Cost-effectiveness of thrombectomy in patients with minor stroke and large vessel occlusion: effect of thrombus location on cost-effectiveness and outcomes

Endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management for moderate-to-severe anterior cerebral artery occlusion stroke

BACKGROUND

There are no established patient selection criteria for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) for anterior cerebral artery (ACA) stroke.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study of the 2016-2020 National Inpatient Sample in the United States. Isolated ACA-occlusion stroke patients with moderate-to-severe stroke symptoms (NIH stroke scale [NIHSS] ≥ 6) were included. Primary outcome was hospital discharge to home with self-care. Secondary outcomes include in-hospital mortality and intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Confounders were accounted for by multivariable logistic regression.

RESULTS

6685 patients were included; 335 received EVT. Compared to medical management (MM), EVT patients were younger (mean 67.2 versus 72.2 years; p = 0.014) and had higher NIHSS (mean 16.0 versus 12.5; p < 0.001). EVT was numerically but not statistically significantly associated with higher odds of home discharge compared to MM (aOR 2.26 [95%CI 0.99-5.17], p = 0.053). EVT was significantly associated with higher odds of home discharge among patients with NIHSS 10 or greater (aOR 3.35 [95%CI 1.06-10.58], p = 0.039), those who did not receive prior thrombolysis (aOR 3.96 [95%CI 1.53-10.23], p = 0.005), and those with embolic stroke etiology (aOR 4.03 [95%CI 1.21-13.47], p = 0.024). EVT was not significantly associated with higher rates of mortality (aOR 1.93 [95%CI 0.80-4.63], p = 0.14); however, it was significantly associated with higher rates of ICH (22.4% vs. 8.5%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

EVT was associated with higher odds of favorable short-term outcomes for moderate-to-severe ACA-occlusion stroke in select patients. Future studies are needed to confirm the efficacy of EVT in terms of longer term neurological outcomes.

Endovascular treatment achieves better outcomes than best medical management in patients with M2 occlusion and high stroke severity: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The lack of randomized evidence makes it difficult to establish reliable treatment recommendations for patients with M2 occlusion. This study aims to compare the efficacy and safety of endovascular treatment (EVT) with best medical management (BMM) in patients with M2 occlusion, and to investigate whether the optimal treatment varies according to stroke severity.

METHODS

Comprehensive literature retrieval was conducted to identify studies that directly compared the outcomes of EVT and BMM. According to stroke severity, the study population were classified into those with moderate-severe stroke and those with mild stroke. National Institute of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores ≥ 6 was defined as moderate-severe stroke, and NIHSS scores 0-5 as mild stroke. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to measure the symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) within 72 h, and the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) scores 0-2 and the mortality at 90 days.

RESULTS

Totally, 20 studies were identified, including 4358 patients. In the moderate-severe stroke population, the EVT had 82% higher odds for mRS scores 0-2 (OR 1.82, 95% CI 1.34-2.49) and a 43% lower odds for mortality (OR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39-0.82) compared with the BMM. However, no difference was found in the sICH rate (OR 0.88, 95% CI 0.44-1.77). In the mild stroke population, no differences were observed in the mRS scores 0-2 (OR 0.81, 95% CI 0.59-1.10) or mortality (OR 1.23, 95% CI 0.72-2.10) between EVT and BMM, whereas EVT was associated with higher sICH rate (OR 4.21, 95% CI 1.86-9.49).

CONCLUSION

EVT may be only beneficial for patients with M2 occlusion and high stroke severity, but not for those with NIHSS scores 0-5.

Middle Cerebral Artery M2 Thrombectomy: Safety and Technical Considerations in the German Stroke Registry (GSR)

There is ongoing debate concerning the safety and efficacy of various mechanical thrombectomy (MT) approaches for M2 occlusions. We compared these for MT in M2 versus M1 occlusions. Subgroup analyses of different technical approaches within the M2 MT cohort were also performed. Patients were included from the German Stroke Registry (GSR), a multicenter registry of consecutive MT patients. Primary outcomes were reperfusion success events. Secondary outcomes were early clinical improvement (improvement in NIHSS score > 4) and independent survival at 90 days (mRS 0−2). Out of 3804 patients, 2689 presented with M1 (71%) and 1115 with isolated M2 occlusions (29%). The mean age was 76 (CI 65−82) and 77 (CI 66−83) years, respectively. Except for baseline NIHSS (15 (CI 10−18) vs. 11 (CI 6−16), p < 0.001) and ASPECTS (9 (CI 7−10) vs. 9 (CI 8−10, p < 0.001), baseline demographics were balanced. Apart from a more frequent use of dedicated small vessel stent retrievers (svSR) in M2 (17.4% vs. 3.0; p < 0.001), intraprocedural aspects were balanced. There was no difference in ICH at 24 h (11%; p = 1.0), adverse events (14.4% vs. 18.1%; p = 0.63), clinical improvement (62.5% vs. 61.4 %; p = 0.57), mortality (26.9% vs. 22.9%; p = 0.23). In M2 MT, conventional stent retriever (cSR) achieved higher rates of mTICI3 (54.0% vs. 37.7−42.0%; p < 0.001), requiring more MT-maneuvers (7, CI 2−8) vs. 2 (CI 2−7)/(CI 2−2); p < 0.001) and without impact on efficacy and outcome. Real-life MT in M2 can be performed with equal safety and efficacy as in M1 occlusions. Different recanalization techniques including the use of svSR did not result in significant differences regarding safety, efficacy and outcome.