Responsiveness of a simple RAPID-3-like index compared to disease-specific BASDAI and ASDAS indices in patients with axial spondyloarthritis

How to Monitor Disease Activity of Axial Spondyloarthritis in Clinical Practice

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Treatment guided by periodic and quantitative data assessment results in better outcomes compared to using clinical gestalt. While validated generic as well as specific disease activity measures for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA) are available, there is vast scope to improve their actual utilization in routine clinical practice. In this review, we discuss available disease activity measures for axSpA, describe results from the survey conducted among general rheumatologists as well as Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (SPARTAN) members about disease activity measurement in daily practice, and discuss ways to improve axSpA disease activity using technological advances. We also discuss the definitions of active disease and target for the treatment of axSpA.

RECENT FINDINGS

The 2019 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/Spondylitis Association of America (SAA)/Spondyloarthritis Research and Treatment Network (SPARTAN) axSpA treatment guidelines conditionally recommend the regular monitoring of disease activity using a validated measure such as Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (BASDAI) or Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Severity Index (ASDAS). Assessment of Spondyloarthritis International Society (ASAS)-European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) guidelines recommend ASDAS as the most appropriate instrument for the assessment of disease activity, preferably calculated using C-reactive protein (CRP). ASAS has selected a core set of variables which were updated recently and have been endorsed by the Outcome Measures in Rheumatology Clinical Trials (OMERACT) group in order to bring homogeneity in assessment of axSpA. In a recent study, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS®) measures were able to discriminate inactive, moderate, and high-very high ASDAS activity groups. A newly developed semi-objective index P4 (pain, physical function, patient global, and physician global) correlates well with BASDAI and ASDAS in axSpA and can also be used for other rheumatic diseases in busy clinical practices. Regular disease activity monitoring is critical for long-term management of axSpA and shared decision-making. The integration of electronic health records and smart devices provides a great opportunity to capture patient-reported data. Automated capture of electronic patient-reported outcome measures (ePROMs) is a highly efficient way and results in consistent regular monitoring and may improve the long-term outcomes. While currently used measures focus only on musculoskeletal symptoms of axSpA, a composite disease activity measure that can also incorporate extra-articular manifestations may provide a better assessment of disease activity.

Evaluating the real-world effectiveness of belimumab in patients with SLE using SLE-related laboratory values and rheumatoid arthritis-derived disease activity measures: RAPID3, swollen joint count and tender joint count

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the real-world impact of intravenous belimumab treatment among patients with SLE using rheumatoid arthritis-derived disease activity measures and SLE-related laboratory values.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used US electronic medical record data from the United Rheumatology Normalised Integrated Community Evidence (UR-NICE) database. Adult patients with SLE who initiated intravenous belimumab between 1 January 2012 and 3 December 2019 (index), had 12 months of pre-index and 24 months of post-index clinical activity, and had ≥6 infusions of belimumab during the 24 months post-index were included. The primary outcome measure was time to first improvement of minimally important difference (MID) for Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), Patient Pain Index (PPI), swollen joint count, tender joint count (TJC), complement C3 and C4 and anti-double-stranded DNA antibodies during the on-treatment follow-up period of up to 24 months. The secondary outcome measure evaluated the trajectories of these outcome measures for up to 24 months of belimumab treatment.

RESULTS

Of 495 patients included, between 21.0% and 52.1% had ≥1 record for each of the disease activity measures or laboratory values in the pre-index and post-index periods and were included in analyses for that measure. The proportion of patients achieving MID for each measure increased rapidly within 3 months, with continued gradual improvement throughout the remaining on-treatment period, up to 24 months. After 6 months, 52.3% and 55.3% of patients had achieved MID in RAPID3 and PPI, respectively. Outcome measure trajectories indicated improved disease activity with belimumab treatment, particularly in RAPID3, TJC and laboratory values.

CONCLUSIONS

In this real-world effectiveness study, belimumab therapy for SLE resulted in clinically meaningful improvements in rheumatoid arthritis-derived disease activity measures within 3 months of treatment, with patients who remained on belimumab therapy experiencing improvement even up to 24 months of observation.

The American College of Rheumatology Fibromyalgia Criteria Are Useful in the Evaluation of Fibromyalgia Symptoms in Patients With Ankylosing Spondylitis: A Cross-Sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Fibromyalgia (FM) is common among patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), and its coexistence is believed to interfere with the measurement of patient-reported outcomes of disease activity and function in AS because of overlapping symptoms between the 2 diseases. This can confound clinical assessment and treatment decisions.

AIMS

The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between the Fibromyalgia Symptom Scale (FSS) and its components, the Widespread Pain Index (WPI), and System Severity Scale with measures of disease activity, function, and patient-reported outcomes in AS.

METHODS

We recruited 63 AS patients (aged ≥18 years) meeting the modified New York criteria, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index, Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein, Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3, and Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index questionnaires were administered to them. The presence of FM was determined using validated 2010 American College of Rheumatology diagnostic criteria for FM.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight of 63 patients (44.4%) with AS and FM had higher disease activity and greater impairment of functional ability compared with AS patients without FM. Using multiple linear regression estimates, there was no significant relationship of FSS scores with Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index (p = 0.36), Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (p = 0.50), Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score-C-Reactive Protein (p = 0.24), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index (p = 0.42) scores, or erythrocyte sedimentation rate (p = 0.82) and C-reactive protein (p = 0.75).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite a high prevalence of FM in our patients with the diagnosis of AS, there was no relationship between FSS and measures of disease activity or function in AS, suggesting that FSS and its components could be a useful tool to assess FM in AS patients. Also, FM impairs functional ability in patients with AS.

Construct validity of The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) in the evaluation of axial spondyloarthritis

OBJECTIVE

Although there are different tools to evaluate axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA), they are hardly used in clinical routine due to time constraints. The Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) is a composite measure feasible to be used as a sole metric in busy clinics. We aimed to test its measurement properties in patients with axial SpA in a real clinical setting.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study that included 131 consecutive patients with axial SpA. The convergent (Spearman's rho) and discriminant (ROC curve analysis) validity of RAPID3 were tested against several axSpA-specific measures (BASDAI, ASDAS, BASFI, mSASSS). A multivariate model was built to detect disease factors associated with RAPID3 remission (values ≤3).

RESULTS

The study included 82 men and 49 women, median age of 55 years (IQR: 46-61), and median disease duration of 11 years (IQR: 6-24). Mean RAPID3 was 9.45 ± 6.7. The BASDAI showed moderate correlation with ASDAS (rho: 0.66, p < 0.0001), but higher with BASFI (rho: 0.78, p < 0.0001) and RAPID3 (rho: 0.75, p < 0.0001). The ASDAS had moderate correlations with BASFI, BASDAI, and RAPID3 (ranges from 0.66 to 0.68, p < 0.0001). Higher correlations were found between BASFI and BASDAI (rho: 0.78, p < 0.0001) and BASFI-RAPID3 (rho: 0.73, p < 0.0001). The m-SASSS did not show any correlation with any of the afore-mentioned composite measures. Kappa agreement between RAPID3 remission and other SpA remission criteria was moderate (k: 0.46-0.56). The RAPID3 thresholds to define remission ranged from values ≤2 to ≤ 6 with areas under the ROC curves between 0.86 and 0.91. Female sex (OR 0.34, 95%CI: 0.12- 0.90, p= 0.031) and NSAIDs intake (OR 0.26, 95%CI: 0.10-0.66, p= 0.005) were independently associated with lower odds of achieving RAPID3 remission.

CONCLUSION

RAPID3 demonstrated construct validity in this cross-sectional study. This index can be useful for a more comprehensive assessment of axSpA in busy clinical settings.

The Importance of Outcome Measures in the Management of Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases

Rheumatic inflammatory diseases include a diverse and heterogeneous group of multifaceted disorders in which clinical history and physical examination are essential to make treatment choices and for optimizing outcomes. Composite outcome measures have become very relevant in rheumatology to evaluate disease activity as they capture the most important dimensions of the disease into one single measure. Most outcome measures may include disease manifestations, laboratory data, physician examination as well as the patient perspective as different outcome dimensions of the disease into a simple index. These outcome measures have proved their utility for guiding treatment in treat-to- target strategies and personalized medicine, with remission being the ultimate goal. In this narrative review, we go over the most commonly used outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthropathies, including psoriatic arthritis, and systemic lupus erythematosus to provide a practical summary for clinicians for everyday routine care.

Measuring Outcomes in Psoriatic Arthritis: Comparing Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease

OBJECTIVE

To examine the construct validity of Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) and Psoriatic Arthritis Impact of Disease (PsAID) in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA). In examining construct validity, we also addressed scores among subgroups with severe psoriasis, poly articular disease, enthesitis, and dactylitis, and evaluated influences of sociodemographic factors and comorbidities (contextual factors) on these patient-reported outcomes (PRO).

METHODS

Patients with PsA were enrolled in the Psoriatic Arthritis Research Consortium (PARC) between 2014 and 2016. PARC is a longitudinal observational cohort study conducted at 4 US institutions. In this cross-sectional study, construct validity was assessed by examining Spearman correlation coefficients for RAPID3 and PsAID with physician-reported disease activity measures and other PRO [e.g., Medical Outcomes Study Short Form-12 physical component summary/mental component summary (SF-12 PCS/MCS), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue scale (FACIT-F)]. Contextual factors and disease subgroups were assessed in multivariable linear regression models with RAPID3 or PsAID12 as outcomes of interest and the hypothesized contextual factors as covariates.

RESULTS

Among 401 patients enrolled in PARC, 347 completed RAPID3 or PsAID12. Of these, most were white females with a mean age of 51.7 years (SD 14.02). RAPID3 and PsAID were highly correlated (r = 0.90). These measures were also correlated with the SF-12 PCS (r = -0.67) and FACIT-F (r = -0.77). Important contextual factors and disease subgroups included enthesitis, joint counts, education, insurance type, and depression.

CONCLUSION

RAPID3 and PsAID12 have excellent construct validity in PsA and are strongly correlated despite differing items. Contextual factors (i.e., the presence of depression and obesity) should be considered when interpreting raw scores of the RAPID3 and PsAID12.

Measuring outcomes in ankylosing spondylitis: pearls and pitfalls

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) warrant a comprehensive clinical assessment because of the lack of biomarkers of disease activity, prognosis and response to biologic therapy. Multiple AS-related questionnaires have been developed to assess the disease status accurately, but feasibility remains a problem in clinical practice. The purpose of this review is to assess the pearls and pitfalls of AS-related outcome measures.

RECENT FINDINGS

Single-item questionnaires to measure pain, stiffness and fatigue in patients with AS are easily administrable but may lack a sufficient degree of responsiveness on an individual patient level. The Bath Ankylosing Disease Activity Index remains the gold standard for assessing disease activity in a routine practice, despite poor correlation with C-reactive protein (CRP) levels and MRI inflammation. The Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Score, a validated and highly discriminatory tool for assessing disease activity in AS, has been developed but lacks feasibility as erythrocytic sedimentation rate and CRP values are often not available during a clinic visit. RAPID-3 appears feasible to assess patients with AS quantitatively over time in busy clinical settings.

SUMMARY

The assessment of disease status in AS is complex and is impacted by multiple factors. The biggest challenge in AS is to incorporate the disease-specific indices into a routine practice. VIDEO ABSTRACT: http://links.lww.com/COR/A42.

Fibromyalgia Assessment Screening Tools (FAST) Based on Only Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) Scores as Clues to Fibromyalgia

Objective

The study was designed to develop fibromyalgia assessment screening tool (FAST) indices based only on multidimensional health assessment questionnaire (MDHAQ) scores as clues to fibromyalgia (FM), analyzed for possible agreement with the 2011 FM criteria.

Methods

All patients with all diagnoses complete an MDHAQ at each visit in routine care. The MDHAQ includes scores for physical function, pain, global assessment, fatigue, self-report painful joint count, and a 60-symptom checklist. MDHAQ items similar or identical to the 2011 FM criteria symptom severity scale (SSS) and widespread pain index (WPI) components of a polysymptomatic distress scale (PSD) were compiled into continuous MDHAQ-FM-SSS, MDHAQ-FM-WPI, and MDHAQ-FM-PSD indices. Ten candidate MDHAQ scores were analyzed against the 2011 FM criteria using descriptive statistics, Spearman correlations, kappa statistics, and receiver operating characteristic curves for the area under the curve (AUC). MDHAQ candidate variables with the highest AUC were compiled into cumulative MDHAQ-FAST indices of three (FAST3) or four (FAST4) scores.

Results

The highest AUCs among MDHAQ scores were seen for symptom checklist, painful joint count, fatigue, and pain, which are included in FAST4; FAST3-F excludes pain, and FAST3-P excludes fatigue. AUCs for FAST3-P, FAST3-F, and FAST4, as well as continuous MDHAQ-FM scores, all were greater than 0.92, indicating excellent criterion validity. Kappa statistics versus the 2011 criteria were 0.63-0.68, higher than 0.41-0.47 versus physician ICD-10 diagnoses.

Conclusion

Pragmatic FAST3, FAST4, and MDHAQ-FM indices are similar to FM criteria to screen for FM in routine care. It is more feasible to collect the same MDHAQ, which is informative in all rheumatic diseases studied, from each patient than to ask different patients with different diagnoses to complete different questionnaires.

Anterior uveitis in patients with spondyloarthropathies in a single US academic center: a retrospective study

Uveitis may represent an opportunity to diagnose spondyloarthropathies (SpA) earlier and influence treatment decisions. We describe the percentage of acute anterior uveitis (AAU) in a diverse group of SpA patients seen at one academic setting and compare demographic and clinical characteristics according to the presence of uveitis. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with SpA and AAU (January 2016-June 2017). Patients were identified using ICD-10 and administrative claim codes, diagnoses were confirmed through chart review. Extracted data included demographics, laboratory, clinical data, treatment and Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) scores based on Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ). Baseline description and comparison between the two groups were performed. We included 190 patients, mostly men (59.5%), with a mean age of 45.9 years: 48% with ankylosing spondylitis (AS), 26% with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), 22% with undifferentiated SpA, and 4% with SpA associated with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Uveitis was identified in 17% of patients, ranging from 25% in AS to 4% in PsA. Time from symptom onset to SpA diagnosis was longer in patients with uveitis (10.9 versus 5.9 years, p < 0.001). A higher percentage of patients with uveitis were HLA-B27 positive (85% versus 67%, p = 0.02). The prevalence of uveitis in our population was 17%, slightly lower than previously reported in the literature. There was a diagnostic delay of about 7 years, significantly longer in patients with uveitis. New screening strategies in collaboration with ophthalmology may lead to earlier diagnosis and better outcomes.

Disease Burden in Osteoarthritis Is Similar to That of Rheumatoid Arthritis at Initial Rheumatology Visit and Significantly Greater Six Months Later

OBJECTIVE

To analyze disease burden in osteoarthritis (OA) according to Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ)/Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3) scores at the initial visit and the 6-month follow-up visit, compared with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as a benchmark for high disease burden.

METHODS

All patients with all diagnoses at the Rush University Medical Center Division of Rheumatology complete a paper MDHAQ at all visits, saved as a PDF in the electronic health record. MDHAQ 0-10 scores for physical function, pain, and patient global assessment (compiled into RAPID3 0-30 scores) and additional scales at the initial and 6-month follow-up visits, for new OA and RA patients seen from 2011 to 2017, were compared. OA and RA patients were classified as self-referred or physician-referred, and RA patients were classified as disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD)-naive or having prior-DMARD treatment. Patient groups were compared using t-tests and analysis of variance, adjusted for age, disease duration, body mass index (BMI), education, and ethnicity.

RESULTS

Compared with RA patients, OA patients had higher age, BMI, and disease duration. At initial visit, the mean RAPID3 did not differ significantly in OA versus DMARD-naive RA patients, whether self- or physician-referred (range 14.8-16.4 [P = 0.38]), or in all OA patients versus DMARD-naive RA patients versus prior-DMARD RA patients (15.0, 15.7, and 15.8, respectively [P = 0.49]). After 6 months, RAPID3 was improved to 13.3, 10.3, and 10.8, respectively, which represented substantially greater improvement in RA patients than OA patients (P < 0.001). Similar results were seen for most self-reported measures and in adjusted analyses.

CONCLUSION

MDHAQ/RAPID3 scores are similar in OA and RA patients at the initial visit, but higher in OA patients than in RA patients 6 months later, reflecting superior RA treatments. The same MDHAQ/RAPID3 allows comparisons of disease burdens in different diseases.

Real-World Patient Experience on the Path to Diagnosis of Ankylosing Spondylitis

Introduction

We describe the journey to diagnosis of ankylosing spondylitis (AS) from the patient perspective and examine differences in this journey by sex.

Methods

US adults aged ≥ 18 years with a self-reported AS diagnosis were recruited online through CreakyJoints, a patient support community, and ArthritisPower, a patient research registry. Respondents completed a web-based survey on sociodemographics, disease burden, and diagnosis history. Results were stratified by sex and time to diagnosis using two-sample t tests and χ² tests, respectively, to observe differences across the groups; P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

Results

Among 235 respondents, 174 (74.0%) were female. Mean (SD) ages of female and male respondents were 48.6 (10.6) and 53.1 (10.3) years, respectively. From the time respondents began seeking medical attention, 87 were diagnosed within ≤ 1 year, 71 in 2–9 years, and 77 after ≥ 10 years. Symptoms that led respondents to seek treatment were back pain (73.2%) and joint pain (63.8%); fatigue and difficulty sleeping were more common among respondents with longer times to diagnosis. During the diagnosis process, men with AS tended to receive quicker AS diagnosis compared with women. Overall, commonly reported initial diagnoses among respondents with longer time to AS diagnosis included back problems and psychosomatic disorders. Significantly more women reported misdiagnoses of fibromyalgia (20.7 vs. 6.6%) and psychosomatic disorders (40.8 vs. 23.0%) compared with men.

Conclusions

Diagnosis delays and misdiagnoses were common among respondents with AS. Increasing awareness about AS among referring providers may minimize diagnosis delay.

Funding

Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Plain Language Summary

Plain language summary available for this article.

Electronic Supplementary Material

The online version of this article (10.1007/s40744-019-0153-7) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Value of the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 in Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis: Results From a Tight-Control Clinical Trial and an Observational Cohort

OBJECTIVE

To analyze the Routine Assessment of Patient Index Data 3 (RAPID3), a patient-reported, composite index, designed initially for feasibility in clinical care. RAPID3 was developed in rheumatoid arthritis, but has been found useful in many rheumatic diseases. We analyzed RAPID3 in patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

METHODS

Post hoc analyses were performed on 2 independent data sets, the Tight Control of Psoriatic Arthritis (TICOPA) clinical trial, and the Long-Term Outcome in Psoriatic Arthritis Study (LOPAS II), an observational cohort. RAPID3 (range 0-30) is the total of three 0-10 scores for the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (recalculated from 0-3), pain visual analog scale (VAS), and global VAS. RAPID3 scores were compared to the Psoriatic Arthritis Disease Activity Score (PASDAS), the Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA), and other available clinical measures, according to Spearman's correlation coefficients, standardized response mean, SEM, smallest detectible difference, minimally important difference (in patients who improved), and receiver operating characteristic curves. RAPID3 remission was compared to criteria for both standard minimal disease activity (MDA) and very low disease activity (VLDA).

RESULTS

RAPID3 was correlated significantly with PASDAS in TICOPA (r = 0.79, P < 0.01) and with DAPSA in LOPAS II (ρ = 0.59, P < 0.01), and with most other measures in both data sets. RAPID3 discriminated between tight control and standard care in TICOPA at 48 weeks at levels comparable to DAPSA and the PASDAS (P < 0.01). RAPID3 remission discriminated treatment groups in TICOPA intermediate between MDA and VLDA criteria.

CONCLUSION

RAPID3 appears comparably informative to PASDAS and DAPSA in PsA, with greater feasibility for routine clinical care.

Securely collecting multidimensional health information from patients with rheumatoid arthritis using smart device technology: Beneficial effect for physicians and patients

AIM

A challenge to the medical care of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the management of the wide variety of information, including medication history and disease status, obtained from multiple sources to inform treatment decisions. To address this important clinical issue, we developed a data management system, based on smart device technology, and evaluated the benefit of this information to medical experts in helping them to form an impression of patients' health and disease, and treatment status before examination.

METHODS

Fifty-seven patients with RA input relevant information about their condition and responses to a self-report health assessment questionnaire into a smart device template before their scheduled examination. The efficacy of the system was assessed as a decrease in examination time at each visit, and the correlation between the self-reported Multi-Dimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire and the 28-joint Disease Activity Score 28-joint count erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), which was used as a gold standard.

RESULTS

Examination duration was reduced in most patients at each visit. During the study, there were no limitations for patients with poor eyesight or severe arthropathy in using the system. In fact, the majority of patients found the smart technology to be easier to use than hand-written questionnaires and health forms, regardless of age and disease activity.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings support the use of smart technology to provide accurate patient-specific data and to streamline the process of medical care for patients with RA.