Intraluminal irradiation for the palliation of lung cancer with the high dose rate micro-Selectron

Systematic review of brachytherapy for symptom palliation

PURPOSE

Brachytherapy is most often applied in the curative or salvage setting, but many forms of brachytherapy can be helpful for symptom palliation. Declining utilization is seen, for multiple reasons, such as lack of awareness, insufficient expertise, or poor access to equipment. High level evidence for many types of palliative brachytherapy has been lacking. The objective of the current study was to review the evidence for utilization and efficacy of brachytherapy to palliate symptoms from cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We performed a systematic search in EMBASE and MEDLINE for English-language articles published from January 1980 to May 2022 that described brachytherapy used for a palliative indication in adults with a diagnosis of cancer (any subtype) and at least one symptom related outcome. Individual case reports and conference abstracts were excluded. All publications were independently screened by two investigators for eligibility.

RESULTS

The initial search identified 3637 abstracts of which 129 were selected for in-depth review. The number of studies (total number of patients) included in the final analysis varied widely by tumor site with the majority (68.2%) involving either lung or esophageal cancer. Despite a limited number of prospective trials that assessed the efficacy of brachytherapy for symptom management, there was a positive effect on palliation of symptoms across all tumor types. There was no clear trend in the number of publications over time. The most commonly cited symptom indications for palliation by brachytherapy were dysphagia, dyspnea, pain and bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy can provide palliation for patients with advanced cancer, across different tumor sites and clinical scenarios. However, high level evidence in the literature to support palliative applications of brachytherapy is lacking or limited for many tumor sites. There appears to be a strong publication bias towards positive studies in favor of brachytherapy. Beyond anecdotal reports and individual practices, outcomes research can further our understanding of the role of brachytherapy in palliating advanced cancers of all types, and should be encouraged.

Endoluminal brachytherapy: Bronchus and oesophagus

Endobronchial brachytherapy could be proposed in case of endoluminal tumours either as a palliative or a curative treatment. As a curative treatment, endobronchial brachytherapy could obtain a high local control rate in case of limited disease. In palliative setting, endobronchial brachytherapy improved thoracic symptoms in more than 80% of cases, but it is less efficient than external beam radiation therapy for palliation. It could be also proposed to maintain the airway open after laser therapy. Oesophageal brachytherapy is a valuable option as a palliative treatment, underused at this time. It causes less side effects and a better quality of life compared to self-expanded metallic stents. For a curative aim, there is today no demonstration that a combination of external beam radiotherapy and oesophageal brachytherapy give better results than external beam radiotherapy alone in locally advanced tumours. For superficial diseases, the combination of external beam radiotherapy and oesophageal brachytherapy seems, on the contrary, promising.

Brachytherapy in the treatment of lung cancer - a valuable solution

The majority of patients with lung cancer are diagnosed with clinically advanced disease. Many of these patients have a short life expectancy and are treated with palliative aim. Because of uncontrolled local or recurrent disease, patients may have significant symptoms such as: cough, dyspnea, hemoptysis, obstructive pneumonia, or atelectasis. Brachytherapy is one of the most efficient methods in overcoming difficulties in breathing that is caused by endobronchial obstruction in palliative treatment of bronchus cancer. Efforts to relieve this obstructive process are worthwhile, because patients may experience improved quality of their life (QoL). Brachytherapy plays a limited but specific role in definitive treatment with curative intent in selected cases of early endobronchial disease as well as in the postoperative treatment of small residual peribronchial disease. Depending on the location of the lesion, in some cases brachytherapy is a treatment of choice. This option is fast, inexpensive, and easy to perform on an outpatient basis. Clinical indications, different techniques, results, and complications are presented in this work.

Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

This is an updated version of the original review published in Issue 2, 2008 of The Cochrane Library. Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) constitute about 80% of all lung cancer cases. Although surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC, fewer than 20% of tumors can be radically resected. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities in lung cancer, contributing to both its cure and palliation. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has been used as one approach to improve local control either alone or in combination with other treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of palliative EBB compared with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or other alternative endoluminal treatments in controlling thoracic symptoms and increasing survival in patients with advanced NSCLC.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL,The Cochrane Library, Issue 1 2012), MEDLINE (OvidSP) (1966 to January 2012), EMBASE (Ovid) (1974 to January 2012) and other databases as well as reference lists, and we handsearched selected journals and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different regimens of palliative EBB with EBRT or other endobronchial interventions in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently extracted data and conducted risk of bias assessment.

MAIN RESULTS

We included fourteen RCTs involving 953 participants. We included a new study assessing a variety of different fractionation schedules of high dose rate palliative EBB in this update. There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, in the patient characteristics and in the outcomes measured. We found trials comparing EBB to EBRT alone, EBB plus EBRT to EBRT alone, EBB plus chemotherapy to EBB alone, EBB to neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Nd-YAG) laser and comparisons between various fractionation schedules of high dose rate EBB. From the heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we concluded that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation of NSCLC symptoms than EBB alone. Our findings did not provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB plus EBRT to relieve symptoms compared to EBRT alone. Overall, for the primary endpoint of survival there was no evidence of benefit for EBB compared to EBRT and Nd-YAG laser or for the combination of EBB with chemotherapy. Additionally, findings from one trial suggested that twice 7.4 Gy was superior to the four times per week 3.8 Gy schedule for mean time of local control and fatal hemoptysis. No significant differences were found for fatal hemoptysis as an adverse event of EBB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence did not provide conclusive results that EBB plus EBRT improved symptom relief over EBRT alone. We were not able to provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB with EBRT, EBB in preference to EBRT, chemotherapy or Nd-YAG laser. From heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we conclude that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation than EBB alone. For patients previously treated by EBRT who are symptomatic from recurrent endobronchial central obstruction, EBB may be considered in selected cases.

Palliative endobronchial brachytherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLC) constitutes about 80% of all lung cancer cases. Although surgery is the only curative treatment of NSCLC, fewer than 20% of tumors can be radically resected. Radiotherapy is one of the main treatment modalities in lung cancer, contributing to both its cure and palliation. Endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) has been used as one approach to improve local control either alone or in combination with other treatments.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of palliative EBB in increasing survival and to control thoracic symptoms in patients with advanced NSCLC compared with external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) or other alternative endoluminal treatments.

SEARCH STRATEGY

The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, EMBASE and other databases were searched, as were reference lists and handsearching of selected journals and conference proceedings.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing different regimens of palliative EBB with EBRT or other endobronchial interventions in patients with advanced NSCLC.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Thirteen RCTs were included. There were important differences in the doses of radiotherapy investigated, patient characteristics and the outcomes measured. Because of this heterogeneity no meta-analysis was attempted.

MAIN RESULTS

We found trials comparing EBB to EBRT alone, EBB plus EBRT to EBRT alone, EBB plus chemotherapy to EBB alone, EBB to Nd-YAG laser and comparisons between diverse fractionation schedules of high dose rate EBB. From the heterogeneous information obtained from several small RCTs, we concluded that EBRT alone is more effective for palliation of NSCLC symptoms than EBB alone. Our findings did not provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB plus EBRT to relieve symptoms compared to EBRT alone. Overall, for the primary endpoint of survival there was no evidence of benefit for EBB compared to EBRT and Nd-YAG laser or for the combination of EBB with chemotherapy. Additionally, findings from one trial suggested that twice 7.4 Gy was superior to the four times per week 3.8 Gy schedule for mean time of local control and fatal haemoptysis. No significant differences were found for fatal haemoptysis as an adverse event of EBB.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The evidence did not provide conclusive results that EBB plus EBRT improved symptom relief over EBRT alone. We were not able to provide conclusive evidence to recommend EBB with EBRT, chemotherapy or Nd-YAG laser. For patients previously treated by EBRT who are symptomatic from recurrent endobronchial central obstruction, EBB may be considered in selected cases.

Palliative care in lung cancer: ACCP evidence-based clinical practice guidelines (2nd edition)

GOALS/OBJECTIVES: To review the scientific evidence on symptoms and specific complications that are associated with lung cancer, and the methods available to palliate those symptoms and complications.

METHODS

MEDLINE literature review (through March 2006) for all studies published in the English language, including case series and case reports, since 1966 using the following medical subject heading terms: bone metastases; brain metastases; cough; dyspnea; electrocautery; hemoptysis; interventional bronchoscopy; laser; pain management; pleural effusions; spinal cord metastases; superior vena cava syndrome; and tracheoesophageal fistula.

RESULTS

Pulmonary symptoms that may require palliation in patients who have lung cancer include those caused by the primary cancer itself (dyspnea, wheezing, cough, hemoptysis, chest pain), or locoregional metastases within the thorax (superior vena cava syndrome, tracheoesophageal fistula, pleural effusions, ribs, and pleura). Respiratory symptoms can also result from complications of lung cancer treatment or from comorbid conditions. Constitutional symptoms are common and require attention and care. Symptoms referable to distant extrathoracic metastases to bone, brain, spinal cord, and liver pose additional problems that require a specific response for optimal symptom control. There are excellent scientific data regarding the management of many of these issues, with lesser evidence from case series or expert opinion on other aspects of providing palliative care for lung cancer patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Palliation of symptoms and complications in lung cancer patients is possible, and physicians who provide such care must be knowledgeable about these issues.

Toward endobronchial Ir-192 high-dose-rate brachytherapy therapeutic optimization

A number of patients with lung cancer receive either palliative or curative high-dose-rate (HDR) endobronchial brachytherapy. Up to a third of patients treated with endobronchial HDR die from hemoptysis. Rather than accept hemoptysis as an expected potential consequence of HDR, we have calculated the radial dose distribution for an Ir-192 HDR source, rigorously examined the dose and prescription points recommended by the American Brachytherapy Society (ABS), and performed a radiobiological-based analysis. The radial dose rate of a commercially available Ir-192 source was calculated with a Monte Carlo simulation. Based on the linear quadratic model, the estimated palliative, curative and blood vessel rupture radii from the center of an Ir-192 source were obtained for the ABS recommendations and a series of customized HDR prescriptions. The estimated radius at risk for blood vessel perforation for the ABS recommendations ranges from 7 to 9 mm. An optimized prescription may in some situations reduce this radius to 4 mm. The estimated blood perforation radius is generally smaller than the palliative radius. Optimized and individualized endobronchial HDR prescriptions are currently feasible based on our current understanding of tumor and normal tissue radiobiology. Individualized prescriptions could minimize complications such as fatal hemoptysis without sacrificing efficacy. Fiducial stents, HDR catheter centering or spacers and the use of CT imaging to better assess the relationship between the catheter and blood vessels promise to be useful strategies for increasing the therapeutic index of this treatment modality. Prospective trials employing treatment optimization algorithms are needed.

Irradiated volume and the risk of fatal hemoptysis in patients submitted to high dose-rate endobronchial brachytherapy

To determine risk factors associated with fatal hemoptysis (FH) in endobronchial high dose-rate brachytherapy (EHDRB) 84 patients treated with EHDRB from January 1991 to June 2002 were studied. Clinical and technical parameters (including treatment volumes) were analyzed. Eight (9.5%) patients died of FH, all but one with recurrent or persistent local disease. Median interval until death due to FH was 4 months versus 6 months for the whole group. The only factor with significant correlation with FH was the 100% isodose volume (V100) (p=0.04). Larger irradiated volumes were related to FH. Analysis of volume parameters is suggested, together with the dose and number of fractions prescribed for each patient.

Chronic Cough Due to Lung Tumors

GOALS/OBJECTIVES: To review the scientific evidence on cough associated with tumors in the lungs.

METHODS

MEDLINE literature review (through March 2004) for all studies published in the English language, including case series and case reports, since 1966 using the medical subject heading terms "cough" and "lung neoplasms."

RESULTS

Primary bronchogenic carcinoma is the most common lethal neoplasm in the United States. Malignancies that arise in other organs will often metastasize to the lungs. Any form of cancer involving the lungs may be associated with cough. However, cough is far more likely to indicate involvement of the airways than the lung parenchyma because of the location of cough receptors. Cough is present in >65% of patients at the time lung cancer is diagnosed, and productive cough is present in >25% of patients. While cough as a presenting symptom of lung cancer is common, many studies have shown that lung cancer is the cause of chronic cough in <or=2% of all patients who present with a chronic cough.

CONCLUSIONS

Bronchoscopy is usually indicated when there is suspicion of airway involvement by a malignancy. Conversely, bronchoscopy usually should not be performed to assess a cough for the possibility of lung cancer when there is little risk for lung cancer (nonsmokers) and when there are normal findings on a plain chest radiograph. If the lung cancer can be removed surgically, cough will usually abate. Radiation therapy, chemotherapy (especially with gemcitabine), and endobronchial treatment methods likely will improve cough caused by lung cancer. Centrally acting narcotic antitussive agents are usually administered for the control of cough caused by lung cancer when other treatment methods fail.

High dose rate brachytherapy: its clinical applications and treatment guidelines

Brachytherapy has the advantage of delivering a high dose to the tumor while sparing the surrounding normal tissues. With proper case selection and delivery technique, high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy has great promise, because it eliminates radiation exposure, allows short treatment times, and can be performed on an outpatient basis. Additionally, use of a single-stepping source, allows optimization of dose distribution by varying the dwell time at each dwell position. However, when HDR brachytherapy is used, the treatments must be executed carefully, because the short treatment times do not allow any time for correction of errors, and mistakes can result in harm to patients. Hence, it is very important that all personnel involved in HDR brachytherapy be well trained and be constantly alert. It is expected that the use of HDR brachytherapy will greatly expand over the next decade and that refinements will occur primarily in the integration of imaging (computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, intraoperative ultrasonography) and optimization of dose distribution. It is anticipated that better tumor localization and normal tissue definition will help to optimize dose distribution to the tumor and reduce normal tissue exposure. The development of well-controlled randomized trials addressing issues of efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, and costs-versus-benefits will ultimately define the role of HDR brachytherapy in the therapeutic armamentarium.

[Endobronchial brachytherapy: technique and indications]

The endobronchial brachytherapy procedure involves the insertion of an afterloading catheter into bronchus in close proximity to an endoluminal lesion, and to perform limited irradiation sparing as much as possible normal health tissues. The catheter is inserted during a classical flexible bronchoscopy. Three types of indications have been discussed: (i) palliative treatment of lung carcinoma, with or without laser desobstruction: an improvement in respiratory symptoms was observed in 60 to 80% of the cases; (ii) curative treatment for localised endobronchial carcinomas, in previously irradiated patients, or in case of contraindication of surgery or external beam irradiation; local control rate range from 60 to 70% at 2 years; (iii) combination of external irradiation and brachytherapy in the first line treatment of lung cancers. Two randomised trials did not show any improvement in survival for this approach; however, they have included advanced diseases. In the opposite, this association seems very effective for early stage lung carcinomas. Two major complications were regularly reported, haemoptysis and radiation bronchitis. Predictive factors for these toxicities are actually better known: haemoptysis could be due to a progressive disease more often than to brachytherapy itself; technical factors (dose, volume, fractionation), however, could explain a number of radiation bronchitis, and their incidence could decrease in the future.

Lung cancer. Palliative care

The majority of patients who acquire lung cancer will have troublesome symptoms at some time during the course of their disease. Some of the symptoms are common to many types of cancers, while others are more often encountered with lung cancer than other primary sites. The most common symptoms are pain, dyspnea, and cough. This document will address the management of these symptoms, and it will also address the palliation of specific problems that are commonly seen in lung cancer: metastases to the brain, spinal cord, and bones; hemoptysis; tracheoesophageal fistula; and obstruction of the superior vena cava.

Endobronchial brachytherapy and external-beam radiotherapy in patients with endobronchial obstruction and extrabronchial extension

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of high-dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy (HDR-EB) with concomitant short-course external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) in patients with both endobronchial and extrabronchial tumor.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with endobronchial disease and extrabronchial lesions greater than 2.5cm were treated with three 5Gy HDR-EB and 37.5Gy EBRT delivered over 3.5 weeks. Flexible fiberoptic bronchoscopy was performed with the patient under conscious sedation, and tumor location, length of lesion, percentage of lumen occlusion, and presence of bleeding were recorded. Fluoroscopic visualization of the guide wire in the catheter tip assisted in demarcating the proximal and distal extent of the intraluminal tumor. 5Gy was prescribed to a distance of 1cm from the catheter and a computerized treatment planning system was used to optimize the dose distribution to the gross target volume with 1.5-2cm margins at the distal and proximal ends. Bronchoscopic and symptomatic response rates were assessed at the third HDR-EB and patients were seen in follow-up every 2 months.

RESULTS

One hundred seventeen endobronchial treatments were delivered to 33 patients with primary carcinoma, and 8 patients with metastatic carcinoma. The median age was 69 (range = 36-94); 95% reported dyspnea; 71% cough and 22% hemoptysis. Seventy-two percent of patients reported resolution of their symptoms and 54% achieved a bronchoscopic response (at least 50% decrease in intraluminal obstruction). In a multivariate logistic model including stage, age, primary tumor type, and Karnofsky performance status (KPS) as predictors, only KPS was statistically associated with bronchoscopic response (OR = 1.1; 95%CI = 1.01-1.13) and palliation of symptoms (OR = 1.3; 95%CI = 1.05-1.59). The overall median survival was 5.2 months and was associated with bronchoscopic response (11 months in responders vs 4 in nonresponders) and symptom resolution (8 months in responders vs 1.5 in nonresponders). In a multivariate Cox survival model with stage, age, primary tumor type, and KPS as predictors, only KPS was significantly associated with survival (RR = 0.92;95%CI = 0.88-0.95).

CONCLUSIONS

HDR-EB with concomitant EBRT is an effective treatment regimen for patients with both endobronchial and extrabronchial tumor. Patients with higher performance status are more likely to have resolution of disease and have longer median survival.

High dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy in combination with external beam radiotherapy for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

INTRODUCTION

A phase-II study was planned to test the effect of external beam radiotherapy in combination with endobronchial brachytherapy on the local control and survival of stage-III non-small cell lung cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients with stage-III non-small cell lung cancer have been treated with 60 Gy external beam radiotherapy and 3 x 5 Gy HDR endobronchial brachytherapy to control tumor and to prolong survival.

RESULTS

Therapy regimen was found to be very effective for the palliation of major symptoms, palliation rates were 42.8% for cough, 95.2% for hemoptysis, 88.2% for chest pain and 80.0% for dyspnea. There was a 76.7% tumor response (53.3% complete, 23.3% partial) verified by chest CT scans and bronchoscopy. However, median locoregional disease free survival was 9+/-4 months (95% CI: 1-17) and it was only 9.6% at 5 years. Major side effects were radiation bronchitis (70.0%), esophagitis (6.6%) in the acute period and bronchial fibrosis (25%), esophagial fibrosis (12.5%) and fatal hemoptysis (10.5%) in the late period. Median survival was 11+/-4 months (95% CI: 4-18),and 5-year actuarial survival was 10%. Locoregional disease free survival (P=0.008) and the overall survival was longer (P<0.001) in the patients younger than 60, survival was also improved in the patients with complete response (P=0.019). There were no major complications during catheterisation; early side effects were quite tolerable but severe late complications were around 10%.

CONCLUSIONS

It is concluded that endobronchial brachytherapy in combination with external irradiation provides a good rate of response, however does not eradicate locoregional disease and does not prolong survival except for some subgroups such as younger patients.

Intraluminal Brachytherapy for Malignant Endobronchial Tumors: An Update on Low-Dose Rate Versus High-Dose Rate Radiation Therapy

Although the evolution from low-dose rate (LDR) to high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy for malignant endobronchial tumors was presumably based on economy, patient convenience, and radiation protection, our experience with both modalities permits assessment of the pros and cons of each technique. In November 1991, our HDR remote afterloading brachytherapy unit became operational. By that time, we had treated 110 patients (group 1) with malignant endobronchial obstruction with LDR brachytherapy. Since then, all patients have been treated with HDR brachytherapy. The outcome of our first 110 patients (group 2) treated with HDR brachytherapy is presented in this communication, using group 1 as the historic control group. In group 1, patients were treated with 1 or 2 sessions of 30-60 Gy, each calculated at a 1-cm radius. In group 2, patients received 3 or 4 weekly treatments of 7 Gy, each calculated at a 1-cm radius. The majority of patients in each group had previously received a full course of external beam irradiation, and a history of laser bronchoscopy was also similar for the 2 groups. Differences in bronchoscopic response rate (82% vs. 96%, respectively) and complications (3.6% vs. 2.7%, respectively) were statistically insignificant between the LDR group and the HDR group. We believe HDR brachytherapy is the state-of-the-art modality in intraluminal therapy for endobronchial malignancies.

External irradiation versus external irradiation plus endobronchial brachytherapy in inoperable non-small cell lung cancer: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

No randomized studies are available on the additional value of endobronchial brachytherapy (EBB) to external irradiation (XRT) regarding palliation of respiratory symptoms (RS). A prospective randomized study was initiated to test the hypothesis that the addition of EBB to XRT provides higher levels of palliation of dyspnea and other RS and improvement of quality of life (QoL) in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with endobronchial tumour.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with previously untreated NSCLC, stages I-IIIb, WHO-performance status of 0-3 and with biopsy proven endobronchial tumour in the proximal airways were eligible. EBB consisted of two fractions of 7.5 Gy at 1 cm on day 1 and 8. XRT started at day 2. The XRT dose was 30 Gy (2 weeks) or 60 Gy (6 weeks). The EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC13 were assessed before treatment and 2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment. Re-expansion of collapsed lung was tested by the inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) and CT scan of the chest.

RESULTS

Ninety-five patients were randomized between arm 1 (XRT alone) (n=48) or arm 2 (XRT+EBB) (n=47). The arms were well balanced regarding pre-treatment characteristics and QoL scores. The compliance for QoL-assessment was >90% at all times. No significant difference between the trial arms was observed with respect to response of dyspnea. However, a beneficial effect of EBB was noted concerning the mean scores of dyspnea over time (P=0.02), which lasted for 3 months. This benefit was only observed among patients with an obstructing tumour of the main bronchus. A higher rate of re-expansion of collapsed lung was observed in arm 2 (57%) compared to arm 1 (35%) (P=0.01). The inspiratory vital capacity (IVC) assessed 2 weeks after radiotherapy improved with 493 cm(3) in arm 2 and decreased 50 cm(3) in arm 1 (P=0.03). No difference was noted regarding the incidence of massive haemoptysis (13 vs. 15%).

CONCLUSION

The addition of EBB to XRT in NSCLC is safe and provides higher rates of re-expansion of collapsed lung resulting in a transient lower levels of dyspnea. This beneficial effect was only observed among patients with obstructing tumours in the main bronchus.

Clinical and quality of life outcomes in the first United Kingdom randomized trial of endobronchial brachytherapy (intraluminal radiotherapy) vs. external beam radiotherapy in the palliative treatment of inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

A randomized controlled trial was designed to evaluate the clinical and quality of life (QL) outcomes of patients receiving endobronchial brachytherapy (EBT) or external beam radiotherapy (XRT) as a primary palliative treatment in advanced lung cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Ninety-nine patients presenting de novo with lung cancer were randomized to receive EBT or XRT. Eleven key symptoms or clinical signs were assessed by clinicians and patient ratings using self-assessment questionnaires were obtained at the same time. The primary endpoints were a comparison of EBT and XRT for symptom relief and acute and late side-effects (palliation) and their effect on patients' functional status and patient-rated QL outcomes. A secondary objective was a comparison of clinician assessments with patient self-reported symptoms.

RESULTS

Both treatments produced good levels of symptom relief. They were better for XRT at the expense of more acute morbidity. Late side-effects were similar. The functional status of patients was well maintained and changed similarly with time in both groups. XRT gave a better duration of palliation. Twenty-eight percent of XRT patients required EBT (at a median time of 304 days) whereas 51% of EBT patients subsequently had XRT (at a median of 125 days). There was a significant modest gain in median survival with initial XRT (287 vs. 250 days). When clinician and patient assessments were compared, doctors were found to underestimate the severity of breathlessness, anorexia, tiredness and nausea.

CONCLUSIONS

Fractionated XRT is preferred to EBT as an initial treatment in better performance patients because it provides better overall and more sustained palliation with fewer retreatments and a modest gain in survival time. QL assessment is required in the evaluation of palliative treatments because clinicians frequently underestimate the incidence and severity of key symptoms.

Treatment of endobronchial metastases with intraluminal radiotherapy

Metastasis to the lung occurs quite commonly from certain types of extrapulmonary primary carcinoma. Spread to the bronchial lumen is relatively rare. When this does occur, symptoms resembling those of primary bronchial carcinoma are often present, in association with partial or complete obstruction of the bronchial lumen. Palliation of such symptoms is possible with the use of intraluminal radiotherapy (ILT). Between 1990 and 1998, 37 patients with endobronchial metastases were treated using this modality; a single fraction of radiation was delivered by the remote afterloading high dose rate microSelectron system. Data regarding these patients' characteristics and outcome are presented, following a retrospective review of case notes. The commonest symptoms were dyspnoea, cough and haemoptysis; the commonest primary tumour sites were breast, colorectum, oesophagus and kidney. Twenty-four (64.9%) patients had some improvement in symptoms following treatment. Mean overall survival was 280 days, range 9-1145 days. No serious adverse effects occurred. ILT is a relatively simple, safe and effective treatment in the palliation of symptoms due to endobronchial metastases.

High-dose-rate brachytherapy: dose escalation in three-dimensional miniorgans of the human bronchial wall

PURPOSE

High-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy of human lung cancer is well established, however fractionation schemes and dosages are based mainly on experience. The aim of this investigation was to study the effects of different doses of HDR iridium-192 on normal human bronchial epithelium in three-dimensional miniorgans of the human bronchial wall.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Forty-eight biopsies from normal bronchi were cultivated for 14 days and exposed at random to different doses of HDR iridium 192 (0 Gy, 30 Gy, 45 Gy, 60 Gy, or 75 Gy). Cell viability was assessed immediately after irradiation, after 4 or 18 days by fluorescent staining, and cell damage of the culture was analyzed by light microscopy. Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) was measured in the supernatant for 4 days.

RESULTS

There was no histologically apparent tissue damage regardless of the irradiation dose. The number of nonvital cells increased in irradiated miniorgans depending on the dose used (p < 0. 05 at 75 Gy). This effect occurred early and was less pronounced with time. LDH measurements showed an increase only in the first 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results confirm that normal bronchial epithelium has a high tolerance to early epithelial damage by irradiation. This model of human bronchial miniorgans is useful for further studies of the effects of irradiation on human bronchi.

Combined Nd-YAG laser/HDR brachytherapy versus Nd-YAG laser only in malignant central airway involvement: a prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND

Laser debulking and prosthetic stents are useful modalities in the palliative treatment of initial inoperable or recurrent lung cancer. Recently, endobrochial brachytherapy was introduced to extend the duration of palliation and reduce the number of endoscopic treatments. This trial compares Nd-YAG laser alone and associated to high dose rated (HDR)-brachytherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From 1995 to 1998, 29 consecutive patients, with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and central airway involvement, were randomized in two groups: group 1 (15 patients) received Nd-YAG laser only; group 2 (14 patients) underwent a combined Nd-YAG laser/ HDR brachytherapy treatment.

RESULTS

There was no mortality or morbidity related to the treatment. The period free from symptoms was 2.8 months for group 1 and increased to 8.5 months in group 2 (P<0.05). The disease's progression free period grew from 2.2 months of group 1 to 7.5 months of group 2 (P<0.05) and the number of further endoscopic treatment reduced from 15 to 3 (P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

The results confirm the potential of brachytherapy to prolong relief from symptoms, lessen disease progression and reduce costs of treatment. A detailed analysis is presented of both groups.

The management of non-small-cell lung cancer: a case history

Accurate assessment and treatment of the patient with lung cancer requires a team approach involving respiratory physicians, cardiothoracic surgeons, oncologists and the palliative care team. Adequate staging and assessment of prognostic factors are essential before deciding what treatment is appropriate for an individual patient. Surgery is the mainstay of treatment for early disease. Patients with medically inoperable stage 1 (T1, T2, N0) tumours should be considered for radical radiotherapy; additional chemotherapy in early stage disease may offer an additional survival advantage, but its overall role can only be assessed by further clinical trials. In more locally advanced tumours radical radiotherapy has never been formally tested. It is however, often used in patients where the tumour can be encompassed safely within a radiation field. This will depend on total dose and fractionation schedule as well as the volume of tissue irradiated. Neo-adjuvant chemotherapy prolongs survival in these patients. As only a few patients are cured, symptom control and quality of life are usually the most important goals of management and can be achieved by a variety of interventions. It is disappointing that in such a common disease less than 5% of patients are entered into clinical trials. Without such evidence the therapeutic outcomes in NSCLC cannot be improved.

Brachytherapy in the treatment of thoracic tumors. Lung and esophageal

Brachytherapy for carcinoma of the lung is most often performed using HDR remote afterloading equipment which delivers the treatment within the tracheal-bronchial tree in an outpatient setting. It provides excellent palliation, rapidly, and can also be selectively used with for curative intent. Permanent implantation using iodine seeds at the time of surgery improves the local control rate for those patients. Esophageal brachytherapy is performed as an intraluminal technique, most often using HDR equipment in an outpatient setting, and is used for palliation as a single modality and as a boost following chemo/radiation for curative patients. In this latter situation, the more aggressive therapy provides significantly better palliation than is possible with single-modality therapy.

Cryotherapy, electrocautery, and brachytherapy

Since it was first used 70 years ago, brachytherapy has become an effective tool in the treatment with tracheal bronchial malignancy including primary and recurrent bronchogenic carcinoma and metastatic carcinoma. The technique has evolved from interstitial implantation of radioactive sources directly to the tumor using rigid bronchoscopy to intraluminal placement of a radioactive source into a polyethylene afterloading catheter placed using FB. Intraluminal brachytherapy is effective in palliating complications caused by malignant endobronchial tumors such as dyspnea, hemoptysis, intractable cough, atelectasis, and postobstructive pneumonia. Brachytherapy may be combined with external beam radiation, Nd:YAG laser therapy, and chemotherapy to enhance the palliative treatments of patients. The risk of severe complications from brachytherapy may be caused more by location of tumor being treated rather than those fractionations scheme. When tumor involves the mainstem bronchi and upper lobes, it seems prudent to obtain CT to exclude tumor invasion of the pulmonary arteries or considerable destruction of the bronchial wall and mediastinal invasion of the tumor. Patients with findings such as these should not be treated with endobronchial brachytherapy or treated with LDR brachytherapy. Brachytherapy is proved to be effective and a safe palliative treatment for endobronchial malignancies, but further investigations are necessary to determine the optimal dose scheme and its efficiency in bronchogenic carcinoma and combined with external beam radiation therapy or surgery or other endobronchial procedures such as Nd:YAG laser or cryotherapy.

Does additional brachytherapy improve the effect of external irradiation? A prospective, randomized study in central lung tumors

PURPOSE

Endobronchial brachytherapy has become more widely used to increase the total local dose of irradiation ("boost") applied for the treatment of lung cancer. Apart from treatment for local stenosis, endobronchial brachytherapy in combination with external irradiation (EI) has the potential to improve local tumor control and perhaps prolong survival, but the real benefit has not been proven yet. To evaluate the possible effects of external irradiation with an additional boost of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy, we conducted a prospective randomized study.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Design-two groups were compared: Group 1 was treated with external radiotherapy alone (planned dose 60 Gy); Group 2 received an additional boost of HDR brachytherapy of scheduled 4.8 Gy each (at 10 mm from the source axis) before and after external irradiation. Patients-98 patients with advanced inoperable lung cancer were included in the study, 42 in Group 1 and 56 in Group 2. Both groups were comparable with respect to age, sex, tumor stage, Karnofsky performance status (KPS), and histology.

RESULTS

A mean total external irradiation dose of 50.5 +/- 14.1 Gy in Group 1 and 50 +/- 12.5 Gy in Group 2 was applied. Group 2 received an additional dose of 7.44 +/- 2.6 Gy (at 10 mm depth) through brachytherapy. The median survival time in both groups was comparable (28 weeks and 27 weeks, respectively). In patients with squamous cell carcinoma (68 patients) Group 2 showed an advantage in median survival with borderline significance (40 vs. 33 weeks, p = 0.09). Group 2 showed also a better local tumor control in all patients; patients with squamous cell carcinoma had a significantly longer period of local tumor control. Fatal hemoptysis was the cause of death in 6 (14.2%) patients in Group 1 and 11 (18.9%) in Group 2 (p = 0.53).

CONCLUSIONS

High dose rate brachytherapy in patients with inoperable lung cancer increased local control in our randomized study when used in combination with external irradiation. Survival time was also longer, but with no clear statistical significance. This applied especially to patients with squamous cell carcinomas. There was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of fatal hemoptysis between the two groups.

Curative irradiation of limited endobronchial carcinomas with high-dose rate brachytherapy. Results of a pilot study

OBJECTIVES OF THE STUDY

Pilot study to assess high-dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy as sole treatment for limited endobronchial non-small cell lung carcinomas.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

Proximal non-small cell lung cancer in a not previously irradiated area, with a maximal diameter of 1 cm, no visible tumor on CT scan, lack of other treatment options in patients with severe, chronic respiratory failure, surgery, or external radiotherapy for a previous lung cancer.

TREATMENT PROTOCOL

Treatment was based on an escalating dose protocol. Patients received three to five fractions of 7 Gy prescribed at 10 mm from the center of the applicator, once a week.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included in this trial. The first two patients received three fractions of 7 Gy, the four next patients received four fractions, and the 13 remaining patients were treated with five fractions of 7 Gy. Two months after the end of the procedure, tumors in 15 of 18 evaluable patients (83%) were locally controlled with negative results of biopsies. At 1 year, local control was still obtained in 12 of 16 evaluable patients (75%). With a mean follow-up of 28-months, 1-year and 2-year actuarial survival rates were 78% and 58%, respectively, with a 28-month median survival. One patient with local control died from hemoptysis 12 months after treatment. Two patients suffered from severe necrosis of the bronchial wall; one of them died from hemoptysis.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy is an effective treatment for small endobronchial tumors. Late toxicity on the bronchial wall is still too high and was attributed mainly to contact between the catheter and the bronchial mucosa. Exclusive HDR brachytherapy should be restricted to carefully selected patients for whom there is no alternative curative treatment. New bronchial applicators and a lower dose per fraction may reduce the incidence and attenuate the severity of late complications.

Palliative radiation therapy for non-small cell lung cancer

The palliative treatment of patients with NSCLC should be individualized. Treatment decisions should be directed by the goal of maximizing the patient's quality of life, and the patient's wishes should always be ascertained. The approaches to palliative radiation treatment of the chest, bones, and brain are quite similar. Treatment of the chest and bones is usually reserved until symptoms are significant. Brain metastases are generally treated soon after diagnosis. With respect to dose-fractionation schedules, the data are not conclusive. In theory, more protracted schedules of 40 to 50 Gy in 4 to 5 weeks are associated with more durable responses and less long-term morbidity than are shorter and lower-dose schedules. These regimens are therefore worth considering for the most favorable subset of palliative patients (i.e., those with good performance status and low burden of disease). At the other end of the spectrum, very ill patients with poor performance status may be best served by short hypofractionated schedules such as 20 Gy in five fractions, 17 Gy in two fractions, or possibly 8 to 10 Gy in one fraction. Response rates with these regimens are good, trips to the treatment facility are minimized, and these ill patients will probably not live long enough to experience the higher long-term toxicity rates associated with larger treatment fractions. The majority of patients, however, fall between these two extremes and are well served by schedules such as 30 Gy in 10 fractions. Radiation treatment fields should not be excessive but cover gross disease with a limited margin. (In the setting of brain metastases, treatment of the whole brain is recommended.) Further study of palliative treatment approaches should focus not only on assessments of response and toxicity but also on the impact of different treatments on overall quality of life.

Defining the roles of high dose rate endobronchial brachytherapy and laser resection for recurrent bronchial malignancy

Endobronchial therapy is commonly used in the palliative management of malignant disease, but the optimal combinations of treatment modalities (laser, brachytherapy, external beam radiotherapy) have not been defined. We have undertaken a prospective analysis of symptom response, duration of response, and prognostic factors for 117 patients treated with brachytherapy at a single centre, to identify hypotheses suitable for prospective randomised studies. All but one patient had received previous treatment. The percentage of patients with scores of 0 or 1 (none or mild) for each symptom pre-treatment and at 3 months were as follows: cough 62% to 77% (43% improving by at least one grade, N.S.); dyspnoea 32% to 56% (50% improvement by at least one grade, P = 0.0063); haemoptysis 78% to 97%; performance status 65% to 84% (54% by at least one grade, P = 0.0417). An actuarial risk of fatal haemoptysis at 2 years of 20% was associated with prior laser resection (P = 0.048). Death before 2 months was associated with dyspnoea scores of 3 or 4. Suggestions for randomised studies are made to address some of the uncertainties revealed by the analysis.

Endoscopic treatment of malignant airway obstructions in 2,008 patients

We report our 13-year experience with endoscopic treatment of malignant obstructions of the airway by Nd:YAG laser, stents, and intraluminal brachytherapy in 2,008 patients. We performed 2,610 laser resections in 1,838 patients, 66 high dose rate brachytherapies, and we placed 393 tracheobronchial silicone stents in 306 patients. We used the rigid bronchoscope in 96% of the laser procedures and in all cases requiring stent placement; general anesthesia was given to 90% of these patients. Endobronchial radiotherapy was performed under local, anesthesia. In 93% of patients undergoing laser resection, we obtained an immediate patency of the airway with consequent improvement of quality of life. The median time between the first and second laser treatment was 102 days, being longer in the case of stent placement (when required) or in association with brachytherapy. Even if endoscopic treatment should be considered only for palliation, laser vaporization could be curative in case of in situ carcinoma. Since 1983, we have treated 23 such lesions in 17 patients and up to now, none has recurred. Finally, endoscopic resection may allow a better assessment of the true extent of the tumor, shifting to surgery patients originally considered to have inoperable disease or allowing lung-sparing operations (21 and 18 patients of our series, respectively). The total mortality rate was 0.4% (12 patients over 2,798 treatments; 2,710 Nd:YAG laser + 151 stents without laser + 37 brachytherapies without laser) in the first week after the procedures, and was mainly related to cardiovascular problems and respiratory failure. In conclusion, endoscopic resection of lung malignancies is rapid, effective, repeatable, and complementary to other treatments; although it should be considered only palliative, laser resection could be curative in patients with in situ carcinomas and early cancers. Laser, stents, and endoluminal brachytherapy should be available in all centers with major experience; a well-trained team is mandatory to plan the most appropriate treatment and manage any possible complication.

Massive haemoptysis death and other morbidity associated with high dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy for carcinoma of the bronchus

Four hundred and six patients with primary non-small cell carcinoma of the bronchus causing symptoms due to endobronchial disease, were treated with intraluminal radiotherapy (ILT) using the microSelectron-HDR machine at the Christie Hospital, Manchester, between April 1988 and the end of 1992. An assessment of morbidity for this treatment is presented, particularly with regard to the risk factors and causes of massive haemoptysis death. The most common early side-effect was a mild transient exacerbation of cough which usually resolved within 2-3 weeks. At various times following ILT treatment 83 bronchoscopies were carried out randomly in 55 patients. In bronchoscopies carried out within the first 3 months following ILT, no tumour was visible in 80% of cases. A mucosal radiation reaction score (RRS) was used to grade bronchoscopic appearance after ILT treatment. Overall, 55% of bronchoscopic examinations showed some degree of mucosal radiation reaction. The majority of radiation reactions from 6 months onwards after ILT demonstrated a degree of fibrosis. A radiation reaction was seen more frequently after treatment with 2000 cGy as opposed to 1500 cGy at 1 cm from the central axis of the radiation source. Thirty-two patients were identified who had died from massive haemoptysis (MH) as a terminal event. A Cox multivariate regression analysis showed that the treatment-related factors of increased dose at first ILT (P = 0.004), prior laser treatment at the site of ILT (P = 0.020) and second ILT treatment in the same location as the first ILT treatment (P = 0.047), all significantly increased the relative risk of MH death compared with their effect on the relative risk of death from other causes (OC). (In addition a fourth treatment-related factor, namely the concurrent use of ILT and external beam radiotherapy (EB) had a P value of 0.08). Twenty out of 25 assessable MH-death patients (80%) had evidence of recurrent or residual tumour before death but 5 patients (20%) did not. For surviving patients the instantancious risk of death at any one time (the cause-specific death rate expressed as deaths per 100 cases per month), showed a sharp peak for MH deaths between 9 and 12 months post ILT in contradistinction to OC death where the peak was between 3 and 6 months post ILT. These findings may imply a role for late radiation reaction in the treatment-related risk factors identified as increasing the relative risk of MH death and possible mechanisms are discussed. The results have implications for treatment regimes that use a dose of 2000 cGy at 1 cm in a single fraction technique, that have a high frequency of previous laser treatment, that use multiple, repeated ILT treatments in the same location and that use ILT concurrently with EB.

High dose rate brachytherapy for the local control of endobronchial carcinoma following external irradiation

BACKGROUND

External irradiation is an established palliative treatment for patients with inoperable lung cancer. However, persistent or recurrent symptoms due to local disase are common following external irradiation. The impact of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy in the palliative management of patients with local sequelae of residual or recurrent endobronchial lung carcinoma following external irradiation was investigated.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 29 patients (19 men, mean age 65 years) underwent HDR brachytherapy for inoperable lung cancer. All patients had completed external irradiation at least one month before entry into the study (mean (SD) dose 4400 (1481) cGy, completed 12.9 (21.3) months previously). Patients underwent outpatient bronchoscopic placement of 1-3 HDR brachytherapy catheters for delivery of 750-1000 cGy of intraluminal irradiation every two weeks on 1-3 occasions. Prospective evaluation before and four weeks after completion of HDR brachytherapy included assessment of indices of level of function, symptoms, extent of atelectasis (chest radiography), and bronchoscopic determination of degree of endobronchial obstruction.

RESULTS

One hundred and eighteen catheters were placed in 81 treatments. Eleven of the 26 patients who underwent repeat bronchoscopy showed a reduction in the degree of endobronchial obstruction; five of 18 patients had radiographic improvement in the extent of atelectasis. Positive response rates ranged from 25% for signs and symptoms related to pneumonitis to 69% for haemoptysis. Performance status improved in 24% of patients. Two patients died before completion of the study protocol. Short term complications included one episode of non-fatal, massive haemoptysis, five of minor haemoptysis, and one pneumothorax.

CONCLUSIONS

HDR brachytherapy may improve the degree of endobronchial obstruction, atelectasis, symptoms, and level of function with minimal short term complications in patients with recurrent or residual symptomatic disease following external irradiation.

Long-term survival and symptom palliation in small primary bronchial carcinomas following treatment with intraluminal radiotherapy alone

Between April 1988 and December 1992, 37 patients with small, previously unirradiated, primary non-small cell carcinomas of the bronchus causing symptoms due to endobronchial disease were treated at the Christie Hospital, Manchester, with a single fraction of high dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy (ILT) using the microSelectron-HDR machine. Small primary (SP) lesions were defined as being less than 2 cm in diameter in a direction perpendicular to the central axis of the iridium-192 treatment source. Fifteen patients (41%) were treated to a dose of 15 Gy and 22 patients (59%) to 20 Gy at a distance of 1 cm from the central axis of the source. At 6 weeks following ILT, improvement in symptoms was seen in the following percentages of patients: haemoptysis 96%, pulmonary collapse 69%, cough 55% and dyspnoea 52%. The magnitude of improvement in these symptoms was largely maintained in patients surviving to 4 months and then 12 months post-ILT. Median actuarial survival was 709 days, 2-year survival 49.4% and 5-year survival 14.1%. Overall, there was no significant difference in survival after treatment with 20 Gy compared with 15 Gy at 1 cm. At the close of study, there were four patients still alive without disease recurrence with survivals of 38, 48, 49 and 63 months. All had had biopsy-proven squamous cell carcinomas and all had been treated with 20 Gy at 1 cm. Five patients died from massive haemoptysis as a terminal event at 4, 9, 9, 10 and 11 months post-ILT, well below the median survival for this group of patients. Again, all had been treated with 20 Gy as opposed to 15 Gy at 1 cm. Over the same time period, 287 patients with non-small cell carcinomas of more than 2 cm in diameter (large primary lesions, LP), were treated with a single fraction of ILT only, as their initial treatment. A consistently greater percentage of patients with SP lesions showed an improvement in the symptoms of haemoptysis and pulmonary collapse when compared with patients with LP lesions. Patients with LP lesions demonstrated a decreased actuarial survival when compared with SP lesions, with median survival being 156 days, 2-year survival 3.1% and no survivors beyond 39 months. This study demonstrates that, in patients with small endobronchial carcinomas a single fraction of ILT can give efficient palliation of symptoms and lead to long term disease-free survival, but that a dose of 20 Gy may be at the limit of bronchial radiation tolerance for a single dose technique employing a high dose rate source.

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy for inoperable non-small cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer is a major cause of mortality and significant morbidity in the UK. The majority of patients are inoperable and the optimum management of these patients requires a multidisciplinary approach involving the cooperation of respiratory physicians, thoracic surgeons and clinical oncologists (radiotherapists). Treatment techniques are constantly being refined and new approaches developed.

Low dose rate versus high dose rate intraluminal brachytherapy for malignant endobronchial tumors

Although the evolution from low dose rate to high dose rate brachytherapy for malignant endobronchial malignancies was primarily based on economy, patient convenience, and radiation protection, the difference in therapeutic index, if any, between these two modalities must be kept in mind. Our experience with both methods permits assessment of the feasibility of replacing low dose rate brachytherapy with high dose rate brachytherapy. Results with our first 110 patients (group 1) treated with low dose rate brachytherapy (133 procedures) were compared with results with our initial 59 consecutive patients (group 2) treated with high dose rate brachytherapy (161 procedures). In group 1, patients were treated with one or two sessions of 30-60 Gy each calculated at a 1 cm radius. In patients in group 2, we aimed at three weekly sessions of 7 Gy each calculated at a 1 cm radius. External beam irradiation therapy had previously been given to 88% of patients in group 1 and to 85% of patients in group 2. Laser bronchoscopy was performed in 36% of patients in group 1 and in 24% of patients in group 2 before brachytherapy. Clinical or bronchoscopic improvement was noted in 72% of patients in group 1 and in 85% of patients in group 2 (p > 0.05). Complication rates were low and comparable. Survival was similar in both groups (median < 6 months). Although both low dose rate and high dose rate brachytherapy appear equally effective in palliation for malignant endobronchial obstruction, we are now practicing the latter exclusively.

High dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy for carcinoma of the bronchus: outcome of treatment of 406 patients

In April 1988 the Christie Hospital started using the microSelectron-HDR machine to deliver intraluminal radiotherapy (ILT) to inoperable bronchial carcinomas causing symptoms due to endobronchial disease. Results of treatment in the first 406 patients with primary non-small-cell carcinoma are presented. Three main categories of patient were defined. Category 1 consisted of 324 patients (79.8%) who were previously unirradiated and received a single fraction of ILT as their primary treatment, mostly to a dose of 1500 cGy (76%) or 2000 cGy (23%) at 1 cm from the centre of the iridium-192 treatment source. The percentage of these patients whose symptoms or signs were improved at 6 weeks following ILT were as follows: stridor 92%, haemoptysis 88%, cough 62%, dyspnoea, 60%, pain, 50% and pulmonary collapse, 46%. Approximately two-thirds of these patients (67.3%) derived long lasting palliation and required no further treatment during their lifetime. The other third of patients needed subsequent treatment at some stage because of recurrence of their symptoms and in this situation external beam radiotherapy (EB) or a repeat ILT treatment was effectively utilised. Category 2 consisted of 65 patients (16%) who had previously received EB but required ILT when their tumour recurred. At 6 weeks post-ILT levels of symptom palliation were broadly similar to those obtained if ILT was used in previously unirradiated individuals, although the improvement was not so well sustained with time and only 7% showed improvement in pulmonary collapse at 6 weeks. Category 3 consisted of 17 patients (4.2%) in whom ILT was used concurrently with EB as a combined initial treatment. Similar levels of palliation were seen when compared with patients who received a single ILT treatment only. Overall, ILT was well tolerated in terms of early and late morbidity. In conclusion, the efficiency of a single ILT treatment in palliating symptoms due to endobronchial tumour in previously unirradiated individuals is comparable with that reported in series where treatment for advanced lung cancer combines a prolonged course of EB concurrently with several ILT treatments.

Bronchoscopic treatment of lung tumors

Several bronchoscopic techniques for the treatment of patients with tracheobronchial pathology have become available during the last decade. Technical development and additional instruments have provided the bronchoscopist with several alternatives for bronchoscopic therapeutic interventions. The majority of patients with malignant tracheobronchial neoplasm have a dismal prognosis. Palliation is the main aim of the treatment. However, in patients with an early-stage tumor, bronchoscopic treatment may have a curative potential. Resectability, after tumor reduction by a bronchoscopic treatment, may be improved. This article discusses various bronchoscopic techniques, the advantages and disadvantages of each method and the possible benefit which can be derived from such a treatment.

Prolonged survival after high-dose rate endobronchial radiation for malignant airway obstruction

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To show that prolonged survival can be observed after high-dose rate (HDR) endobronchial brachytherapy as the sole treatment for some selected patients presenting with an endobronchial malignant obstruction.

PATIENTS

Twenty-nine patients (group 1) who presented with an endoluminal localized tumor without metastatic extension were treated by HDR endobronchial brachytherapy and are compared with 22 subjects who presented with extraluminal dissemination and were palliatively treated (group 2).

TREATMENT PROTOCOL

Treatment consisted of sessions of two exposures, delivering 7 Grays at a 10-mm radius from the center of the applicator each, and repeated every 15 days, to a maximum of six exposures. Endoscopic response and survival are the main criteria of assessment.

RESULTS

Follow-up bronchoscopies, performed 2 months after the end of the procedure, showed tumor regressions: macroscopic complete responses (CR) were observed in 21 of 25 patients evaluable in group 1, and 6 of 22 in group 2, with histologic CR in 18 and 2 patients, respectively. Median overall survival was not reached in group 1 after 23 months of follow-up; it was 5 months for group 2.

CONCLUSIONS

These results confirm that HDR brachytherapy can be used as a monotherapy for carefully selected patients who have small tumors to all appearances limited to the bronchial lumen and bronchial wall without adjacent parenchymal extension or metastatic disease.

High dose rate afterloading intraluminal brachytherapy in malignant airway obstruction of lung cancer

PURPOSE

This is a retrospective study to review the palliation rate, survival rate and complications of high dose rate (HDR) intraluminal brachytherapy in the treatment of malignant airway obstruction of lung cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 225 high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy treatments were delivered to 76 patients with symptomatic malignant airway obstruction by remote afterloading technique. An average of 7 Gy at a radius of 1 cm from the center of the source was delivered by Iridium-192 (Ir-192) sources. The majority of the patients received 3 fractions at 2 week intervals. Fifty-four patients received HDR brachytherapy as part of their initial treatment; 20 patients presented as symptomatic endobronchial recurrence. Two patients received YAG laser photoresection to open up the obstruction to allow insertion of the brachytherapy catheter. Fifty-nine patients received concurrent external beam irradiation. Forty-two patients were given 60-70 Gy in 6-7 weeks with curative intent. Seventeen patients were given 20-59 Gy in 2-5 weeks as a palliative measure. Nine patients received a radiosensitizer. One patient received concurrent chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The symptomatic response rates are as follows: dyspnea had an 87% response rate (59% partial response, 28% complete response), cough had a 79% response rate (47% partial response, 32% complete response), hemoptysis had a 95% response rate (38% partial response, 57% complete response), and postobstructive pneumonia had an 88% response rate (53% partial response, 35% complete response). Sixty-six patients had follow up endoscopic examination (1-3 months after brachytherapy). Their total response rate was 87% (52% partial response and 35% complete response). There were four acute complications: three cases of massive hemoptysis and one of mild hemoptysis. There are five late complications: three cases of radiation pneumonitis and two of esophagitis. At the time of this study, 55 patients have died with the maximum survival duration 113 months (9.4 years) from diagnosis date and 18 months from first HDR treatment. Twenty-one patients are still alive with a mean follow-up duration of 20 months from diagnosis date and 7.8 months from the first HDR treatment.

CONCLUSION

HDR brachytherapy is an excellent modality for palliating symptomatic malignant airway obstruction with an acceptable complication rate; however, no definitive increase of survival rate was observed. Prospective clinical trials are needed to better define its merit regarding survival. This paper also includes a literature review and discussion of HDR brachytherapy on bronchogenic cancer.

High dose-rate intraluminal irradiation in bronchogenic carcinoma. Technique and results

Patients who present with symptomatic airway obstruction often have limited therapeutic options. Intraluminal irradiation has been used in an attempt to obtain sustained palliation. Patients treated with high dose-rate endobronchial irradiation have shown good to excellent palliation of symptoms, as well as a high rate of local control; however, these results have not always been devoid of complications. Some recent reports have shown a high incidence of morbidity, including an excessive incidence of fatal pulmonary hemorrhage. In this series, we report on 80 high dose-rate endobronchial treatments in 32 patients who were treated with remote afterloading endobronchial irradiation. All patients had endoscopic and histologic proof of tumor. Patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 consisted of 17 patients who were treated with endobronchial brachytherapy as a boost to primary external-beam irradiation. The remaining 15 patients comprised group 2 and were treated for endobronchial recurrence after prior irradiation with an external beam (main dose, 5,000 cGy). The endobronchial irradiation treatments were delivered using a high dose-rate remote afterloader. The standard dose per fraction was 500 cGy prescribed at a distance of 1 cm from the central axis of the catheter for a median of 3 fractions at weekly intervals. Treatment length averaged 5 cm; the median total dose was 1,500 cGy. The median follow-up for the entire group was 9.3 months, with a range of 6 to 24 months. Symptomatic improvement was attained in 15 of 15 patients presenting with hemoptysis, in 6 of 7 of those with cough, and in 10 of 10 who presented with dyspnea. In ten patients, follow-up endoscopy was performed, which revealed a pathologic complete response (by negative results on biopsies). At 6 months past the last brachytherapy, clinical and radiographic local control was obtained in 15/17 (88 percent) of the patients in group 1 and in 70 percent of the patients in group 2. All patients tolerated treatment well, without any acute or late complications, and there were no instances of fistula formation or fatal pulmonary hemorrhage. There was no association between the location of recurrence and complications. Fractionation, dose per fraction, and total combined dose appear to be important parameters in reducing complications.

Remote afterloading brachytherapy for the local control of endobronchial carcinoma

PURPOSE

The study was designed to, (a) standardize endobronchial brachytherapy and, (b) to evaluate the relief of obstructive signs and symptoms.

METHODS

Patients with endobronchial carcinoma were treated on a protocol (n = 342) with remote afterloading brachytherapy. Group 1 patients were treated with medium dose rate and received 1000 cGy at 5 mm depth for three fractions (n = 47). Group 2 were treated with high dose rate, 1000 cGy to a 10 mm depth for three fractions (n = 144) and Group 3 received 750 cGy delivered to a 10 mm depth for three fractions (n = 151). Each group was divided into curative, palliative, and recurrent categories. Neodymium yttrium aluminum garnet photoresection was used in 24% of patients prior to brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Evaluation consisted of symptom index scoring with weighted responses of hemoptysis 99%, obstructive pneumonia 99%, cough 85%, and dyspnea 86%. Obstruction improvement was 80% overall, curative 87%, palliative 84%, and recurrent 70% of mean pretreatment scores. Survival 10% alive, 88% expired, and 2% lost to follow-up. Cause of death was intrathoracic carcinoma 41%, metastatic carcinoma 38%, intercurrent disease 9%, and unknown cause 13%. Survival from diagnosis and first treatment was, respectively, for curative 10.8 and 9.5 months, palliative 14 and 5.6 months, and recurrent 25.6 and 6.2 months. Significant complications were fatal hemoptysis 7%, and radiation bronchitis and stenosis 11%.

CONCLUSION

Endoluminal brachytherapy provides excellent palliation of the endobronchial portion of neoplastic disease.