Wong CE, Chen PW, Hsu HJ, Cheng SY, Fan CC, Chen YC, Chiu YP, Lee JS, Liang SF. Collaborative Human-Computer Vision Operative Video Analysis Algorithm for Analyzing Surgical Fluency and Surgical Interruptions in Endonasal Endoscopic Pituitary Surgery: Cohort Study.
J Med Internet Res 2024;
26:e56127. [PMID:
38963694 PMCID:
PMC11258519 DOI:
10.2196/56127]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2024] [Revised: 03/27/2024] [Accepted: 05/24/2024] [Indexed: 07/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND
The endonasal endoscopic approach (EEA) is effective for pituitary adenoma resection. However, manual review of operative videos is time-consuming. The application of a computer vision (CV) algorithm could potentially reduce the time required for operative video review and facilitate the training of surgeons to overcome the learning curve of EEA.
OBJECTIVE
This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a CV-based video analysis system, based on OpenCV algorithm, to detect surgical interruptions and analyze surgical fluency in EEA. The accuracy of the CV-based video analysis was investigated, and the time required for operative video review using CV-based analysis was compared to that of manual review.
METHODS
The dominant color of each frame in the EEA video was determined using OpenCV. We developed an algorithm to identify events of surgical interruption if the alterations in the dominant color pixels reached certain thresholds. The thresholds were determined by training the current algorithm using EEA videos. The accuracy of the CV analysis was determined by manual review, and the time spent was reported.
RESULTS
A total of 46 EEA operative videos were analyzed, with 93.6%, 95.1%, and 93.3% accuracies in the training, test 1, and test 2 data sets, respectively. Compared with manual review, CV-based analysis reduced the time required for operative video review by 86% (manual review: 166.8 and CV analysis: 22.6 minutes; P<.001). The application of a human-computer collaborative strategy increased the overall accuracy to 98.5%, with a 74% reduction in the review time (manual review: 166.8 and human-CV collaboration: 43.4 minutes; P<.001). Analysis of the different surgical phases showed that the sellar phase had the lowest frequency (nasal phase: 14.9, sphenoidal phase: 15.9, and sellar phase: 4.9 interruptions/10 minutes; P<.001) and duration (nasal phase: 67.4, sphenoidal phase: 77.9, and sellar phase: 31.1 seconds/10 minutes; P<.001) of surgical interruptions. A comparison of the early and late EEA videos showed that increased surgical experience was associated with a decreased number (early: 4.9 and late: 2.9 interruptions/10 minutes; P=.03) and duration (early: 41.1 and late: 19.8 seconds/10 minutes; P=.02) of surgical interruptions during the sellar phase.
CONCLUSIONS
CV-based analysis had a 93% to 98% accuracy in detecting the number, frequency, and duration of surgical interruptions occurring during EEA. Moreover, CV-based analysis reduced the time required to analyze the surgical fluency in EEA videos compared to manual review. The application of CV can facilitate the training of surgeons to overcome the learning curve of endoscopic skull base surgery.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06156020; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT06156020.
Collapse