Assessment of bronchodilatation after spontaneous recovery from a histamine challenge in asthmatic children

Assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness following methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to investigate bronchodilator responsiveness (BDR) following methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction and to determine differences in BDR according to clinical parameters in children with asthma.

Methods

The methacholine challenge test was performed in 145 children with mild to moderate asthma, and the provocative concentration causing a 20% decline in FEV1 (PC20) was determined. Immediately after the challenge test, patients were asked to inhale short-acting β2-agonists (SABAs) to achieve BDR, which was assessed as the change in FEV1% predicted×100/post-methacholine FEV1% predicted. For each subject, the asthma medication, blood eosinophil count, serum total IgE, serum eosinophil cationic protein level, and skin prick test result were assessed.

Results

The FEV1 (mean±SD) values of the 145 patients were 90.5±10.9% predicted, 64.2±11.5% predicted, and 86.2±11.2% predicted before and after methacholine inhalation, and following the administration of a SABA, respectively. The BDR did not differ significantly according to asthma medication, age, or gender. However, BDR in the atopy group (37.4±17.7%) was significantly higher than that in the non-atopy group (30.5±10.7%; P=0.037). Patients with blood eosinophilia (38.6±18.1%) displayed increased BDR compared with patients without eosinophilia (32.0±13.8%; P=0.037).

Conclusions

In children with mild to moderate asthma, the responsiveness to short-acting bronchodilators after methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction was not related to asthma medication, but was higher in children with atopy and/or peripheral blood eosinophilia.

Can bronchodilator response predict bronchial response to methacholine in preschool coughers?

The aim of the present study was to determine the relationship between bronchodilator response, assessed by interrupter resistance (Rint), and bronchial reactivity in preschool children with chronic cough. Thirty-eight children coughers (median age 5.0 years, range 2.8-6.4) were tested. Bronchodilator response was recorded within 4 months before methacholine challenge. Response to the latter was assessed using transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen and Rint. Children were considered responders if a 20% fall in transcutaneous partial pressure of oxygen occurred during the bronchial challenge. Bronchodilator response was not different between responders (n = 24) and nonresponders (n = 14) [median (range) -0.11 (-0.44-0.09) vs. -0.08 (-0.21-0.10) kPa L(-1) sec; respectively]. However, none of the nonresponders had a bronchodilator response larger than -0.21 kPa L(-1) sec, this cutoff had a 100% positive and a 44% negative predictive value to predict a positive methacholine challenge. The relationship between bronchodilator response and bronchial methacholine responsiveness reached the limit of significance (P = 0.048). Furthermore, the magnitude of the bronchodilator response was correlated to the level of methacholine-induced level of bronchoconstriction (P = 0.01), and to the postchallenge bronchodilation (P = 0.04), all values expressed as % predicted. Moreover, the postbronchodilator Rint value obtained with preceding methacholine challenge was lower than the postbronchodilator value without preceding methacholine challenge in 71.4% (10/14) of the nonresponders and in only 33.3% (8/24) of the responders. Conclusions in preschool coughers bronchodilator response, assessed by the interrupter technique, was correlated to the bronchial responsiveness to methacholine. Non responders had a bronchodilator response not larger than -0.21 kPa L(-1) sec.

Effect of different antiasthmatic treatments on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

BACKGROUND

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction occurs in a large proportion of children with asthma, limiting everyday activities important for their physical and social development.

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was to compare the ability of different patterns of antiasthmatic treatment, recommended in childhood asthma, to protect patients from exercise-induced bronchoconstriction.

METHODS

Children 6 to 18 years of age with atopic asthma were randomized to a 4-week, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Patients were randomly allocated to receive daily 200 microg budesonide (twice daily, 100 microg per dose) + 9 microg formoterol (twice daily, 4.5 microg per dose; n = 20); 200 microg budesonide + 5 or 10 mg montelukast (once daily at bedtime; n = 20); 5 or 10 mg montelukast (n = 20); 200 microg budesonide (n = 20); or placebo (n = 20). A standardized treadmill exercise challenge was performed before and after treatment.

RESULTS

Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction, reflected by area under the curve for the FEV1 values from exercise over the 20-minute period and by maximum percent fall in FEV1 after exercise, was significantly diminished after 4 weeks in all active treatment groups, and compared with placebo. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction protection improved more significantly in the budesonide + montelukast and montelukast groups compared with other therapeutic options.

CONCLUSION

These data indicate differences in effects on exercise-induced bronchoconstriction between therapeutic options recommended in childhood asthma. Control of childhood asthma with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction can be obtained by using regular controller treatment.

Time intervals (3' or 5') between dose steps can influence methacholine challenge test

Bronchial hyperresponsiveness (BHR) is a common feature in the majority of asthmatic subjects and methacholine is the most frequently used agent for the test. The influence of 3 or 5 min time intervals between doses steps in a double methacholine challenge test (MCH-3' or MCH-5') was investigated. Using the MCH-3' challenge, 52 intermittent asthmatics were classified as having moderate (BHR-M; 18 subjects), mild (BHR-m; 19 subjects), or bordeline (BHR-B; 15 subjects) BHR. The cumulative dose and the PD20FEV(1) were higher for MCH-5' compared with MCH-3' in BHR-m (p < 0.05) and BHR-B (p < 0.05) but not in the BHR-M group. Also the dose response slopes, FEV(1)% decline/cumulative methacholine dose, calculated for the two challenge tests were statistically different only in BHR-m (p < 0.05) and BHR-B (p < 0.01). At MCH-5', there were 16 subjects with BHR-M, 18 with BHR-m, 12 with BHR-B and 6 subjects with normal reactivity. Results may suggest that in the group of BHR-m and BHR-B subjects, at MCH-5' compared with MCH-3', the cumulative effect of the administered drug, quickly metabolized by cholinesterase, is not complete, thus leading to an incorrect estimation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness degree. It is hoped that time interval between doses be standardized to ensure maximum comparability within and between subjects in challenge tests.

Bronchodilator response in asthmatic children is significantly reduced when measured immediately after methacholine challenge

AIM

Airway responses to a bronchodilator (BDR) and to methacholine are frequently measured in the assessment of childhood asthma and in pulmonary research. For practical reasons, we wondered whether it would be possible to obtain a reliable BDR immediately after completion of a methacholine challenge test. To this end, we compared BDR with and without a preceding methacholine challenge.

METHODS

The BDR was measured twice in random order on consecutive days in 24 asthmatic children with methacholine hyperresponsiveness. It was calculated as the change in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) before and 20 min after inhaling 800 microg of salbutamol (metered dose inhaler with a spacer), expressed as a percentage of the predicted value (deltaFEV1%pred). On one day BDR was measured immediately after completing a methacholine challenge, on the other day without any preceding challenge.

RESULTS

Mean(SD) baseline FEV1%pred was not significantly different between test days [98.6(14.2)% and 98.1(13.8)%, respectively, p=0.53]. The geometric mean provocative dose of methacholine producing a 20% fall in FEV1 (PD20) was 56.2 microg (range 10.3-306.2 microg). The mean (SEM) BDR without preceding methacholine challenge was 10.8(1.4)%, while after preceding methacholine challenge it was 5.2(1.5)% (mean difference 5.6%, 95% CI 3.0%-8.1%, p<0.001). Mean(SEM) postbronchodilator FEV1%pred was 109.4(3.0)% without and 103.4(2.7)% with preceding methacholine challenge (mean difference 6.0%, 95% CI 3.5%-8.6%, p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

A preceding methacholine challenge significantly reduces BDR in asthmatic children. Therefore, a BDR, measured immediately after completing a methacholine challenge, cannot be used as a substitute for a separate bronchodilator test.

Dose-responses over time to inhaled fluticasone propionate treatment of exercise- and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction in children with asthma

When treating bronchial hyperresponsiveness to so-called direct and indirect stimuli, distinct pathophysiological mechanisms might require differences in dose and duration of inhaled corticosteroid therapy. To test this hypothesis in children with asthma, we investigated the time- and dose-dependent effects of 2 doses of fluticasone propionate (FP, 100 or 250 microg bid.) in improving exercise- (EIB) and methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction during 6 months of treatment, using a placebo-controlled parallel group study design. Thirty-seven children with asthma (aged 6 to 14 years; forced expired volume in 1 sec (FEV(1)) >/=70% predicted; EIB >/=20% fall in FEV(1) from baseline; no inhaled steroids during the past 4 months) participated in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, 3-arm parallel study. Children receiving placebo were re-randomized to active treatment after 6 weeks. Standardized dry air treadmill exercise testing (EIB expressed as %fall in FEV(1) from baseline) and methacholine challenge using a dosimetric technique (expressed as PD(20)) were performed repeatedly during the study. During FP-treatment, the severity of EIB decreased significantly as compared to placebo within 3 weeks, the geometric mean % fall in FEV(1) being reduced from 34.1% to 9.9% for 100 microg FP bid, and from 35.9% to 7.6% for 250 microg FP bid (P < 0.05). These reductions in EIB did not differ between the 2 doses and were sustained throughout the treatment period. PD(20) methacholine improved significantly during the first 6 weeks as compared to placebo (P < 0.04) and steadily increased with time in both treatment limbs (P = 0.04), the difference in improvement between doses (100 microg FP bid, 1.6 dose steps; 250 microg FP bid, 3.3 dose steps) approaching significance after 24 weeks (P = 0.06). We conclude that in childhood asthma, the protection afforded by inhaled fluticasone propionate against methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction is time- and dose-dependent, whereas protection against EIB is not. This suggests different modes of action of inhaled steroids in protecting against these pharmacological and physiological stimuli. This has to be taken into account when monitoring asthma treatment.

A comparison of the onset of action of salbutamol and formoterol in reversing methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction

This single-centre, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy four-way cross-over study in 24 moderately severe asthmatic patients compared the speed of onset of recommended doses of salbutamol (200 micrograms) and formoterol (12 micrograms) delivered by metered-dose inhaler in reversing the bronchoconstriction induced by a cumulative dose of methacholine to produce a 20% decrease (PD20) in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1). Specific airway conductance (SGAW) and airway resistance (RAW) were measured in baseline condition, immediately after challenge and 0.5, 1.5, 3, 5, 10, 15, 30, 60 min and every hour up to 4 h after inhalation of the trial drug. FEV1 was measured in baseline condition, after challenge and 15, 30 and 60 min and then every 30 min up to 4 h after inhalation of the study drug. The primary efficacy parameter was the change in SGAW. Salbutamol produced a two-fold increase in SGAW within 4 min and a maximum increase after 79.3 min. Formoterol produced a two-fold increase in SGAW after 5 min and a maximum increase after 119.6 min. Changes in SGAW were slightly, but consistently, higher during the first 2 h after inhalation of salbutamol, both in absolute values and as a percentage of the maximum response. Differences were significant at 10, 15 and 30 min time points. There was no significant difference between the maximum values of SGAW after the two drugs. Changes in RAW and FEV1 reflected the differences in SGAW. It was concluded that in methacholine-induced bronchoconstriction both formoterol and salbutamol have a very fast onset of action, achieving prechallenge values of SGAW within 3 min, salbutamol being slightly faster than formoterol.

Addition of salmeterol versus doubling the dose of beclomethasone in children with asthma. The Dutch Asthma Study Group

Studies in adults revealed that addition of salmeterol to a moderate dose of inhaled corticosteroid resulted in better symptom control and higher PEF compared with doubling the dose of inhaled corticosteroid. The aim of this three group study was to compare the effects of a moderate dose of beclomethasone, the same dose of beclomethasone with salmeterol, and a doubling dose of beclomethasone on lung function and symptoms in children with moderate asthma. A total of 177 children already treated with inhaled corticosteroids, were randomized in a double-blind parallel study either to salmeterol 50 microg twice daily (BDP400+salm), beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily (BDP800), or placebo (BDP400) in addition to beclomethasone 200 microg twice daily. No significant differences between groups were found in FEV1, PD20 methacholine, symptom scores, and exacerbation rates after 1 yr. Salmeterol resulted in slightly better PEF in the first months of treatment. FEV1, and PD20 methacholine significantly improved in all groups. After 1 yr mean changes in FEV1, percent predicted were 4.3% (95% CI 1.3; 7.2), 5.8% (95% CI 2.9; 8.7), and 4.3% (95% CI 2.1; 6.5) for BDP400+salm, BDP800, and BDP400, respectively. Changes in airway responsiveness were 0.60 (95% CI 0.05; 1.14), 1.30 (95% CI 0.73; 1. 87), and 0.80 (95% CI 0.33; 1.27) doubling doses. Growth was significantly slower in the BDP800 group. We conclude that no additional benefit was found of adding either salmeterol or more beclomethasone to a daily dose of 400 microg beclomethasone in this group of children with excellent compliance of medication.

One year treatment with salmeterol compared with beclomethasone in children with asthma. The Dutch Paediatric Asthma Study Group

The aim of this study was to compare the effects of salmeterol and beclomethasone on lung function and symptoms in children with mild to moderate asthma. Sixty-seven children not treated with inhaled corticosteroids were randomized in a double-blind parallel study either to salmeterol 50 micrograms b.i.d. or beclomethasone 200 micrograms b.i.d. After one year, FEV1 significantly increased in the beclomethasone group, whereas in the salmeterol group there was a small reduction. Differences between groups were 14.2% predicted (p < 0.0001) and 7.0% predicted (p = 0.007) for pre- and postbronchodilator FEV1 values, respectively. PD20 methacholine decreased by 0.73 DD (p = 0.05) in the salmeterol group and increased by 2.02 DD (p < 0.0001) in the beclomethasone group. Morning and evening PEF and symptom scores improved in both groups, although more in the beclomethasone group. Asthma exacerbations, for which prednisolone was needed, were more frequent in the salmeterol group (17 versus two), as were the number of withdrawals due to exacerbations (six versus one). However, growth was significantly slower in the beclomethasone group (-0.28 SDS) compared with that in the salmeterol group (-0.03 SDS) (p = 0.001). We conclude that treatment with a moderate dose of beclomethasone is superior to salmeterol in children with mild to moderate asthma and recommend that salmeterol should not be used as monotherapy.

The reversibility of airway obstruction to an inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agent is less satisfactory after methacholine testing in asthmatic subjects

AIMS

The aim of this work was to compare the response to an inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agent in two situations: (1) spontaneous airway obstruction in asthmatic subjects who had withheld treatment with the medication for more than 12 hs; and (2) after methacholine-induced airway obstruction once airway caliber had recovered to the premethacholine test value.

SUBJECTS AND METHODS

Sixteen asthmatic subjects who showed a 20% or more improvement in FEV1 after inhaled beta 2-adrenergic agent (B2) (salbutamol, 200 micrograms) entered a double-blind crossover randomized trial in which the following tests were carried out: (1) FEV1 response after inhaling a placebo or active B2; (2) FEV1 response after inhaling a placebo or active B2 after a methacholine test that had induced a 20% or more reduction in FEV1, once FEV1 had recovered to the premethacholine value after inhaling salbutamol in an open fashion.

RESULTS

As expected, the mean percent improvement in FEV1 in the spontaneous airway obstruction situation was 21.7 +/- 8.5% after inhaling the active B2 and 2.2 +/- 1.8% after placebo B2 (p < 0.001). Following recovery after methacholine challenge, the FEV1 was slightly superior (mean difference of 146 mL) to the premethacholine value before inhaling the active or placebo B2. In this situation, the percent improvement in FEV1 after inhaling the active B2 was only 7.5 +/- 4.4% and not significantly different from after inhaling placebo B2 (4.9 +/- 5.4%). Consequently, the end FEV1 value after inhaling active B2 was significantly higher in a situation of spontaneous airway obstruction than after methacholine-induced airway obstruction (mean difference = 110 mL; p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

After a methacholine test, the reversibility of an inhaled beta 2 agent is not significantly different from a placebo and is less satisfactory than in a situation of spontaneous airway obstruction. The mechanism for this needs to be explored but it is not secondary to persisting airway obstruction.

Large lungs after childhood asthma. A case-control study

Several studies have suggested that the TLC after childhood asthma is increased compared wtih that in healthy subjects. The aim of this study was to assess whether TLC is increased after childhood asthma and whether this is associated with an increased growth of the lung during adolescence. During a mean period of 29 months we studied 53 patients and 106 healthy control subjects who were matched for sex, age, and standing height. The patients had had asthma for a mean period of 10 yr. We found that in asthmatics TLC was increased in both sexes by about 7% predicted compared with that in the matched control subjects. The growth of TLC in ml/yr during adolescence was less in patients; this can be accounted for by a delay in pubertal development. When corrected for the delay in growth of stature, growth of TLC in ml/cm in asthmatics was similar to that found in control subjects. These findings support the hypothesis of a developmental change of enhanced lung growth during childhood asthma; they do not support a mechanism with progressive loss of elastic recoil of the lung.