The wrong end of the telescope: neuromuscular mimics of movement disorders (and vice versa)

Movement disorders and neuropathies: overlaps and mimics in clinical practice

Movement disorders as well as peripheral neuropathies are extremely frequent in the general population; therefore, it is not uncommon to encounter patients with both these conditions. Often, the coexistence is coincidental, due to the high incidence of common causes of peripheral neuropathy, such as diabetes and other age-related disorders, as well as of Parkinson disease (PD), which has a typical late onset. Nonetheless, there is broad evidence that PD patients may commonly develop a sensory and/or autonomic polyneuropathy, triggered by intrinsic and/or extrinsic mechanisms. Similarly, some peripheral neuropathies may develop some movement disorders in the long run, such as tremor, and rarely dystonia and myoclonus, suggesting that central mechanisms may ensue in the pathogenesis of these diseases. Although rare, several acquired or hereditary causes may be responsible for the combination of movement and peripheral nerve disorders as a unique entity, some of which are potentially treatable, including paraneoplastic, autoimmune and nutritional aetiologies. Finally, genetic causes should be pursued in case of positive family history, young onset or multisystemic involvement, and examined for neuroacanthocytosis, spinocerebellar ataxias, mitochondrial disorders and less common causes of adult-onset cerebellar ataxias and spastic paraparesis. Deep phenotyping in terms of neurological and general examination, as well as laboratory tests, neuroimaging, neurophysiology, and next-generation genetic analysis, may guide the clinician toward the correct diagnosis and management.

Data-Driven Prediction of Freezing of Gait Events From Stepping Data

Freezing of gait (FoG) is typically a symptom of advanced Parkinson's disease (PD) that negatively influences the quality of life and is often resistant to pharmacological interventions. Novel treatment options that make use of auditory or sensory cues might be optimized by prediction of freezing events. These predictions might help to trigger external sensory cues—shown to improve walking performance—when behavior is changed in a manner indicative of an impending freeze (i.e., when the user needs it the most), rather than delivering cue information continuously. A data-driven approach is proposed for predicting freezing events using Random Forrest (RF), Neural Network (NN), and Naive Bayes (NB) classifiers. Vertical forces, sampled at 100 Hz from a force platform were collected from 9 PD subjects as they stepped in place until they at least had one freezing episode or for 90 s. The F1 scores of RF/NN/NB algorithms were computed for different IL (input to the machine learning algorithm), and GL (how early the freezing event is predicted). A significant negative correlation between the F1 scores and GL, highlighting the difficulty of early detection is found. The IL that maximized the F1 score is approximately equal to 1.13 s. This indicates that the physiological (and therefore neurological) changes leading to freezing take effect at-least one step before the freezing incident. Our algorithm has the potential to support the development of devices to detect and then potentially prevent freezing events in people with Parkinson's which might occur if left uncorrected.

Guidelines on clinical presentation and management of nondystrophic myotonias

The nondystrophic myotonias are rare muscle hyperexcitability disorders caused by gain-of-function mutations in the SCN4A gene or loss-of-function mutations in the CLCN1 gene. Clinically, they are characterized by myotonia, defined as delayed muscle relaxation after voluntary contraction, which leads to symptoms of muscle stiffness, pain, fatigue, and weakness. Diagnosis is based on history and examination findings, the presence of electrical myotonia on electromyography, and genetic confirmation. In the absence of genetic confirmation, the diagnosis is supported by detailed electrophysiological testing, exclusion of other related disorders, and analysis of a variant of uncertain significance if present. Symptomatic treatment with a sodium channel blocker, such as mexiletine, is usually the first step in management, as well as educating patients about potential anesthetic complications.

Pitfalls in the diagnosis of myositis

The idiopathic inflammatory myopathies are a group of heterogeneous autoimmune connective tissue diseases. Despite increase in the understanding of these conditions, securing a timely diagnosis and accurate subtype classification remains difficult in some cases. This has important implications for patients, where delayed or inappropriate treatments can have a negative effect on outcomes. Several conditions can mimic myositis, including metabolic myopathies, genetic myopathies and neurological disease. In addition, the heterogeneity within the idiopathic inflammatory myopathy spectrum can also create diagnostic confusion, referred to here as 'myositis chameleons'. This includes inclusion body myositis, immune-mediated necrotizing myopathy, hypomyopathic variants of anti-synthetase syndrome and overlap disease. We highlight the importance of a thorough diagnostic workup, refer to updated classification criteria and emphasize the importance of myositis autoantibody testing. Where diagnostic doubt exists, the involvement of a specialist centre and a multidisciplinary team is vital.

The Waiting Room: neurological observations made outside the movement disorder specialist's consulting office

The neurological examination should always begin before the patient enters the doctor's office. Movement disorders in particular lend themselves to a spot diagnosis. In today's busy buzzing world, it seems wasteful not to make use of the various diagnostic clues that can be picked up readily while the patient is still in the waiting room. We present several illustrative examples, drawn from the literature and from our own experience. These are divided according to the different waiting room 'stages': the patient sitting in the waiting room, the response on being summoned to enter the consulting room-including rising from the chair, exchanging initial pleasantries and the way of walking. We also discuss the importance of paying attention to the patient's behaviour, clothing, posture, breathing patterns, facial expression and major gait abnormalities.

Pseudodystonia: A new perspective on an old phenomenon

Pseudodystonia represents a wide range of conditions that mimic dystonia, including disorders of the peripheral nervous system, spinal cord, brainstem, thalamus, cortex and non-neurological conditions such as musculoskeletal diseases. Here, we propose a definition of pseudodystonia and suggest a classification based on underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. We describe phenomenology of different forms of pseudodystonia and point to distinctions between dystonia and pseudodystonia as well as challenging issues that may arise in clinical practice. The term pseudodystonia can be used to describe abnormal postures, repetitive movements or both, in which results of clinical, imaging, laboratory or electrophysiological investigations provide definite explanation of symptoms which is not compatible with dystonia. Pseudodystonia can be classified into non-neurological disorders of the musculoskeletal system, disorders of sensory pathways, disorders of motor pathways and compensatory postures in other neurological diseases. Presence of associated neurological findings in the affected body part is the key towards diagnosis of pseudodystonia. Additional supporting features are the presence of fixed postures, the absence of sensory trick, acute mode of onset and severe pain. Worsening on eye closure, traditionally considered typical for pseudodystonia, is not always present and can also appear in dystonia. It is challenging to separate dystonia and pseudodystonia in patients with thalamic lesions or corticobasal syndrome, where abnormal postures coexist with sensory loss. Many cases of pseudodystonia are treatable. Therefore, it is essential to consider pseudodystonia in a differential diagnosis of abnormal postures until a detailed neurological examination rules it out.

Open source modular ptosis crutch for the treatment of myasthenia gravis

INTRODUCTION

Pharmacologic treatment of Myasthenia Gravis presents challenges due to poor tolerability in some patients. Conventional ptosis crutches have limitations such as interference with blinking which causes ocular surface drying, and frequent irritation of the eyes. To address this problem, a modular and adjustable ptosis crutch for elevating the upper eyelid in Myasthenia Gravis patients has been proposed as a non-surgical and low-cost solution.

AREAS COVERED

This paper reviews the literature on the challenges in the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis globally and focuses on a modular and adjustable ptosis crutch that has been developed by the Medical Device Laboratory at the University of Cape Town.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The new medical device has potential as a simple, effective and unobtrusive solution to elevate the drooping upper eyelid(s) above the visual axis without the need for medication and surgery. Access to the technology is provided through an open source platform which makes it available globally. Open access provides opportunities for further open innovation to address the current limitations of the device, ultimately for the benefit not only of people suffering from Myasthenia Gravis but also of those with ptosis from other aetiologies.