Cilostazol increases patency and reduces adverse outcomes in percutaneous femoropopliteal revascularisation: a meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

The effect of cilostazol on late outcomes after endovascular treatment for occlusive femoropopliteal disease

OBJECTIVE

Restenosis and late occlusion remain a significant problem for endovascular treatment of peripheral artery disease. This meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effect of cilostazol on late outcomes after endovascular repair of occlusive femoropopliteal disease.

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted conforming to established criteria to identify articles published up to September 2023 evaluating late outcomes after endovascular treatment for atherosclerotic femoropopliteal disease. Eligible studies should compare outcomes between patients treated with cilostazol and patients not treated with cilostazol. Both prospective and retrospective studies were eligible. Late outcomes included primary patency (PP), restenosis, target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major amputation during follow-up.

RESULTS

Overall, 10 clinical studies were identified for analysis including 4721 patients (1831 with cilostazol vs 2890 without cilostazol) that were treated for 5703 lesions (2235 with cilostazol vs 3468 without cilostazol). All studies were performed in Japan. Mean follow-up was 24.1 ± 12.5 months. Cilostazol was associated with a lower risk for restenosis (pooled odds ratio [OR], 0.503; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.383-0.660; P < .0001). However, no association was found between cilostazol and TLR (pooled OR, 0.918; 95% CI, 0.300-2.812; P = .881) as well as major amputation (pooled OR, 1.512; 95% CI, 0.734-3.116; P = .263). Regarding primary patency, cilostazol was associated with a higher 12-month PP (OR, 3.047; 95% CI, 1.168-7.946; P = .023), and a higher 36-month PP (OR, 1.616; 95% CI, 1.412-1.850; P < .0001). No association was found between cilostazol and mortality during follow-up (pooled OR, .755; 95% CI, 0.293-1.946; P = .561).

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol seems to have a positive effect on 1- to 3-year PP and restenosis rates among patients treated endovascularly for atherosclerotic femoropopliteal disease. A positive effect on TLR and amputation risk was not verified in this review.

A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Efficacy and Safety of Cilostazol Prescription in Patients With Femoropopliteal Peripheral Artery Disease After Endovascular Therapy

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to assess the efficacy and safety of cilostazol prescription in patients with femoropopliteal peripheral artery disease (PAD) after endovascular therapy (EVT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all studies reporting the outcomes of cilostazol after femoropopliteal EVT of PAD up to September 2022. Clinical outcomes of interest included primary patency, in-stent restenosis (ISR), vessel re-occlusion, freedom from target lesion revascularization (TLR), repeat revascularization, all-cause mortality, amputation, major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) and major adverse limb events (MALEs), and bleeding complication.

RESULTS

A total of 4 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and 8 observational studies containing a total of 4898 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this systematic review and meta-analysis. We found that the use of cilostazol was associated with higher primary patency after femoropopliteal artery EVT (odds ratio [OR]=1.67, 95% confidence interval [CI]=1.50-1.87, p<0.001, I2=33.2%), a lower risk of ISR (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.29-0.63, p<0.001, I2=37.6%), repeat revascularization (OR=0.43, 95% CI=0.24-0.76, p<0.005, I2=27.4%), and vessel re-occlusion (OR=0.59, 95% CI=0.38-0.93, p<0.05, I2=0%). There was an increase in freedom from TLR rate (OR=2.19, 95% CI=1.58-3.05, p<0.001, I2=0%), as well as a reduction in the occurrence of MALEs (OR=0.50, 95% CI=0.29-0.85, p<0.05, I2=0%). However, there was no significant difference in amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, and major bleeding complications. Subgroup analysis showed that cilostazol treatment in patients with femoropopliteal drug-eluting stents (DES) implantation remained associated with higher primary patency and a lower risk of ISR.

CONCLUSIONS

After EVT of femoropopliteal artery lesions, additional oral cilostazol enhances primary patency, reduces the occurrences of ISR and vessel re-occlusion, diminishes the risks associated with MALEs, lowers the need for repeat revascularization, and increases freedom from TLR rates. However, it does not impact amputation, MACEs, all-cause mortality, or major bleeding complications. These findings suggest cilostazol as a potentially safe and effective adjunct therapy in patients with femoropopliteal PAD after EVT.

CLINICAL IMPACT

After undergoing endovascular therapy (EVT) for femoropopliteal artery lesions, the addition of cilostazol to antiplatelet therapy can significantly improve primary patency, reducing the incidence of in-stent restenosis, repeat revascularization, vessel re-occlusion, and major adverse limb events while increasing freedom from target lesion revascularization rate. The simultaneous use of drug-eluting stents in the femoropopliteal artery lesions, combined with cilostazol, potentially results in a synergistic anti-stenotic effect. This therapeutic approach does not appear to be associated with an increased risk of major bleeding events or all-cause mortality. These findings provide additional evidence supporting the treatment of anti-stenosis in patients with femoropopliteal artery lesions after EVT.

Cilostazol for peripheral arterial disease - a position paper from the Italian Society for Angiology and Vascular Medicine

Cilostazol is a quinolinone-derivative selective phosphodiesterase inhibitor and is a platelet-aggregation inhibitor and arterial vasodilator for the symptomatic treatment of intermittent claudication (IC). Cilostazol has been shown to improve walking distance for patients with moderate to severe disabling intermittent claudication who do not respond to exercise therapy and who are not candidates for vascular surgical or endovascular procedures. Several studies evaluated the pharmacological effects of cilostazol for restenosis prevention and indicated a possible effect on re-endothelialization mediated by hepatocyte growth factor and endothelial precursor cells, as well as inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation and leukocyte adhesion to endothelium, thereby exerting an anti-inflammatory effect. These effects may suggest a potential effectiveness of cilostazol in preventing restenosis and promoting the long-term outcome of revascularization interventions. This review aimed to point out the role of cilostazol in treating patients with peripheral arterial disease, particularly with IC, and to explore its possible role in restenosis after lower limb revascularization.

The effect of cilostazol on the platelet-derived growth factor-beta/beta isoform reduction on venous hyperplasia in an experimental balloon-induced injury model

BACKGROUND

Intimal hyperplasia is the response to endothelial injury. Platelet-derived growth factor is released early and favors the formation of intimal hyperplasia. Although multiple treatments, from open surgery to endovascular techniques, have been used they remain controversial. There is currently interest in developing pharmacological strategies to address this pathology. Local vascular inflammation induced by vessel barotrauma generates intimal hyperplasia due to mechanical stress over the venous endothelium. Cilostazol is a selective phosphodiesterase type 3 (PDE3) selective inhibitor with a regulatory effect over intimal hyperplasia. The objective was to investigate cilostazol's role in inhibiting smooth muscle cell proliferation due to changes in the expression and release of PDGF-BB isoform and the effect on developing IH using an experimental model of vascular barotrauma (balloon-induced injury model).

METHODS

We included 12 New Zealand rabbits. The balloon-induced injury model (BIIM) and experimental group cilostazol (20 mg/kg/day) included 6 rabbits each. Contralateral veins from 6 rabbits used in BIIM model has been taken as control group. We measured and compared the expression of PDGF-BB and the development of IH. A pathologist board chooses a PDGFRα antibody to localized its expression by immunohistochemistry analysis. Subsequently, using an automated immunohistochemical staining machine, the PDGFR expression was evaluated using a Zeiss Primo Star 4 light microscope.

RESULTS

The measurement obtained in the intimal layer was: 126.12 μm2 in the CG, 232 μm2 in the BIIM group, and 178 μm2 in the EG. A statistically significant difference was observed. Baseline serum concentrations of PDGF-BB in the BIIM group were 0.22 pg/mL. At 12 h 0.42 pg/mL, and 0.17 pg/mL at seven days. In the experimental group, the basal levels were 0.33 pg/mL. With the use of cilostazol, a lower peak was obtained at 12 h (0.08 pg/mL). This difference was statistically significant.

CONCLUSIONS

Cilostazol induced a significant reduction of IH caused by barotrauma in the venous endothelium, which correlates with decrease in the PDGF-BB in serum. This could be attributed to the pharmacologic effect on PDGFR expression.

Risk factors for in-stent restenosis after vertebral artery stenting of V1 segment: A systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

In-stent restenosis (ISR) remains a challenge in the treatment of vertebral artery V1 segment stenosis. The aim of this meta-analysis is to identify the risk factors of ISR.

METHODS

Studies eligible for inclusion criteria were found in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Data related to risk factors of ISR were extracted from the included studies, and pooled analysis was performed when data of the same factor were available in ≥2 studies. Dichotomous outcomes were analyzed with odds ratios (OR) and continuous outcomes were analyzed with a weighted mean difference (WMD). The Stata 14.0 program was used for the meta-analysis.

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies involving 1356 patients were included in our analysis. Pooled analyses showed that younger age (p = 0.01; WMD= -1.958; 95% confidence interval [CI], -3.453 to -0.463) and V1 tortuosity (p = 0.004; OR = 4.145; 95% CI, 1.56-11.012) significantly associated with higher risk of ISR in V1 segment stenting. While bare-metal stents, stent diameter and length, diabetes mellitus, coronary artery disease, and smoking were not found to increase ISR rates.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis showed that young age and V1 tortuosity increase the ISR rates after vertebral V1 segment stenting.

Update on Cilostazol: A Critical Review of Its Antithrombotic and Cardiovascular Actions and Its Clinical Applications

Cilostazol, a phosphodiesterase III inhibitor, has vasodilating and antiplatelet properties with a low rate of bleeding complications. It has been used over the past 25 years for improving intermittent claudication in patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD). Cilostazol also has demonstrated efficacy in patients undergoing percutaneous revascularization procedures for both PAD and coronary artery disease. In addition to its antithrombotic and vasodilating actions, cilostazol also inhibits vascular smooth muscle cell proliferation via phosphodiesterase III inhibition, thus mitigating restenosis. Accumulated evidence has shown that cilostazol, due to its "pleiotropic" effects, is a useful, albeit underutilized, agent for both coronary artery disease and PAD. It is also potentially useful after ischemic stroke and is an alternative in those who are allergic or intolerant to classical antithrombotic agents (eg, aspirin or clopidogrel). These issues are herein reviewed together with the pharmacology and pharmacodynamics of cilostazol. Large studies and meta-analyses are presented and evaluated. Current guidelines are also discussed, and the spectrum of cilostazol's actions and therapeutic applications are illustrated.

Effects of Postoperative Percutaneous Coronary Intervention, Pharmacologic Treatment, and Predisposing Factors on Clinical Outcomes in Patients With and Without Type 2 Diabetes Along With Critical Limb Ischemia

PURPOSE

Critical limb ischemia (CLI) has been identified as being connected to rates of cardiovascular mortality and lower extremity amputation (LEA). This prospective study investigated the effects of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), pharmacologic treatment, and predisposing factors on clinical outcomes in patients with and without type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) along with CLI after endovascular intervention.

METHODS

249 consecutive patients with CLI (Fontaine stages III-IV) received pharmacologic treatment after successful endovascular intervention. Their primary patency rates of infrapopliteal lesions and cardiovascular and amputation events during a 36-month follow-up period were assessed.

FINDINGS

Patients with DM were more likely to be younger (P = 0.026); 50% (n = 63), 42.9% (n = 54), 52.4% (n = 66), and 77% (n = 97) of DM patients had arterial calcification, end-stage renal disease, diabetic neuropathy, and Fontaine stage IV (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.019, respectively). The primary patency rates were 61%, 48.8%, and 42.3% at 12, 24, and 36 months, in the patients without DM (P = 0.034, P = 0.013, and P = 0.005). Patients with DM had higher risks of 36-month coronary artery disease, cerebrovascular accident, mortality, and LEA (P = 0.005, P = 0.042, P = 0.042, and P < 0.001). Patients with CLI receiving long-term cilostazol treatment had a better primary patency and amputation-free survival, and a lower risk of mortality at 36 months (P < 0.001, P < 0.001, and P = 0.001). Statin use was associated with 36-month amputation-free survival but not with primary patency (P = 0.032 and P = 0.088). Subgroup multivariate Cox analyses showed that primary patency was independently associated with long-term cilostazol treatment, PCI in the first postoperative year, and direct revascularization in the DM group, whereas in the control group, long-term cilostazol treatment was the main independent factor. The risk of amputation was independently associated with a high high-sensitivity chronic reactive protein level, diabetic neuropathy, sole use of an oral hypoglycemic agent, and lack of supervised exercise.

IMPLICATIONS

Long-term cilostazol treatment, aggressive management of dyslipidemia, and meticulous assessment and prevention of postoperative unstable coronary artery disease should be considered in CLI patients with and without DM to maximize clinical outcomes. PCI in the first postoperative year may be a predisposing factor for patency failure in patients with CLI, especially those with DM. A large-scale prospective randomized trial should be conducted to confirm these findings (TVGH IRB No. 2013-08-020B).

Long-Term Cilostazol Treatment and Predictive Factors on Outcomes of Endovascular Intervention in Patients with Diabetes Mellitus and Critical Limb Ischemia

INTRODUCTION

Despite improvements in endovascular interventions and multidisciplinary approaches, improving clinical outcomes and increasing limb salvage have become increasingly challenging. This prospective study investigated the associations of cilostazol treatment with clinical outcomes and predictive factors in patients with diabetes mellitus (DM) and critical limb ischemia (CLI) after endovascular revascularization of the affected angiosome.

METHODS

In this study, 172 consecutive patients with CLI (Fontaine levels III-IV) received cilostazol treatment after successful endovascular intervention according to the angiosome concept, and their primary patency rates and cardiovascular and amputation events during a 24-month follow-up period were assessed.

RESULT

The 24-month primary patency rate, mortality rate, and amputation rate were better in the patients under long-term cilostazol treatment (P < 0.001, P = 0.029, and P = 0.014). Weighted multivariate Cox analyses with a propensity scoring-based method showed that long-term cilostazol treatment [hazard ratio (HR) 0.2, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11-0.36, P < 0.001], direct revascularization (DR) (HR 0.46, 95% CI 0.28-0.74, P = 0.002), and supervised exercise (HR 0.4, 95% CI 0.24-0.66, P < 0.001) were independently associated with primary patency. Patients with lower-extremity amputation (LEA) had a higher risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) and mortality. Cellulitis and neuropathy were independently associated with LEA events (cellulitis: HR 2.89, 95% CI 1.66-5.05, P < 0.001; neuropathy: HR 2.2, 95% CI 1.31-3.7, P = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Our results showed that patients with DM who received cilostazol treatment for more than 3 months had significantly better outcomes and decreased amputation and mortality rates after DR, and cellulitis and neuropathy were highly associated with the risk of limb loss. A large-scale randomized trial should be conducted in the future to confirm these results.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Taipei Veterans General Hospital (TVGH) IRB no. 2013-08-020B. Registered 30 August 2013.

Outcomes with cilostazol after endovascular therapy of peripheral artery disease

The role of cilostazol after endovascular therapy (EVT) of peripheral artery disease (PAD) remains unclear. We conducted a meta-analysis for all studies reporting the outcomes of cilostazol after EVT of PAD from January 2000 through November 2018 with the outcomes of interest including primary patency, major adverse limb events (MALE), target lesion revascularization (TLR), and major amputation. We included eight studies (three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and five observational studies) with a total of 3846 patients (4713 lesions). During a mean follow-up duration of 12.5 ± 5 months, the use of cilostazol was associated with higher primary patency (OR 2.28, 95% CI (1.77, 2.94), p < 0.001, I² = 24%), lower risk of TLR (OR 0.37, 95% CI (0.26, 0.52), p < 0.001, I² = 0%), and lower risk of major amputation (OR 0.15, 95% CI (0.04, 0.62), p = 0.008, I² = 0%). The use of cilostazol in RCTs was associated with significantly higher odds of primary patency compared with observational studies (OR 3.37 vs 2.28, p-interaction = 0.03). After further subgroup analysis, cilostazol remained associated with higher primary patency regardless of the use of anticoagulants (warfarin) (p-interaction = 0.49). We conclude that the use of cilostazol after EVT of femoropopliteal and iliac lesions is associated with improved primary patency and lower risk of major amputation and TLR. The favorable impact of cilostazol is independent of the use of warfarin. PROSPERO identifier: CRD42018092715.

One-Year Clinical Outcomes following Implantation of InnovaTM Self-Expanding Nitinol Stents in Patients with Peripheral Artery Diseases Presenting Femoropopliteal Artery Lesions

Aim: Although the Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA) exhibits acceptable performance in long-term safety and efficacy when used for the treatment of femoropopliteal (FP) lesions, clinical outcomes following its implantation have not been systematically studied in real-world settings. We investigated the one-year clinical outcomes after implantation of Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stents for the treatment of FP lesions in real-world settings.

Methods: In this multicenter study, 481 lesions in 453 consecutive patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) (74 ± 9 years; male, 70%; diabetes mellitus, 61%; dialysis, 27%; critical limb ischemia, 37%) who underwent endovascular therapy with the implantation of Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stents for FP lesions were analyzed from February 2016 to April 2017. The primary endpoint was one-year restenosis, whereas the secondary endpoints included one-year major adverse limb events and predictors for one-year restenosis.

Results: The mean lesion length was 18 ± 10 cm. One-year restenosis and major adverse limb event rates were 36% and 18%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed that the presence of diabetes mellitus (odds ratio [OR]: 1.83; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07–3.13), distal reference vessel diameter (OR: 1.86; 95% CI: 1.09–3.16), spot stenting (OR: 2.27; 95% CI: 1.27–4.06), and lack of one-year cilostazol treatment (OR: 0.58; 95% CI: 0.33–1.00) were independent risk factors for one-year restenosis.

Conclusion: The current study demonstrated one-year clinical outcomes after Innova™ self-expanding nitinol stent placement for the treatment of FP lesions, including challenging cases in real-world settings.

Restenosis after Coronary and Peripheral Intervention: Efficacy and Clinical Impact of Cilostazol

Restenosis is one of the main complications in patients undergoing coronary or peripheral revascularization procedures and is the leading cause for their long-term failures. Cilostazol is the only pharmacotherapy that showed an adequate efficacy for preventing restenosis in randomized, controlled studies after coronary or peripheral revascularization procedures. The present review sums up the main clinical evidence supporting the use of cilostazol after revascularization interventions, focusing on all its benefits, warnings, and administration schedules.

Meta-Analysis of Studies Evaluating the Effect of Cilostazol on Major Outcomes After Carotid Stenting

PURPOSE

To evaluate the effect of cilostazol on major outcomes after carotid artery stenting (CAS).

METHODS

A systematic literature review was conducted conforming to established criteria in order to identify articles published prior to May 2015 evaluating major post-CAS outcomes in patients treated with cilostazol vs patients not treated with cilostazol. Major outcomes included in-stent restenosis (ISR) within the observation period, the revascularization rate, major/minor bleeding, and the myocardial infarction/stroke/death rate (MI/stroke/death) at 30 days and within the observation period. Data were pooled for all studies containing adequate data for each outcome investigated; effect estimates are presented as the odds ratios (ORs) and 95 confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

Overall, 7 studies pertaining to 1297 patients were eligible. Heterogeneity was low among studies so a fixed-effect analysis was conducted. Six studies (n=1233) were compared for the ISR endpoint, showing a significantly lower ISR rate with cilostazol treatment after a mean follow-up of 20 months (OR 0.158, 95% CI 0.072 to 0.349, p<0.001). Five studies (n=649) were compared regarding 30-day MI/stroke/death (OR 0.724, 95% CI 0.293 to 1.789, p=0.484) and 3 studies (n=1076) were analyzed regarding MI/stroke/death within the entire follow-up period (OR 0.768, 95% CI 0.477 to 1.236, p=0.276); no significant difference was found between the groups. Data on bleeding rates and revascularization rates post ISR were inadequate to conduct further analysis.

CONCLUSION

Cilostazol seems to decrease total ISR rates in patients undergoing CAS without affecting MI/stroke/death events, both in the early and late settings.

Prevention of Femoropopliteal In-Stent Restenosis With Cilostazol

Severe peripheral artery disease requires revascularization to relieve life-limiting ischemic symptoms. Postrevascularization in-stent restenosis continues to be a problem after femoropopliteal procedures. Our aim was to evaluate the use of cilostazol to prevent in-stent restenosis among patients with lower extremity arterial stenting. We performed a MEDLINE and EMBASE search and reviewed the abstracts and manuscripts following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. The primary efficacy outcome was patency rate after stenting. The odds ratio estimates were pooled using the Mantel–Haenszel random-effects method. We identified 524 studies, and 20 articles were fully abstracted and 4 were included in the meta-analysis. The total number of patients included was 2434. Patients in the cilostazol group had better primary patency rates after endovascular stenting than those not taking cilostazol (odds ratio: 0.55; 95% confidence interval: 0.43-0.71). The use of cilostazol appears to prevent in-stent restenosis of high-risk patients.