National survey of diagnostic services for genital herpes

Evaluating HIV Prevention Programs: Herpes Simplex Virus Type 2 Antibodies as Biomarker for Sexual Risk Behavior in Young Adults in Resource-Poor Countries

Background

Measuring effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions is challenged by bias when using self-reported knowledge, attitude or behavior change. HIV incidence is an objective marker to measure effectiveness of HIV prevention interventions, however, because new infection rates are relatively low, prevention studies require large sample sizes. Herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV-2) is similarly transmitted and more prevalent and could thus serve as a proxy marker for sexual risk behavior and therefore HIV infection.

Methods

HSV-2 antibodies were assessed in a sub-study of 70,000 students participating in an education intervention in Western Province, Kenya. Feasibility of testing for HSV-2 antibodies was assessed comparing two methods using Fisher’s exact test. Three hundred and ninety four students (aged 18 to 22 years) were randomly chosen from the cohort and tested for HIV, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis. Out of these, 139 students were tested for HSV-2 with ELISA and surveyed for sexual risk behavior and 89 students were additionally tested for HSV-2 with a point-of-contact (POC) test.

Results

Prevalence rates were 0.5%, 1.8%, 0.3% and 2.3% for HIV, Chlamydia trachomatis, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, and Trichomonas vaginalis, respectively. Prevalence of HSV-2 antibodies was 3.4 % as measured by POC test (n=89) and 14.4 % by ELISA (n=139). Specificity of the POC test compared with ELISA was 100%, and the sensitivity only 23.1%. Associations between self-reported sexual behavior and HSV-2 serostatus could not be shown.

Conclusions

Associations between self-reported sexual risk behavior and HSV-2 serostatus could not be shown, probably due to social bias in interviews since its transmission is clearly linked. HSV-2 antibody testing is feasible in resource-poor settings and shows higher prevalence rates than other sexually transmitted diseases thus representing a potential biomarker for evaluation of HIV prevention interventions.

2014 UK national guideline for the management of anogenital herpes

These guidelines concern the management of anogenital herpes simplex virus infections in adults and give advice on diagnosis, management, and counselling of patients. This guideline replaces the 2007 BASHH herpes guidelines and includes new sections on herpes proctitis, key points to cover with patients regarding transmission and removal of advice on the management of HSV in pregnancy which now has a separate joint BASHH/RCOG guideline.

Diagnosis of genital herpes simplex virus infection in the clinical laboratory

Since the type of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection affects prognosis and subsequent counseling, type-specific testing to distinguish HSV-1 from HSV-2 is always recommended. Although PCR has been the diagnostic standard method for HSV infections of the central nervous system, until now viral culture has been the test of choice for HSV genital infection. However, HSV PCR, with its consistently and substantially higher rate of HSV detection, could replace viral culture as the gold standard for the diagnosis of genital herpes in people with active mucocutaneous lesions, regardless of anatomic location or viral type. Alternatively, antigen detection—an immunofluorescence test or enzyme immunoassay from samples from symptomatic patients--could be employed, but HSV type determination is of importance. Type-specific serology based on glycoprotein G should be used for detecting asymptomatic individuals but widespread screening for HSV antibodies is not recommended. In conclusion, rapid and accurate laboratory diagnosis of HSV is now become a necessity, given the difficulty in making the clinical diagnosis of HSV, the growing worldwide prevalence of genital herpes and the availability of effective antiviral therapy.

Clinical assessment of assays for diagnosis of herpes simplex infection

It is becoming increasingly clear that the herpes simplex viruses (HSVs) 1 and 2 constitute a major, global, public health problem, particularly as genital herpes is implicated in the causation of a significant percentage of onwards transmission of the HIV virus. A major factor in the transmission of HSV is that most carriers are unaware of their diagnosis. In the last few years, the development of nucleic acid amplification technology and type-specific antibody serology to test for HSV-1 and -2 has contributed significantly to the accurate diagnosis of these infections. Despite guidance to the contrary, there is still much use of less sensitive tests such as viral culture and antibody testing based on crude antigen. It is essential that we use the most sensitive and specific diagnostic tests if we are to curb this epidemic.

Molecular methods and platforms for infectious diseases testing a review of FDA-approved and cleared assays

The superior sensitivity and specificity associated with the use of molecular assays has greatly improved the field of infectious disease diagnostics by providing clinicians with results that are both accurate and rapidly obtained. Herein, we review molecularly based infectious disease diagnostic tests that are Food and Drug Administration approved or cleared and commercially available in the United States as of December 31, 2010. We describe specific assays and their performance, as stated in the Food and Drug Administration's Summary of Safety and Effectiveness Data or the Office of In Vitro Diagnostic Device Evaluation and Safety's decision summaries, product inserts, or peer-reviewed literature. We summarize indications for testing, limitations, and challenges related to implementation in a clinical laboratory setting for a wide variety of common pathogens. The information presented in this review will be particularly useful for laboratories that plan to implement or expand their molecular offerings in the near term.

The diagnosis of genital herpes - beyond culture: An evidence-based guide for the utilization of polymerase chain reaction and herpes simplex virus type-specific serology

Accurate identification of persons with genital herpes is necessary for optimal patient management and prevention of transmission. Because of inherent inaccuracies, clinical diagnosis of genital herpes should be confirmed by laboratory testing for the causative agents herpes simplex virus type 1 (HSV-1) and HSV type 2 (HSV-2). Further identification of the HSV type is valuable for counselling on the natural history of infection and risk of transmission. Laboratory methods include antigen detection, culture, polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and conventional and type-specific serology (TSS). PCR has, by far, the greater sensitivity and should be the test of choice for symptomatic cases. HSV-2 TSS is indicated for patients with genital lesions in whom antigen detection, culture or PCR fail to detect HSV, and for patients who are asymptomatic but have a history suggestive of genital herpes. HSV-2 TSS is further indicated for patients infected with HIV. HSV-2 TSS along with HSV-1 TSS may be considered, as appropriate, in evaluating infection and/or immune status in couples discordant for genital herpes, women who develop their first clinical episode of genital herpes during pregnancy, asymptomatic pregnant women whose partners have a history of genital herpes or HIV infection, and women contemplating pregnancy or considering sexual partnership with those with a history of genital herpes. The above should be performed in conjunction with counselling of infected persons and their sex partners.

Genital Herpes / Genitalni herpes

Genital herpes is a chronic, nearly always active herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection of sacral ganglia, that may appear bilaterally and in more ganglia than previously thought. It represents one of the most prevalent sexually transmitted infections, and the most frequent cause of genital ulcer disease in the general populations of developed countries. It is caused by HSV type-2 (HSV-2) in 60-80% of cases, with HSV-1 infections causing the remainder. Genital herpes caused by HSV-1 is on the rise. Since genital HSV-1 infections have higher risk for transmission from mother to infant during delivery than HSV-2, they account for 30% of all cases of neonatal herpes. Serological studies have found prevalence of HSV-2 in the general population of developed contries to be up to 25%. Thirty years ago, herpes was defined as “Today’s Scarlet Letter”in the absence of reliable serological tests and highly effective medications, for diagnosis and treatment of genital herpes. In 2000, apart from virus isolation in cell culture (70% sensitivity), that has long been regarded as the diagnostic gold standard, type specific serological tests and higly effective antiviral agents have evolved. However, the following questions were raised: should serological testing be routinely recommended in asymptomatic patients; can antiviral therapy reduce asymptomatic shedding of the virus; can antiviral therapy reduce sexual transmission of infection; can antiviral therapy reduce acquisitation of viral copathogens, such as human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)? Now, ten years later, we know the answers. Type specific HSV DNA detection by real-time PCR assays (100% sensitivity) are tests of choice for every person with recurrent genital ulcers lasting more than 4 days, and must be available in those laboratories currently performing a significant number of PCR tests for different purposes. Type specific IgG serology assays are indicated in all asymptomatic persons who are at increased risk for HSV infection. In sexually active patients experiencing ≥ 6 recurrences per year, daily supressive dose of acyclovir, valacyclovir or famciclovir should be discontinued after a maximum of a year of continuous antiviral therapy in order to reassess recurrence frequency. If necessary, the therapy should be restarted after at least two recurrences. With such expansive diagnostic possibilities and more aggressive therapeutic approaches, we can define genital herpes not as a “Scarlet Letter”, but as a “widespread untoward consequence of human sexuality”.

Identifying potential pitfalls in conventional herpes simplex virus management

In recent years, it has become increasingly clear that genital ulcers from herpes simplex virus (HSV) are associated with HIV acquisition. In light of this evolving synergy in transmission and the availability of effective antiviral therapy, proper diagnosis and management of HSV becomes increasingly important. Unfortunately, conventional HSV management is founded on several popular misconceptions. Herein, we hope to dispel these common misconceptions and expand the current model of herpetic reactivation. By doing so, we aimed to unveil potential pitfalls in current herpetic management.

Comparison between turnaround time and cost of herpes simplex virus testing by cell culture and polymerase chain reaction from genital swabs

Clinical diagnosis of genital herpes simplex virus (HSV) (GH) infection is insensitive and non-specific and requires laboratory confirmation. In this study we compared viral culture and the amplification of HSV DNA by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) with respect to turnaround time and cost. We compared 182 swabs submitted to our laboratory between March and May 2005, which were tested using MRC-5 cell culture, with 168 genital swabs submitted during the same months in 2006, and were tested by PCR. We concluded that PCR testing in our laboratory has significantly improved the turnaround time, with 68.4% of tests having been reported in less than 24 hours. This in turn significantly improved the service provided for the diagnosis of genital herpes without additional costs.

[Diagnostic resources for sexually transmitted infections in laboratories in Catalonia (Spain)]

OBJECTIVE

With the aim of describing both the capacity and organization of the laboratories in Catalonia to diagnose sexually transmitted infections, a cross-sectional study was performed between November 2005 and March 2006, which included 140 laboratories.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight laboratories performed some STI tests, 45 received more than 50 vaginal swabs per month, 42 diagnosed Chlamydia trachomatis, but only six used polymerase chain reaction techniques. None diagnosed venereal lymphogranuloma. Eighty were able to detect Neisseria gonorrhoeae, 76 by means of culture and 63 analyzed its antibiotic resistance. A total of 23, 22, 22 and 14 laboratories received more than 500 blood samples for hepatitis B, hepatitis C, HIV and syphilis, respectively. Non-treponemic and treponemic tests were available in 84 and 52 laboratories, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In Catalonia, most STIs can be diagnosed but new technologies need to be introduced. Moreover, the efficiency of biological sample circuits should be improved.

Interactions and management issues in HSV and HIV coinfection

Significant synergistic interactions have been observed between HIV and herpes simplex virus (HSV). HIV-induced immune compromise can cause frequent and persistent HSV disease, while poorly controlled HSV replication may influence HIV pathogenicity and transmission. HSV-2 seroprevalence is high in HIV-infected cohorts worldwide, with rates of over 80% for HSV-1 and ranging from 33% to more than 80% for HSV-2. As seen in HIV-negative individuals, HSV-2 coinfection is associated with female gender, older age and black ethnicity. HSV infection is commonly under-diagnosed in HIV-infected individuals, although the use of PCR for HSV detection in mucocutaneous swabs and HSV type-specific serology can improve the diagnostic yield. In HIV-1-infected patients with frequent clinical episodes of HSV reactivation, suppressive antiviral therapy may prove beneficial in controlling HSV disease while also reducing HSV-mediated promotion of HIV replication. Antiretroviral therapy leads to a gradual recovery of HSV-specific T-cell responses and a reduction in HSV-related morbidity, indicating that successful management of coinfection should target both HIV and HSV replication. The aim of this review is to address the more speculative issues surrounding the management of HSV/HIV coinfection and to summarize the data that inform them.

Herpes simplex virus type 2: epidemiology and management options in developing countries

Genital herpes simplex virus type 2 (HSV2) is highly prevalent worldwide and an increasingly important cause of genital ulcer disease (GUD). Continued HSV2 transmission is facilitated by the large number of undiagnosed cases, the frequency of atypical disease and the occurrence of asymptomatic shedding. The lack of easy, affordable diagnostic methods and specific antiviral treatment in countries with low and middle income is of great concern, given the ability of GUD to enhance HIV transmission and acquisition. With rising HSV2 prevalence contributing to an increase in the proportion of GUD attributed to genital herpes in high-HIV prevalence settings, a safe and effective HSV vaccine is urgently needed. Meanwhile, multifaceted interventions are required to improve recognition of genital herpes, to prevent its spread and also to prevent its potential to promote HIV transmission in developing countries.