1
|
Busse WW. Improving systemic corticosteroid stewardship in asthma. Eur Respir J 2022; 60:60/5/2201440. [DOI: 10.1183/13993003.01440-2022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/18/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
|
2
|
de Carvalho-Pinto RM, Cançado JED, Pizzichini MMM, Fiterman J, Rubin AS, Cerci A, Cruz ÁA, Fernandes ALG, Araujo AMS, Blanco DC, Cordeiro G, Caetano LSB, Rabahi MF, de Menezes MB, de Oliveira MA, Lima MA, Pitrez PM. 2021 Brazilian Thoracic Association recommendations for the management of severe asthma. J Bras Pneumol 2021; 47:e20210273. [PMID: 34932721 PMCID: PMC8836628 DOI: 10.36416/1806-3756/e20210273] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 08/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
Advances in the understanding that severe asthma is a complex and heterogeneous disease and in the knowledge of the pathophysiology of asthma, with the identification of different phenotypes and endotypes, have allowed new approaches for the diagnosis and characterization of the disease and have resulted in relevant changes in pharmacological management. In this context, the definition of severe asthma has been established, being differentiated from difficult-to-control asthma. These recommendations address this topic and review advances in phenotyping, use of biomarkers, and new treatments for severe asthma. Emphasis is given to topics regarding personalized management of the patient and selection of biologicals, as well as the importance of evaluating the response to treatment. These recommendations apply to adults and children with severe asthma and are targeted at physicians involved in asthma treatment. A panel of 17 Brazilian pulmonologists was invited to review recent evidence on the diagnosis and management of severe asthma, adapting it to the Brazilian reality. Each of the experts was responsible for reviewing a topic or question relevant to the topic. In a second phase, four experts discussed and structured the texts produced, and, in the last phase, all experts reviewed and approved the present manuscript and its recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Regina Maria de Carvalho-Pinto
- . Divisão de Pneumologia, Instituto do Coração − InCor − Hospital das Clínicas, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo (SP) Brasil
| | | | | | - Jussara Fiterman
- . Hospital São Lucas, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul − PUCRS − Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - Adalberto Sperb Rubin
- . Universidade Federal de Ciências da Saúde de Porto Alegre − UFCSPA − Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
- . Santa Casa de Misericórdia de Porto Alegre, Porto Alegre (RS) Brasil
| | - Alcindo Cerci
- . Universidade Estadual de Londrina − UEL − Londrina (PR) Brasil
- . Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná − PUCPR − Londrina (PR) Brasil
| | - Álvaro Augusto Cruz
- . Universidade Federal da Bahia − UFBA − Salvador (BA) Brasil
- . Fundação ProAR, Salvador (BA) Brasil
| | | | - Ana Maria Silva Araujo
- . Instituto de Doenças do Tórax, Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro − IDT/UFRJ − Rio de Janeiro (RJ) Brasil
| | - Daniela Cavalet Blanco
- . Escola de Medicina, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Rio Grande do Sul − PUCRS − Porto Alegre (RS), Brasil
| | - Gediel Cordeiro
- . Hospital Júlia Kubitschek, Fundação Hospitalar do Estado de Minas Gerais - FHEMIG - Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
- . Hospital Madre Teresa, Belo Horizonte (MG) Brasil
| | | | - Marcelo Fouad Rabahi
- . Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade Federal de Goiás − UFG − Goiânia (GO) Brasil
| | - Marcelo Bezerra de Menezes
- . Departamento de Clínica Médica, Faculdade de Medicina de Ribeirão Preto, Universidade de São Paulo, Ribeirão Preto (SP) Brasil
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
3
|
Menzella F, Ghidoni G, Fontana M, Capobelli S, Livrieri F, Castagnetti C, Facciolongo N. The role of systemic corticosteroids in severe asthma and new evidence in their management and tapering. Expert Rev Clin Immunol 2021; 17:1283-1299. [PMID: 34761712 DOI: 10.1080/1744666x.2021.2004123] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/29/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Based on the latest literature evidence, between 30% and 60% of adults with severe refractory asthma (SRA) are systemic corticosteroid (SCS) dependent. There are numerous therapeutic options in asthma, which are often not effective in severe forms. In these cases, SCS should be considered, but it is increasingly recognized that their regular use is often associated with significant and potentially serious adverse events. AREAS COVERED The aim of this article is to provide an update about the recent and significant literature on SCS and to establish their role in the management of SRA. We summarized the most important and recent evidence and we provided useful indications for clinicians. EXPERT OPINION There is now strong evidence supporting the increased risk of comorbidities and complications with long-term SCS therapies, regardless of the dose. New evidence on SCS tapering and withdrawal will allow to define protocols to address SCS management with greater safety and effectiveness, after starting efficient steroid-sparing strategies. In the next 5years, it will be necessary to implement corrective actions to address these unmet needs, to reduce the inappropriate use of SCS by maximizing the application of more innovative and effective therapies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Menzella
- Department of Medical Specialties, Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Giulia Ghidoni
- University Hospital of Modena, 208968,Respiratory Diseases Unit, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Modena Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy
| | - Matteo Fontana
- Department of Medical Specialties, Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Silvia Capobelli
- Department of Medical Specialties, Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Francesco Livrieri
- Department of Medical Specialties, Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Claudia Castagnetti
- Department of Medical Specialties, Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| | - Nicola Facciolongo
- Department of Medical Specialties, Pulmonology Unit, Arcispedale Santa Maria Nuova, Azienda USL Di Reggio Emilia - IRCCS, Reggio Emilia, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ramsahai JM, King E, Niven R, Tavernier G, Wark PAB, Simpson JL. Serum prednisolone levels as a marker of oral corticosteroid adherence in severe asthma. BMC Pulm Med 2020; 20:228. [PMID: 32854657 PMCID: PMC7451116 DOI: 10.1186/s12890-020-01263-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/20/2020] [Accepted: 08/10/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Severe asthma is a complex heterogeneous disease typically requiring advanced therapies. Underlying the treatment of all asthma, however, is the consistent recommendation across international guidelines to ensure that adherence to therapy is adequate. Currently, there is no consensus on an objective marker of adherence. Methods We performed a prospective observational study of 17 participants taking oral prednisolone using serum prednisolone levels as a marker of adherence, and sputum eosinophilia as a marker of control of type 2 airway inflammation. Based on these biomarkers, we classified participants into a non-adherent and an adherent cohort, and further stratified by the presence of ongoing sputum eosinophilia. Results We identified 3 non-adherent participants and 14 who were adherent, based on their serum prednisolone levels. Stratification using sputum eosinophil counts identified one participant as having ongoing sputum eosinophilia in the setting of non-adherence, while six were identified as steroid resistant with ongoing sputum eosinophilia despite adherence to oral prednisolone therapy. Conclusion Serum prednisolone can be used an objective marker of adherence in those patients with severe asthma taking daily oral prednisolone. In combination with sputum eosinophil counts, a steroid resistant cohort can be distinguished from one with ongoing inflammation in the setting of non-adherence. This information can then be used by clinicians to differentiate the optimal next steps for treatment in these specific populations. Trial registration Participants were recruited as part of the Markers of Inflammation in the Management of Severe Asthma (MIMOSA) study, trial registration ACTRN12616001015437, 02 August 2016.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michael Ramsahai
- Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Level 2 West, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cir, New Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia. .,Division of Respirology, Department of Medicine, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
| | - Emily King
- Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Level 2 West, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cir, New Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Robert Niven
- North West Lung Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, United Kingdom and Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Gael Tavernier
- North West Lung Centre, University Hospital of South Manchester, United Kingdom and Institute of Inflammation and Repair, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Peter A B Wark
- Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Level 2 West, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cir, New Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| | - Jodie L Simpson
- Priority Research Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute, University of Newcastle, Level 2 West, Lot 1 Kookaburra Cir, New Lambton, Newcastle, NSW, 2305, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Bleecker ER, Menzies-Gow AN, Price DB, Bourdin A, Sweet S, Martin AL, Alacqua M, Tran TN. Systematic Literature Review of Systemic Corticosteroid Use for Asthma Management. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2020; 201:276-293. [PMID: 31525297 PMCID: PMC6999108 DOI: 10.1164/rccm.201904-0903so] [Citation(s) in RCA: 171] [Impact Index Per Article: 42.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Systemic corticosteroid use to manage uncontrolled asthma and its associated healthcare burden may account for important health-related adverse effects. We conducted a systematic literature review to investigate the real-world extent and burden of systemic corticosteroid use in asthma. We searched MEDLINE and Embase databases to identify English-language articles published in 2010–2017, using search terms for asthma with keywords for oral corticosteroids and systemic corticosteroids. Observational studies, prescription database analyses, economic analyses, and surveys on oral/systemic corticosteroid use in children (>5 yr old), adolescents (12–17 yr old), and adults with asthma were included. We identified and reviewed 387 full-text articles, and our review included data from 139 studies. The included studies were conducted in Europe, North America, and Asia. Overall, oral/systemic corticosteroids were commonly used for asthma management and were more frequently used in patients with severe asthma than in those with milder disease. Long-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use was, in general, less frequent than short-term use. Compared with no use, long-term and repeated short-term oral/systemic corticosteroid use were associated with an increased risk of acute and chronic adverse events, even when doses were comparatively low. Greater oral/systemic corticosteroid exposure was also associated with increased costs and healthcare resource use. This review provides a comprehensive overview of oral/systemic corticosteroid use and associated adverse events for patients with all degrees of asthma severity and exposure duration. We report that oral/systemic corticosteroid use is prevalent in asthma management, and the risks of acute and chronic complications increase with the cumulative oral corticosteroid dosage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eugene R Bleecker
- Division of Genetics, Genomics and Precision Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Arizona Health Sciences, Tucson, Arizona
| | | | - David B Price
- Department of Primary Care Respiratory Medicine, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, United Kingdom.,Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- Department of Respiratory Diseases, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Stephen Sweet
- Research Evaluation Unit, Oxford PharmaGenesis Ltd., Oxford, United Kingdom
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
Price D, Castro M, Bourdin A, Fucile S, Altman P. Short-course systemic corticosteroids in asthma: striking the balance between efficacy and safety. Eur Respir Rev 2020; 29:29/155/190151. [PMID: 32245768 PMCID: PMC9488828 DOI: 10.1183/16000617.0151-2019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 60] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2019] [Accepted: 03/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Short courses of systemic corticosteroids (SCS), both oral and injectable, are very effective for the resolution of acute asthma symptoms, including exacerbations. However, the benefits of SCS, even short courses, must be balanced against the impact of their side-effects. While the adverse consequences of long-term use are widely recognised, there appears to be a perception in the medical community that short courses of SCS are safe. Limited but growing evidence in the literature suggests that even very brief dosing periods (3–7 days) of SCS are enough to cause significantly negative outcomes for patients. Short courses of SCS are associated with increased risk of adverse events including loss of bone density, hypertension and gastrointestinal ulcers/bleeds, in addition to serious impacts on mental health. Strategies to improve asthma control are recommended, including: 1) as-needed combination therapies in mild asthma; 2) risk factor reduction; 3) improving adherence/inhaler technique; 4) earlier initiation of add-on therapies; 5) use of biologics in appropriate patients; 6) development of new therapies to better control the disease; and 7) widespread education of the medical community. We propose that patients and primary care physicians should consider a cumulative SCS dose of 1 g per year as a highly relevant and easy-to-recall threshold. Inappropriate use of systemic corticosteroids in asthma may add to disease burden. Even short-term, intermittent use is associated with health risks. Strategies to improve asthma control and reduce inappropriate use of systemic corticosteroids are needed. https://bit.ly/3bdieam
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore.,Centre of Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK
| | - Mario Castro
- Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, University of Kansas School of Medicine, Kansas City, MO, USA
| | - Arnaud Bourdin
- Dept of Respiratory Diseases, Université de Montpellier, PhyMedExp, INSERM, CNRS, CHU de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | | | - Pablo Altman
- Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, East Hanover, NJ, USA
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Ramsahai JM, Wark PA. Appropriate use of oral corticosteroids for severe asthma. Med J Aust 2019; 209:S18-S21. [PMID: 30453868 DOI: 10.5694/mja18.00134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/06/2018] [Accepted: 05/25/2018] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
Severe asthma represents a significant burden of disease, particularly in high income nations; oral corticosteroids (OCS) remain an important part of the management toolkit for these patients. Corticosteroids are effective at targeting numerous elements of the type 2/eosinophilic inflammatory pathway and lead to both rapid reduction in eosinophilic inflammation and longer term reduction in airway hyper-responsiveness. Resistance or insensitivity to corticosteroids is a feature of severe asthma, with persistent type 2 inflammation often occurring despite regular use of OCS. OCS remain the only accepted, effective treatment for acute asthma, and also continue to play an important role in the long term management of severe asthma, in spite of their significant side effect profile. Even with the availability of the new biological therapies against IgE and interleukin-5, it is likely that a large proportion of patients will continue to require OCS to control their asthma. Future work should focus on optimising the balance between OCS efficacy and safety, and continued development of agents that allow reduction, or ideally discontinuation of their use, is needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J Michael Ramsahai
- Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
| | - Peter Ab Wark
- Centre for Healthy Lungs, Hunter Medical Research Institute University of Newcastle, Newcastle, NSW
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Eassey D, Reddel HK, Foster JM, Kirkpatrick S, Locock L, Ryan K, Smith L. "…I've said I wish I was dead, you'd be better off without me": A systematic review of people's experiences of living with severe asthma. J Asthma 2019; 56:311-322. [PMID: 29617182 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2018.1452034] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2017] [Revised: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/09/2018] [Indexed: 01/01/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Our aim was to conduct a systematic review and synthesis of qualitative evidence exploring the lived experience of adults with severe asthma. DATA SOURCES We searched MEDLINE via OvidSP, PsycINFO via OvidSP, PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, Sociological Abstracts, Google Scholar, the journals Qualitative Health Research and Qualitative Research, and a study of experiences of living with asthma by the Health Experiences Research group. STUDY SELECTIONS Studies were included if they used qualitative methods and explored the subjective experiences of adults (≥18 years) with a clear diagnosis of severe asthma. RESULTS From 575 identified studies, five met the inclusion criteria. Synthesis revealed an overarching theme of efforts that people living with severe asthma engage in to achieve personal control over their condition. Individuals 'strive for autonomy' through dealing with symptoms and treatment, acquiring knowledge, making decisions and reclaiming identity. CONCLUSION This systematic review found a paucity of qualitative studies reporting on people's perspectives of living with severe asthma, and a focus on clinical rather than personal issues. Our synthesis reveals that severe asthma was disempowering, and a threat to identity and life roles. What was important to people living with severe asthma was striving to achieve a greater level of personal control over their condition, but these efforts received little support from their healthcare providers. Thus, more attention should be paid to understanding the self-management strategies and personal goals of people living with severe asthma. This may assist in designing interventions to better support patient self-management and improve health outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Eassey
- a Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Helen K Reddel
- b Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Clinical Management Group, University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Juliet M Foster
- b Woolcock Institute of Medical Research, Clinical Management Group, University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| | - Susan Kirkpatrick
- c Health Experiences Research Group, Nuffield Department of Primary Care Health Science , University of Oxford , Oxford , UK
| | - Louise Locock
- d Health Services Research Unit , University of Aberdeen , UK
| | - Kath Ryan
- e School of Pharmacy, University of Reading , Reading , UK
| | - Lorraine Smith
- a Faculty of Pharmacy , University of Sydney , Sydney , NSW , Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Katsaounou P, Buhl R, Brusselle G, Pfister P, Martínez R, Wahn U, Bousquet J. Omalizumab as alternative to chronic use of oral corticosteroids in severe asthma. Respir Med 2019; 150:51-62. [PMID: 30961951 DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2019.02.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2018] [Revised: 12/21/2018] [Accepted: 02/04/2019] [Indexed: 10/27/2022]
Abstract
Systemic/oral corticosteroids (OCS) have been used for decades in the management of acute asthma exacerbations and chronically in patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. However, while OCS are effective at treating acute exacerbations, there is only empirical evidence regarding the efficacy of OCS at reducing the rate of exacerbations. Evidence, although scarce, is suggestive of high exacerbation rates in severe asthma patients even when receiving maintenance treatment with OCS. In addition, use of OCS is associated with undesirable effects. Despite all this, physicians have continued to use OCS for managing severe asthma and acute exacerbation due to the lack of availability of effective alternatives. Fortunately, in the last decade several biologics have been proven safe and effective for patients with uncontrolled severe asthma. This has led to the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) recommending the use of biologics, instead of maintenance OCS, in patients with severe asthma (GINA Step 5). These include one biologic targeting immunoglobulin E (IgE) (omalizumab), and different biologics targeting interleukin-5 (IL-5), the IL-5 receptor (IL-5R) or IL-4 receptor α-unit (IL-4R α), including mepolizumab (subcutaneous), reslizumab (intravenous), benralizumab (subcutaneous) and dupilumab (subcutaneous). Omalizumab for the treatment of severe allergic asthma reduces exacerbations, irrespective of blood eosinophil levels. Anti-IL-5/IL-5R biologics are indicated in patients with severe eosinophilic asthma and repetitive exacerbations, irrespective of the presence or absence of allergy. Recently, an anti-IL4Rα biologic has been approved by the FDA for eosinophilic phenotype or oral corticosteroid-dependent asthma. Finally, physicians should consider using biologics as an alternative to chronic OCS therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paraskevi Katsaounou
- School of Medicine, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, 1st ICU Evangelismos Hospital, Athens, Greece.
| | - Roland Buhl
- Pulmonary Department, Mainz University Hospital, Mainz, Germany.
| | - Guy Brusselle
- Department of Respiratory Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, De Pintelaan, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Epidemiology and Respiratory Medicine, Erasmus MC Rotterdam, Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
| | - Pascal Pfister
- Global Medical Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland.
| | - Rafael Martínez
- Global Medical Department, Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Ulrich Wahn
- Department of Paediatric Pneumology & Immunology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
| | - Jean Bousquet
- Service des Maladies Respiratoires, Hôpital Arnaud de Villeneuve, Montpellier, France.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Price DB, Trudo F, Voorham J, Xu X, Kerkhof M, Ling Zhi Jie J, Tran TN. Adverse outcomes from initiation of systemic corticosteroids for asthma: long-term observational study. J Asthma Allergy 2018; 11:193-204. [PMID: 30214247 PMCID: PMC6121746 DOI: 10.2147/jaa.s176026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 265] [Impact Index Per Article: 44.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Prior work suggests a threshold of four courses/year of systemic corticosteroid (SCS) therapy is associated with adverse consequences. The objective of this study was to investigate the onset of adverse outcomes beginning at SCS initiation in a broad asthma population. Patients and methods This historical matched cohort study utilized anonymized, longitudinal medical record data (1984–2017) of patients (≥18 years) with active asthma. Matched patients with first SCS prescription (SCS arm) and no SCS exposure (non-SCS arm) were followed until first outcome event. Associations between time-varying exposure measures and onset of 17 SCS-associated adverse outcomes were estimated using Cox proportional hazard regression, adjusting for confounders, in separate models. Results We matched 24,117 pairs of patients with median record availability before SCS initiation of 9.9 and 8.7 years and median follow-up 7.4 and 6.4 years in SCS and non-SCS arms, respectively. Compared with patients in the non-SCS arm, patients prescribed SCS had significantly increased risk of osteoporosis/osteoporotic fracture (adjusted hazard ratio 3.11; 95% CI 1.87–5.19), pneumonia (2.68; 2.30–3.11), cardio-/cerebrovascular diseases (1.53; 1.36–1.72), cataract (1.50; 1.31–1.73), sleep apnea (1.40; 1.04–1.86), renal impairment (1.36; 1.26–1.47), depression/anxiety (1.31; 1.21–1.41), type 2 diabetes (1.26; 1.15–1.37), and weight gain (1.14; 1.10–1.18). A dose-response relationship for cumulative SCS exposure with most adverse outcomes began at cumulative exposures of 1.0–<2.5 g and for some outcomes at cumulative exposures of only 0.5–<1 g (vs >0–<0.5 g reference), equivalent to four lifetime SCS courses. Conclusion Our findings suggest urgent need for reappraisal of when patients need specialist care and consideration of nonsteroid therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David B Price
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore, .,Academic Primary Care, Division of Applied Health Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK,
| | - Frank Trudo
- Medical Affairs, AstraZeneca, Wilmington, DE, USA
| | - Jaco Voorham
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore,
| | - Xiao Xu
- Global Payer Evidence and Pricing, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| | - Marjan Kerkhof
- Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute, Singapore, Singapore,
| | | | - Trung N Tran
- Medical Evidence and Observational Research, AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Daugherty J, Lin X, Baxter R, Suruki R, Bradford E. The impact of long-term systemic glucocorticoid use in severe asthma: A UK retrospective cohort analysis. J Asthma 2017; 55:651-658. [PMID: 28925768 DOI: 10.1080/02770903.2017.1353612] [Citation(s) in RCA: 35] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE Systemic glucocorticoids (SGCs) are a treatment option for severe asthma but are associated with the development of adverse events (AEs). Evidence on the extent of SGC use and the relationship between SGC dose and AE risk in severe asthma is limited. METHODS Patients with severe asthma (Global Initiative for Asthma step 4/5), with no SGC use during the <6-12 months before severe asthma determination (index date) were identified in the UK-based Clinical Practice Research Datalink database (2004-2012). Patients were assessed for SGC exposure and an incident diagnosis of an SGC-related AE (cataracts, diabetes, myocardial infarction [MI], osteoporosis, peptic ulcer or stroke) during the 8-year observation phase. The dose-related risk of an SGC-related AE was determined using AE-specific Cox proportional hazards models. RESULTS Overall, 75% of 60,418 patients identified with severe asthma received SGC during the 8-year follow-up, with the majority receiving an average of >0-≤2.5 mg/day. The risk of diabetes (hazard ratio [HR]:1.20 [95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11, 1.30]), MI (HR: 1.25 [95% CI: 1.09, 1.43]) and osteoporosis (HR: 1.64 [95% CI: 1.51, 1.78]) was increased at low SGC doses (0-2.5 mg/day), with further risk increases at doses >2.5 mg/day versus no SGC use. Compared with no SGC use, SGC increased the risk of peptic ulcer in a non-dose-dependent manner, but the risk of stroke was unchanged. CONCLUSIONS Most patients with severe asthma are exposed to SGC, which increases SGC-related AE risk. This suggests that SGC exposure should be minimized as recommended by asthma treatment guidelines.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jonas Daugherty
- a Department of Pharmaceutical Outcomes and Policy, UNC Eshelman School of Pharmacy , University of North Carolina , Chapel Hill , NC , USA.,b Value Outcomes and Epidemiology , PAREXEL International , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA
| | - Xiwu Lin
- c Value Evidence and Outcomes , GSK , Collegeville , PA , USA
| | | | - Robert Suruki
- e Worldwide Epidemiology , GSK , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA.,f Epidemiology UCB Biosciences , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA
| | - Eric Bradford
- g Respiratory Therapeutic Area , GSK , Research Triangle Park , NC , USA
| |
Collapse
|