HIV testing in termination of pregnancy services

High HIV prevalence in gestational trophoblastic neoplasia patients

OBJECTIVE

To assess the HIV prevalence in patients diagnosed with gestational trophoblastic neoplasia (GTN).

DESIGN

A retrospective single centre cohort study.

METHODS

A database from the Sheffield Trophoblastic Disease Centre (STDC), Sheffield, UK was searched between 1st January 2015 and 31st December 2021. A total of 3,591 patients were referred to STDC with a diagnosis of gestational trophoblastic disease (GTD), of which 221 (6.2%) were treated for GTN. The prevalence of HIV-positive tests in GTN patients was assessed.

RESULTS

HIV testing was performed in 93% GTN patients ( n  = 205/221). Overall, 1.3% of GTN patients ( n  = 3/221) were HIV-positive, involving two known HIV-positive patients and one new diagnosis. This equates to a HIV prevalence of 14 : 1000, which is ∼7 to 9× higher than the HIV prevalence in Sheffield (1.9 per 1000) and Yorkshire and Humber (1.5 per 1000).

CONCLUSION

Given the extremely high HIV prevalence in our population, 'opt out' HIV testing is recommended within our specialist trophoblastic centre for all referred GTD and GTN patients. There is little reason to suspect that the prevalence of HIV-positive patients is any lower in the cohort of GTD patients referred to specialist trophoblastic centres for hCG screening alone, without requiring chemotherapy, particularly considering that most GTN arises from GTD.

HIV testing in termination of pregnancy and colposcopy services: a scoping review

Background

Women and girls are relatively under-represented across the HIV treatment cascade. Two conditions unique to women, pregnancy and cervical cancer/dysplasia, share a common acquisition mode with HIV. This scoping review aimed to explore HIV testing practices in voluntary termination of pregnancy (TOP) and colposcopy services.

Methods

The scoping review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. We searched articles published up to 20 December 2020 using three electronic databases (PubMed/Medline, Embase, Google Scholar) and including the keywords “HIV Testing”, “Abortion, Induced”, “Colposcopy”, “HIV screen*” and “termination of pregnancy”.

Results

A total of 1496 articles were identified, of which 55 met the inclusion criteria. We included studies providing background HIV prevalence in addition to prevalence in the study population and studies of women seeking TOP rather than presenting with TOP complications. This limited our review to high-income, low HIV prevalence settings. We observed two study phases: studies pre-antiretroviral therapy (ART) using unlinked anonymous testing data and examining HIV risk factors associated with positive HIV tests and studies post-ART using routine testing data and exploring HIV testing uptake. HIV prevalence was estimated at >0.2% in most TOP settings and >1% (range 1.7%–11.4%) in colposcopy services. Many TOP providers did not have local HIV testing policies and HIV testing was not mentioned in many specialist guidelines. Testing uptake was 49%–96% in TOP and 23%–75% in colposcopy services.

Conclusion

Given the estimated HIV prevalence of >0.1% among women attending TOP and colposcopy services, HIV testing would be economically feasible to perform in high-income settings. Explicit testing policies are frequently lacking in these two settings, both at the local level and in specialist guidelines. Offering HIV testing regardless of risk factors could normalise testing, reduce late HIV presentation and create an opportunity for preventive counselling.