Assessment of potential damage to DNA in urine of coke oven workers: an assay of unscheduled DNA synthesis

Global H3K79 di-methylation mediates DNA damage response to PAH exposure in Chinese coke oven workers

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are the main contaminants of coke oven emissions which can induce serious genetic damage in coke oven workers. Epigenetic alternations play essential roles in the regulation of DNA damage effect of PAHs. Previous studies indicate that H3K79 di-methylation (H3K79me2) is integral in DNA damage repair. However, the potential role of H3K79me2 in DNA damage response (DDR) following PAHs exposure is still unclear. In this study, we recruited 256 male coke oven workers and control workers, and examined H3K79me2 and DNA damage in their peripheral blood lymphocytes (PBLCs). The results showed that global H3K79me2 of coke oven workers was 29.3% less than that of the controls (P < 0.001). The H3K79me2 was negatively correlated with the concentration of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) (β = -0.235, P < 0.001) and level of genetic damage evaluated by comet assay (β_{Tail DNA %} = -0.313, P < 0.001; β_OTM = -0.251, P = 0.008). Consistently, we found that benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) inhibited H3K79me2 in immortalized human bronchial epithelial (HBE) cells in a time-dependent manner. In order to explore the function of H3K79me2 in PAHs DDR, we established histone 3.1/3.3 K79A mutant cells (H3K79 A) to suppress H3K79me2. H3K79 A cells showed more serious DNA damage and decreased cell viability than control cells after BaP treatment. In addition, we also found that the expression of DOT1L, the only methyltransferase in H3K79, was repressed by BaP dose-dependently. DOT1L knockdown resulted in decreased H3K79me2 level and aggravated DNA damage after BaP exposure. This suggests that BaP induces H3K79me2 repression via inhibiting DOT1L expression. In conclusion, these findings indicate that PAH exposure decreases the level of global H3K79me2, which is integral for DNA damage response regulation of PAHs.

Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene as a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: biological monitoring strategies and methodology for determining biological exposure indices for various work environments

This article reviews the published studies on urinary 1-hydroxypyrene (1-OHP) as a biomarker of exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in work environments. Sampling and analysis strategies as well as a methodology for determining biological exposure indices (BEIs) of 1-OHP in urine for different work environments are proposed for the biological monitoring of occupational exposure to PAHs. Owing to the kinetics of absorption of pyrene by different exposure routes and excretion of 1-OHP in urine, in general, 1-OHP urinary excretion levels increase during the course of a workday, reaching maximum values 3-9 h after the end of work. When the contribution of dermal exposure is important, post-shift 1-OHP excretion can however be lower than pre-shift levels in the case where a worker has been exposed occupationally to PAHs on the day prior to sampling. In addition, 1-OHP excretion levels in either pre-shift, post-shift or evening samples increase during the course of a work-week, levelling off after three consecutive days of work. Consequently, ideally, for a first characterization of a work environment and for an indication of the major exposure route, considering a 5-day work-week (Monday to Friday), the best sampling strategy would be to collect all micturitions over 24 h starting on Monday morning. Alternatively, collection of pre-shift, post-shift and evening urine samples on the first day of the work-week and at the end of the work-week is recommended. For routine monitoring, pre-shift samples on Monday and post-shift samples on Friday should be collected when pulmonary exposure is the main route of exposure. On the other hand, pre-shift samples on Monday and Friday should be collected when the contribution of skin uptake is important. The difference between beginning and end of work-week excretion will give an indication of the average exposure over the workweek. Pre-shift samples on the first day of the work-week will indicate background values, and, hence, reflect general environment exposure and body burden of pyrene and/or its metabolites. On the other hand, since PAH profile can vary substantially in different work sites, a single BEI cannot apply to all workplaces. A simple equation was therefore developed to establish BEIs for workers exposed to PAHs in different work environments by using a BEI already established for a given work environment and by introducing a correction factor corresponding to the ratio of the airborne concentration of the sum of benzo(a)pyrene (BaP) equivalent to that of pyrene. The sum of BaP equivalent concentrations represents the sum of carcinogenic PAH concentrations expressed as BaP using toxic equivalent factors. Based on a previously estimated BEI of 2.3 μmol 1-OHP mol(-1) creatinine for coke-oven workers, BEIs of 4.4, 8.0 and 9.8 μmol 1-OHP mol(-1) creatinine were respectively calculated for vertical pin Söderberg workers, anode workers and pre-bake workers of aluminium plants and a BEI of 1.2 μmol 1-OHP mol(-1) creatinine was estimated for iron foundry workers. This approach will allow the potential risk of cancer in individuals occupationally exposed to PAHs to be assessed better.

Urinary 1-hydroxypyrene as a biomarker of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons exposure of workers on a contaminated site: influence of exposure conditions

The aim of the study was to determine the exposure levels of workers to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on gasworks sites by the measurement of urinary 1-hydroxypyrene. Start-shift and end-shift urine samples were taken every day during an entire week (Monday to Friday), once in November and a second time in June. Four groups of workers were selected according to their activity. Increased exposure was only found among volunteers involved in the remediation of a site, 0.16 to 2.31 mumol/mol creatinine in non-smokers. The median of the non-smoker referent group was 0.02 mumol/mol creatinine (95% confidence interval, 0.01 to 0.04). Smokers had greater exposure levels than non-smokers in every group. Within and between variability was around 200%. Assessment of the exposure of persons on contaminated soil is possible, with the condition that the exposed subjects come in direct contact with the soil.