Long-term use of adalimumab as monotherapy after attainment of low disease activity with adalimumab plus methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis

Can Patients With Controlled Rheumatoid Arthritis Taper Methotrexate From Targeted Therapy and Sustain Remission? A Systematic Review and Metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the risk of not being able to sustain remission after tapering methotrexate (MTX) from targeted therapy in patients with controlled rheumatoid arthritis (RA).

METHODS

A systematic literature search was conducted in MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for studies reporting remission outcomes after tapering MTX from targeted therapies in RA. Full-text articles and abstracts reported in English were included. Metaanalyses were conducted using random-effects models. Forest and funnel plots were created.

RESULTS

A total of 10 articles were included. Studies evaluated MTX being tapered from combination treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, tocilizumab, abatacept, and tofacitinib. A total of 9 studies used a randomized design and 1 was observational. Out of 10 studies, 3 focused on early RA (ie, < 1 yr). The MTX-tapering strategy was gradual in 2 studies and rapid in 8 studies. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 18 months in randomized trials and up to 3 years in the observational study. Our metaanalysis, which included 2000 participants with RA from 10 studies, showed that patients who tapered MTX from targeted therapy had a 10% reduction in the ability to sustain remission and an overall pooled risk ratio of 0.90 (95% CI 0.84-0.97). There was no heterogeneity (I ² = 0%, P = 0.94). Our funnel plot indicated minimal publication bias.

CONCLUSION

Patients with controlled RA may taper MTX from targeted therapy with a 10% reduction in the ability to sustain remission for up to 18 months. Longer follow-up studies with attention to radiographic, functional, and patient-reported outcomes are needed. The risk of disease worsening should be discussed with the patient with careful follow-up and prompt retreatment of disease worsening.

The addition of iguratimod can reduce methotrexate dose in rheumatoid arthritis with clinical remission

OBJECTIVES

We prospectively evaluated whether the addition of iguratimod (IGU) could sustain clinical remission in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients after tapering of methotrexate (MTX).

METHODS

The study included 47 patients; 25 patients in the MTX maintenance group, and 22 patients in the IGU addition group who were treated with additional IGU and tapering of MTX dose. Clinical efficacy and safety were evaluated at 12, 24, and 36 weeks.

RESULTS

In the IGU addition group, the dose of MTX could be reduced from 8.6 ± 2.4 mg/week at baseline to 4.7 ± 2.2 mg/week at 36 weeks (p < .001). Clinical remission was maintained (disease activity score [DAS]28-ESR 1.48 ± 0.63 at baseline and 1.69 ± 0.76 at 36 weeks, p = .911), and disease activity remained low (clinical disease activity index [CDAI] 2.4 ± 1.5 at baseline and 3.1 ± 3.4 at 36 weeks, p = .825). The US-GLOSS score significantly decreased from 9.2 ± 5.3 at baseline to 6.4 ± 4.3 at 36 weeks (p = .034). In the IGU addition group, two patients discontinued IGU because of stomatitis and three patients relapsed during the follow-up period (flare rate: 15.0%). There was no significant difference in RA disease activity at 36 weeks between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Additional use of IGU can effectively reduce the MTX dose required by patients during clinical remission without inducing a flare.

Early non-response to certolizumab pegol in rheumatoid arthritis predicts failure to achieve low disease activity at 1 year: data from a prospective observational study

Objective

To evaluate the performance of clinical criteria for predicting late treatment failure in patients with early non-response to certolizumab pegol (CZP).

Methods

A protocol-specified analysis of interim data from ECLAIR, a 3-year longitudinal, prospective, observational, multicentre study of patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) initiating CZP treatment in France, was conducted. Clinical measures assessed were Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), Disease Activity Score-28 with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28(ESR)) and Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI). Early non-response was measured at 3 months (M3) and failure to achieve low disease activity (LDA) at 12 months (M12).

Results

574/792 enrolled patients were treated at M3. The numbers available for predictability analyses were 532 (CDAI), 434 (DAS28(ESR)) and 496 (HAQ-DI). Of the three indices evaluated, the highest predictor of non-response value was observed for the CDAI (88.8% (95% CI 81.0 to 94.1)), indicating that up to 88% of patients identified as non-responders at M3 failed to achieve LDA at M12, regardless of baseline disease severity or treatment history. The specificity for this measure was also very high (96.0%), indicating that less than 5% of patients who achieved CDAI response at M12 had not responded at M3. Similar predictability was observed for DAS28(ESR), but only in patients with high disease activity at baseline and/or those previously treated by a biological disease-modifying antirheumatic drug.

Conclusion

CDAI non-response at M3 is a predictor of failure to achieve the therapeutic target of LDA at M12 in patients with RA initiating treatment with CZP.

Current Therapeutic Options in the Treatment of Rheumatoid Arthritis

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by chronic inflammation of the joints. Untreated RA leads to a destruction of joints through the erosion of cartilage and bone. The loss of physical function is the consequence. Early treatment is important to control disease activity and to prevent joint destruction. Nowadays, different classes of drugs with different modes of action are available to control the inflammation and to achieve remission. In this review, we want to discuss differences and similarities of these different drugs.