Probable adverse interaction between oral metoprolol and verapamil

Development and Validation of a Chiral Liquid Chromatographic Assay for Enantiomeric Separation and Quantification of Verapamil in Rat Plasma: Stereoselective Pharmacokinetic Application

A novel, fast and sensitive enantioselective HPLC assay with a new core-shell isopropyl carbamate cyclofructan 6 (superficially porous particle, SPP) chiral column (LarihcShell-P, LSP) was developed and validated for the enantiomeric separation and quantification of verapamil (VER) in rat plasma. The polar organic mobile phase composed of acetonitrile/methanol/trifluoroacetic acid/triethylamine (98:2:0.05: 0.025, v/v/v/v) and a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min was applied. Fluorescence detection set at excitation/emission wavelengths 280/313 nm was used and the whole analysis process was within 3.5 min, which is 10-fold lower than the previous reported HPLC methods in the literature. Propranolol was selected as the internal standard. The S-(-)- and R-(+)-VER enantiomers with the IS were extracted from rat plasma by utilizing Waters Oasis HLB C18 solid phase extraction cartridges without interference from endogenous compounds. The developed assay was validated following the US-FDA guidelines over the concentration range of 1-450 ng/mL (r2 ≥ 0.997) for each enantiomer (plasma) and the lower limit of quantification was 1 ng/mL for both isomers. The intra- and inter-day precisions were not more than 11.6% and the recoveries of S-(-)- and R-(+)-VER at all quality control levels ranged from 92.3% to 98.2%. The developed approach was successfully applied to the stereoselective pharmacokinetic study of VER enantiomers after oral administration of 10 mg/kg racemic VER to Wistar rats. It was found that S-(-)-VER established higher Cmax and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) values than the R-(+)-enantiomer. The newly developed approach is the first chiral HPLC for the enantiomeric separation and quantification of verapamil utilizing a core-shell isopropyl carbamate cyclofructan 6 chiral column in rat plasma within 3.5 min after solid phase extraction (SPE).

Fall-Related Hospitalizations in Nursing Home Residents Co-Prescribed a Cholinesterase Inhibitor and Beta-Blocker

BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES

To examine the association between hospitalization for a fall-related injury and the co-prescription of a cholinesterase inhibitor (ChEI) among persons with dementia receiving a beta-blocker, and whether this potential drug-drug interaction is modified by frailty.

DESIGN

Nested case-control study using population-based administrative databases.

SETTING

All nursing homes in Ontario, Canada.

PARTICIPANTS

Persons with dementia aged 66 and older who received at least one beta-blocker between April 2013 and March 2018 following nursing home admission (n = 19,060).

MEASUREMENTS

Cases were persons with dementia with a hospitalization (emergency department visit or acute care admission) for a fall-related injury with concurrent beta-blocker use. Each case (n = 3,038) was matched 1:1 to a control by age (±1 year), sex, cohort entry year, frailty, and history of fall-related injuries. The association between fall-related injury and exposure to a ChEI in the 90 days prior was examined using multivariable conditional logistic regression. Secondary exposures included ChEI type, daily dose, incident versus prevalent use, and use in the prior 30 days. Subgroup analyses considered frailty, age group, sex, and history of hospitalization for fall-related injuries.

RESULTS

Exposure to a ChEI in the prior 90 days occurred among 947 (31.2%) cases and 940 (30.9%) controls. In multivariable models, no association was found between hospitalization for a fall-related injury and prior exposure to a ChEI in persons with dementia dispensed beta-blockers (adjusted odds ratio = .96, 95% confidence interval = .85-1.08). Findings were consistent across secondary exposures and subgroup analyses.

CONCLUSION

Among nursing home residents with dementia receiving beta-blockers, co-prescription of a ChEI was not associated with an increased risk of hospitalization for a fall-related injury. However, we did not assess for its association with falls not leading to hospitalization. This finding could inform clinical guidelines and shared decision making between persons with dementia, caregivers, and clinicians concerning ChEI initiation and/or discontinuation.

Analytical techniques for the determination of verapamil in biological samples and dosage forms: an overview

Verapamil (VER) is a calcium channel blocker that is widely used to treat various cardiovascular diseases and is also effective in migraine prophylaxis. As the therapeutic range of VER is very narrow and toxicity can occur in patients after oral administration, therapeutic drug monitoring is recommended to optimize pharmacotherapy. The choice of an appropriate bioanalytical method for therapeutic drug monitoring of VER in the biological samples is a very important step in achieving fast and reliable results. This review focuses on the various analytical methods reported between 1976 and 2019 for the determination of VER in different biological samples and pharmaceutical dosage forms along with their methodological limitations. This review provides an overview for pharmaceutical industry researchers, clinicians and clinical chemists.

Heart insufficiency after combination of verapamil and metoprolol: A fatal case report and literature review

The combination of verapamil or diltiazem with beta-blockers should be avoided because of potentially profound adverse effects on AV (atrioventricular) nodal conduction, heart rate, or cardiac contractility. This effect is unpredictable but may be enhanced due to CYP2D6 poor metabolizer status which could be a special vulnerability factor.

Determination of Verapamil in Exhaled Breath Condensate by Using Microextraction and Liquid Chromatography

Background:

Developing a simple analysis method for quantification of drug concentration is one of the essential issues in pharmacokinetic and therapeutic drug monitoring studies.

Objective:

A fast and reliable dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction procedure was employed for preconcentration of verapamil in exhaled breath condensate (EBC) samples and this was followed by the determination with high-performance liquid chromatography-ultraviolet detection.

Methods:

A reverse-phase high-performance liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) combined with a dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction method (DLLME) was applied for quantification of verapamil in the EBC samples. The developed method was validated according to FDA guidelines.

Results:

Under the optimum conditions, the method provided a linear range between 0.07 and 0.8 µg.mL-1 with a coefficient of determination of 0.998. The intra- and inter-day relative standard deviation and relative error values of the method were below 15%, which indicated good precision and accuracy. The proposed method was successfully applied for the analysis of verapamil in two real samples with concentrations of 0.07 and 0.09 µg.mL-1.

Conclusion:

The established HPLC-UV-DLLME method could be applied for the analysis of verapamil in human EBC samples.

A validated micellar LC method for simultaneous determination of furosemide, metoprolol and verapamil in human plasma

An accurate and precise micellar LC method coupled with UV and fluorimetric detectors was developed and validated for the simultaneous analysis of furosemide, metoprolol and verapamil in human plasma. The total analysis time was 25 min (12 min for sample preparation and 13 min for drug separation). All drugs possessed linear behavior (r > 0.999 for calibration curves) in their therapeutic concentrations. The mean drug recoveries were 101.9, 100.1 and 100.2% for furosemide, metoprolol and verapamil, respectively. The accuracies (relative error %) were less than 15% for all drugs. Intra- and inter-day precisions (RSD%) were less than 15% and the stability data were acceptable according to the US FDA guideline for bioanalytical method validation.

Calcium antagonists. Drug interactions of clinical significance

The interaction of calcium antagonists, including the dihydropyridine calcium antagonists (e.g. nifedipine), verapamil and diltiazem, with drugs from other classes has major clinical ramifications as the use of drug combinations increases in frequency. Combinations are used in the treatment of disorders ranging from hypertension to cardiac rhythm disturbances, angina pectoris and peripheral vasospastic disease. In this era of organ transplantation, drugs like cyclosporin are coming into potential conflict with an ever-growing list of drugs. Drug combinations used as part of long term therapies are also making their appearance in toxic drug reactions, including antituberculous and anticonvulsant agents. Bronchodilators and H2-blockers also fall into this category of potential culprits of combined drug toxicity, and the interactions of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers and antiarrhythmic agents are also becoming a matter of concern.

Calcium channel antagonism and beta blockade in combination--a therapeutic alternative in cardiovascular disorders. A review

Calcium-channel antagonists and beta-adrenergic blocking agents have become important modalities in the cardiovascular therapeutic armamentarium. These drugs are often administered as monotherapy to a wide range of cardiological patients with angina pectoris, hypertension, arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, and other diseases. Since within each class these drugs exhibit pharmacologic differences, it follows that their effectiveness varies in different disease states and that they exhibit a wide variety of side effects. In an attempt to optimize therapy, the individual drugs from these two classes can be combined; and the efficaciousness and side-effect profile of various combinations between calcium-channel antagonists and beta blockers are discussed in this review. Recommendations as to which patients may benefit from a combination and as to which patients may be harmed by the combination therapy will be made. Very few studies have compared the safety and efficacy of a single agent with the combination and with placebo in a controlled randomized fashion. To determine which therapy is superior and to determine which combination one should recommend under what circumstances, such placebo-controlled, randomized trials are a necessity, and will hopefully be performed although the complexity is enormous.

The effects of oral nitrendipine and propranolol, alone and in combination, on hypertensive patients with special reference to AV conduction

The effects of oral nitrendipine and oral propranolol, alone and in combination, on AV conduction have been examined in 11 patients with essential hypertension in whom arterial pressure was not adequately controlled despite treatment with thiazide diuretics. The study was performed double-blind. After a drug free period of 1 week, the patients received two 7 day courses of drug therapy after initial control measurements. Five of the eleven patients were randomised to receive nitrendipine 20 mg daily, the other six patients received propranolol (Inderal LA 160 mg daily) for the first week of therapy. During week 2, 10 patients received combined therapy. In the 10 patients who completed the study, oral nitrendipine, given either alone or in combination with oral propranolol, had no significant effect on resting PR, QRS, QT intervals nor on AV conduction as assessed by ambulatory electrocardiography. Propranolol did not affect the resting PR interval but significantly increased PR intervals on the ambulatory ECG recordings during single and combined therapy. However the maximum PR intervals remained within normal limits.