Role of platelet function testing in acute coronary syndromes: a meta-analysis

Platelet function testing and clinical outcomes in peripheral arterial disease: Systematic review and narrative synthesis

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review aims to comprehensively assess the contemporary literature on platelet function testing (PFT) in individuals undergoing revascularization therapy for peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The goal is to identify whether PFT can aid in detecting antiplatelet resistance, predicting post-procedural thrombotic complications, and informing tailored treatment strategies.

METHODS

Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, a literature review was conducted using PubMed databases. Search terms included relevant medical subject headings (MeSH) terms. Eligible articles published in English between 1990 and 2023 were analyzed. Studies that examined PFT outcomes in patients with PAD after lower extremity revascularization were included.

RESULTS

Ten studies met the inclusion criteria. Various PFT methods were used, including thromboelastography with platelet mapping, multiplate analyzer, Cytochrome P450 2C19 testing, VerifyNow, corrected whole blood aggregometry, platelet function analyzer-100, and light transmission aggregometry. PFT identified individuals who were resistant or non-sensitive to antiplatelet therapy, with such patients facing increased risks of graft/stent thrombosis, amputation, and reintervention. However, substantial heterogeneity in surgical procedures, drug regimens, and testing methods was observed among the studies.

CONCLUSIONS

PFTs can play a crucial role in detecting resistance and non-sensitivity to antiplatelet drugs in patients with PAD post-revascularization. However, heterogeneity of data and methods underlines the need for standardized protocols and consensus-building among PFTs. Enhancing clinical utility and reliability could help optimize antiplatelet thromboprophylaxis, minimize thrombotic complications, and improve treatment strategies in vascular surgery. Further research is necessary to solidify the role of PFTs in guiding antiplatelet therapy post-revascularization in patients with PAD.

Advances in Platelet-Dysfunction Diagnostic Technologies

The crucial role of platelets in hemostasis and their broad implications under various physiological conditions underscore the importance of accurate platelet-function testing. Platelets are key to clotting blood and healing wounds. Therefore, accurate diagnosis and management of platelet disorders are vital for patient care. This review outlines the significant advancements in platelet-function testing technologies, focusing on their working principles and the shift from traditional diagnostic methods to more innovative approaches. These improvements have deepened our understanding of platelet-related disorders and ushered in personalized treatment options. Despite challenges such as interpretation of complex data and the costs of new technologies, the potential for artificial-intelligence integration and the creation of wearable monitoring devices offers exciting future possibilities. This review underscores how these technological advances have enhanced the landscape of precision medicine and provided better diagnostic and treatment options for platelet-function disorders.

Guided Anti-P2Y12 Therapy in Patients Undergoing PCI: Three Systematic Reviews with Meta-analyses of Randomized Controlled Trials with Homogeneous Design

BACKGROUND

 The value of guided therapy (GT) with anti-P2Y12 drugs in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is unclear. Meta-analyses lumped together randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with heterogeneous designs, comparing either genotype-GT or platelet function test (PFT)-GT with unguided therapy. Some meta-analysis also included RCTs that did not explore GT, but included the effects of switching patients with high on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) to alternative therapies (HTPR-Therapy). We performed three distinct systematic reviews/meta-analyses, each exploring only RCTs with homogeneous design.

METHODS

 MEDLINE, Embase, and Central databases were searched for RCTs testing genotype-GT, PFT-GT, or HTPR-Therapy in PCI-treated patients, through October 1, 2022. Two reviewers extracted the data. Risk ratios (RRs) (95% confidence intervals) were calculated. Primary outcomes were major bleedings (MBs) and major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE).

RESULTS

 In seven genotype-GT RCTs, RRs were: MB, 1.06 (0.73-1.54; p = 0.76); MACE, 0.65 (0.47-0.91; p = 0.01), but significant risk reduction was observed in RCTs performed in China (0.30, 0.16-0.54; p < 0.0001) and not elsewhere (0.75, 0.48-1.18; p = 0.21). In six PFT-GT RCTs, RRs were: MB, 0.91 (0.64-1.28, p = 0.58); MACE, 0.82 (0.56-1.19; p = 0.30): 0.62 (0.42-0.93; p = 0.02) in China, 1.08 (0.82-1.41; p = 0.53) elsewhere. In eight HTPR-Therapy RCTs, RRs were: MB, 0.71 (0.41-1.23; p = 0.22); MACE, 0.57 (0.44-0.75; p < 0.0001): 0.56 (0.43-0.74, p < 0.0001) in China, 0.58 (0.27-1.23, p = 0.16) elsewhere.

CONCLUSION

 No GT strategy affected MB. Overall, genotype-GT but not PFT-GT reduced MACE. However, genotype-GT and PFT-GT reduced MACE in China, but not elsewhere. PFT-GT performed poorly compared to HTPR-Therapy, likely due to inaccurate identification of HTPR patients by PFT.

Current Strategies to Guide the Antiplatelet Therapy in Acute Coronary Syndromes

The role of antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes is a moving target with considerable novelty in the last few years. The pathophysiological basis of the treatment depends on platelet biology and physiology, and the interplay between these aspects and clinical practice must guide the physician in determining the best therapeutic options for patients with acute coronary syndromes. In the present narrative review, we discuss the latest novelties in the antiplatelet therapy of patients with acute coronary syndromes. We start with a description of platelet biology and the role of the main platelet signal pathways involved in platelet aggregation during an acute coronary syndrome. Then, we present the latest evidence on the evaluation of platelet function, focusing on the strengths and weaknesses of each platelet's function test. We continue our review by describing the role of aspirin and P2Y12 inhibitors in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes, critically appraising the available evidence from clinical trials, and providing current international guidelines and recommendations. Finally, we describe alternative therapeutic regimens to standard dual antiplatelet therapy, in particular for patients at high bleeding risk. The aim of our review is to give a comprehensive representation of current data on antiplatelet therapy in patients with acute coronary syndromes that could be useful both for clinicians and basic science researchers to be up-to-date on this complex topic.

Clinical impact of high platelet reactivity in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant percutaneous coronary intervention on dual or triple antithrombotic therapy

High platelet reactivity (HPR) on clopidogrel is an established thrombotic risk factor after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). The introduction of more potent antiplatelet drugs has partially surpassed this issue. However, in the setting of concomitant atrial fibrillation (AF) and PCI clopidogrel is still the most adopted P2Y12 inhibitor. In the present study all consecutive patients with history of AF discharged from our cardiology ward with dual (DAT) or triple (TAT) antithrombotic therapy after a PCI from April 2018 to March 2021 were enrolled in an observational registry. For all subjects, blood serum samples were collected and tested for platelet reactivity by arachidonic acid and ADP (VerifyNow system) and genotyping of the CYP2C19*2 loss-of-function polymorphism. We recorded at 3 and 12-months follow-up: (1) major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), (2) major hemorrhagic or clinically relevant non-major bleeding and (3) all-cause mortality. A total of 147 patients were included (91, 62% on TAT). In 93.4% of patients, clopidogrel was chosen as P2Y12 inhibitor. P2Y12 dependent HPR resulted an independent predictor of MACCE both at 3 and 12 months (HR 2.93, 95% C.I. 1.03 to 7.56, p = 0.027 and HR 1.67, 95% C.I. 1.20 to 2.34, p = 0.003, respectively). At 3-months follow-up the presence of CYP2C19*2 polymorphism was independently associated with MACCE (HR 5.21, 95% C.I. 1.03 to 26.28, p = 0.045). In conclusion, in a real-world unselected population on TAT or DAT, the entity of platelet inhibition on P2Y12 inhibitor is a potent predictor of thrombotic risk, suggesting the clinical utility of this laboratory evaluation for a tailored antithrombotic therapy in this high-risk clinical scenario. The present analysis was performed in patients with AF undergoing PCI on dual or triple antithrombotic therapy. At 1 year follow-up MACCE incidence was consistent, and it was not different in different antithrombotic pattern groups. P2Y12 dependent HPR was a potent independent predictor of MACCE both at 3- and 12-months follow-up. In the first 3 months after stenting the carriage of CYP2C19*2 allele was similarly associated with MACCE. Abbreviation: DAT, dual antithrombotic therapy; HPR, high platelet reactivity; MACCE, major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events; PRU, P2Y12 reactive unit; TAT, triple antithrombotic therapy. Created with BioRender.com.