Stroke imaging modality for endovascular therapy in the extended window: systematic review and meta-analysis

Endovascular thrombectomy beyond 24 hours from last known well: a systematic review with meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Different studies have demonstrated the benefit of endovascular treatment (EVT) up to 24 hours after acute ischemic stroke (AIS) onset. Recent cohort observational studies suggest that patients with large vessel occlusion AIS may benefit from EVT beyond 24 hours from the last known well (LKW) when adequately selected. We aimed to examine the safety and efficacy of EVT beyond 24 hours from LKW using a meta-analysis of all the literature available.

METHODS

A systematic search from inception to April 2023 was conducted for studies including AIS patients with EVT beyond 24 hours from LKW in Medline, Embase, Scopus, and Web of Science. Outcomes of interest included favorable functional outcome (90-day modified Rankin scale (mRS) 0-2), successful reperfusion (modified Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (mTICI) 2b-3), symptomatic intracerebral hemorrhage (sICH), and 90-day mortality. Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Twelve studies with 894 patients were included. The rate of favorable functional outcome was 40% (95% CI 31% to 49%; I2=76%). The rate of successful reperfusion was 83% (95% CI 80% to 85%; I2=0%). The sICH rate was 7% (95% CI 5% to 9%; I2=0%) and the 90-day mortality rate was 28% (95% CI 24% to 33%; I2=0%). There was no significant difference in favorable outcomes (OR=0.69; 95% CI 0.41 to 1.14) and 90-day mortality (OR=1.35; 95% CI 0.90 to 2.00) among patients who underwent EVT <24 hours versus >24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

EVT beyond 24 hours from LKW may achieve favorable clinical outcomes and high reperfusion rates, with acceptable intracranial hemorrhage rates in selected patients. Considering the current certainty of the evidence and heterogenous individual study results, larger prospective trials are warranted.

Brain imaging prior to thrombectomy in the late window of large vessel occlusion ischemic stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Optimal imaging modalities to select patients for endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window of acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions (AIS-LVO) are not known. We conducted a systematic review comparing outcomes of patients selected by non-contrast computed tomography (NCCT)/CT angiography (CTA) vs. those selected by CT perfusion (CTP) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) for EVT in these patients.

METHODS

We searched PUBMED, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library from January 1, 2000, to July 15, 2023, to identify studies comparing outcomes of patients selected for EVT by NCCT/CTA vs. CTP or MRI in the late time window for AIS-LVO. Primary outcome was independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days or discharge. Secondary outcomes were symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH) and mortality. We pooled data across studies based on an inverse variance method.

RESULTS

Six cohort studies with 4208 patients were included. Pooled results showed no significant difference in the rate of independence at 90 days or discharge (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.88-1.03) and sICH (RR 1.26, 0.85-1.86) between patients selected by NCCT/CTA vs. CTP or MRI for EVT in the late window of AIS-LVO. However, patients selected by NCCT/CTA vs. CTP or MRI for EVT were associated with a higher risk of mortality (RR 1.21, 1.06-1.39).

CONCLUSION

For AIS-LVO in the late window, patients selected by NCCT/CTA compared with those selected by CTP or MRI for EVT might have a comparable rate of functional independence and sICH. Baseline NCCT/CTA may triage AIS-LVO in the late window.

CT Perfusion vs Noncontrast CT for Late Window Stroke Thrombectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS) treated with endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in the late window (6-24 hours) can be evaluated with CT perfusion (CTP) or with noncontrast CT (NCCT) only. Whether outcomes differ depending on the type of imaging selection is unknown. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing outcomes between CTP and NCCT for EVT selection in the late therapeutic window.

METHODS

This study is reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses 2020 guidelines. A systematic literature review of the English language literature was conducted using Web of Science, Embase, Scopus, and PubMed databases. Studies focusing on late-window AIS undergoing EVT imaged through CTP and NCCT were included. Data were pooled using a random-effects model. The primary outcome of interest was rate of functional independence, defined as modified Rankin scale 0-2. The secondary outcomes of interest included rates of successful reperfusion, defined as thrombolysis in cerebral infarction 2b-3, mortality, and symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH).

RESULTS

Five studies with 3,384 patients were included in our analysis. There were comparable rates of functional independence (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% CI 0.87-1.22; p = 0.71) and sICH (OR 1.09, 95% CI 0.58-2.04; p = 0.80) between the 2 groups. Patients imaged with CTP had higher rates of successful reperfusion (OR 1.31, 95% CI 1.05-1.64; p = 0.015) and lower rates of mortality (OR 0.79, 95% CI 0.65-0.96; p = 0.017).

DISCUSSION

Although recovery of functional independence after late-window EVT was not more common in patients selected by CTP when compared with patients selected by NCCT only, patients selected by CTP had lower mortality.