation. The mean (range) aneurysm maximal width and neck width sizes were 7.2 (1.5-42.5) mm and 4.1 (1.0-15.1) mm, respectively. Successful FRED deployment was achieved in 122 procedures (99.2%). Adjunctive coiling was used in 4 procedures (3.3%). Radiological follow-up was available for 101 aneurysms at a median duration of 7.0 months. At last follow-up, complete occlusion was observed in 55.4% of patients, residual neck in 8.9%, and filling aneurysm in 35.6%; among cases with radiological follow-up duration > 10 months, these values were 21/43 (48.8%), 3/43 (7.0%), and 19/43 (44.2%), respectively. On multivariate regression analysis, age (OR 0.93, p = 0.001) and aneurysm neck size (OR 0.83, p = 0.048) were negatively correlated with odds of complete occlusion at latest follow-up. The retreatment rate was 6/124 (4.8%). The overall complication rate was 31/116 (26.7%). Parent vessel occlusion, covered branch occlusion, and in-stent stenosis were detected in 9/99 (9.1%), 6/63 (9.5%), and 15/99 (15.2%) cases, respectively. The FRED-related, symptomatic, thromboembolic, and hemorrhagic complication rates were 22.4%, 12.9%, 6.9%, and 0.9% respectively. The morbidity rate was 10/116 patients (8.6%). There was 1 death due to massive periprocedural internal carotid artery stroke, and 3.6% of the patients had an mRS score > 2 at the last follow-up (vs 0.9% at baseline).

CONCLUSIONS

As the first large-scale North American multicenter FRED experience, this study confirmed the ease of successful FRED deployment but suggested lower efficacy and a higher rate of complications than reported by previous European and South American studies on FRED and other flow-diverting devices. The authors recommend judicious use of this device until future studies can better elucidate the long-term outcomes of FRED treatment.

Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device (FRED) with or without Adjunctive Coiling in Treatment of Very Large and Giant Cerebral Aneurysms

PURPOSE

Flow diverter stents are gaining wider use in the treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms; however, there are limited data on occlusion and complication rates of flow diverters in very large and giant aneurysms. This study assessed the safety and efficacy of flow redirection endoluminal device (FRED) and FRED Jr. stents in aneurysms ≥ 20 mm.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed all aneurysms ≥ 20 mm treated with FRED/FRED Jr. between January 2010 and June 2020 from three centers. Endpoints for clinical safety were absence of major stroke, aneurysmal rupture, or death and complete or near-complete occlusion for efficacy.

RESULTS

A total of 45 patients with very large (28 cases) and giant aneurysms (17 cases) were treated with FRED (41 cases), and FRED Jr. (4 cases) stents. The majority of the aneurysms (40/45, 88.9%) were in the anterior circulation. Adjunctive aneurysm coiling was performed in 21 aneurysms (46.7%). Technical complications were encountered in 4 procedures (8.9%). Ischemic and hemorrhagic complication rates were 6.7% and 8.9%, respectively. There was no case with major stroke. The mortality rate was 8.9%, and all cases were due to hemorrhagic complications from aneurysmal rupture. Median angiographic follow-up was 21.5 months (range 3-60 months). Complete occlusion was achieved in 32 aneurysms (71.1%), and near-complete occlusion in 5 cases (11.1%).

CONCLUSION

The use of FRED/FRED Jr. for the treatment of aneurysms ≥ 20 mm achieved a long-term aneurysm occlusion rate and a safety profile comparable to the large series reported with other flow diverter stents.

Retrospective analysis of intracranial aneurysms after flow diverter treatment including color-coded imaging (syngo iFlow) as a predictor of aneurysm occlusion

PURPOSE

Flow Diverters (FD) have immensely extended the treatment of cerebral aneurysms in the past years. Complete aneurysm occlusion is a process that often takes a certain amount of time and is usually difficult to predict. Our aim was to investigate different syngo iFlow parameters in order to predict aneurysm occlusion.

METHODS

Between 2014 and 2018 patients with unruptured cerebral aneurysms treated with a FD were reviewed. Aneurysm occlusion and complication rates have been assessed.In addition, various quantitative criteria were assessed using syngo iFlow before, after the intervention, and after short and long-term digital subtraction angiography (DSA).

RESULTS

A total of 66 patients hosting 66 cerebral aneurysms were included in this study. 87.9% (n = 58) aneurysms in the anterior and 12.1% (n = 8) in the posterior circulation were treated. Adequate aneurysm occlusion at long-term follow-up (19.05 ± 15.1 months) was achieved in 90.9% (n = 60). Adequately occluded aneurysm revealed a significantly greater peak intensity delay (PI-D, p = 0.008) and intensity decrease ratio (ID-R, p < 0.001) compared to insufficiently occluded aneurysms. Increased intra-aneurysmal contrast agent intensity (>100%) after FD implantation resulted in an ID-R < 1, which was associated with aneurysm growth during follow-up DSA. Retreatment with another FD due to foreshortening and/or aneurysm growth was performed in 10.6% (n = 7). Overall morbidity and mortality rates were 1.5% (n = 1) and 0%.

CONCLUSION

The applied syngo iFlow parameters were found to be useful in predicting adequate aneurysm occlusion and foresee aneurysm growth, which might indicate the implantation of another FD.