Impaired coronary flow velocity reserve is associated with cardiovascular risk factors but not with angina symptoms

The Complementary Role of Cardiopulmonary Exercise Testing in Coronary Artery Disease: From Early Diagnosis to Tailored Management

Coronary artery disease (CAD) remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide, accounting for over 9 million deaths annually. The prevalence of CAD continues to rise, driven by ageing and the increasing prevalence of risk factors such as hypertension, diabetes, and obesity. Current clinical guidelines emphasize the importance of functional tests in the diagnostic pathway, particularly for assessing the presence and severity of ischemia. While recommended tests are valuable, they may not fully capture the complex physiological responses to exercise or provide the necessary detail to tailor personalized treatment plans. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) offers a comprehensive assessment of the cardiovascular, pulmonary, and muscular systems under stress, potentially addressing these gaps and providing a more precise understanding of CAD, particularly in settings where traditional diagnostics may be insufficient. By enabling more personalized and precise treatment strategies, CPET could play a central role in the future of CAD management. This narrative review examines the current evidence supporting the use of CPET in CAD diagnosis and management and explores the potential for integrating CPET into existing clinical guidelines, considering its diagnostic and prognostic capabilities, cost-effectiveness, and the challenges associated with its adoption.

The evolving role of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in ischemic heart disease - state of the art review

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is the gold standard for directly assessing cardiorespiratory fitness (CRF) and has a relatively new and evolving role in evaluating atherosclerotic heart disease, particularly in detecting cardiac dysfunction caused by ischemic heart disease. The purpose of this review is to assess the current literature on the link between cardiovascular (CV) risk factors, cardiac dysfunction and CRF assessed by CPET.

RECENT FINDINGS

We summarize the basics of exercise physiology and the key determinants of CRF. Prognostically, several studies have been published relating directly measured CRF by CPET and outcomes allowing for more precise risk assessment. Diagnostically, this review describes in detail what is considered healthy and abnormal cardiac function assessed by CPET. New studies demonstrate that cardiac dysfunction on CPET is a common finding in asymptomatic individuals and is associated with CV risk factors and lower CRF. This review covers how key CPET parameters change as individuals transition from the asymptomatic to the symptomatic stage with progressively decreasing CRF. Finally, a supplement with case studies with long-term longitudinal data demonstrating how CPET can be used in daily clinical decision making is presented.

SUMMARY

In summary, CPET is a powerful tool to provide individualized CV risk assessment, monitor the effectiveness of therapeutic interventions, and provide meaningful feedback to help patients guide their path to improve CRF when routinely used in the outpatient setting.

Biomarkers and Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction in Women With Angina and No Obstructive Coronary Artery Disease

Background

Coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) is a major cause of ischemia with no obstructed coronary arteries.

Objectives

The authors sought to assess protein biomarker signature for CMD.

Methods

We quantified 184 unique cardiovascular proteins with proximity extension assay in 1,471 women with angina and no obstructive coronary artery disease characterized for CMD by coronary flow velocity reserve (CFVR) by transthoracic echo Doppler. We performed Pearson's correlations of CFVR and each of the 184 biomarkers, and principal component analyses and weighted correlation network analysis to identify clusters linked to CMD. For prediction of CMD (CFVR < 2.25), we applied logistic regression and machine learning algorithms (least absolute shrinkage and selection operator, random forest, extreme gradient boosting, and adaptive boosting) in discovery and validation cohorts.

Results

Sixty-one biomarkers were correlated with CFVR with strongest correlations for renin (REN), growth differentiation factor 15, brain natriuretic protein (BNP), N-terminal-proBNP (NT-proBNP), and adrenomedullin (ADM) (all P < 1e-06). Two principal components with highest loading on BNP/NTproBNP and interleukin 6, respectively, were strongly associated with low CFVR. Weighted correlation network analysis identified 2 clusters associated with low CFVR reflecting involvement of hypertension/vascular function and immune modulation. The best prediction model for CFVR <2.25 using clinical data had area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC) of 0.61 (95% CI: 0.56-0.66). ROC-AUC was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.62-0.71) with addition of biomarkers (P for model improvement = 0.01). Stringent two-layer cross-validated machine learning models had ROC-AUC ranging from 0.58 to 0.66; the most predictive biomarkers were REN, BNP, NT-proBNP, growth differentiation factor 15, and ADM.

Conclusions

CMD was associated with pathways particularly involving inflammation (interleukin 6), blood pressure (REN, ADM), and ventricular remodeling (BNP/NT-proBNP) independently of clinical risk factors. Model prediction improved with biomarkers, but prediction remained moderate.

Gender-Related Differences in Chest Pain Syndromes in the Frontiers in CV Medicine Special Issue: Sex & Gender in CV Medicine

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is the leading cause of morbidity and mortality among both women and men, yet women continue to have delays in diagnosis and treatment. The lack of recognition of sex-specific biological and socio-cultural gender-related differences in chest pain presentation of CAD may, in part, explain these disparities. Sex and gender differences in pain mechanisms including psychological susceptibility, the autonomic nervous system (ANS) reactivity, and visceral innervation likely contribute to chest pain differences. CAD risk scores and typical/atypical angina characterization no longer appear relevant and should not be used in women and men. Women more often have ischemia with no obstructive CAD (INOCA) and myocardial infarction, contributing to diagnostic and therapeutic equipoise. Existing knowledge demonstrates that chest pain often does not relate to obstructive CAD, suggesting a more thoughtful approach to percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and medical therapy for chest pain in stable obstructive CAD. Emerging knowledge regarding the central and ANS and visceral pain processing in patients with and without angina offers explanatory mechanisms for chest pain and should be investigated with interdisciplinary teams of cardiologists, neuroscientists, bio-behavioral experts, and pain specialists. Improved understanding of sex and gender differences in chest pain, including biological pathways as well as sociocultural contributions, is needed to improve clinical care in both women and men.

Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction: A Practical Approach to Diagnosis and Management

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review is to provide an overview of diagnostic and treatment considerations in patients with coronary microvascular dysfunction (CMD) in the absence of obstructive coronary artery disease (CAD).

RECENT FINDINGS

The prevalence of obstructive CAD in unselected patient populations referred for evaluation of angina is less than 10%. A significant proportion of patients with angina and no obstructive CAD have CMD, a condition associated with impaired cardiovascular prognosis. Non-invasive and invasive evaluation of coronary microvascular function is feasible and widely available, yet CMD is underdiagnosed and undertreated. A patient-tailored treatment approach guided by coronary microvascular testing shows promising results for patient-reported outcomes of symptom burden and quality of life. Coronary microvascular testing should be considered in angina patients with no obstructive CAD, before other causes of chest pain are explored. A patient-tailored treatment approach guided by a complete evaluation of epicardial anatomy and macro-and microvascular function may help optimize treatment strategy and prevent unnecessary medical interventions. More research is needed to establish the long-term effect of patient-tailored therapies on risk reduction in CMD.