Transcutaneous auricular branch vagal nerve stimulation as a non-invasive add-on therapeutic approach for pain in systemic sclerosis

Effect of transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation in hemodialysis patients: A randomized controlled trial

INTRODUCTION

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) has shown potential in neurological, autoimmune, and cardiovascular disorders, but its effects on HD patients remain unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of tVNS in HD patients.

METHODS

We conducted a randomized controlled clinical trial on patients receiving HD ≥6 months. The tVNS group received stimulation for 1 h during the first 2 h of HD sessions, three times weekly for 8 weeks, while the control group received standard care. The primary outcomes were dialysis efficiency (Single-pool Kt/V, Sp Kt/V) and dialysis-related symptoms (Dialysis Symptom Index, DSI), assessed every 4 weeks. Secondary outcomes included pain and fatigue scores, physical performance, Hemodialysis Comfort Scale, hemoglobin levels, Mini-Mental State Examination, and anxiety and depression scores, measured at baseline and 8 weeks after intervention.

RESULTS

A total of 63 patients were enrolled in the study, with 32 patients assigned to the tVNS group and 31 patients to the control group. At 8 weeks, the tVNS group showed significant improvements in Sp Kt/V (1.31 ± 0.11 vs. 1.25 ± 0.10, p = 0.02), and DSI (12.09 ± 5.84 vs. 16.26 ± 5.27, p = 0.004), as well as reductions in pain and fatigue, and increases in physical function, comfort, and hemoglobin. However, there were no statistically significant changes observed in cognitive function, anxiety, or depression.

CONCLUSIONS

tVNS could improve dialysis efficiency, symptoms, and physical function in HD patients, indicating it may have a role as a complementary therapy.

Cardiac vagal control and inflammation are upregulated in exceptional human longevity

We investigated the interplay of cardiovascular autonomic and inflammatory profiles in persons with extreme longevity (PEL), their direct offsprings (DO), and a group of controls matched for age and sex with the DO. Cardiac autonomic control was assessed through the heart rate variability (HRV) using spectral and symbolic analysis. The plasma concentration and gene expression of interleukin (IL)-10, IL-6, and TNF-α were quantified. In PEL, the sympatho-vagal is shifted to a vagal predominance and both pro- and anti-inflammatory circulation cytokines are increased compared to DO and controls. Also, no differences were found in HRV between DO and controls. These preliminary results suggest that environmental factors, at least in our small sample, may overcome the impact of heritability on cardiac autonomic control and inflammatory circulation cytokines.

Transcutaneous Auricular Vagus Nerve Stimulation for Managing Pain: A Scoping Review

OBJECTIVES

To examine the pain conditions that have been studied using transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS), the various methods and dosage configurations used, as well as identify current gaps in the literature.

DESIGN

Scoping review with the literature search and reporting guided by the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement-extension for scoping reviews.

REVIEW METHODS

A systematic search was conducted across four databases-Pubmed/Medline (n = 24), PsycInfo (n = 218), CINAHL (n = 114), and Scopus (n = 52)-comprising a total of 408 publications from peer-reviewed journals. The MeSH terms used for the search were: "transcutaneous nerve stimulation AND vagus nerve stimulation" along with "transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation OR taVNS AND pain" with filters placed for clinical trials published between 2014 to March 2024.

RESULTS

A total of 26 publications met eligibility for inclusion in this scoping review. The most common types of pain that have been used to evaluate the efficacy of taVNS include episodic migraine without aura, rheumatoid arthritis, fibromyalgia, irritable bowel syndrome, and chronic low back pain. The device type and settings, dosage, and placement of electrodes varied across studies. Identified research gaps include the need to determine optimal dosage for the pain condition under study, inclusion of measures to evaluate intervention fidelity, long-term outcomes and symptoms that co-occur with pain, and subanalyses to examine outcomes among various sociodemographic variables.

CONCLUSIONS

There is increasing evidence supporting the potential of taVNS in pain management. Further research is necessary to comprehensively evaluate its efficacy, underlying mechanisms, and to optimize its clinical application.

NURSING PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

The findings indicate a growing body of evidence for effective use of taVNS for pain management, along with reducing co-occurring symptoms, such as depression. Nurses should be knowledgeable about this treatment option and collaborate with other healthcare professionals to develop best practices for the use of this technology in practice.

Clinical application of transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation: a scoping review

PURPOSE

Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (taVNS) is an emerging non-invasive neuromodulation therapy. This study aimed to explore the therapeutic use of taVNS, optimal stimulation parameters, effective sham protocols, and safety.

METHODS

A scoping review was conducted. Five databases and grey literature were searched. The data extracted included stimulation parameters, adverse events (AEs), and therapeutic effects on clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

109 studies were included. taVNS was used across 21 different clinical populations, most commonly in psychiatric, cardiac, and neurological disorders. Overall, 2,214 adults received active taVNS and 1,017 received sham taVNS. Reporting of stimulation parameters was limited and inconsistent. taVNS appeared to have a favourable therapeutic effect across a wide range of clinical populations with varied parameters. Three sham protocols were reported but their effectiveness was documented in only two of the 54 sham-controlled studies. Most reported adverse events were localised to stimulation site.

CONCLUSION

There is growing evidence for taVNS therapeutic effect. taVNS appears safe and tolerable. Sham protocols need evaluation. Standardised and comprehensive reporting of both stimulation parameters and adverse events is required. Two different questionnaires have been proposed to evaluate adverse events and the effectiveness of sham methods in blinding participants.

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS): recent advances and future directions

PURPOSE

Vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) is emerging as a unique and potent intervention, particularly within neurology and psychiatry. The clinical value of VNS continues to grow, while the development of noninvasive options promises to change a landscape that is already quickly evolving. In this review, we highlight recent progress in the field and offer readers a glimpse of the future for this bright and promising modality.

METHODS

We compiled a narrative review of VNS literature using PubMed and organized the discussion by disease states with approved indications (epilepsy, depression, obesity, post-stroke motor rehabilitation, headache), followed by a section highlighting novel, exploratory areas of VNS research. In each section, we summarized the current role, recent advancements, and future directions of VNS in the treatment of each disease.

RESULTS

The field continues to gain appreciation for the clinical potential of this modality. VNS was initially developed for treatment-resistant epilepsy, with the first depression studies following shortly thereafter. Overall, VNS has gained approval or clearance in the treatment of medication-refractory epilepsy, treatment-resistant depression, obesity, migraine/cluster headache, and post-stroke motor rehabilitation.

CONCLUSION

Noninvasive VNS represents an opportunity to bridge the translational gap between preclinical and clinical paradigms and may offer the same therapeutic potential as invasive VNS. Further investigation into how VNS parameters modulate behavior and biology, as well as how to translate noninvasive options into the clinical arena, are crucial next steps for researchers and clinicians studying VNS.

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation in anti-inflammatory therapy: mechanistic insights and future perspectives

Non-invasive vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) represents a transformative approach for managing a broad spectrum of inflammatory and autoimmune conditions, including rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease. This comprehensive review delineates the mechanisms underlying VNS, emphasizing the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, and explores interactions within the neuro-immune and vagus-gut axes based on both clinical outcomes and pre-clinical models. Clinical applications have confirmed the efficacy of VNS in managing specific autoimmune diseases, such as rheumatoid arthritis, and chronic inflammatory conditions like inflammatory bowel disease, showcasing the variability in stimulation parameters and patient responses. Concurrently, pre-clinical studies have provided insights into the potential of VNS in modulating cardiovascular and broader inflammatory responses, paving the way for its translational application in clinical settings. Innovations in non-invasive VNS technology and precision neuromodulation are enhancing its therapeutic potential, making it a viable option for patients who are unresponsive to conventional treatments. Nonetheless, the widespread adoption of this promising therapy is impeded by regulatory challenges, patient compliance issues, and the need for extensive studies on long-term efficacy and safety. Future research directions will focus on refining VNS technology, optimizing treatment parameters, and exploring synergistic effects with other therapeutic modalities, which could revolutionize the management of chronic inflammatory and autoimmune disorders.

Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation effects on chronic pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Chronic pain is one of the major causes of disability with a tremendous impact on an individual's quality of life and on public health. Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) is a safe therapeutic for this condition. We aimed to evaluate its effects in adults with chronic pain. A comprehensive search was performed, including randomized controlled trials published until October 2023, which assessed the effects of noninvasive tVNS. Cohen's d effect size and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated, and random-effects meta-analyses were performed. Fifteen studies were included. The results revealed a mean effect size of 0.41 (95% CI 0.17-0.66) in favor of tVNS as compared with control, although a significant heterogeneity was observed (χ2 = 21.7, df = 10, P = 0.02, I 2 = 53.9%). However, when compared with nonactive controls, tVNS shows a larger effect size (0.79, 95% CI 0.25-1.33), although the number of studies was small (n = 3). When analyzed separately, auricular tVNS and cervical tVNS against control, it shows a significant small to moderate effect size, similar to that of the main analysis, respectively, 0.42 (95% CI 0.08-0.76, 8 studies) and 0.36 (95% CI 0.01-0.70, 3 studies). No differences were observed in the number of migraine days for the trials on migraine. This meta-analysis indicates that tVNS shows promise as an effective intervention for managing pain intensity in chronic pain conditions. We discuss the design of future trials to confirm these preliminary results, including sample size and parameters of stimulation.

The combined effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation and transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation on pressure and heat pain thresholds in pain-free subjects: a randomized cross-over trial

BACKGROUND

Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is a non-invasive modality that utilizes electrical currents to modulate pain in populations with acute and chronic pain. TENS has been demonstrated to produce hypoalgesic effects in postoperative pain, fibromyalgia, knee osteoarthritis, and healthy subjects. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (TaVNS) is a non-invasive modality that modulates the vagus nerve by stimulating its auricular branches. The effects of the combination of TENS and TaVNS on producing an analgesic response have not been studied. Considering that TENS and TaVNS both stimulate similar analgesic pathways but through different means of activation, we can hypothesize that a combination of both methods can produce a more pronounced analgesic response. Therefore, the objective of this study is to assess the hypoalgesic effect of a combination of TENS and TaVNS in pain-free subjects.

METHODS/DESIGN

The study will be a simple crossover design conducted at the University of Hartford. Subjects will be recruited from the University of Hartford population via oral communication, digital flyers, and posters on campus. Thirty participants will undergo two sessions in a crossover manner with one week in between. During one session, the participants will receive TENS with active TaVNS and the other session will be a placebo procedure (TENS with placebo TaVNS). The order of these sessions will be randomized. Importantly, the pressure pain threshold (PPT) and heat pain threshold (HPT) assessors will be blinded to the treatment category. For active TaVNS, a frequency of 25 Hz will be applied with a pulse duration of 200 µs. For placebo TaVNS, the intensity will be increased to a sensory level and then decreased to 0 mA. High-frequency TENS of 100 Hz will be applied in both sessions, with a pulse duration of 200 µsec, asymmetrical biphasic square waveform, and intensity of maximal tolerance without pain. TENS and TaVNS will be turned on for 30 min after a baseline measurement of outcomes. TENS and TaVNS will then be turned off, but the electrodes will remain on until completion of post-treatment assessment. Pressure pain threshold, heat pain threshold, blood pressure, oxygen saturation, and heart rate will be tested 4 times: Once pre-intervention, once during intervention, once immediately after the intervention, and once 15 min post-intervention. Statistical analysis of the data obtained will consider a significance level of p < 0.05.

DISCUSSION

This study will provide evidence concerning the combined effects of TENS and TaVNS on pain threshold in pain-free participants. Based on the outcomes, a greater understanding of how TENS and TaVNS, when used in conjunction, can modulate pain pathways.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06361381. Registered on 09 April 2024.

Enteric neuropathy and the vagus nerve: Therapeutic implications

Enteric neuropathies are characterized by abnormalities of gut innervation, which includes the enteric nervous system, inducing severe gut dysmotility among other dysfunctions. Most of the gastrointestinal tract is innervated by the vagus nerve, the efferent branches of which have close interconnections with the enteric nervous system and whose afferents are distributed throughout the different layers of the digestive wall. The vagus nerve is a key element of the autonomic nervous system, involved in the stress response, at the interface of the microbiota-gut-brain axis, has anti-inflammatory and prokinetic properties, modulates intestinal permeability, and has a significant capacity of plasticity and regeneration. Targeting these properties of the vagus nerve, with vagus nerve stimulation (or non-stimulation/ pharmacological methods), could be of interest in the therapeutic management of enteric neuropathies.

Managing gastrointestinal manifestations in systemic sclerosis, a mechanistic approach

INTRODUCTION

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a connective tissue disease with heterogeneous presentation. Gastrointestinal (GI) complications of SSc are characterized by esophageal reflux, abnormal motility, and microbiome dysbiosis, which impact patient quality of life and mortality. Preventative therapeutics are lacking, with management primarily aimed at symptomatic control.

AREAS COVERED

A broad literature review was conducted through electronic databases and references from key articles. We summarize the physiology of gastric acid production and GI motility to provide context for existing therapies, detail the current understanding of SSc-GI disease, and review GI medications studied in SSc. Finally, we explore new therapeutic options. We propose a management strategy that integrates data on drug efficacy with knowledge of disease pathophysiology, aiming to optimize future therapeutic targets.

EXPERT OPINION

SSc-GI complications remain a challenge for patients, clinicians, and investigators alike. Management presently focuses on treating symptoms and minimizing mucosal damage. Little evidence exists to suggest immunosuppressive therapy halts progression of GI involvement or reverses damage, leaving many unanswered questions about the optimal clinical approach. Further research focused on identifying patients at risk for GI progression, and the underlying mechanism(s) that drive disease will provide opportunities to prevent long-term damage, and significantly improve patient quality of life.

Vagus nerve stimulation as a therapeutic option in inflammatory rheumatic diseases

The vagus nerve forms intricate neural connections with an extensive number of organs, particularly the digestive system. The vagus nerve has a pivotal role as a fundamental component of the autonomic nervous system, exhibiting an essential effect. It establishes a direct link with the parasympathetic system, consequently eliciting the synaptic release of acetylcholine. Recent studies have revealed the potential anti-inflammatory function of the vagus nerve. The activation of the hypothalamic system through the stimulation of vagal afferents is fundamentally involved in regulating inflammation. This activation process leads to the production of cortisol. The other mechanism, defined as the cholinergic anti-inflammatory pathway, is characterized by the involvement of vagal efferents. These fibers release the neurotransmitter acetylcholine at particular synaptic connections, involving interactions with macrophages and enteric neurons. The mechanism under consideration is ascribed to the α-7-nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. The fusion of acetylcholine receptors is responsible for the restricted secretion of inflammatory mediators by macrophages. A potential mechanism for anti-inflammatory effects involves the stimulation of the sympathetic system through the vagus nerve, leading to the control of immunological responses within the spleen. This article offers an extensive summary of the present knowledge regarding the therapeutic effectiveness of stimulating the vagus nerve in managing inflammatory rheumatic conditions based on the relationship of inflammation with the vagus nerve. Furthermore, the objective is to present alternatives that may be preferred while applying vagus nerve stimulation approaches.