Diagnostic spectrum and 2-year outcome in a cohort of patients with very early arthritis

Risk Factors for Developing Rheumatoid Arthritis in Patients With Undifferentiated Arthritis and Inflammatory Arthralgia

Currently, there is an increasing interest in treating patients at risk of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) to prevent the development of this chronic disease. In this sense, research has focused attention on the early identification of predictive factors of this disease. Autoantibodies and markers of systemic inflammation can be present before clinical arthritis and RA development. So, the phase of inflammatory arthralgia preceding clinical arthritis is an important part of the window of opportunity and, starting treatment might prevent progression to chronic arthritis. Additionally, the early diagnosis and treatment initiation, in patients with inflammatory arthritis at risk of persistence and/or erosive progression, are fundamental because may allow optimal clinical responses, better chances of achieving sustained remission, preventing irreversible organ damage and optimizing long-term outcomes. This review aims to give an overview of clinical risk factors for developing RA, both in suspected arthralgia and in undifferentiated arthritis. Besides taking into consideration the role of serological markers (immunological and acute phase reactants) and clinical features assessed at consultation such as: articular affection and patient's clinical perception. Other features as sociodemographic and environmental factors (lifestyle habits, microbiota, periodontal disease among others), have been included in this revision to give an insight on strategies to prevent development of RA and/or to treat it in early stages.

Rheumatoid factor and falsely elevated results in commercial immunoassays: data from an early arthritis cohort

The aim of the study was to  assess RF cross-reactivity to animal antibodies used in immunoassays, and to test if selected commercial immunoassays are vulnerable to interference from RF, causing false test results. Our study included samples from patients with RF-positive rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and controls (patients with RF-negative RA and psoriatic arthritis), included in an early arthritis-cohort. Reactivity to mouse IgG1, mouse IgG2a, rabbit IgG, bovine IgG, sheep/goat IgG and human IgG was analysed using in-house interference assays. RF-positive sera with strong reactivity to mouse IgG1 were analysed in three commercial immunoassays. To reveal interference, results before and after addition of blocking aggregated murine IgG1 were compared. Samples from 124 RF-positive RA patients and 66 controls were tested. We found considerably stronger reactivity toward animal antibodies, particularly mouse IgG1 (73% vs. 12%) and rabbit IgG (81% vs. 6%), in sera from RF-positive RA-patients compared to controls (p < 0.001). After selecting samples for testing in commercial assays, interference was revealed in 6/30 sera in the Architect β-hCG assay, 7/10 sera in the 27-plex cytokine assays, and in 2/33 samples in the Elecsys Soluble Transferrin Receptor assay. Our study revealed considerable RF reactivity to animal antibodies used in immunoassays and RF was associated with falsely elevated results in immunoassays used in clinical care and research. Clinicians, laboratorians, researchers and assay manufacturers must be alert to the risk of falsely elevated test results in RF-positive RA patients.

The importance of ultrasound examination in early arthritis

Objectives

To assess the importance of ultrasound (US) examination of joints in hands and feet in patients with early arthritis and perform comparative analysis of the diagnostic value of US examination for 8, 12 and 52 selected joints.

Material and methods

123 patients (87 women, 36 men) with arthritis lasting less than 12 months, naive to disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs and glucocorticosteroids. Necessary differential diagnostics was performed for each patient. After the preliminary analysis, 72 patients met the classification criteria for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to ACR/EULAR of 2010, and undifferentiated arthritis (UA) was diagnosed in 51 patients. UA patients were followed up after 6 and 12 months, and verification of the initial diagnosis yielded the following groups of patients: patients meeting classification criteria for RA, patients with maintained diagnosis of UA, patients in remission, and patients with other diagnoses. Ultrasound examination was performed considering the volume of joint effusion (JE), synovial membrane hypertrophy (GS), and synovial membrane hyperaemia assessed by power Doppler (PD). Results were assessed using the semi-qualitative scale. Coefficients being the sum of US scores for the assessment of JE, GS and PD for 52 and 12 joints in hands and feet, and 8 joints in hands were determined for the purpose of the study.

Results

In patients meeting classification criteria for RA during the initial assessment the US examination yielded significantly higher PD-52I, PD-12I and PD-8I coefficients. In UA patients who were diagnosed with RA after 12 months, the GS-8I coefficient was significantly higher.

Conclusions

Ultrasonography is a valuable tool in diagnostics of early arthritis. The GS assessment has prognostic value for UA patients. The assessment of 8 or 12 selected joints is often sufficient for the diagnostics of patients with early arthritis.

Autoantibody and metalloproteinase activity in early arthritis

OBJECTIVES

The aim of the study was to evaluate the frequency of anti-mutated citrullinated vimentin antibodies (a-Sa), anti-citrullinated α-enolase peptide 1 antibodies (a-CEP-1), anti-filaggrin antibodies (AFAs), heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein compies/anti-RA33-antibodies (a-hnRNP/RA33), anti-carbamylated protein antibodies (a-CarP), and metalloproteinase (MMPs) activity in patients with early inflammatory arthritis (EIA).

METHODS

Seventy-four patients with EIA: 51 diagnosed with RA (rheumatoid arthritis) and 23 with UA (undifferentiated arthritis), and 20 healthy volunteers were enrolled to the study. Inflammatory markers, rheumatoid factor (RF), and antibodies mentioned above were assessed in all patients.

RESULTS

In the EIA group, we observed significantly higher concentration of a-CEP-1 (65.8 ± 111.6 RU/mL) than in controls (2.0 ± 0.0 RU/mL). In RF(+) RA patients, we observed higher concentration of a-Sa and a-CEP-1 than in other groups. A-Sa were positive in 69% of RF(+) RA, 37% of RF(-) RA, 26% of UA patients and in 10% of controls. A-CEP-1 were positive in 77% of RF(+) RA patients, in 56% of RF(-) RA patients, in 8.7% of UA patients, but they were negative in controls. In patients with RF(+) RA, positive a-CarP were present statistically significantly more often than in RF (-) RA patients. No statistically significant difference in frequency of a-hnRNP/RA33 and AFA between RF(+) RA, RF(-) RA, and UA was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that a-CEP-1 may help in differentiation between RF(-) RA and UA. a-CEP-1 and a-Sa may be useful while diagnosing EIA. a-CarP may be used in differentiation of RA RF(-) and UA. However, a follow-up study is needed to evaluate the prognostic value of analyzed antibodies.