Long-term complications of unintentional dural puncture during labor epidural analgesia: a case-control study

Epidural Blood Patch for the Treatment of Spontaneous Intracranial Hypotension: A Case Series

BACKGROUND

Epidural blood patch (EBP) is frequently used for the treatment of spontaneous intracranial hypotension (SIH) and anesthesiologists are often involved in performing such procedures. However, the optimal technique and approach of EBP remains uncertain.

METHODS

This case series included adult patients with SIH who underwent EBPs at London Health Science Centre, Ontario, Canada between 2010 and 2022. Demographics, clinical presentations, investigations, and EBP treatment details were collected and analyzed. Univariate analysis was used to investigate the association of the variables with the likelihood of EBP 1-month efficacy and the efficacy duration of EBP.

RESULTS

The study included 36 patients with SIH who received at least 1 EBP. EBPs provided immediate relief in almost all patients, albeit with diminishing effects over time. The 1-month efficacy improved with increasing number of EBP attempts (P=0.032, Fisher exact test), though no particular EBP technique or volume of injectate was associated with better efficacy (P=0.38, Fisher exact test). Though permanent resolution of symptoms was observed in only 24 of 82 EBPs (29%), 24 of 36 patients (67%) had permanent symptom resolution following repeated EBPs.

CONCLUSIONS

EBP is a promising treatment and symptomatic relief option in patients suffering from the debilitating symptoms of SIH. Tailored EBP techniques, including use of targeted higher volume EBP and a multi-level catheter guided technique for refractory cases, showed efficacy in our institutional setting. Despite its limitations, this study contributes valuable insights and experiences into the use of EBP for treatment of SIH.

Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines on postdural puncture headache: a consensus report from a multisociety international working group

INTRODUCTION

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) can follow unintentional dural puncture during epidural techniques or intentional dural puncture during neuraxial procedures such as a lumbar puncture or spinal anesthesia. Evidence-based guidance on the prevention, diagnosis or management of this condition is, however, currently lacking. This multisociety guidance aims to fill this void and provide practitioners with comprehensive information and patient-centric recommendations to prevent, diagnose and manage patients with PDPH.

METHODS

Based on input from committee members and stakeholders, the committee cochairs developed 10 review questions deemed important for the prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH. A literature search for each question was performed in MEDLINE (Ovid) on 2 March 2022. The results from each search were imported into separate Covidence projects for deduplication and screening, followed by data extraction. Additional relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and research studies published through March 2022 were also considered for the development of guidelines and shared with contributors. Each group submitted a structured narrative review along with recommendations graded according to the US Preventative Services Task Force grading of evidence. The interim draft was shared electronically, with each collaborator requested to vote anonymously on each recommendation using two rounds of a modified Delphi approach.

RESULTS

Based on contemporary evidence and consensus, the multidisciplinary panel generated 50 recommendations to provide guidance regarding risk factors, prevention, diagnosis and management of PDPH, along with their strength and certainty of evidence. After two rounds of voting, we achieved a high level of consensus for all statements and recommendations. Several recommendations had moderate-to-low certainty of evidence.

CONCLUSIONS

These clinical practice guidelines for PDPH provide a framework to improve identification, evaluation and delivery of evidence-based care by physicians performing neuraxial procedures to improve the quality of care and align with patients' interests. Uncertainty remains regarding best practice for the majority of management approaches for PDPH due to the paucity of evidence. Additionally, opportunities for future research are identified.

Long-term effects of neuraxial analgesia

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review article explores the potential longer-term implications of neuraxial analgesia in labour for both the mother and her child.

RECENT FINDINGS

Neuraxial techniques for labour analgesia are well tolerated and effective, and long-term adverse sequelae are rare. Labour epidural analgesia is not independently associated with long-term headache, backache, postnatal depression or anal sphincter injury, and evidence supports that epidurals may offer protection against severe maternal morbidity, particularly in women at a higher risk of complications. However, there is an increasing awareness that postdural puncture headache may be associated with chronic headache, back pain and postnatal depression, emphasizing the need for adequate follow-up until symptoms resolve.For the neonate, a growing body of evidence refutes any association between epidural analgesia in labour and the later development of autism spectrum disorder. The clinical significance of epidural related maternal fever remains uncertain and is a research priority.

SUMMARY

Women should continue to access the significant benefits of neuraxial analgesia in labour without undue concern about adverse sequelae for themselves or their offspring. Measures to prevent, appropriately manage and adequately follow-up women who have suffered complications of neuraxial analgesia, such as postdural puncture headache, are good practice and can mitigate the development of long-term sequelae.

Health-related quality of life, work ability and disability among individuals with persistent post-dural puncture headache

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Postdural puncture headache (PDPH) is an acknowledged consequence of procedures like lumbar punctures, epidural analgesia, and neurosurgical interventions. Persistence over more than three months, however has been poorly studied. In particular, little is known about the impact of persistent PDPH (pPDPH) on health related quality of life (HRQoL), disability and ability to work. The study aimed to provide a holistic understanding of pPDPH, encompassing medical, physical and psychological aspects.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional anonymous online survey in individuals aged 18 or older, diagnosed with, or suspected to have pPDPH via self-help groups on Facebook. Participants completed a structured questionnaire covering diagnosis, symptoms, and the ability to work. For assessing headache related disability, and mental health, they filled in the Henry Ford Hospital Headache Disability Inventory (HDI) and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scale-21 (DASS-21).

RESULTS

A total of 179 participants (83.2% female, mean age 39.7 years) completed the survey. PPDPH had been present for one year or more in 74.3%, and 44.1% were unable to be in an upright position for more than one hour per day without having to lie down or sit down. Headaches were extremely severe or severe in 18% and 34%, respectively. According to the HDI, 31.8% of participants had mild, 25.7% moderate, and 42.5% severe disability. DASS-21 revealed substantial mental health challenges with depression, anxiety and stress experienced by 83%, 98%, and 88% of the respondents. The ability to work was limited considerably: 27.9% were unable to work, 59.8% worked part-time, 1.1% changed their job because of pPDPH, and only 11.2% were able to work full-time in their previous job. Despite treatment, the patients' condition had deteriorated in 32.4% and remained unchanged in 27.9%.

CONCLUSION

This study stresses the burden of pPDPH in terms of substantial disability, limited quality of life, mental health concerns, and significant impact on the ability to work. The study highlights the long-term impact of pPDPH on individuals, emphasizing the need for timely diagnosis and effective treatment. It underscores the complexity of managing pPDPH and calls for further research into its long-term effects on patient health and HRQoL.

The contralateral oblique fluoroscopic view is associated with a lower incidence of postdural puncture headache in patients undergoing percutaneous spinal cord stimulation

BACKGROUND

Spinal cord stimulation (SCS) is a minimally invasive therapy that is increasingly used to treat refractory neuropathic pain. Although this technique has a low incidence of serious long-term adverse sequelae, the risk of complications such as inadvertent dural puncture remains.

OBJECTIVES

The goal of this article was to determine the impact of the contralateral oblique (CLO) fluoroscopic view incidence of postdural puncture headache (PDPH) during spinal cord stimulator implantation as compared to lateral fluoroscopic view.

METHODS

This was a single academic institution retrospective analysis of electronic medical records spanning an approximate 20-year time period. Operative and postoperative notes were reviewed for details on dural puncture, including technique and spinal level of access, the development of a PDPH, and subsequent management.

RESULTS

Over nearly two decades, a total of 1637 leads inserted resulted in 5 PDPH that were refractory to conservative measures but responded to epidural blood patch without long-term complications. The incidence of PDPH per lead insertion utilizing loss of resistance and lateral fluoroscopic guidance was 0.8% (4/489). However, adoption of CLO guidance was associated with a lower rate of PDPH at 0.08% (1/1148), p < 0.02.

CONCLUSIONS

The incorporation of the CLO view to guide epidural needle placement can decrease the odds of a PDPH during percutaneous SCS procedures. This study further provides real-world data supporting the potential enhanced accuracy of epidural needle placement in order to avoid unintentional puncture or trauma to deeper spinal anatomic structures.

Etiology, management, and sequela of postdural puncture headache

PURPOSE

The purpose of this article is to provide readers with a concise overview of the cause, incidence, treatment of, and sequalae of postdural puncture headaches (PDPH). Over the past 2 years, much data has been published on modifiable risk factors for PDPH, treatments for PDPH, and sequalae of PDPH particularly long-term.

RECENT FINDINGS

There is emerging data about how modifiable risk factors for PDPH are not as absolute as once believed. There have been several new meta-analysis and clinical trials published, providing more data about effective therapies for PDPH. Significantly, much recent data has come out about the sequalae, particularly long-term of dural puncture.

SUMMARY

Emerging evidence demonstrates that in patients who are at low risk of PDPH, needle type and gauge may be of no consequence in a patient developing a PDPH. Although epidural blood patch (EBP) remains the gold-standard of therapy, several other interventions, both medical and procedural, show promise and may obviate the need for EBP in patients with mild-moderate PDPH. Patients who endure dural puncture, especially accidental dural puncture (ADP) are at low but significant risk of developing short term issues as well as chronic pain symptoms.

Efficacy of pharmacological therapies for preventing post-dural puncture headaches in obstetric patients: a Bayesian network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

BACKGROUND

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a major complication of neuraxial anesthesia. PDPH usually occurs after Caesarean section in obstetric patients. The efficacy of prophylactic pharmacological therapies remains controversial.

METHODS

Seven pharmacological therapies (aminophylline (AMP), dexamethasone, gabapentin/pregabalin (GBP/PGB), hydrocortisone, magnesium, ondansetron (OND), and propofol (PPF)), were studied in this Bayesian network meta-analysis. The primary outcome was the cumulative incidence of PDPH within 7 days. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of PDPH at 24 and 48 h postoperatively, the severity of headache in PDPH patients (24, 48, and 72 h postoperatively), and postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV).

RESULTS

Twenty-two randomized controlled trials with 4,921 pregnant women (2,723 parturients received prophylactic pharmacological therapies) were included. The analyses demonstrated that PPF, OND, and AMP were efficient in decreasing the cumulative incidence of PDPH during the follow-up period compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.70; OR = 0.37, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.87; OR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.18 to 0.84, respectively). PPF and OND had the lower incidence of PONV compared to the placebo group (OR = 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01 to 0.30; and OR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.02 to 0.63). No significant difference in other outcomes was found among different therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on available data, PPF, OND, and AMP may have better efficacy in decreasing the incidence of PDPH compared to the placebo group. No significant side effects were revealed. Better-designed studies are requested to verify these conclusions.

Chronic headaches related to post-dural puncture headaches: a scoping review

Post-dural puncture headache (PDPH) is a well-recognised complication of neuraxial procedures. Although it is generally considered to be self-limiting, there is mounting evidence suggesting an association between PDPH and chronic headaches. In this review, chronic headache after dural puncture was defined as the reporting of persistent headaches more than 1 month after the index dural puncture. This scoping review aims to: (1) review the relationship between PDPH and chronic headaches, (2) explore the pathophysiology of chronic headache arising from a dural puncture, and (3) make recommendations about the follow-up and treatment of these patients. The pooled relative risk of chronic headache from 15 863 patients reported in 12 cohort studies in patients with an accidental dural puncture compared with those without accidental dural puncture were 1.9 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-2.9), 2.5 (95% CI, 2.0-3.2), and 3.6 (95% CI, 1.9-7.1) at 2, 6, and 12 months, respectively. We also identified 20 case reports of 49 patients who developed chronic headache after a dural puncture. Epidural blood patch and fibrin glue injection and surgery have been used to treat chronic postural headaches. Overall, the level of evidence is low for all reported outcomes (aetiology, intervention and outcome) by virtue of the type of studies available (cohort and case reports) and significant risk of bias in the cohort studies. Based on findings from this review, we recommend that the risk of chronic headache is included in the informed consent discussion for all neuraxial procedures. Patients with PDPH should be closely followed up after hospital discharge.