Nautilus-assisted coil embolization for a complex AcomA wide-necked aneurysm in the setting of acute subarachnoid hemorrhage

Endovascular treatment of wide-necked intracranial aneurysms using the Nautilus Intrasaccular System: initial case series of 41 patients at a single center

BACKGROUND

Endovascular treatment of intracranial wide-necked and bifurcation aneurysms (WNBA) is technically challenging. The Nautilus Intrasaccular System is designed to provide a mechanical barrier at the aneurysm neck to support coil embolization. We report the results of a single-center series of patients treated for intracranial aneurysms with the Nautilus.

METHODS

Clinical and radiological data were retrospectively collected for all patients treated with the Nautilus for an unruptured or ruptured intracranial aneurysm at our center between March 2021 and March 2022. Clinical outcomes (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores), Raymond-Roy angiographic occlusion, recanalization, and complications were measured immediately post-procedure and at 3-6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

A total of 41 patients of mean age 56.7 years (range 37-83 years) were treated with the Nautilus, with 41 saccular aneurysms (18 (43.9%) unruptured and 23 (56.1%) ruptured). The majority of aneurysms (39/41 (95.1%)) were located in the anterior circulation. We experienced no technical complications. One patient had an asymptomatic post-procedural minor stroke related to the procedure. Immediate Class I occlusion was achieved in 30 (73.1%) patients. The rate of all-cause mortality was 7.3% (3/41). One patient was lost to follow-up. At follow-up, 94.5% (35/37) of patients achieved Class I occlusion and 94.5% (35/37) had an mRS score of 0. There were no procedural-related deaths or permanent morbidities at discharge or follow-up.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates good safety and effectiveness using the Nautilus Intrasaccular System to treat both ruptured and unruptured intracranial aneurysms. Larger studies are needed to confirm these findings.

A review and journey in intrasaccular treatment of intracranial aneurysms

The invested effort and collaboration of clinicians and medical device companies to improve occlusion rates and clinical outcomes for patients with intracranial aneurysms treated via less invasive endovascular means led to the development of the concept of intrasaccular devices. Intrasaccular devices were introduced to offer simple treatment options, offering easier navigation through difficult anatomy, simpler and quicker deployment into large and wide-neck aneurysms. Additionally, they offer easier sizing, whilst offering a wide range of options suitable for aneurysms of different sizes. The concept of most intrasaccular devices is to occupy the aneurysm neck, however offering better stability than simple coiling, therefore increasing the chance of long-term aneurysm occlusion. This is achieved without a sizable metal content within the parent vessel, contrary to flow diverters, theoretically reducing the risk of thromboembolic events. This review aims to discuss the history and latest developments of intrasaccular intracranial devices, which offer an exciting and potentially successful option for treatment of complex intracranial aneurysms.

The pCONUS2 and pCONUS2 HPC Neck Bridging Devices : Results from an International Multicenter Retrospective Study

INTRODUCTION

Bifurcation aneurysms represent an ongoing endovascular challenge with a variety of techniques and devices designed to address them. We present our multicenter series of the pCONUS2 and pCONUS2 HPC devices when treating bifurcation aneurysms.

METHODS

We performed a retrospective review of our prospectively maintained databases at 3 tertiary neurointerventional centers to identify all patients who underwent coil embolization with the pCONUS2 or pCONUS2 HPC device between February 2015 and August 2021. We recorded baseline demographics, aneurysm data, complications, immediate and delayed angiographic results.

RESULTS

We identified 55 patients with 56 aneurysms, median age 63 years (range 42-78 years), 67.3% female (n = 37). The commonest aneurysm location was the MCA bifurcation (n = 40, 71.4%). Average dome height was 8.9 ± 4.2 mm (range 3.2-21.5 mm), average neck width 6.4 ± 2.5 mm (range 2.6-14 mm), and average aspect ratio 1.3 ± 0.6 (range 0.5-3.3). The pCONUS2 was used in 64.3% and the pCONUS2 HPC in 35.7%. The procedural technical success rate was 98.2%. Intraoperative complications occurred in 5 cases (8.9%), 4 of which were related to the coils with partial thrombus formation on the pCONUS2 HPC seen in 1 case that was resolved with heparin. In relation to the procedure and treatment of the aneurysm the overall permanent morbidity was 1.8% (n = 1/55) and mortality 0%. Delayed angiographic follow-up (48 aneurysms) at median 12 months postprocedure (range 3-36 months) demonstrated adequate occlusion of 83.4% of aneurysms.

CONCLUSION

The pCONUS2 and pCONUS2 HPC devices carry a high technical success rate, low complication and retreatment rate, and good rates of adequate occlusion. Larger prospective confirmatory studies are required.

A mini-review of intrasaccular flow diverters

Treatment of wide-necked complex intracranial aneurysms continues to challenge neurointerventionalists. Intrasaccular flow diverters have expanded the armamentarium considerably and are now used extensively. While five types of devices have already obtained the CE mark for use within Europe, only the Woven EndoBridge (WEB) device is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration. Other intrasaccular devices are the Luna/Artisse Aneurysm Embolization System (Medtronic), the Medina Embolic Device (Medtronic), the Contour Neurovascular System (Cerus), and the Neqstent Coil Assisted Flow Diverter (Cerus). This mini review will provide a compact overview of these devices and a summary of the current literature.