Radial artery access for neuroendovascular procedures: safety review and complications

Femoral versus radial access for middle meningeal artery embolization for chronic subdural hematomas: multicenter propensity score matched study

BACKGROUND

With transradial access (TRA) being more progressively used in neuroendovascular procedures, we compared TRA with transfemoral access (TFA) in middle meningeal artery embolization (MMAE) for chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH).

METHODS

Consecutive patients undergoing MMAE for cSDH at 14 North American centers (2018-23) were included. TRA and TFA groups were compared using propensity score matching (PSM) controlling for: age, sex, concurrent surgery, previous surgery, hematoma thickness and side, midline shift, and pretreatment antithrombotics. The primary outcome was access site and overall complications, and procedure duration; secondary endpoints were surgical rescue, radiographic improvement, and technical success and length of stay.

RESULTS

872 patients (median age 73 years, 72.9% men) underwent 1070 MMAE procedures (54% TFA vs 46% TRA). Access site hematoma occurred in three TFA cases (0.5%; none required operative intervention) versus 0% in TRA (P=0.23), and radial-to-femoral conversion occurred in 1% of TRA cases. TRA was more used in right sided cSDH (58.4% vs 44.8%; P<0.001). Particle embolics were significantly higher in TFA while Onyx was higher in TRA (P<0.001). Following PSM, 150 matched pairs were generated. Particles were more utilized in the TFA group (53% vs 29.7%) and Onyx was more utilized in the TRA group (56.1% vs 31.5%) (P=0.001). Procedural duration was longer in the TRA group (median 68.5 min (IQR 43.1-95) vs 59 (42-84); P=0.038), and radiographic success was higher in the TFA group (87.3% vs 77.4%; P=0.036). No differences were noted in surgical rescue (8.4% vs 10.1%, P=0.35) or technical failures (2.4% vs 2%; P=0.67) between TFA and TRA. Sensitivity analysis in the standalone MMAE retained all associations but differences in procedural duration.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, TRA offered comparable outcomes to TFA in MMAE for cSDH in terms of access related and overall complications, technical feasibility, and functional outcomes. Procedural duration was slightly longer in the TRA group, and radiographic success was higher in the TFA group, with no differences in surgical rescue rates.

Practical uses of the BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 in the road less travelled: Guide catheter comparison for radial access in neurovascular intervention

BACKGROUND

Radial arterial access has gained interest for neurovascular procedures in recent years. Although there are no randomized control trials for neurointervention procedures using radial access, there is growing literature demonstrating its feasibility and favorable outcomes. Equipment technical improvements, like the recently introduced BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 System, have made radial navigation safer, with improved maneuverability and support for a variety of procedures. We present a multicenter case series highlighting our institutional radial access experience comparing the BMX®81 with alternative catheters.

METHODS

Multicenter retrospective cohort study of 80 patients who underwent neurovascular procedures through a radial approach. In half of the cases a BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 System was used. The comparison group consisted of the BENCHMARK™071 and 96, Neuron MAX®088 and BALLAST™ systems. Procedures included endovascular thrombectomy, carotid and brachiocephalic artery stenting, middle meningeal artery embolization, flow diverter stenting, vertebral artery sacrifice, aneurysm coiling, and WEB™ device deployment.

RESULTS

In our series, the BMX®81 was successful in the navigation of the anatomy to the target location in 95% of cases. No radial access or BMX®81 related complications were identified. There was no significant difference in fluoroscopy time between the BMX81 and the comparison group. Four patients in the comparison group had catheter-related complications due to vasospasm. Eighty-six percent of BMX®81 cases had satisfactory outcomes and no technical difficulties. The remainder presented technical difficulties, but none of these were considered secondary to the puncture site or support structure.

CONCLUSIONS

The BENCHMARK™ BMX®81 System is a recently developed guiding catheter which has design and size features supporting radial access for a variety of neurovascular interventions. Early multicenter experience highlights the ease of use and versatility of this new catheter as an alternative to transfemoral access as well as other catheters used for radial access.

A new very-small-bore Simmons guiding sheath for transradial neurointervention: Technical note and initial experience

Transradial access during neurointerventions has increased in popularity because of reduced complications and patient preference. Nevertheless, transradial cannulation into the left common carotid artery can be difficult technically because of the lack of catheter support in the aortic arch. Furthermore, the use of large sheaths can increase the risk of complications at the access site. Here, we developed a new very-small-bore transradial system using a 3F Simmons guiding sheath, to increase the procedural success rate and minimize access-site complications. This system can represent a valuable treatment option for neurointerventions and has the potential to expand the indications for transradial access.

The Zoom RDL radial access system for neurointervention: An early single-center experience

BACKGROUND

The transradial approach (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures is increasingly being used given its technical feasibility and safety. However, catheter trackability and device deliverability are reported barriers to TRA adoption.

METHODS

This is the first report describing the technical feasibility and performance of using the Zoom RDL Radial Access System (Imperative Care, Inc., Campbell, CA) in 29 patients who underwent neurointerventional procedures from October 2022 to January 2023 in a single-center institution.

RESULTS

Mean age of the study population was 61.9±17.2 years, 79.3% were male (23/29), and 62.1% were black (18/29). The most common procedures were stroke thrombectomy (31.0%, 9/29) and aneurysm embolization (27.6%, 8/29). All the stroke thrombectomy procedures were successfully performed; first-pass effect rate (mTICI≥2 c in one pass) was achieved in 66.7% (6/9) of cases. We used TRA in 86.2% of cases (25/29), including distal radial/snuffbox access in 31.0% (9/29) of cases. The radial diameter was >2 mm for all cases. An intermediate/aspiration catheter was used in 89.7% (26/29) of cases. Access success was achieved in 89.7% of cases (26/29); two cases required conversion from TRA to transfemoral approach (6.9%) and one case required conversion to a different guide catheter (3.4%). There were no access site complications or other Zoom RDL-related complications. One intracerebral hemorrhage, and one procedure-related thrombus were observed.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of Zoom RDL Radial Access System is technically feasible and effective for complex neurointerventional procedures with low complication rates.

Comparison of Transradial Access and Transfemoral Access for Diagnostic Cerebral Angiography in the Elderly Population

OBJECTIVE

Evaluate the efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction of transradial access (TRA) compared with conventional transfemoral access (TFA) for diagnostic cerebral angiography in elderly patients (≥65 years of age).

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of patients receiving cerebral angiography via TRA or TFA between October 2020 and December 2021 at 3 institutions. Basic patient characteristics, angiographic data, postoperative complications, and patient satisfaction were collected for analysis.

RESULTS

Of the 357 enrolled elderly patients, 175 were performed through TRA and 182 were performed through TFA. There was no significant difference in mean fluoroscopy time (8.6 ± 3.8 minutes vs. 9.1 ± 3.1 minutes; P = 0.103) and radiation exposure (47.7 ± 10.8 Gy-cm2 vs. 49.8 ± 11.3 Gy-cm2; P = 0.068) between the TRA and TFA groups. However, the TRA group had a shorter procedural time (54.7 ± 6.2 minutes vs. 61.1 ± 5.6 minutes; P < 0.001) and less contrast agent (83.2 ± 28.1 mL vs. 100.1 ± 26.2 mL; P < 0.001) than the TFA group. In terms of safety, the incidence of minor vascular access complications in the TRA group was lower than that in the TFA group (1.7% vs. 8.8%; P = 0.003). The incidence of serious complications and neurologic complications in the TRA group was also lower, although the difference was not statistically significant. Overall patient satisfaction was higher in the TRA group than that in the TFA group.

CONCLUSIONS

TRA was an efficient and safe alternative to conventional TFA in elderly patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiography and who underwent TRA were more satisfied. Findings supported the radial-first strategy for cerebral angiography in elderly populations.

Radial artery occlusion after aneurysm treatment using the rist guide catheter: Single center cohort study

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Delayed radial artery occlusion (dRAO) is a frequent complication after transradial access (TRA) for neurointervention when using standard large guide catheters. The RIST 079 guide catheter (RIST GC) is the first catheter designed for TRA in neurointervention. We aimed to assess the rate of dRAO after intracranial aneurysm (IA) treatment using the RIST GC.

METHODS

Patients treated for an IA using TRA and the RIST GC between June 2021 and November 2022 were referred to a systematic US-doppler assessment of the radial artery patency at 3-month follow-up. Patients with and without dRAO were compared to identify risk factors.

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were included in the analysis. At 3-months follow up, 6 patients (27.3 %) presented with dRAO. Four patients were asymptomatic and 2 experienced post-operative radial hematoma and wrist pain. There was a tendency towards younger age, longer procedure duration and higher rate of forearm hematoma in patients with dRAO. Navigation using the RIST GC was successful in 90.9 % of cases. Intracranial access failures and navigation complications were all related to left internal carotid artery navigation.

CONCLUSIONS

At 3-month follow up, 27.3 % of patients treated for IA using TRA with the RIST GC presented dRAO.

Simplified Transradial Access for Aneurysms Treatment: A Guiding System Using Solo Distal Access Catheter and Anatomical Considerations

OBJECTIVE

The recent shift from transfemoral access to transradial access in neurointervention has led to gaps in guiding systems. We propose a useful guiding system, the solo distal access catheter system without a conventional guiding catheter or a sheath in transradial access for aneurysms treatment. We also assessed the anatomical features required for suitable patient selection.

METHODS

We retrospectively collected data from consecutive patients with aneurysms treated with the solo distal access catheter system at our institution between April 2022 and April 2023, and evaluated the anatomical factors that appeared to affect the procedure.

RESULTS

Of the 20 patients who underwent transradial access, 11 were treated using the solo distal access catheter system, and 10 (90.9%) completed the procedure. No radial artery occlusion was detected. The entry angle of the target vessel ranged from 37° to 139°, and the mean proximal parent artery diameter was 9.34 ± 1.48 mm. A double subclavian innominate curve was observed in 3 of 5 patients whose target vessels were the right common carotid artery.

CONCLUSIONS

Using a solo distal access catheter as a guiding system for treating aneurysm proved effective and feasible with appropriate patient selection. Anatomical assessment of the entry angle of the target vessel, proximal parent artery diameter, and tortuosity may be important factors for the success of this method.

Retained radial catheters associated with variant radial anatomy in neurointerventional procedures

BACKGROUND

Transradial artery access (TRA) for neurointerventional procedures is gaining widespread acceptance. However, complications that were previously rare may arise as TRA procedures increase. Here we report a series of retained catheter cases with a literature review.

METHODS

All patients who underwent a neurointerventional procedure during a 23-month period at a single institution were retrospectively reviewed for a retained catheter in TRA cases. In cases of retained catheters, imaging was reviewed for anatomical variances in the radial artery, and clinical and demographic case details were analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 1386 nondiagnostic neurointerventional procedures were performed during the study period, 631 (46%) initially via TRA. The 631 TRA cases were performed for aneurysm embolization (n=221, 35%), mechanical thrombectomy (n=116, 18%), carotid stent/angioplasty (n=40, 6%), arteriovenous malformation embolization (n=38, 6%), and other reasons (n=216, 34%). Thirty-nine (6%) TRA procedures crossed over to femoral access, most commonly because the artery of interest could not be catheterized (26/39, 67%). A retained catheter was identified in five cases (1%), and one (0.2%) patient had an entrapped catheter that was recovered. All six patients with a retained or entrapped catheter had aberrant radial anatomy.

CONCLUSION

Retained catheters for neurointerventional procedures performed via TRA are rare. However, this complication may be associated with variant radial anatomy. With the increased use of TRA for neurointerventional procedures, awareness of anatomical abnormalities that may lead to a retained catheter is necessary. We propose a simple protocol to avoid catheter entrapment, including in emergent situations such as TRA for stroke thrombectomy.

The impact of Verapamil for radial access in diagnostic cerebrovascular angiograms: A retrospective case-control study

INTRODUCTION

Different combinations of medications are utilized during wrist access for radial artery (RA) or ulnar artery (UA) catheterization in neuroendovascular procedures to preclude vasospasm. These "cocktails" commonly include the calcium channel blocker Verapamil, without established benefit. We analyze outcomes in patients with and without Verapamil in their "cocktail" by using a case-control cohort of our single-center experience.

METHODS

A prospective log of consecutive patients who underwent diagnostic cerebral angiograms using RA/UA access was retrospectively reviewed, and patients were grouped into Verapamil and non-Verapamil cohorts. The primary outcomes assessed were the presence of forearm skin rashes (hives) and RA/UA spasms. Our initial management included Verapamil (5 mg) in the cocktail, but Verapamil was removed after we noticed the development of hives in multiple patients immediately following its injection.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients underwent 241 RA/UA diagnostic cerebral angiograms and were included in our analysis. One hundred and forty-nine patients (61.8%) underwent catheterization with Verapamil and 92 (38.2%) were catheterized without it. Four of the 149 patients in the Verapamil group (2.7%) developed hives during the procedure and were treated with Benadryl (25 mg). Of the 92 patients who did not receive Verapamil, there were zero (0%) cases of hives and one (1.1%) case of vasospasm.

CONCLUSION

Verapamil in the "cocktail" for wrist access diagnostic cerebral angiograms was associated with periprocedural hives, but not associated with a significant reduction in spasm compared to the non-Verapamil group. Our findings suggest that the administration of prophylactic Verapamil for these procedures may not be necessary.

Transradial Access Failures During Neuroangiography for Patients With Moyamoya

BACKGROUND

Despite studies continuing to demonstrate the utility of transradial access (TRA) in neuroangiography, minimal data exist regarding predictors of TRA failure. Furthermore, although many patients with moyamoya disease/syndrome will require life-long angiographic evaluation, even less has been reported on the usage of TRA in this population.

OBJECTIVE

To perform a matched analysis at our high-volume moyamoya center to determine predictors of TRA failure in these patients.

METHODS

A total of 636 patients undergoing TRA for neuroangiography were identified from 2018 to 2020. Demographic and angiographic characteristics including radial artery spasm (RAS), radial anomalies, and access site conversion were compared between patients with moyamoya and the rest of the cohort. A 4:1 matched analysis, based on age and sex, was also performed to eliminate confounding variables.

RESULTS

Patients with moyamoya were younger (40 vs 57 years, P < .0001), had smaller radial diameters (1.9 vs 2.6 mm, P < .0001), more commonly had a high brachial bifurcation (25.9% vs 8.5%, P = .008), more frequently experienced clinically significant RAS (40% vs 8.4%, P < .0001), and more often required access site conversion (26.7% vs 7.8%, P = .002). Increasing age was associated with less TRA failures in patients with moyamoya (odds ratio = 0.918) but more failures in the rest of the cohort (odds ratio = 1.034). In the matched analysis, patients with moyamoya continued to experience more radial anomalies, RAS, and access site conversions.

CONCLUSION

Patients with moyamoya, when controlling for age and sex, have higher rates of TRA failure during neuroangiography. Increasing age in Moyamoya is inversely correlated with TRA failures suggesting that younger patients with moyamoya are at higher risk of extracranial arteriopathy.

Phantom Study of Arterial Localization using Tactile Sensor Array and a Normal Vs. Shear Pulse Pressure Propagation Method

OBJECTIVE

Locating the radial artery reliably is a key challenge in reducing patient risks from complications in Trans-Radial Access, which is an important clinical method for catheterization, cardiac monitoring, and neuroendovascular procedures. New tactile sensing technology is being developed to bridge the skill, cost, and performance gap between ultrasonic needle guidance, and manual palpation, for use in developing countries. This paper further develops tactile artery localization with a novel algorithm for arterial localization based on the properties of a curved tactile sensor array.

METHODS

Using tactile sensor insensitivity to shear loading, coupled with a radial pulse wave propagation path, the position of the artery can be found at the intersection of a normal and tangential vector from the array corresponding to maximum and minimum pulse pressure measurement locations respectively. This was validated in a simple silicone phantom study Results: The proposed method measured with MAE= 0.58±0.25mm whilst the artery is within range of the tactile array, compared with 0.81±0.57mm for a comparative method of simple pulse localization. This showed improvement in arterial localization and repeatability, and was within 1 arterial radius, expected to reduce the risk of missing the artery, or perforating the side wall.Clinical Relevance- Robust and repeatable arterial localization is important for reducing the failure rate of trans-radial (and other arterial) procedures, and thus reducing the risk of harmful complications.

Effect of proximal blood flow arrest during endovascular thrombectomy (ProFATE): Study protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Observational studies have demonstrated improved outcomes with the adjunctive use of balloon guide catheters (BGC) during endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for anterior circulation acute ischaemic stroke (AIS). However, the lack of high-level evidence and global practice heterogeneity justifies a randomised controlled trial (RCT) to investigate the effect of transient proximal blood flow arrest on the procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with AIS following EVT.

HYPOTHESIS

Proximal blood flow arrest in the cervical internal carotid artery during EVT for proximal large vessel occlusion is superior to no flow arrest in achieving complete vessel recanalisation.

METHODS

ProFATE is an investigator-initiated, pragmatic, multicentre RCT with blinding of participants and outcome assessment. An estimated 124 participants with an anterior circulation AIS due to large vessel occlusion, an NIHSS of ⩾2, ASPECTS ⩾ 5 and eligible for EVT using a first-line combined technique (contact aspiration and stent retriever) or contact aspiration only will be randomised (1:1) to receive BGC balloon inflation or no inflation during EVT.

OUTCOMES

The primary outcome is the proportion of patients achieving near-complete/complete vessel recanalisation (eTICI 2c-3) at the end of the EVT procedure. Secondary outcomes include the functional outcome (modified Rankin Scale at 90 days), new or distal vascular territory clot embolisation rate, near-complete/complete recanalisation after the first pass, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, procedure-related complications and death at 90 days.

DISCUSSION

This is the first RCT to investigate the effect of proximal blood flow arrest during EVT using a BGC on the procedural and clinical outcomes of patients with AIS due to large vessel occlusion.

A complication of the transradial approach: thyrocervical trunk pseudoaneurysm with hemothorax

The transradial approach has gained popularity in the neuroendovascular field after several studies proved its low rate of hemorrhagic and vascular-related complications in both diagnostic and therapeutic procedures. This is a case of a patient who presented for flow diversion treatment of an incidental left carotid ophthalmic aneurysm. The procedure was uneventful. Post-operatively, the patient's neurological exam and vital signs were normal, however the patient complained of abdominal and chest pain that worsened when lying down and improved when sitting up. Radiologic diagnosis confirmed the presence of a thyrocervical trunk pseudoaneurysm which was completely obliterated with Onyx 18 embolization. Thyrocervical trunk pseudoaneurysm formation is a rare complication of the transradial approach. Shedding the light on these entities is essential as symptoms vary in severity and presentation and necessitate swift diagnosis and treatment.

A novel 3-Fr guiding sheath for transradial access in aneurysm embolization: Technical note

Neurointervention via transradial access (TRA) is challenging when the radial artery is narrow. We performed aneurysm embolization via TRA using a novel 3-Fr guiding sheath (GS) (Axcelguide; Medikit, Tokyo, Japan) with an outer diameter of only 1.76 mm for patients with a radial artery of inner diameter less than 2 mm, and described the whole procedure and pitfalls as a technical note. Here, we present two patients with radial arteries less than 2 mm. One patient had a narrow neck intracranial aneurysm at the bifurcation of the left vertebral artery and posterior inferior cerebellar artery, which was embolized with the primary coiling technique. The other was a patient with a wide-necked extracranial aneurysm in the cavernous portion of the right internal carotid artery, which was embolized with the transcell technique with stent. We utilized a 3-Fr GS, distal access catheter, and a 0.0165-inch microcatheter for coil embolization. All aneurysms were completely occluded, without neurological or puncture site-related complications including subcutaneous hematoma, radial artery occlusion, and vasospasm. This report provides the first description of neurointervention using a 3-Fr GS. The 3-Fr GS contributed to successful completion of TRA aneurysm embolization without neurological or puncture site-related complications in patients with radial arteries narrower than 2 mm. The 3-Fr GS may be useful to accomplish aneurysmal embolization via TRA even in patients with a small radial artery.

Use of reverse angle guide catheter with trans-radial approach in patients undergoing middle meningeal artery embolization

Background

Trans-radial access (TRA) for MMA embolization has grown due to lower access site complications and greater patient satisfaction. Here, we describe the feasibility of utilizing a 6F Envoy Simmons 2 (6F-SIM2) as a guide catheter with TRA and compare outcomes with trans-femoral approach (TFA) in a single center case series.

Methods

We performed a retrospective review of patients who underwent MMA embolization for management of chronic subdural hematoma (cSDH). TRA was performed by utilizing a combination of 6F 90cm Envoy (Codman &amp; Shurtleff, Inc., Rayham, MA) Simmons 2 guide catheter and 5F 125cm Sofia (Microvention, Aliso Viejo, CA) intermediate catheter. Outcomes measured are Modified Rankin Score (mRS) at 90 days, inpatient mortality, post-embolization recurrence, fluoroscopy time and radiation exposure.

Results

A total of 71 patients underwent 97 MMA embolization overall with 65 (67%) in trans-femoral access group, 11 (11.3%) in trans-radial access without use of Simmons 2 Guide catheter group and 21 (21.6%) in trans-radial access with use of Simmons 2 Guide catheter group. There were no direct access-related complications in either group. One patient had thromboembolic stroke in trans-femoral group. There was no difference in average procedure-related total fluro time or radiation dose among all three groups.

Conclusion

Trans-radial approach using 6F-SIM2 guide catheter coupled with 5F Sofia intermediate catheter is safe and effective. It provides an alternative approach to access distal branches of bilateral anterior circulation in elderly patients with difficult anatomy undergoing MMA embolization.

Transradial Approach for Thoracolumbar Spinal Angiography and Tumor Embolization: Feasibility and Technical Considerations

The transradial approach (TRA) is an effective and safe alternative to transfemoral access for diagnostic neuroangiography and craniocervical interventions. While the technical aspects of supraclavicular intervention are well-described, there are little data on the TRA for thoracolumbar angiography and intervention. The authors describe the feasibility of the TRA for preoperative thoracic tumor embolization, emphasizing technique, device selection, navigation, and catheterization of thoracolumbar segmental arteries. This approach extends the benefits of TRA to spinal interventional neuroradiology.

Radial artery access anatomy: considerations for neuroendovascular procedures

Although enthusiasm for transradial access for neurointerventional procedures has grown, a unique set of considerations bear emphasis to preserve safety and minimize complications. In the first part of this review series, we will review important anatomical considerations for safe and easy neuroendovascular procedures from a transradial approach. These include normal and variant radial artery anatomy, the anatomic snuffbox, as well as axillary, brachial, and great vessel arterial anatomy that is imperative for the neuroendovascular surgeon to be intimately familiar prior to pursuing transradial access procedures. In the next part of the review series, we will focus on safety and complications specific to a transradial approach.