Systemic activity of inhaled and swallowed beclomethasone dipropionate and the effect of different inhaler devices

Clinical Considerations in the Use of Inhalation Delivery Devices

Medications delivered through oral inhalation represent the cornerstone of pharmacotherapy for asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary diseases. Several options exist as methods of delivering aerosols to the lung, including metered-dose inhalers, metered-dose inhalers attached to spacers or valved holding chambers, dry powder inhalers, and nebulizers. Delivery of aerosols to the lung is affected by numerous factors including characteristics of aerosol particles, patients’ ventilatory patterns, and physical condition of the lung. It has become increasingly clear that the device used to deliver the medication is an important factor in the extent of deposition and the ultimate therapeutic effect. Further, the same therapeutic agent may exhibit differing effects depending on which delivery device is used. Each inhalation device has specific instructions for use, and the techniques for use vary significantly among the available products. In each case, patients should be instructed and observed to ensure that they have the proper technique of use to achieve an optimal effect.

Cohort study of corticosteroid use and risk of hospital admission for diverticular disease

BACKGROUND

Medication has been suggested as a potential risk factor for diverticular disease. The objective of this study was to investigate the association between the intake of corticosteroids, indometacin or aspirin and diverticular disease.

METHOD

This was a prospective population-based cohort study of middle-aged women in the Swedish Mammography Cohort. Use of corticosteroids (oral or inhaled), indometacin or aspirin in 1997 was determined from questionnaires. Cases of diverticular disease were identified from the Swedish national registers until the end of 2010. The relative risk (RR) of diverticular disease requiring hospital admission according to the use of medication was estimated using Cox proportional hazards models, adjusted for age, body mass index, physical activity, fibre intake, diabetes, hypertension, alcohol, smoking and education.

RESULTS

A total of 36 586 middle-aged women in the Swedish Mammography Cohort were included, of whom 674 (1.8 per cent) were hospitalized with diverticular disease at least once. Some 7.2 per cent of women reported intake of oral corticosteroids and 8.5 per cent use of inhaled corticosteroids. In multivariable analysis, women who reported oral corticosteroid intake had a 37 per cent (RR 1.37, 95 per cent c.i. 1.06 to 1.78; P = 0.012) increased risk of diverticular disease compared with those who reported no intake at all. Use of inhaled corticosteroids was associated with an even more pronounced increase in risk of 71 per cent (RR 1.71, 1.36 to 2.14; P < 0.001). There was a significant dose-response relationship, with the risk increasing with longer duration of inhaled corticosteroids (P for trend < 0.001). Use of indometacin (2.5 per cent of women) or aspirin (44.2 per cent) did not influence the risk.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant relationship between corticosteroids (especially inhaled) and diverticular disease requiring hospital admission.

Risk of adverse gastrointestinal events from inhaled corticosteroids

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine whether patients prescribed inhaled corticosteroids are at risk for adverse gastrointestinal effects.

DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

Urban health center with an academic affiliation.

PATIENTS

A total of 19,443 adults (mean age 31.8 yrs) with airways disease, defined as a diagnosis of asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and who were prescribed both an inhaled corticosteroid and albuterol (7156 patients) or inhaled albuterol alone (12,287 patients) between November 1977 and February 2002.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

The frequency of adverse gastrointestinal events in the patients who used inhaled corticosteroids and albuterol was compared with that in the patients who used albuterol alone. Adverse gastrointestinal outcomes included events such as gastritis, ulcers, and bleeding. Cox proportional hazards models were used to determine the risk of adverse events, controlling for possible confounders such as alcohol use or nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug use. Adverse gastrointestinal events were observed in 461 (6.4%) patients using inhaled corticosteroids and albuterol and in 302 (2.5%) patients using only albuterol. After controlling for potential confounders, patients who used inhaled corticosteroids and albuterol had an increased risk for adverse gastrointestinal events compared with patients who used only inhaled albuterol (hazard ratio [HR] 1.26, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02-1.56). A prescription for a spacer device reduced this risk among patients using an inhaled corticosteroid (HR 0.26, 95% CI 0.20-0.34).

CONCLUSION

Patients using inhaled corticosteroids appear to have a slight risk for adverse gastrointestinal events that is mitigated in patients who used a spacer device.

Assessment of use of spacer devices for inhaled drug delivery to asthmatic children

In the treatment of bronchial asthma, inhaled therapy with both bronchodilators and corticosteroids represents the basis for acute and long-term management. Drug therapy in asthma is predominantly by pressurized metered dose inhalers. The impact of treatment on the disease morbidity and mortality depends to a large extent on appropriate delivery of drug to the lungs by means of a spacer device. We performed an audit on spacer use in 200 children and showed that 99% owned a spacer, 2% owned but did not use their spacer, 11% were using a spacer which was not ideal for their age, 17% had a poor technique, and 24% were not following the recommendations given on previous visits to wash the spacer only with a soapy solution. Although physicians frequently associate poor control of asthma with inadequate doses of drugs, many factors must be considered before increasing the dose of inhaled medications to children. We should all ensure that the drugs we prescribe are delivered in the best possible manner, thus improving control of asthma, reducing side effects and offering a more cost-effective therapy.

Asthma medications and how to use them

Aerosolized medications for the treatment of asthma are now considered to be the delivery system of choice. Despite their popularity, traditional pressurized metered dose inhalers are associated with a variety of drawbacks. This article reviews the aerosolized drug delivery systems currently available, along with their advantages and disadvantages. Patient technique in the use of these agents is addressed. Special considerations in children and the elderly are discussed, with specific recommendations tailored to these age groups, followed by practical suggestions for general inhaler use.