1
|
Hobson E, McDermott C. Advances in symptom management and in monitoring disease progression in motor neuron disease. INTERNATIONAL REVIEW OF NEUROBIOLOGY 2024; 176:119-169. [PMID: 38802174 DOI: 10.1016/bs.irn.2024.04.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/29/2024]
Abstract
The aim of supportive management of motor neuron disease is to improve survival, promote good quality of life and patient independence and autonomy whilst preparing for future progression and the end of life. Multidisciplinary specialist care aims to address the multifaceted and interacting biopsychosocial problems associated with motor neuron disease that leads to proven benefits in both survival and quality of life. This chapter will explore principles, structure and details of treatment options, and make recommendations for practice and for future research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Esther Hobson
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom
| | - Christopher McDermott
- Sheffield Institute for Translational Neuroscience, Division of Neuroscience, School of Medicine and Population Health, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Fowler WC, Koenig HG. Should Physician-Assisted Suicide or Euthanasia be Legalized in the United States? A Medically Informed Perspective. JOURNAL OF RELIGION AND HEALTH 2024; 63:1058-1074. [PMID: 37938413 DOI: 10.1007/s10943-023-01939-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/09/2023]
Abstract
There is a pressing debate in the United States concerning the implied physicians' obligation to do no harm and the status of legalizing physician-assisted suicide (PAS). Key issues that underpin the debate are important to consider. These include: (1) foundational medical beginnings; (2) euthanasia's historical and legal background context; and (3) the key arguments held by those for and against legalization of PAS. This paper reviews the major claims made by proponents for the legalization of PAS and the associated complexities and concerns that help underscore the importance of conscience freedoms. Relief of suffering, respect for patient autonomy, and public policy arguments are discussed in these contexts. We argue here that the emphasis by healthcare providers should be on high quality and compassionate care for those at the end of life's journey who are questioning whether to prematurely end their lives. If medicine loses its chief focus on the quality of caring-even when a cure is not possible-it betrays its objective and purpose. In this backdrop, legalization of PAS harms not only healthcare professionals, but also the medical profession's mission itself. Medicine's foundation is grounded in the concept of never intentionally to inflict harm. Inflicting death by any means is not professional or proper, and is not trustworthy medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- W Craig Fowler
- Campbell University School of Osteopathic Medicine, Lillington, NC, USA
- University of North Carolina School of Medicine, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Harold G Koenig
- Department of Psychiatry, Duke University Medical Center, Box 3400, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
- Department of Medicine, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia.
- Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, People's Republic of China.
- Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van Eenennaam RM, Kruithof W, Beelen A, Bakker LA, van Eijk RPA, Maessen M, Baardman JF, Visser-Meily JMA, Veldink JH, van den Berg LH. Frequency of euthanasia, factors associated with end-of-life practices, and quality of end-of-life care in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in the Netherlands: a population-based cohort study. Lancet Neurol 2023; 22:591-601. [PMID: 37353279 DOI: 10.1016/s1474-4422(23)00155-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2023] [Revised: 04/12/2023] [Accepted: 04/13/2023] [Indexed: 06/25/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a progressive and lethal neurodegenerative disease that is at the forefront of debates on regulation of assisted dying. Since 2002, when euthanasia was legally regulated in the Netherlands, the frequency of this end-of-life practice has increased substantially from 1·7% of all deaths in 1990 and 2005 to 4·5% in 2015. We aimed to investigate whether the frequency of euthanasia in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis had similarly increased since 2002, and to assess the factors associated with end-of-life practices and the quality of end-of-life care in patients with this disease. METHODS Using data from the Netherlands ALS registry, we did a population-based cohort study of clinicians and informal caregivers of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis to assess factors associated with end-of-life decision making and the quality of end-of-life care. We included individuals who were diagnosed with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis according to the revised El-Escorial criteria, and who died between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2016. We calculated the frequency of euthanasia in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from reports made to euthanasia review committees (ERCs) between 2012 and 2020. Results were compared with clinic-based survey studies conducted in 1994-2005. End-of-life practices were end-of-life decisions by a clinician when hastening of death was considered as the potential, probable, or definite effect comprising euthanasia, physician-assisted suicide, ending of life without explicit request, forgoing life-prolonging treatment, and intensified alleviation of symptoms. FINDINGS Between Jan 1, 2012, and Dec 31, 2020, 4130 reports of death from amyotrophic lateral sclerosis were made to ERCs, of which 1014 were from euthanasia or physician-assisted suicide (mean frequency 25% [SD 3] per year). Sex and gender data were unavailable from the ERC registry. Of 884 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who died between Jan 1, 2014, and Dec 31, 2016, their treating clinician was identified for 731 and a caregiver was identified for 741, of whom 356 (49%) and 450 (61%), respectively, agreed to participate in the population-based survey study. According to clinicians, end-of-life practices were chosen by 280 (79%) of 356 patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who died. The frequency of euthanasia in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in 2014-16 (141 [40%] of 356 deaths in patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis) was higher than in 1994-98 (35 [17%] of 203) and 2000-05 (33 [16%] of 209). Median survival of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis from diagnosis was 15·9 months (95% CI 12·6-17·6) for those who chose euthanasia and 16·1 months (13·4-19·1) for those who did not choose euthanasia (hazard ratio 1·07, 95% CI 0·85-1·34; p=0·58). According to caregivers, compared with other end-of-life practices, patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis choosing euthanasia commonly reported reasons to hasten death as no chance of improvement (53 [56%] of 94 patients who chose euthanasia vs 28 [39%] of 72 patients who chose other end-of-life practices), loss of dignity (47 [50%] vs 15 [21%]), dependency (34 [36%] vs five [7%]), and fatigue or extreme weakness (41 [44%] vs 14 [20%]). According to caregivers, people with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis-whether they chose euthanasia or did not-were satisfied with the general quality (83 [93%] of 89 patients who chose euthanasia vs 73 [86%] of 85 patients who did not) and availability (85 [97%] of 88 vs 81 [91%] of 90) of end-of-life care. INTERPRETATION The proportion of patients with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis who chose euthanasia in the Netherlands has increased since 2002. The choice of euthanasia was not associated with disease or patient characteristics, depression or hopelessness, or the availability or quality of end-of-life care. The choice of euthanasia had no effect on overall survival. Future studies could focus on the effect of discussing end-of-life options on quality of life as part of multidisciplinary care throughout the course of the disease, to reduce feelings of loss of autonomy and dignity in patients living with amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. FUNDING Netherlands ALS Foundation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Remko M van Eenennaam
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Willeke Kruithof
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Anita Beelen
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leonhard A Bakker
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Ruben P A van Eijk
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Biostatistics & Research Support, Julius Centre for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Maud Maessen
- University Center for Palliative Care, Inselspital University Hospital Bern, and Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland
| | - Joost F Baardman
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Johanna M A Visser-Meily
- Department of Rehabilitation, Physical Therapy Science and Sports, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; Centre of Excellence for Rehabilitation Medicine, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands; De Hoogstraat Rehabilitation, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Jan H Veldink
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands
| | - Leonard H van den Berg
- Department of Neurology, UMC Utrecht Brain Centre, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glenny L, Nyatanga B, Regnard C, Bisset M, Damaso S, Davis C, Edwards F, Fallon M, George R, Pollock J, Proffitt A, Robinson V, Spiller J, Thavaraj A, Twycross A, Twycross R, Wright G. Assisted dying. Int J Palliat Nurs 2022; 28:55-58. [PMID: 35446671 DOI: 10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.2.55] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Affiliation(s)
| | - Brian Nyatanga
- Consultant Editor, IJPN; Senior lecturer, University of Worcester
| | - Claud Regnard
- Honorary Consultant in Palliative Care Medicine, St Oswald's Hospice, Newcastle upon Tyne
| | | | - Sergio Damaso
- Clinical Nurse Specialist and Visiting Lecturer in Palliative Care
| | - Carol Davis
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine and Clinical Lead for End-of-Life care, University Hospital Southampton
| | | | - Marie Fallon
- Professor of Palliative Medicine, University of Edinburgh
| | - Rob George
- Professor of Palliative Care, Kings College London; Consultant in Palliative Care, Guys, and St Thomas's Foundation Trust; Independent Clinical and Medicolegal Expert
| | - Jennie Pollock
- Associate Head of Public Policy at the Christian Medical Fellowship
| | - Amy Proffitt
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine; Chair of the Association for Palliative Medicine, London
| | - Vicky Robinson
- Retired Consultant Nurse, Palliative and End-of-Life Care
| | - Juliet Spiller
- Consultant in Palliative Medicine, Marie Curie Hospice, Edinburgh
| | - Angela Thavaraj
- Palliative Care Clinical Nurse Specialist, University Hospital Lewisham, London
| | - Alison Twycross
- Senior Lecturer in Children and Young People's Nursing, The Open University; Editor-in-Chief, Evidence Based Nursing
| | - Robert Twycross
- Emeritus Clinical Reader in Palliative Medicine, Oxford University
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Rajkumar RP. Physician-Assisted Suicide in Dementia: Paradoxes, Pitfalls and the Need for Prudence. FRONTIERS IN SOCIOLOGY 2021; 6:815233. [PMID: 35004941 PMCID: PMC8727695 DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2021.815233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2021] [Accepted: 12/07/2021] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
There has been an increasing drive towards the legalization of physician-assisted suicide (PAS) in patients with dementia, particularly in patients with advanced disease and severe cognitive impairment. Advocacy for this position is often based on utilitarian philosophical principles, on appeals to the quality of life of the patient and their caregiver(s), or on economic constraints faced by caregivers as well as healthcare systems. In this paper, two lines of evidence against this position are presented. First, data on attitudes towards euthanasia for twenty-eight countries, obtained from the World Values Survey, is analyzed. An examination of this data shows that, paradoxically, positive attitudes towards this procedure are found in more economically advanced countries, and are strongly associated with specific cultural factors. Second, the literature on existing attitudes towards PAS in cases of dementia, along with ethical arguments for and against the practice, is reviewed and specific hazards for patients, caregivers and healthcare professionals are identified. On the basis of these findings, the author suggests that the practice of PAS in dementia is not one that can be widely or safely endorsed, on both cultural and ethical grounds. Instead, the medical field should work in collaboration with governmental, social welfare and patient advocacy services to ensure optimal physical, emotional and financial support to this group of patients and their caregivers.
Collapse
|