Treatment of wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms with the eCLIPs device: 5-year experience of a single center

eCLIPs bifurcation remodeling system for treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: A systematic review and meta-analysis of safety and efficacy

BACKGROUND

Wide neck bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are a subtype of aneurysms that are especially complex to treat. We aim to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis to synthesize the available literature on the safety and efficacy of employing endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) in the treatment of WNBAs.

METHODS

We report this study in accordance to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guidelines. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus were queried for this review. Screening and extraction were performed by at least two authors to ensure accuracy and completeness, and a senior author arbitrated any discrepancies. All data were analyzed using R software version 4.3.0. and random-effects model.

RESULTS

Four studies were finally included, of which three were prospective and one was retrospective. Successful adjunctive coiling occurred in 91.38% (95% CI = 70.71-97.9) of cases and overall technical success was achieved in 88.61% (95 CI = 75.54-95.15) of cases. The pooled complete occlusion (Raymond-Roy Class I) was 50.65% (95% CI = 39.63-61.60) and adequate occlusion (Raymond-Roy Class I/II) was 84.42% (95% CI = 74.53-90.93). Thrombo-embolic complication had a pooled rate of 1.22% (95% CI = 0.17-8.15), retreatment rate was 6.10% (95% CI = 2.56-13.83), and mortality reported in 3.66% (95% CI = 1.18-10.74) of patients.

CONCLUSION

The use of eCLIPs may be a safe and efficacious treatment for WNBAs. Future randomized controlled trials are needed for further validation of the findings.

Endovascular treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms: the eCLIPs device

The endovascular clip system device, eCLIPs (eVasc, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada), was introduced almost a decade ago for the treatment of wide-neck bifurcation aneurysms,1-3 which represent a challenge for both endovascular and surgical approaches. Several techniques and devices (intrasaccular or intra-arterial) have been introduced and are currently available in order to improve the technical and clinical outcomes of aneurysm embolization. Flow diversion and flow disruption have shown controversial results in this subtype of aneurysm. In this video we present the use of the eCLIPs device to treat a ruptured, wide-neck aneurysm of the top of the basilar artery. The decisional approach, technical details, and the different steps of the endovascular treatment are described. The final part of the video is dedicated to the characteristics of the device for re-endothelialization4 and flow diversion (video 1).5 neurintsurg;16/3/229/V1F1V1Video 1 .

The Safety and Efficacy of eCLIPs for Treatment of Wide-Necked Bifurcation Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Wide-necked bifurcation aneurysms (WNBAs) are challenging intracranial aneurysms. Several device and treatment approaches have been proposed for the treatment of WNBAs. The endovascular clip system (eCLIPs) is a newly developed endovascular device with flow diverter and flow disruptor features. This study aims to investigate the safety and efficacy of the eCLIPs for treatment of patients with WNBAs.

METHODS

This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study conducted in accordance with the PRISMA (preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses) guidelines. The electronic databases of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science were systematically reviewed from inception to June 19, 2023. The rate of complete and near-complete occlusion, successful device implantation, and serious adverse events were pooled using STATA, version 17.

RESULTS

A total of 5 studies with 110 patients with WNBAs were systematically investigated. Our findings show that the immediate successful implantation rate of eCLIPs was 0.93 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.88-0.97). Moreover, the immediate postoperative complete occlusion rate was 0.34 (95% CI, 0.10-0.58), and the immediate postoperative near-complete occlusion rate was 0.35 (95% CI, 0.24-0.45). Also, the near-complete occlusion rate at the latest follow-up was 0.3 (95% CI, 0.16-0.44). The serious adverse event rate was 0.14 (95% CI, 0.05-0.22). Stroke was also reported in 2 studies, with 1 study reporting 1 patient who experienced stroke within the first 24 hours and 1 study reporting no patients with stroke.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings document that the eCLIPs is a safe and effective device for treating patients with WNBAs and associated with favorable outcomes.

Endovascular treatment of middle cerebral artery aneurysms: current status and future prospects

Middle cerebral artery (MCA) aneurysms are complex and widely distributed throughout the course of the MCA. Various types of aneurysms can occur in the MCA. Ruptured as well as unruptured MCA aneurysms may require treatment to avoid bleeding or rebleeding. Currently, clipping is regarded as the first-line choice for the treatment of MCA aneurysms. However, endovascular treatment (EVT) is emerging as an alternative treatment in selected cases. EVT techniques vary. Therefore, it is necessary to review EVT for MCA aneurysms. In this review, the following issues were discussed: MCA anatomy and anomalies, classifications of MCA aneurysms, the natural history of MCA aneurysms, EVT status and principle, deployments of traditional coiling techniques and flow diverters (FDs), and deployments and prospects of intrasaccular flow disruptors and stent-like devices. According to the review and our experience, traditional coiling EVT is still the preferred therapy for most MCA aneurysms. FD deployment can be used in selective MCA aneurysms. Parent artery occlusion (PAO) can be used to treat distal MCA aneurysms. In addition, new devices can be used to treat MCA aneurysms, such as intrasaccular flow disruptors and stent-like devices. In general, EVT is gaining popularity as an alternative treatment option; however, there is still a lack of evidence regarding EVT, and longer-term data are not currently available for most EVT devices.