Endovascular thrombectomy versus standard medical treatment for stroke patients with acute basilar artery occlusion: a systematic review and meta-analysis

A meta-analysis and systematic review of endovascular thrombectomy versus medical management for acute basilar artery occlusion

OBJECTIVE

Acute basilar artery occlusion (BAO) is a devastating neurologic event. As endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) became more prevalent for anterior circulation strokes, investigations were conducted in the posterior circulation. Its success in improving outcomes compared to standard medical therapy (SMT) after BAO has been debated.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational cohort studies evaluating EVT compared to SMT in acute BAO. We queried PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane for studies. Primary outcome was good functional outcome at 90 days (modified Rankin scale (mRS) ≤ 3). We analyzed studies for risk of bias (ROB) and calculated pooled risk ratios (RRs), odds ratios (ORs), and mean differences (MDs) with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using the random effects model for our primary outcome and secondary positive outcomes and harms.

RESULTS

We identified four RCTs (991 patients randomized) and three cohort studies (1030 patients treated in-trial) that fit inclusion criteria. Three RCTs had low ROB, one had serious ROB. One cohort study had high ROB, one had moderate ROB, and one had low ROB. EVT was statistically significantly more associated with good functional outcome than SMT in RCTs (RR=1.54, 95%CI=1.16-2.04, p = 0.003) and trended towards significance in cohort studies (RR=2.64, 95%CI=0.87-8.00, p = 0.09). Mean mRS at 90 days was lower in EVT patients in RCTs (MD=-0.65, 95%CI=-1.07--0.22, p = 0.003) though not cohort studies (MD =-0.84, 95%CI=-2.48-0.79, p = 0.31). Symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH) was statistically significantly associated with EVT in RCTs (OR=6.36, 95%CI=2.24-18.07, p < 0.001) and statistically non-significantly in cohort studies (OR=4.51, 95CI=1.00-20.33, p = 0.05). Mortality at 90 days was statistically lower with EVT than with SMT in both RCTs (OR=0.76, 95%CI=0.65-0.88, p < 0.001) cohort studies (OR=0.36, 95%CI=0.26-0.50, p < 0.001) CONCLUSION: EVT is associated with greater rates of good functional outcomes and lower rates of death and disability despite higher rates of periprocedural sICH.

Effective Mechanical Thrombectomy for Posterior Circulation Ischemia Using Magnetic Resonance Imaging-based Arterial Structures

To improve the success of mechanical thrombectomy, three-dimensional turbo spin-echo (3D-TSE) sequences on T2WI can be employed to estimate the vascular structure of the posterior circulation. In addition to the short imaging time of 3D-TSE T2WI (33 sec), it can visualize the outer diameter of the main cerebral artery, including the occluded vessels. However, to date, the efficacy of mechanical thrombectomy in the posterior circulation remains unclear, and safer and more efficient mechanical thrombectomy procedures are required. Assessment of the anatomical variations in the posterior circulation using 3D-TSE T2WI is valuable for access decisions, device selection, and safe device guidance and retrieval techniques to the target vessel. Herein, we present representative cases of basilar artery and posterior cerebral artery occlusions in our institute and describe the utility of preoperative 3D-TSE T2WI in these patients.

Tenecteplase vs. alteplase for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

At present, studies regarding the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase for the treatment of patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are still limited and inconsistent. The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to compare the efficacy and safety of tenecteplase with alteplase for the treatment of AIS patients.

METHODS

Literature search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to May 10, 2022. Primary outcomes of this study included 90-day good outcome (defined as an mRS score of 0-2) and 90-day excellent outcome (defined as an mRS score of 0-1). Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were calculated using a random-effect model for each outcome.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies with a total of 3537 patients were finally included in this meta-analysis. There was no statistical difference between patients receiving tenecteplase and those receiving alteplase in the rates of 90-day good outcome (RR 1.01; 95% CI 0.91-1.13; P = 0.79) and 90-day excellent outcome (RR 1.04; 95% CI 0.92-1.19; P = 0.50). Patients receiving tenecteplase might associated with higher incidence of early neurologic improvement compared with those receiving alteplase (RR 1.29; 95% CI 1.04-1.61; P = 0.02). In addition, no statistical difference was observed between the two groups in other outcomes.

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis indicated that tenecteplase in AIS patients is as safe and effective as alteplase and might provide more benefit than alteplase. However, due to several inherent limitations of this study, more prospective studies should be conducted to confirm the above results.