Analgesic efficacy and impact of caudal block on surgical complications of hypospadias repair: a systematic review and meta-analysis

The effect of combined pudendal nerve and spermatic cord block or caudal epidural block on postoperative analgesia after posterior urethroplasty: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

Postoperative pain management remains a significant challenge for patients undergoing posterior urethroplasty (PU). In a previous study, we proposed a novel technique of combined pudendal nerve (PN) and spermatic cord (SC) block to manage pain after PU. The present trial was conducted to test the hypothesis that this technique is effective for pain control after PU and provides longer-lasting analgesia than caudal epidural block (CB).

METHODS

Sixty patients undergoing PU were randomized into two groups: Group NB received combined PN and SC block, and Group CB received CB. General anesthesia with a laryngeal mask was performed. The primary outcome was the postoperative analgesic duration, and the secondary outcomes included the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) scores for pain and the number of patients with different motor scores of the lower limb at 3, 6, 12, and 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Two patients in Group CB were withdrawn due to block failure. The postoperative analgesic duration was statistically longer in Group NB compared with Group CB (mean difference [95% confidence interval], 115.78 min [17.80, 213.75]; P = 0.021). The NRS scores for pain at 12 and 24 h after surgery were statistically lower in Group NB compared with Group CB. Group NB had statistically more patients with motor score 0 at 3 h postoperatively than Group CB.

CONCLUSIONS

PN combined with SC block is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia in PU. This technique can achieve a longer duration of analgesia and lower pain scores, especially 12 h after surgery, than a CB.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

This study was registered in the Chinese Clinical Trial Register (registration no. ChiCTR2100042971, registration date on 2/2/2021).

Pediatric regional anesthesia and acute pain management: State of the art

Pediatric regional anesthesia has been in existence for over 125 years, but significant progress and widespread use has occurred in the last few decades, with the increasing availability of ultrasound guidance. Evidence supporting the safety of regional anesthesia when performed under general anesthesia has also allowed the field to flourish. Newer techniques allow for more precise nerve blockade and in general this has resulted in more peripheral blocks replacing central blocks, such as caudal epidurals and spinal anesthesia. Current controversial topics in the field include the method of obtaining loss of resistance when placing epidural catheters, the role of regional anesthesia in compartment syndrome and post-hypospadias repair complications, and utility of test doses.

Efficacy of adjuvant dexmedetomidine on penile block for pediatric hypospadias repair

INTRODUCTION

The management of postoperative pain, particularly in younger children, presents a challenge due to their limited ability to articulate the intensity of pain, lower pain threshold, and restricted availability of approved analgesics for pediatric use. Peripheral nerve blocks may be favored over neuraxial blocks because they allow quicker mobilization after surgery.

OBJECTIVE

The present study aims to investigate the potential impact of adding dexmedetomidine to a local anesthetic (bupivacaine) on the analgesic efficacy in dorsal penile nerve block in hypospadias repair surgery.

METHOD

In this prospective double-blinded clinical trial, 50 children aged between 6 months and 6 years old undergoing hypospadias repair surgery participated. Analgesia was administered through a dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB) at the end of surgery. Participants were divided into two groups; one received bupivacaine alone, and the other received dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine in DPNB. Pain and sedation levels were assessed with FLACC score and MOAA/S score, respectively, at 0,1,2 and 4 h after surgery. Vital signs and adverse effects were also recorded, including hemodynamic changes, nausea, and vomiting.

RESULT

There was no statistically significant difference in demographic variables. As illustrated in Figure, the median of FLACC score in group BD was significantly lower compared to group B at every measured time point. MOAA/S score was significantly lower in group BD than in group B (p < 0.001), indicating a higher sedation level. None of the participants in either group experienced any adverse effect except for vomiting, which was not statistically significant (8 % in group B vs. 4 % in group BD, p > 0.999).

DISCUSSION

Several studies have documented the supplementary analgesic properties of dexmedetomidine when used in conjunction with local anesthetic during various surgical procedures and nerve blocks. The present study provides evidence for the additional analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine and bupivacaine in the context of dorsal penile nerve block during hypospadias repair surgery while not yielding any significant adverse outcomes. Although the patients in our study were monitored for 4 h in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU), conducting a more comprehensive assessment of patients is advisable.

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study indicate that incorporating dexmedetomidine alongside bupivacaine in dorsal penile nerve block during hypospadias repair surgery may lead to enhanced management of postoperative pain. The lack of adverse effects implies it may be a potentially safe supplementary pain reliever for surgical procedures.

Urethrocutaneous fistula and glans dehiscence formation of hypospadias surgery in patients receiving caudal block vs. non-caudal block: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate the difference in postoperative complications as urethrocutaneous fistula or glans dehiscence, in children undergoing primary hypospadias repair with caudal block (CB) versus non-caudal block (NCB).

METHODS

Data were obtained from MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Comparative studies of CB versus NCB were identified, with reports of complications published or presented until October 2022. Subgroup analyses were performed based on study type, meatal location (distal only), type of NCB, surgeon and technique, and concentration and dose of anesthetics.

RESULTS

Compared to the reference group of NCB, CB was not significantly associated with the development of complications following primary hypospadias repair (OR 1.40, 95 % CI 0.88-2.23). After adjusting for confounding factors, such as type of study(OR 1.51, 95%CI: 0.29-7.91), type of NCB[PB (OR 1.82, 95 % CI: 0.87-3.84), GA (OR 1.26, 95 % CI: 0.39-4.04)], meatal location (distal only) (OR 1.22, 95 % CI: 0.61-2.43), surgeon and technique (OR 1.37, 95 % CI: 0.59-3.14) and concentration and dose of anesthetics(OR 2.74, 95 % CI: 0.82-9.20), subgroup analyses revealed no significant association between CB and NCB (P > 0.05).

DISCUSSION

Previous studies have found a correlation between CB and increased incidence of postoperative complications (urethrocutaneous fistula or glans dehiscence) of hypospadias, but different literature have suggested that surgical technique, surgical duration and the severity of hypospadias, rather than CB, are closely related to the occurrence of complications. In order to reduce confounding factors, subgroup analyses were conducted. The results showed that no correlation could be found in postoperative complications and CB.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis compared the incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula or glans dehiscence in the CB and NCB groups for primary hypospadias repair in children, indicating that no clear correlation could be found in postoperative complications and CB. Subgroup analyses on study type, type of NCB, meatal location (distal only), surgeon and technique, and regional anesthetic concentration and dose supported this conclusion.

Intravenous dexamethasone does not prolong the duration of pudendal nerve block in infants and children undergoing hypospadias surgery: A randomized clinical trial

BACKGROUND

The administration of intravenous dexamethasone increases the duration of neuraxial block and improves the quality of analgesia. However, little is known about these effects of dexamethasone on peripheral nerve blocks in children.

AIMS

In this study, we aimed to investigate the benefit of intravenous dexamethasone for enhancing the effect of pudendal block on postoperative analgesia in children who underwent hypospadias surgery.

METHODS

In total, 46 children aged 6-36 months who underwent hypospadias surgery were randomly allocated to either a control group (normal saline, group C) or dexamethasone group (0.5 mg/kg, group D). Pudendal block was performed before the surgery using 0.3 mL/kg of 0.225% ropivacaine on both sides. Parents were instructed to press the patient-controlled analgesia bolus button when their children's pain score was >4 points. The primary outcome measure was the time at which the first patient-controlled analgesia by proxy bolus dose was administered. The secondary outcome measures were pain score, number of patient-controlled analgesia administration by proxy bolus attempts, number of rescue analgesics required, total amount of fentanyl administered, and overall parental satisfaction.

RESULTS

The time of first patient-controlled analgesia bolus administration by proxy was not different between the control and dexamethasone groups (5.6 [5.2, 8.8] h versus 6.5 [5.4, 8.1] h, hazard ratio 0.8, 95% confidence intervals 0.43 to 1.47, p = .46). There were no statistically significant differences among the secondary outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of intravenous dexamethasone did not enhance the duration of pudendal nerve block in infants and children aged 6-36 months who underwent hypospadias surgery.

Ultrasound-guided trans-incisional quadratus lumborum block versus ultrasound-guided caudal analgesia in pediatric open renal surgery: a randomized trial

BACKGROUND

The caudal route is a common approach for postoperative analgesia; however, it is associated with limited duration of action. The quadratus lumborum block (QLB) may produce prolonged postoperative analgesia. Therefore, this study aimed to compare the postoperative analgesic efficacy of the ultrasound-guided caudal block with that of the ultrasound-guided transincisional QLB (TiQLB) in pediatric patients undergoing open renal surgery.

METHODS

Forty patients of both sexes, aged 2-11 years, were randomly assigned to receive either caudal analgesia with 1.25 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.2% (Caudal group; n = 20) or a QLB with 0.5 ml/kg of bupivacaine 0.2% (TiQLB group; n = 20) in addition to standard general anesthesia. Time to first analgesia was the primary outcome. Total analgesic consumption in the first 24 h postoperatively, pain scores, and the incidence of side effects were the secondary outcomes.

RESULTS

The mean time to first analgesic requirement was significantly longer in the TiQLB group than in the Caudal group (18.8 ± 5.1 vs. 6.7 ± 0.7 h, P < 0.001). Total ketorolac consumption and pain scores were significantly lower in the TiQLB group (P < 0.001). A few cases of mild postoperative nausea and vomiting were noted among patients in both groups; however, the difference was not statistically significant. No incidence of pruritus, shivering, or respiratory depression was noted.

CONCLUSIONS

Analgesia after the ultrasound-guided TiQLB with bupivacaine was superior to that after the ultrasound-guided caudal block, with similar side effects.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block and caudal epidural block for postoperative analgesia in paediatric lower abdominal surgeries: A randomised controlled trial

Background and Aims

Ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane (TAP) block is an effective technique for postoperative analgesia in lower abdominal surgeries. This study aims to compare the duration and efficacy of an ultrasound-guided TAP block with those of a caudal epidural for paediatric unilateral lower abdominal surgeries.

Methods

After ethical approval, sixty children aged 1 to 9 years were randomised into ultrasound-guided TAP block or caudal block with general anaesthesia for unilateral lower abdominal surgeries. The primary endpoint was time for the first rescue analgesia in the postoperative period. The secondary endpoints were total postoperative opioid consumption, modified Children Hospital of Eastern Ontario Pain Scale (CHEOPS) and the Face, Legs, Activity, Cry and Consolability (FLACC) scale in the postoperative period.

Results

The mean time for first rescue analgesia was 11.33 ± 2.80 h in the TAP block group, while in the caudal group, it was 13.18 ± 2.67 h (95% confidence interval [CI] mean difference 2.58-10.58, P = 0.017). The total postoperative morphine requirement was comparable in both groups at both 12 h (TAP block group 0.50 ± 0.12 mg vs. caudal block group 0.56 ± 0.12 mg, 95% CI mean difference 0.09-0.02, P = 0.08) and 24 h (TAP block group 0.96 ± 0.30 mg vs. caudal block group 0.81 ± 0.34 mg, 95% CI mean difference 0.06-0.32, P = 0.06) time period.

Conclusion

The mean time for first rescue analgesia was lesser in the TAP block group as compared to caudal group.

Impact of caudal block on revision rates after hypospadias repair: Multi-institution review

INTRODUCTION

There is controversy surrounding the association between caudal block and complication rates after hypospadias repair. Conflicting results have been reported mostly from single-center, low volume studies and those that did not include relevant variables.

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that caudal block is not associated with increased rates of reoperation after primary repair and is associated with more complex hypospadias surgery.

STUDY DESIGN

The Clinical Practice Solutions Center database was queried to identify patients who received a primary hypospadias repair between 2009 and 2010. Primary hypospadias repair was further categorized as meatal advancement and glanduloplasty, distal, one-stage proximal, or one-stage perineal repair. Anesthesia coding was evaluated to identify those who received a caudal block. Any revision surgery was captured between 2009 and 2019 and the types of revision surgeries were identified. Variables such as caudal block, age, insurance type, surgeon volume, and surgeon years in practice were analyzed with mixed effects multiple logistic regression models.

RESULTS

The dataset query identified 3343 pediatric males who had primary hypospadias repair. The procedures were performed by 50 surgeons at 27 hospitals. Primary surgeries included meatal advancement and glanduloplasty (23%), distal (69%), proximal (6.9%), and perineal repairs (1%). Caudal block was administered to 42% of patients. Utilization of caudal block was not associated with type of primary surgery (p = 0.21). Adjusting for all other variables, increased patient age was associated with decreased usage of caudal block (p < 0.001). Analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant association between utilization of caudal block with rates of revision surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

This large, multi-institution study demonstrates that the use of caudal block was not associated with more complex hypospadias surgery nor statistically significantly associated with increased rates of revision surgery after primary hypospadias repair.

Establishment of Difficult Caudal Epidural Blockade Prediction Model

Background

We aimed to develop a predictive difficult caudal epidural blockade (pDCEB) model when ultrasound was not available and verified the role of ultrasound in difficult caudal epidural blockade (CEB).

Methods

From October 2018 to March 2019, this study consisted of three phases. First, we prospectively enrolled 202 patients scheduled to undergo caudal epidural anesthesia and assessed risk factors by binary logistic regression to develop the predictive scoring system. Second, we enrolled 87 patients to validate it. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to evaluate the performance of the prediction model. Youden-index was used to determine the cut-off value. Third, we enrolled 68 patients with a high risk of difficult CEB (pDCEB score ≥3) and randomized them into ultrasound and landmark groups to verify the role of ultrasound.

Result

The rate of difficult CEB was 14.98% overall 289 patients. We found a correlation between unclear palpation of the sacral hiatus (OR 9.688) and cornua (OR 4.725), the number of the sacral hiatus by palpation ≥1 (OR 4.451), and history of difficult CEB (OR 39.282) with a higher possibility of difficult CEB. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of the pDCEB model involving the aforementioned factors was 0.889 (95% CI, 0.827-0.952) in the development cohort and 0.862 (95% CI, 0.747-0.977) in the validation cohort. For patients with a pDCEB score ≥3, a preprocedure ultrasound scan could reduce the incidence of difficult CEB (55.56% in the Landmark group vs. 9.38% in the ultrasound group, p < 0.001).

Conclusion

This novel pDCEB score, which takes into account palpation of the sacral hiatus/cornua, number of the sacral hiatus by palpation ≥1, and history of difficult CEB, showed a good predictive ability of difficult CEB. The findings suggested that performing an ultrasound scan is essential for patients with a pDCEB score ≥3. Trial registration: No: ChiCTR1800018871, Site URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn/edit.aspx?pid=31875&htm=4; Principal investigator: Jialian Zhao, Date of registration: 2018.10.14.

Ultrasound-Guided Quadratus Lumborum Block Versus Caudal Block for Pain Relief in Children Undergoing Lower Abdominal Surgeries: A Randomized, Double-Blind Comparative Study

Background

The quadratus lumborum (QL) block, also known as the abdominal truncal block, was developed to provide visceral and somatic analgesia during abdominal procedures.

Objectives

This study aimed to assess pain alleviation, the incidence of complications in lower abdominal procedures, and hemodynamic stability between the caudal block and ultrasound-guided QL block.

Methods

Fifty-two patients aged 1 to 7 years old from both genders scheduled for unilateral lower abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to 2 study groups: group QL, unilateral QL block (n = 26), and group C, caudal block (n = 26). In group C, children received caudal block. In group QL, an ultrasound-guided QL block was performed. The time to first rescue analgesia was evaluated as a primary outcome. The quality of analgesia was determined using the face, legs, activity, cry, consolability scale (FLACC scale), hemodynamic parameters, and incidence of complications because hemodynamic instability was recorded under ultrasound guidance. Signs of local anesthetics toxicity and the parents' satisfaction were secondary outcomes.

Results

The time until the first demand for analgesia postoperatively was statistically longer in group QL compared to group C. A non-significant difference was observed between the 2 groups (P > 0.05) regarding age, weight, gender, duration of surgery, type of surgery, FLACC scale, and hemodynamics (SBP, systolic blood pressure), except at 30 minutes, which was significant in QL block. Also, a non-significant difference was observed in the severity of postoperative pain up to 1 day postoperatively. Group QL showed more satisfaction than group C. No intraoperative complications were detected.

Conclusions

Compared to caudal block, QL block produced sustained and adequate analgesia time postoperatively, with higher satisfaction.

Effects of Caudal and Penile Blocks on the Complication Rates of Hypospadias Repair

Background:

The major influencing factors for complications during hypospadias repair are the original location of the meatus, previous urethral surgery, surgical technique, and surgeon’s experience. While the effect of the technique of regional analgesia on complication rates has been considered in some studies, this issue remains controversial.hile the effect of the technique of regional analgesia on complication rates has been considered in some studies, this issue remains controversial.

Aims:

To determine the effect of caudal block and penile block on complication rates of hypospadias repair in patients with subcoronal hypospadias.

Study Design:

Retrospective cross-sectional study.

Methods:

Data of children who underwent hypospadias repair between 2011 and 2019 in our clinic (n = 770) were reviewed retrospectively. Only patients with subcoronal hypospadias and who underwent tubularized incised plate urethroplasty, performed by the same two experienced surgeons (n = 279), were included in the study. The exclusion criteria were incomplete data and follow-up time shorter than 12 months. Data of 279 patients were analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups according to the analgesia type: caudal block (n = 95) and penile block (n = 184), and complication rates were compared between these groups.

Results:

The median age was 36 months in the caudal block group and 30 months in the penile block group (P = 0.390). The median follow-up times were 54 and 42.7 months in the caudal and penile block groups, respectively. Total complication rates did not differ significantly between the groups and were determined as 10.5% and 12.5% in the caudal and penile groups, respectively. Urethrocutaneous fistula rates were observed as 2.1% and 4.3% (p=0.50). None of the patients had penile chordee and no penile plication was performed in the whole group.

Conclusion:

This study shows that there is no increase in post-repair complications in patients with subcoronal hypospadias who underwent caudal block.

Incidence of urethrocutaneous fistula following distal hypospadias repair with and without caudal epidural block: A randomized pilot study

INTRODUCTION

Recent investigations have raised a doubt regarding the safety of Caudal epidural block (CEB) administered to children with distal hypospadias undergoing tubularised incised plate (TIP) urethroplasty. The primary objective of the study was to investigate whether there is any association between CEB and the occurrence of urethrocutaneous fistula (UCF) in the postoperative period.

METHODS

Fifty ASA 1 and 2 children with distal hypospadias aged 0-8 years were randomly allocated to CEB group (GA with CEB, 0.2% ropivacaine 1 ml/kg; n = 25) and Non-CEB group (GA without CEB; n = 25). Penile measurements were taken before and 20 min after administration of CEB to assess penile engorgement. Intraoperative hemodynamics were recorded at 10 min intervals after induction of anaesthesia. Consumption of IV fentanyl intraoperatively and postoperatively in first 24 h was recorded in both the groups. Rescue analgesia was administered for a score >4 on FLACC scale. After surgery children were followed up monthly for first three months and then at 6-months and yearly in paediatric surgery OPD to assess for development of UCF.

RESULTS

UCF was found to occur in only two children, one from each group on follow up, with an overall incidence of 4%. There was no difference in the incidence of UCF in the patients with and without CEB. A 26.8% increase in penile volume from baseline was recorded in CEB group (P = 0.000). The intraoperative heart rate and mean arterial pressure was significantly lower in the CEB group as compared to non CEB group at various time intervals. No additional intraoperative IV fentanyl supplementation was required in CEB group. Fentanyl consumption was significantly less in CEB group postoperatively in first 24 h (P = 0.000).

DISCUSSION

Administration of CEB was not found to have any impact on UCF formation. No relationship between the increase in penile volume after CEB block and occurrence of UCF was noticed.

CONCLUSION

Despite increase in penile volume after CEB, there was no difference between the two groups as regards to the occurrence of post operative UCF. CEB is an effective analgesic modality and can be continued to be used till the results of well powered prospective randomised trials with long follow up are reported.

The effect of caudal epidural block on the surgical complications of hypospadias repair in children aged 6 to 35 months: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Caudal epidural block (CEB) in hypospadias surgery has the benefit of reducing post-operative pain and possibly intra-operative bleeding. Some studies, however, have suggested that this technique may increase the rate of post-operative complications. Considering the uncertainty about the effect of CEB on surgical complications of hypospadias repair, the current study was performed.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the complication rates between patients who receive CEB after hypospadias surgery and those who did not.

STUDY DESIGN

This double-blind randomized controlled trial was conducted on boys aged 6-35 months, who underwent hypospadias repair surgery in a university hospital from March 2018 to March 2019. Sixty patients were randomly divided into two groups (group A: 31 and group B: 29). In group B, CEB was performed, using 0.5 mg/kg of 0.125% bupivacaine (Marcaine). Postoperative complications including fistula, meatal stenosis, dehiscence, and occurrence of bleeding were assessed during six months after surgery.

RESULTS

The patients were assessed for possible complications at 24 h, one week, one, three and six months after surgery. No remarkable differences were observed between the patients in the two groups in terms of the frequency of dehiscence, fistula, and meatal stenosis (P > 0.05). Moreover, the difference in complication rates between the patients with proximal and distal hypospadias did not reach statistical significance (P = 0.549).

DISCUSSION

Assessment of complications showed no significant difference between the two study groups in terms of dehiscence, fistula, and meatal stenosis (Clavien type III). In addition, complication rate was not significantly different according to severity of hypospadias between the two groups. Our study had limitations such as short follow up and small sample size, which resulted in insignificant difference in complication rate between proximal and distal hypospadias. These limitations request large studies with long term follow up.

CONCLUSION

The current study showed that the use of caudal block anesthesia in comparison with general anesthesia did not increase surgical complications, which approved CEB protocol as a safe method in hypospadias repair.

Regional anesthesia for ambulatory pediatric penoscrotal procedures

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Pediatric urology procedures are amongst the most commonly performed in children. The need for proactive treatment of pain is essential for optimal patient care. Current guidelines recommend the routine use of regional anesthesia in children as appropriate unless contraindicated. Given the commonality of urologic procedures in children, it is essential to understand the indications for and the utility of regional anesthesia.

METHODS

The current literature was searched using PubMed as the primary platform. Search words included 'dorsal penile nerve block,' 'pudendal nerve block,' 'ring block,' 'spinal anesthesia,' and 'caudal,' along with 'pediatric', 'circumcision,' 'hypospadias,' 'urology', and 'urological surgery' as part of the keywords of the search.

RESULTS

The articles resulting from the literature search were reviewed for content, clarity and study design by two co-authors, and agreement determined the incorporation into the review. Additionally, a detailed description of study design, regional anesthetic technique, local anesthetic(s) used, and outcomes of each study referenced was incorporated into the supplemental table.

CONCLUSION

Given the variance in block technique and local anesthetic choice amongst the current reported studies in the literature, it is difficult to truly compare and infer superiority of the regional anesthetic choices for ambulatory penoscrotal procedures. When choosing a regional anesthetic technique, careful consideration must be placed on block coverage, severity of expected pain and surgical duration of the procedure, type and dose of local anesthetic, as well as the patient's past medical history and anatomy. Moreover, the regional block chosen should result from a thorough preoperative discussion between the surgeon and the anesthesiologist.

Inadvertent life-threatening total spinal anesthesia following caudal block in a preschool child underwent urologic surgery: A rare case report

INTRODUCTION AND IMPORTANCE

Caudal block is considered to be safe and provide optimal analgesia for pediatric patients undergoing sub-umbilical operations. It overcomes opioid-related side effects, particularly the dangers associated with respiratory depression in small children.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 5-year-old male underwent uneventful hypospadias surgery under general endotracheal anesthesia. Caudal block planned to be administered postoperatively for postoperative analgesia then performed after palpation of sacral cornu with 8 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. A few minutes later, the patient became apneic, heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation dropped abruptly-immediate resuscitation with ventilatory support, fluid bolus, and atropine administration. After a minute patients' vital signs returned to the normal range then 2 h later patient started to breathe spontaneously and consciousness is regained. After close follow-up for 24 h in the post-anesthesia care unit patient was discharged to the pediatric ward then discharged to home without any neurologic sequelae after 3 days.

CLINICAL DISCUSSION

Total spinal anesthesia in a very infrequent incident during central neuraxial blocks, especially in the pediatrics population where a caudal block is usually performed. Manifestation of this event can be detected by loss of consciousness, cessation of respiratory effort, hemodynamic instability, and dilated pupils. Delayed treatment can result in cardiopulmonary arrest.

CONCLUSION

Unanticipated total spinal anesthesia following central neuraxial blocks can potentially cause severe adverse consequences. Preventive modalities must be employed to avoid this incident. Early recognition and instant management should be instituted to avoid dangerous complications following the total spinal blockade.

The association between caudal block and urethroplasty complications of distal tubularized incised plate repair: experience from a South China National Children's Medical Center

Background

The effect of caudal block (CB) on the incidence of urethroplasty complications in hypospadias repair remains controversial. The evidence is conflicting, and some confounding bias issues need to be addressed. We sought to study a more homogenous group of distal hypospadias patients undergoing primary tubularized incised plate (TIP) repair by a senior pediatric urology surgeon in the past 2 years to examine the relationship between urethroplasty complications and the use of CB.

Methods

We reviewed our database to identify consecutive patients who had undergone hypospadias repairs by a senior director surgeon at our Center between January 2018 and November 2020. To be eligible to participate in the study, patients had to meet the following inclusion criteria: (I) have distal hypospadias; (II) have undergone a primary TIP repair; and (III) have attended follow-up appointments for a minimum period of 6 months. The primary outcome was the development of urethroplasty complications during the follow-up period. The principal variable of interest was whether or not CB was used perioperatively. The patients were categorized into a CB group (general anesthesia combined with CB) or a control group (general anesthesia only). Other potential risk factors were analyzed, including patient age at operation, patient weight, glans width, and the length of the urethral plate defect.

Results

Thirty (12.2%) of the distal patients developed postoperative surgical complications. The postoperative surgical complication rates were similar between the different anesthesia groups. Weight, the length of the urethral plate length, and glans width did not contribute to the risk. Age was the only independent risk factor for postoperative surgical complications, and the complication rates increased in older patients.

Conclusions

Our data from consecutive TIP repairs in distal hypospadias patients indicated no association between the use of CB anesthesia and the postoperative urethroplasty complication rate. Patients who were older in age when they underwent surgery had a higher risk of complications.

Comparison of Caudal Block vs. Penile Block vs. Intravenous Fentanyl Only in Children Undergoing Penile Surgery: A Prospective, Randomized, Double Blind Study

Objectives: Penile surgery is commonly performed in pediatric surgical centers. There is no consensus regarding which analgesic method is most effective in controlling pain in these children. Methods: Consecutive children between 4 months and 16 years of age who underwent elective penile surgery were recruited. After inhaled induction of anesthesia, children were randomized to one of three methods of intraoperative analgesia: caudal block, IV fentanyl titrated to surgical response and spontaneous respiration, or dorsal penile nerve block (DPNB). All patients were given inhaled agents; fentanyl was added if either block was insufficient. Demographic data, analgesic use and pain scores were recorded by a blinded investigator in the PACU and ward. Pain scores, analgesic requirement, and recovery parameters of returning to normal activity level, eating, and voiding post-operatively for up to 4 days, were compared. Results: 116 children were recruited. Pain scores in the post anesthesia care unit were significantly lower in the DPNB and caudal block groups compared to the fentanyl group for the first 30 postoperative min. Pain scores and analgesic use were subsequently similar among the three groups for the rest of the study period. There was no statistical difference in time to eat, return to normal activity or in parental satisfaction scores among the groups. There was a trend toward earliest time to void in the DPNB group. Conclusions: Regional blocks most effectively controlled pain for 30 min after surgery. The choice of intra-operative analgesia protocol had no effect on later pain and recovery parameters.

Penile nerve block predicts higher revision surgery rate following distal hypospadias repair when compared with caudal epidural block: A consecutive cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Recent literature has suggested caudal epidural blocks (CEB) may increase revision surgery rates following hypospadias repair. We sought to investigate this using a large, multi-surgeon series.

OBJECTIVE

The primary objective of this study was to identify the impact of CEB or penile nerve blocks (PNB) on revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair at our centre.

STUDY DESIGN

A prospectively maintained database of consecutive patients undergoing primary hypospadias repairs under the supervision of 8 different paediatric surgeons at our centre between January 2015 and December 2018 was queried for the following potential risk factors: Age at surgery, American Society of Anaesthesiologist's (ASA) grade, hypospadias type, type of surgery, CEB or PNB, and training level of primary surgeon. Revision surgery was defined as reoperation for fistulas, dehiscence, strictures or meatal stenosis. Univariate and Multivariate analysis was performed using logistic regression.

RESULTS

188 patients underwent primary distal hypospadias repair over the study time period. Patients were aged between 7 months and 15 years of age. Median age at surgery was 14 months. Revision surgery was performed for 31 patients (16.5%). Indications were urethrocutaneous fistula (n = 17, 9.0%), meatal stenosis or stricture (n = 9, 4.8%) and glans dehiscence (n = 5, 2.7%). 114 (60.6%) received a penile block and 74 (39.4%) a caudal block. On univariate analysis, PNB (HR 2.55 95% CI 1.04-6.27, p = 0.04) was statistically significant for revision surgery. This association remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR 2.74 95% CI 1.09-6.92, p = 0.03). All other prognostic factors examined were not statistically significant for revision surgery.

DISCUSSION

Our findings suggest PNB are associated with higher revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair. This contrasts with the findings of other authors.

CONCLUSION

Our study is the first to demonstrate an association between PNB and higher revision surgery rates following distal hypospadias repair.