Efficacy of combined use of a stent retriever and aspiration catheter in mechanical thrombectomy for acute ischemic stroke

Impact of double stent retriever configuration on first-pass effect in stroke: a multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Efficient recanalization of occluded cerebral arteries is crucial in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke. Double stent retrievers have shown the potential to enhance the rates of recanalization on the first pass. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the double stent retriever technique and the predictors of achieving first-pass effect in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

METHODS

This prospective multicenter study involved 209 patients from 16 comprehensive stroke centers in Spain. Patients with occlusions in the anterior circulation were treated using the Aperio Hybrid double stent retriever. The study examined various deployment techniques, including simultaneous and sequential deployment and stent configurations, comparing the Y-shaped and parallel configurations.

RESULTS

The double stent retriever technique achieved a first-pass effect in 72.7% of cases and a final successful recanalization rate of 99.5%. The Y-shaped configuration was significantly associated with higher recanalization rates on the first pass (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.18 to 5.68, P=0.02). Procedural complications were mild to moderate in 6.7% and severe in 1.5% of cases, with symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurring in 3.3% of patients. At 3 months follow-up, 57.2% of patients achieved a good clinical outcome, with a mortality rate of 15.1%.

CONCLUSION

The findings support the efficacy of the double stent retriever technique, particularly the Y-shaped configuration, in achieving high recanalization rates on the first pass with an acceptable safety profile. This technique may offer clinical benefits for future acute ischemic stroke treatment protocols.

Efficacy and safety of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration vs. stent retriever alone on revascularization in patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Whether the efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration (S + A) is superior to stent retriever (S) alone for revascularisation in patients with large vessel occlusive stroke remains uncertain. The aim of this meta-analysis was to assess the safety and efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration for the treatment of acute ischaemic stroke with large vessel occlusion by comparing it with stent retriever alone.

Methods

We systematically searched the PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and The Cochrane Library databases for randomised controlled trials and observational studies (case-control and cohort studies) published before 1 October 2023 comparing the efficacy of combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus tent retriever alone in patients with large vessel occlusive stroke. The end point of the primary efficacy observed in this meta-analysis study was the rate of first pass nearly complete or complete recanalisation (mTICI 2c-3). Secondary effectiveness nodes were: rate of first pass successful recanalisation (mTICI 2b-3), rate of near-complete or complete recanalisation of the postoperative vessel, rate of successful recanalisation of the postoperative vessel, and MRS 0-2 within 90 days. Safety endpoints were interoperative embolism, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, and mortality within 90 days.

Results

A total of 16 studies were included in the literature for this meta-analysis, with a total of 7,320 patients (S + C group: 3,406, S group: 3,914). A comprehensive analysis of the included literature showed that combined stent retriever and contact aspiration had a higher rate of near-complete or complete recanalisation of the postoperative vessel [OR = 1.53, 95% CI (1.24, 1.88), p < 0.0001] and rate of successful recanalisation of the postoperative vessel compared to stent retriever alone [OR = 1.83, 95% CI (1.55, 2.17), p < 0.00001]; there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of the rate of first pass nearly complete or complete recanalisation [OR = 1.00, 95% CI (0.83, 1.19), p = 0.96], rate of first pass successful recanalisation [OR = 1.02, 95% CI (0.85, 1.24), p = 0.81], interoperative embolism [OR = 0.93, 95% CI (0.72, 1.20), p = 0.56], symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage [OR = 1.14, 95% CI (0.87, 1.48), p = 0.33], MRS 0-2 within 90 days [OR = 0.89, 95% CI (0.76, 1.04), p = 0.14] and mortality within 90 days [OR = 1.11, 95% CI (0.94, 1.31), p = 0.22].

Conclusion

Combined stent retriever and contact aspiration has a higher rate of postprocedural revascularisation (mTICI 2c-3/mTICI 2b-3) compared with stent retriever alone in patients with large vessel occlusion stroke. In addition, it was not superior to stenting alone in terms of the rate of first pass recanalisation (mTICI 2c-3/mTICI 2b-3), interoperative embolisation, symptomatic intracranial haemorrhage, good functional prognosis within 90 days and mortality within 90 days.

Combined Technique for Internal Carotid Artery Terminus or Middle Cerebral Artery Occlusions in the ASTER2 Trial

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to report the results of a subgroup analysis of the ASTER2 trial (Effect of Thrombectomy With Combined Contact Aspiration and Stent Retriever vs Stent Retriever Alone on Revascularization in Patients With Acute Ischemic Stroke and Large Vessel Occlusion) comparing the safety and efficacy of the combined technique (CoT) and stent retriever as a first-line approach in internal carotid artery (ICA) terminus±M1-middle cerebral artery (M1-MCA) and isolated M1-MCA occlusions.

METHODS

Patients enrolled in the ASTER2 trial with ICA terminus±M1-MCA and isolated M1-MCA occlusions were included in this subgroup analysis. The effect of first-line CoT versus stent retriever according to the occlusion site was assessed on angiographic (first-pass effect, expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b50, and expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2c grades at the end of the first-line strategy and at the end of the procedure) and clinicoradiological outcomes (24-hour National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale, ECASS-III [European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study] grades, and 3-month modified Rankin Scale).

RESULTS

Three hundred sixty-two patients were included in the postsubgroup analysis according to the occlusion site: 299 were treated for isolated M1-MCA occlusion (150 with first-line CoT) and 63 were treated for ICA terminus±M1-MCA occlusion (30 with first-line CoT). Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2b50 (odds ratio, 11.83 [95% CI, 2.32-60.12]) and expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction score ≥2c (odds ratio, 4.09 [95% CI, 1.39-11.94]) were significantly higher in first-line CoT compared with first-line stent retriever in patients with ICA terminus±M1-MCA occlusion but not in patients with isolated M1-MCA.

CONCLUSIONS

First-line CoT was associated with higher reperfusion grades in patients with ICA terminus±M1-MCA at the end of the procedure.

REGISTRATION

URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov; Unique identifier: NCT03290885.

Improving the Reachability of Contact Aspiration for Acute Ischemic Stroke Using a New Delivery Assist Catheter

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to improve the reachability of large lumen catheter for contact aspiration during acute ischemic stroke by a new delivery assist catheter.

METHODS

This study included 58 patients with large-vessel stroke treated using endovascular procedures at our institution and affiliated hospitals between July 2021 and January 2023. Contact aspiration, especially contact aspiration using nonpenetrating of thrombus (CANP) technique, was adopted as first-line thrombectomy for localized internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery proximal (M1 segment), and basilar artery without tandem occlusion in acute stroke. The new delivery assist catheter (AXS Offset catheter, Stryker, Fremont, CA, USA) was standardized after its release. Results of this improved contact aspiration technique using the new delivery assist catheter, including reachability, procedure time, and first-pass effect, were compared with conventional catheters.

RESULTS

Of the 58 patients, 43 underwent only thrombectomy for acute embolic stroke. CANP technique was attempted on 25 patients (25/43, 58.1%). Of these, a normal inner catheter (inner diameter: 0.021 or 0.027 inches) and the new delivery assist catheter were used on 10 (10/25, 40%) and 15 (15/25, 60%) patients, respectively. An aspiration catheter reached the thrombus for 5 patients (5/10, 50%) and 14 patients (14/15 93.3%) in the normal and new delivery assist catheter groups, respectively (P = 0.023). There was no significant difference in the results of contact aspiration due to the delivery catheter.

CONCLUSIONS

The new delivery assist catheter improved the reachability of the aspiration catheter to the thrombus and is an effective device for performing CANP technique.

Mechanical thrombectomy with combined stent retriever and contact aspiration versus stent retriever alone for acute large vessel occlusion: data from ANGEL-ACT registry

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

An analysis of the ASTER 2 trial revealed similar final recanalisation levels and clinical outcomes in acute large vessel occlusion (LVO) stroke between stent retrieval (SR) alone as a first-line mechanical thrombectomy (MT) technique (SR alone first-line) and concomitant use of contact aspiration (CA) plus SR as a first-line MT technique (SR+CA first-line). The purpose of the present study was to compare the safety and efficacy of SR+CA first-line with those of SR alone first-line for patients with LVO in China.

METHODS

We conducted the present study by using the data from the ANGEL-ACT registry. We divided the selected patients into SR+CA first-line and SR alone first-line groups. We performed logistic regression and generalised linear models with adjustments to compare the angiographic and clinical outcomes, including successful/complete recanalisation after the first technique alone and all procedures, first-pass successful/complete recanalisation, number of passes, 90-day modified Rankin Scale, procedure duration, rescue treatment and intracranial haemorrhage within 24 hours.

RESULTS

Of the 1233 enrolled patients, 1069 (86.7%) received SR alone first-line, and 164 (13.3%) received SR+CA first-line. SR+CA first-line was associated with more thrombectomy passes (3 (2-4) vs 2 (1-2); β=1.77, 95% CI=1.55 to 1.99, p<0.001), and longer procedure duration (86 (60-129) min vs 80 (50-122) min; β=10.76, 95% CI=1.08 to 20.43, p=0.029) than SR alone first-line group. Other outcomes were comparable (all p>0.05) between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients undergoing SR+CA first-line had more thrombectomy passes and longer procedure duration than patients undergoing SR alone first-line. Additionally, we suggested that SR+CA first-line was not superior to SR alone first-line in final recanalisation level, first-pass recanalisation level and 90-day clinical outcomes in the Chinese population.

Comparative efficacy and safety of various mechanical thrombectomy strategies for patients with acute ischemic stroke: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Background

Stent retriever, contact aspiration, and combined treatment are crucial mechanical thrombectomy strategies for patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS).

Objectives

The aim of this study was to compare and rank three different mechanical thrombectomy strategies for AIS due to large vessel occlusion by means of a Bayesian network meta-analysis.

Design

A systematic review and Bayesian network meta-analysis based on PRISMA guidelines.

Data sources and methods

Relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were identified in Embase, MEDLINE, the Cochrane Library database, and Clinicaltrials.gov from inception to 15 March 2022. We used random effect models to estimate corresponding odds ratios (ORs) and rank probabilities using pairwise and Bayesian network meta-analysis. We applied the grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation (GRADE) methodology to rate the certainty of evidence.

Results

We identified 10 RCTs enrolling 2098 participants. As for modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 0-2, moderate certainty evidence established all mechanical thrombectomy strategies that were more effective than standard medical treatment [combined: log OR 0.9288, 95% credibility intervals (CrI) 0.1268-1.7246; contact aspiration: log OR 0.9507, 95% CrI 0.3361-1.5688; stent retriever: log OR 1.0919, 95% CrI 0.6127-1.5702]. The same applied to mRS 0-3 (combined: log OR 0.9603, 95% CrI 0.2122-1.7157; contact aspiration: log OR 0.7554, 95% CrI 0.1769-1.3279; stent retriever: log OR 1.0046, 95% CrI 0.6001-1.4789). Combined treatment was superior to stent retriever in substantial reperfusion (log OR 0.8921, 95% CrI 0.2105-1.5907, high certainty). Stent retriever had the highest probability of being optimal for mRS 0-2 and mRS 0-3. Standard medical treatment had the lowest risk of subarachnoid hemorrhage. For all other outcomes, combined treatment was most likely the best treatment.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that, with the exception of functional outcome, combined treatment might be the outstanding strategy. Apart from subarachnoid hemorrhage, all three mechanical thrombectomy strategies proved better strategies than standard medical treatment.

Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42022351878).

Combined balloon guide catheter, aspiration catheter, and stent retriever technique versus balloon guide catheter and stent retriever alone technique: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The use of a combination of balloon guide catheter (BGC), aspiration catheter, and stent retriever in acute ischemic stroke thrombectomy has not been shown to be better than a stent retriever and BGC alone, but this may be due to a lack of power in these studies. We therefore performed a meta-analysis on this subject.

METHODS

A systematic literature search was performed on PubMed, Scopus, Embase/Ovid, and the Cochrane Library from inception to October 20, 2021. Our primary outcomes were the rate of successful final reperfusion (Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (TICI) 2c-3) and first pass effect (FPE, defined as TICI 2c-3 in a single pass). Secondary outcomes were 3 month functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2), mortality, procedural complications, embolic complications, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (SICH). A meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5,4, and heterogeneity was assessed using the I² test.

RESULTS

Of 1629 studies identified, five articles with 2091 patients were included. For the primary outcomes, FPE (44.9% vs 45.4%, OR 1.04 (95% CI 0.90 to 1.22), I²=57%) or final successful reperfusion (64.5% vs 68.6%, OR 0.98 (95% CI 0.81% to 1.20%), I²=85%) was similar between the combination technique and stent retriever only groups. However, the combination technique had significantly less rescue treatment (18.8% vs 26.9%; OR 0.70 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.91), I²=0%). This did not translate into significant differences in secondary outcomes in functional outcomes, mortality, emboli, complications, or SICH.

CONCLUSION

There was no significant difference in successful reperfusion and FPE between the combined techniques and the stent retriever and BGC alone groups. Neither was there any difference in functional outcomes, complications, or mortality.

Possible Contribution of the Aspiration Catheter in Preventing Post-stent Retriever Thrombectomy Subarachnoid Hemorrhage

PURPOSE

This study aimed to identify factors related to the incidence of post-thrombectomy subarachnoid hemorrhage (PTSAH).

METHODS

This retrospective, observational cohort study enrolled consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) due to the internal carotid artery (IC) top or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 or M2 segment occlusion who underwent single-pass stent retriever (SR) treatment between January 2015 and May 2022 at two acute care hospitals.

RESULTS

Of the 54 included patients, 10 were in the PTSAH group (18.5%). The occlusion sites were IC top (31.5%), M1 segment (48.1%), and M2 segment (20.4%). Aspiration catheters (ACs) were used in 32 (59.3%) patients; however, the combined technique (AC advancement at least to the most proximal marker of SR) was actually used in 26 (48.1%) patients because a ledge effect at the ophthalmic artery origin from the IC interfered with distal navigation of the ACs. The baseline patient characteristics did not differ between the groups. M2 segment occlusion in the PTSAH and non-PTSAH groups were 40.0% and 15.9%, respectively (p = 0.19). More ACs were used in the non-PTSAH group (65.9% vs. 30.0%, p = 0.07). Significantly fewer combined techniques were performed in the PTSAH group (10.0% vs. 56.8%, p = 0.01). In multivariate analysis adjusted by variables with M2 segment occlusion and the combined technique, the combined technique (odds ratio 0.098; 95% confidence interval, 0.011-0.887; p = 0.039) was identified as a significantly associated factor for PTSAH. There was one PTSAH case (1.9%) with symptom worsening.

CONCLUSION

The combined technique significantly influenced PTSAH occurrence as a preventive factor.

Poor clinical outcome despite successful basilar occlusion recanalization in the early time window: incidence and predictors

Background

Endovascular treatment (EVT) for basilar artery occlusions (BAO) is associated with a higher rate of futile recanalization compared with anterior circulation procedures. We aimed to identify the incidence and predictors of poor clinical outcome despite successful reperfusion in current clinical practice.

Methods

We used data from the ETIS (Endovascular Treatment in Ischemic Stroke) registry, a prospective multicenter observational registry of stroke treated with EVT in France. Patients undergoing EVT for acute BAO from January 2014 to May 2019 successfully treated within 8 hours from onset were included. Predictors of 90-day poor outcome (modified Rankin Scale (mRS) 4–6) were researched within patients with successful (modified Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (mTICI 2b-3)) and excellent (mTICI 2c-3) reperfusion.

Results

Among 242 patients treated within 8 hours, successful reperfusion was achieved in 195 (80.5%) and excellent reperfusion in 120 (49.5%). Poor outcome was observed in 107 (54.8%) and 60 (50%) patients, respectively. In patients with successful early reperfusion, age, higher initial National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score, lower posterior circulation Alberta Stroke Programme Early CT Score (pc-ASPECTS), and absence of prior intravenous thrombolysis were independent predictors of poor outcome. The only treatment factor with an independent predictive value was first-pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion (adjusted OR 0.13, 95% CI 0.05 to 0.37, p<0.001). In patients with excellent early reperfusion, independent predictors were age, initial NIHSS score, first-pass mTICI 2c-3 reperfusion, and hemorrhagic transformation on post-interventional imaging.

Conclusions

Early successful reperfusion with EVT occurred in 80.5% of patients, and the only treatment-related factor predictive of clinical outcome was first pass mTICI 2b-3 reperfusion. Further research is warranted to identify the optimal techniques and devices associated with first pass reperfusion in the posterior circulation.

A Meta-analysis of Combined Aspiration Catheter and Stent Retriever versus Stent Retriever Alone for Large-Vessel Occlusion Ischemic Stroke

BACKGROUND

The efficacy of combined aspiration catheter and stent retriever compared with stent retriever alone for the treatment of large-vessel occlusion acute ischemic stroke is unclear.

PURPOSE

Our aim was to conduct a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on several metrics of efficacy comparing aspiration catheter and stent retriever with stent retriever alone.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE and the Cochrane Library Databases were searched. Randomized controlled trials and case-control and cohort studies were included.

STUDY SELECTION

Ten comparative studies were included detailing a combined 1495 patients with aspiration catheter and stent retriever and 1864 with stent retrievers alone.

DATA ANALYSIS

Data on first pass effect (TICI 2b/2c/3 after first pass), final successful reperfusion (modified TICI ≥2b), and 90-day functional independence (mRS ≤ 2) were collected. Meta-analysis was performed using a random-effects model.

DATA SYNTHESIS

There was a pooled composite first pass effect of 40.8% (611/1495) versus 32.6% (608/1864) for aspiration catheter and stent retriever and stent retriever alone, respectively (P < .0001). Similarly, on a meta-analysis, aspiration catheter and stent retriever were associated with a higher first pass effect compared with stent retriever alone (OR = 1.63; 95% CI, 1.20-2.21; P = .002; I² = 72%). There was no significant difference in composite rates of successful reperfusion between aspiration catheter and stent retriever (72.8%, 867/1190) and stent retriever alone (70.8%, 931/1314) (P = .27) or on meta-analysis (OR = 1.31; CI, 0.81-2.12; P = .27; I² = 82%). No difference was found between aspiration catheter and stent retriever and stent retriever alone on 90-day functional independence (OR = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.77-1.36; P = .88; I² = 40%).

LIMITATIONS

This study is limited by high interstudy heterogeneity.

CONCLUSIONS

On meta-analysis, aspiration catheter and stent retriever are associated with a superior first pass effect compared with stent retriever alone, but they are not associated with statistically different final reperfusion or functional independence.