Type-2 inflammation and lung function decline in chronic airway disease in the general population

Long-Term Outcome of Childhood Asthma: Characterizing COPD-A and COPD-C Subtypes in Adulthood

Background and Aim

Asthma in early life has been linked to subsequent development of COPD and according to GOLD 2023 COPD may be divided into distinct subtypes. We aimed to investigate factors associated with the GOLD classification COPD-A (asthma in childhood) and COPD-C (tobacco exposure) in a cohort of adults with a history of severe childhood asthma.

Patients and Methods

In a cohort of Danish adults with a history of severe childhood asthma and a previous 4-month stay during childhood at the asthma care facility in Kongsberg, Norway, we divided participants in a long-term follow-up examination into COPD-A and COPD-C, defined as post-bronchodilator FEV1/FVC < 0.7, and never-smoker or ever-smoker, respectively, and no airflow limitation. Characteristics between groups were analysed.

Results

The study cohort comprised 232 adults with a history of severe childhood asthma, of whom 30 (13%) and 23 (10%), respectively, were classified as COPD-A and COPD-C. Compared to those with no airflow limitation, individuals with COPD-A and COPD-C more often had had at least one exacerbation (filled prescription of oral corticosteroid) in the past 12 months (risk ratio [RR] 1.83 and 2.65, respectively). The COPD-C group had a significantly higher Medical Research Council dyspnoea score (p<0.01) and significantly higher blood eosinophil count (p<0.01) than those with no airflow limitation. Compared to the COPD-C group, the COPD-A group had higher fractional exhaled nitric oxide (mean 29 [SD 28]) and FEV1%pred (mean 75 [SD 20]). Finally, when comparing participants with COPD-A to both COPD-C and participants without airflow limitation, the proportion of participants with osteoporosis (17%) and depression (10%) was more than twice as high.

Conclusion

Our study revealed a high prevalence and unique features of the two COPD subtypes COPD-A and COPD-C in a cohort of adults with a history of severe childhood asthma.

Differential Clinical Significance of FENO200 and CANO in Asthma, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), and Asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO)

Purpose

To investigate the differential clinical significance of fractional concentration of exhaled nitric oxide measured at a flow rate of 200 mL/s (FENO200) and concentration of nitric oxide in alveolar (CANO) in asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) or asthma-COPD Overlap (ACO).

Methods

A total of 178 patients were included, with 82 patients in asthma group, 47 patients in COPD group and 49 patients in ACO group. Data for demographic data, spirometry and exhaled nitric oxide were collected for comparative analysis, correlation analysis and discriminant canonical analysis.

Results

The values of FENO200 in asthma, COPD and ACO groups were 11.0(7.0-22.3), 8.0(6.0-11.0) and 9.0(6.5-19.5) ppb, respectively. In the asthma group, FENO200 exhibited negative correlations with FEV1/FVC, MMEF and MEF50. No significant correlation was observed between CANO and pulmonary function parameters. In the COPD group, both FENO200 and CANO showed negative correlation with pulmonary function parameters including FVC, FEV1, PEF, MMEF, MEF75, MEF50. In the ACO group, FENO200 demonstrated no significant correlation with pulmonary function parameters, while CANO was correlated with FEV1, PEF, MMEF and MEF50. In COPD group, ΔFEV1 in the bronchodilator test was correlated with FENO200. As for the ACO group, ΔFEV1 was correlated with CANO. In the discriminant canonical analysis, four parameters including gender, age, MEF75 and FENO50 discriminated between the three groups of asthma, COPD and ACO.

Conclusion

In asthma, COPD and ACO, FENO200 has demonstrated a robust correlation with CANO. Elevated FENO200 levels are predominantly indicative of pulmonary function impairment in asthma and COPD, whereas elevated CANO levels are mainly correlated with pulmonary function impairment in COPD and ACO. Compared with FENO200 and CANO, FENO50 may have a better discriminatory ability in distinguishing asthma, COPD and ACO.

Real-World and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Dupilumab and Other Biological Drugs for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease-A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Over the last few decades, the efficacy of biological therapies for COPD has been evaluated by different randomized controlled trials (RCTs). Still, the evaluation of real-world data and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have not been performed in this field before. In the current work, we present a systematic literature review of the real-world data and PROMs of biological treatments for COPD.

METHODS

Three large databases (MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, and ScienceDirect) were utilized for the systematic literature review. Clinical studies (RCT, cohorts, case series/reports) assessing patients with COPD treated by any biological therapy were included.

RESULTS

The review resulted in twelve eligible studies (nine randomized controlled trials and three "real-world" case series/reports). The evaluation of PROMs in the included studies was mainly limited to the severity and burden of respiratory symptoms. Most biological therapies were associated with improved PROMs compared to the baseline, although not for the placebo. Dupilumab was the only biologic therapy with proven efficacy in RCT for both objective and subjective measures. One prior study reported patients' self-perceived drug effects, and none evaluated patients' perceived disease status. Only 25 patients were assessed in a real-world setting for all biologic therapies combined. Real-world data were retrospective in the form of case reports or series.

CONCLUSIONS

There are limited data on patients' experience with biological therapies for COPD. While real-world data and PROMs are missing, biases such as a placebo effect must be considered, requiring their incorporation with objective outcomes from prospective controlled trials.

Choosing the Right Biologic for the Right Patient With Severe Asthma

In this instalment of the How I Do It series on severe asthma, we tackle the clinical conundrum of choosing the right biologic for the right patient with severe asthma. With 6 biologics now approved for use in this area comprising 4 different targeting strategies (anti-Ig E: omalizumab; anti-IL-5 and anti-IL-5-receptor: mepolizumab, reslizumab, and benralizumab; anti-IL-4-receptor: dupilumab; anti-thymic stromal lymphopoietin: tezepelumab), this question is increasingly complex. Recognizing that no head-to-head trial has compared biologics, we based our review on the expected effects of inhibiting different aspects of type 2 airway inflammation, supported whenever possible by clinical trial and real-world data. We use 4 variations of a case of severe uncontrolled asthma to develop concepts and considerations introduced in the previous installment ("Workup of Severe Asthma") and discuss pregnancy-related, biomarker-related, comorbidity-related, and corticosteroid dependency-related considerations when choosing a biologic. The related questions of deciding when, why, and how to switch from one biologic to another also are discussed. Overall, we consider that the choice of biologics should be based on the available clinical trial data for the desired efficacy outcomes, the biomarker profile of the patient, safety profiles (eg, when pregnancy is considered), and opportunities to target 2 comorbidities with 1 biologic. Using systemic and airway biomarkers (blood eosinophils and exhaled nitric oxide) and other phenotypic characteristics, we suggest a framework to facilitate therapeutic decision-making. Post hoc studies and new comparative studies are needed urgently to test this framework and to determine whether it allows us to make other clinically useful predictions.

Correlation of fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) and clinical outcomes in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: A prospective cohort study

BACKGROUND

Fractional exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) is an acceptable and noninvasive marker for defining eosinophilic airway inflammation. Further study is necessary to clarify the role of FeNO in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This study aimed to determine the association between FeNO levels and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

A prospective observational study was conducted at Songklanagarind Hospital from October 2020 to November 2022. FeNO testing and spirometry were performed at the initial visit and 12-month follow-up. Exacerbation, hospitalization, lung function decline, and all-cause mortality were analyzed to determine the association between FeNO levels and clinical outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 60 patients with COPD were enrolled, 88.3 % of whom were male, with a mean age of 71.3 ± 9.5 years. There were 18 patients (30 %) in the high FeNO group (≥25 ppb) and 42 patients (70 %) in the low (<25 ppb) FeNO group. The mean blood eosinophil count (BEC) was significantly higher in the high FeNO group (p < 0.001). After a 12-month follow-up period, high FeNO group had higher exacerbation events (HR of 1.26, 95 % confidence interval (CI), 1.10-1.97, p= 0.025). Hospitalization and mortality rates were significantly higher in the high FeNO group. Regardless of the inhaled corticosteroids used, patients with high BEC and FeNO levels tended to have a greater risk of exacerbation.

CONCLUSION

In patients with COPD, FeNO levels are strongly correlated with BEC. Poor clinical outcomes were reported in patients with high FeNO levels. FeNO may be a useful biomarker for predicting clinical outcomes in patients with COPD.