An aggressive policy of bilateral saphenous vein harvest for infragenicular revascularisation in the era of multidrug resistant bacteria

Long-Term Results of Femorotibial Polytetrafluoroethylene Bypass with a Distal Vein Cuff for Critical Limb Ischemia

Objective: Although autologous veins are the first-choice conduit for femorotibial artery bypass, if there are no appropriate autologous veins, we perform femorotibial artery bypass using polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE) with a distal vein cuff for patients with critical limb ischemia (CLI). This study examined the long-term outcomes of femorotibial artery bypass using PTFE with a Miller's cuff. Materials and Methods: Using prospectively collected data for 444 distal bypasses, a retrospective analysis was conducted for 32 femorotibial PTFE bypasses with a Miller's cuff (PTFE-Miller's cuff) performed for patients with CLI from April 1994 to December 2016. Results: Primary and secondary patency rates of PTFE-Miller's cuff at 3 years were 35.8% and 51.2%, respectively. Limb salvage rate of PTFE-Miller's cuff at 3 years was 71.0%. Conclusion: Although the patency rate was low and failed to yield satisfactory results, the limb salvage rate remained relatively high. Femorotibial PTFE bypass with a Miller's cuff was a useful technique of limb salvage for patients with CLI in whom an appropriate autologous vein could not be used.

Are femorodistal bypass grafts for acute limb ischemia worthwhile?

Background: It has been shown that autogenous veins are associated with the best limb salvage rates for femorodistal bypass surgery. However, in emergency settings, when an autogenous vein is unavailable, use of synthetic graft material or amputation is a critical decision to make. Objective: To assess the appropriateness of femorodistal bypass grafts for acute limb ischemia in emergency settings. Methods: Patients who underwent emergent bypass and elective femorodistal bypass surgery between 1996 and 2006 were reviewed retrospectively in a single center. Results: There were 147 patients of which 84 had elective and 63 had emergent bypass. The graft patency rates for elective admissions were 44 and 25% vs. 25 and 23% for admissions for acute femorodistal graft surgery at 2 and 4 years, respectively (p < 0.004). Admissions for acute ischemia who were treated with prosthetic grafts had a primary patency of 24 vs. 27% for vein grafts at 2 years and 24 vs. 23% at 4 years (p = 0.33). In the acute femorodistal grafts group, primary patency at 2 years for vein and prosthetic grafts was 27 and 24% as compared to 42 and 32% for electives. These values for cumulative limb salvage rates for elective bypasses were 73 and 63% as compared to 52% at both time points in the acute femorodistal graft group (p < 0.004). In emergency settings, the limb salvage rate for acute femorodistal bypass with prosthetic grafts was 38%, and for vein grafts it was 62% at both time points (p = 0.08). Conclusion: The long term limb salvage rate of 38% suggests that emergent femorodistal revascularization is worthwhile.

An Audit Demonstrating a Reduction in MRSA Infection in a Specialised Vascular Unit Resulting from a Change in Infection Control Protocol

INTRODUCTION

In 2003, 18% of all admissions to our vascular ward were colonised by MRSA, with an MRSA infection rate of 10.6%. Standard practice was to segregate patients with proven MRSA from the rest of the patient pool. After a prospective audit, regression analysis was used to identify factors that could stratify patients into high and low risk for MRSA colonisation. A change in isolation policy was introduced that segregated patients according to their risk of MRSA acquisition, and isolated all patients undergoing prosthetic vascular reconstruction. Antibiotic policy was also altered. This audit reports the impact of these changes on MRSA colonisation and infection rates.

METHODS

The MRSA status of patients during 777 in-patient episodes was prospectively recorded during three time spans; period 1 (November 2002-April 2003) before the change in isolation and antibiotic policy and, periods 2 (August-December 2003) and 3 (October 2004-January 2005) after the change in policy.

RESULTS

Hospital acquired MRSA colonisation was reduced from 10.6% in period 1, to 1.1 and 1.4% in periods 2 and 3, respectively (p<0.001). Similarly, MRSA infection rates fell from 10.6 to 2.9 and 0.9% over the same time frame (p<0.001). The most dramatic changes in MRSA infection rates occurred in patients undergoing aneurysm repair (MRSA infection 30.1% in period 1 vs. 3.9 and 2.9% in periods 2 and 3) and lower limb revascularization (31 vs. 0 vs. 4.2%). Stepwise regression analysis revealed that the system of isolation was a significant factor reducing MRSA infection and colonisation rates (p<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

These data demonstrate that a change in infection control policy can significantly reduce MRSA infection in a vascular unit.