1
|
Santorsola M, Capuozzo M, Nasti G, Sabbatino F, Di Mauro A, Di Mauro G, Vanni G, Maiolino P, Correra M, Granata V, Gualillo O, Berretta M, Ottaiano A. Exploring the Spectrum of VEGF Inhibitors' Toxicities from Systemic to Intra-Vitreal Usage in Medical Practice. Cancers (Basel) 2024; 16:350. [PMID: 38254839 PMCID: PMC10813960 DOI: 10.3390/cancers16020350] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/24/2023] [Revised: 01/11/2024] [Accepted: 01/11/2024] [Indexed: 01/24/2024] Open
Abstract
The use of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor inhibitors (VEGFi) has become prevalent in the field of medicine, given the high incidence of various pathological conditions necessitating VEGF inhibition within the general population. These conditions encompass a range of advanced neoplasms, such as colorectal cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, renal cancer, ovarian cancer, and others, along with ocular diseases. The utilization of VEGFi is not without potential risks and adverse effects, requiring healthcare providers to be well-prepared for identification and management. VEGFi can be broadly categorized into two groups: antibodies or chimeric proteins that specifically target VEGF (bevacizumab, ramucirumab, aflibercept, ranibizumab, and brolucizumab) and non-selective and selective small molecules (sunitinib, sorafenib, cabozantinib, lenvatinib, regorafenib, etc.) designed to impede intracellular signaling of the VEGF receptor (RTKi, receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors). The presentation and mechanisms of adverse effects resulting from VEGFi depend primarily on this distinction and the route of drug administration (systemic or intra-vitreal). This review provides a thorough examination of the causes, recognition, management, and preventive strategies for VEGFi toxicities with the goal of offering support to oncologists in both clinical practice and the design of clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mariachiara Santorsola
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| | | | - Guglielmo Nasti
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Francesco Sabbatino
- Oncology Unit, Department of Medicine, Surgery and Dentistry, University of Salerno, 84081 Salerno, Italy;
| | - Annabella Di Mauro
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Giordana Di Mauro
- Department of Human Pathology “G. Barresi”, University of Messina, 98125 Messina, Italy;
| | - Gianluca Vanni
- Breast Unit, Department of Surgical Science, PTV Policlinico Tor Vergata University, 00133 Rome, Italy;
| | - Piera Maiolino
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Marco Correra
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| | - Oreste Gualillo
- SERGAS (Servizo Galego de Saude), NEIRID Laboratory (Neuroendocrine Interactions in Rheumatology and Inflammatory Diseases), IDIS (Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria de Santiago), Research Laboratory 9, Santiago University Clinical Hospital, 15706 Santiago de Compostela, Spain;
| | - Massimiliano Berretta
- Department of Clinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Messina, Via Consolare Valeria, 98125 Messina, Italy
| | - Alessandro Ottaiano
- Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Napoli, IRCCS “G. Pascale”, via M. Semmola, 80131 Naples, Italy; (M.S.); (G.N.); (A.D.M.); (P.M.); (M.C.); (V.G.)
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Hwang HJ, Han SA. Differential Cardiovascular Outcomes of Each Antihypertensive Drug Class in Patients With Hypertension and Breast Cancer Undergoing Doxorubicin-Containing Chemotherapy. J Breast Cancer 2023; 26:492-503. [PMID: 37704380 PMCID: PMC10625866 DOI: 10.4048/jbc.2023.26.e34] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/12/2023] [Revised: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The preemptive use of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors may reduce doxorubicin (DOX)-related cardiotoxicity. Using the national insurance claims data of Korea, this study compared cardiovascular (CV) outcomes following the use of four major antihypertensive drug classes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy. METHODS A total of 4,722 patients with hypertension and breast cancer who underwent DOX-containing chemotherapy were included. The outcomes were compared between patients who used RAS inhibitors, calcium channel blockers (CCBs), beta-blockers (BBs), and thiazide and thiazide-like diuretics (TDs). The primary outcome was a composite of incident heart failure and serious ventricular arrhythmias, including ventricular tachycardia and fibrillation, ischemic heart disease, and stroke. RESULTS In the propensity score-matched population, there were no significant differences in the primary outcome between RAS inhibitor and CCB users; however, patients with diabetes who used CCBs had a worse primary outcome than those who used RAS inhibitors (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.93; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-3.51). BB and TD users had a worse primary outcome compared with RAS inhibitor (aHR, 1.88; 95% CI, 1.30-2.71 in BB users and aHR, 2.55; 95% CI, 1.37-4.75 in TD users) or CCB (aHR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.09-2.16 in BB users and aHR, 2.08; 95% CI, 1.13-3.82 in TD users) users. CONCLUSION RAS inhibitors are preferred for the treating hypertension and improving CV outcomes in patients with hypertension and breast cancer undergoing DOX-containing chemotherapy, particularly in patients with comorbid diabetes. However, CCBs are equivalent to RAS inhibitors and are more favorable than BBs and TDs in terms of improving CV outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Hui-Jeong Hwang
- Department of Cardiology, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sang-Ah Han
- Department of Surgery, Kyung Hee University Hospital at Gangdong, Kyung Hee University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Regulska K, Michalak M, Kolenda T, Kozłowska-Masłoń J, Guglas K, Stanisz B. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors for ovarian cancer? - a new adjuvant option or a silent trap. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2023; 28:551-564. [PMID: 37795232 PMCID: PMC10547424 DOI: 10.5603/rpor.a2023.0059] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2023] [Accepted: 07/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Ovarian cancer is a huge therapeutic and financial problem for which approved treatments have already achieved their limit of efficiency. A cost-effective strategy to extend therapeutic options in this malignancy is drug repurposing aimed at overcoming chemoresistance. Here, angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (ACE-I) are worth considering. Materials and methods We searched literature for publications supporting the idea of adjuvant application of ACE-Is in ovarian malignancy. Then, we searched The Cancer Genome Atlas databases for relevant alternations of gene expression patterns. We also performed in silico structure-activity relationship evaluation for predicting ACE-Is' cytotoxicity against ovarian cancer cell lines. Finally, we reviewed the potential obstacles in ACE-Is repurposing process. Results The alternation of angiotensin receptor expression in ovarian cancer translates into poorer patient survival. This confirms the participation of the renin-angiotensin system in ovarian carcinogenesis. In observational studies, ACE-Is were shown synergize with both, platinum-based chemotherapy as well as with antiangiogenic therapy. Consistently, our in silico simulation showed that ACE-Is are probably cytotoxic against ovarian cancer cells. However, the publications on their chemopreventive properties were inconclusive. In addition, some reports correlated ACE-Is use with increased general cancer incidence. We hypothesized that this effect could be associated with mutagenic nitrosamine formation in ACE-Is' pharmaceutical formulations, as was the case with angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) and other well-established pharmaceuticals. Conclusions Available data warrant further research into repositioning ACE-Is to ovarian cancer as chemosensitizers. Prior to this, however, a special research program is needed to detect possible genotoxic contaminants of ACE-Is.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katarzyna Regulska
- Pharmacy, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznan, Poland
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Biopharmacy, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland, Collegium Pharmaceuticum, Poznan, Poland
- Research and Implementation Unit, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
| | - Marcin Michalak
- Surgical, Oncological and Endoscopic Gynaecology Department, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
| | - Tomasz Kolenda
- Research and Implementation Unit, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
| | - Joanna Kozłowska-Masłoń
- Research and Implementation Unit, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
- Postgraduate School of Molecular Medicine, Medical University of Warsaw, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Kacper Guglas
- Research and Implementation Unit, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
- Laboratory of Cancer Genetics, Greater Poland Cancer Center, Poznan, Poland
- Institute of Human Biology and Evolution, Faculty of Biology, Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznan, Poland
| | - Beata Stanisz
- Chair and Department of Pharmaceutical Chemistry, Poznan University of Medical Sciences, Poznan, Poland
| |
Collapse
|