How reliable is the diagnosis of lung cancer using small biopsy specimens? Report of a UKCCCR Lung Cancer Working Party

Mutation profile and programmed death ligand 1 status of patients with non-small cell lung cancer diagnosed with "adenocarcinoma" and "non-small cell carcinoma favor adenocarcinoma"

BACKGROUND

The terminology for lung cancer diagnosis in small biopsies was adopted in the 2015 World Health Organization classification. If non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has no clear adenocarcinoma (AD) or squamous cell carcinoma morphology, the tumor is further classified based on mucin or immunohistochemical staining as NSCLC favor AD (NFAD), NSCLC favor squamous cell carcinoma, or NSCLC not otherwise specified. Since this new term was defined, the difference between AD and NFAD has not yet been fully explored. This study aimed to examine the differences in clinical background, gene alteration frequency, and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression.

METHODS

We included patients diagnosed with AD or NFAD with small samples, and who underwent testing with the Oncomine Dx target test between August 2019 and April 2023 in Kanagawa Cancer Center.

RESULTS

This study comprised 268 patients. A total of 96 patients underwent surgery after AD or NFAD diagnosis. The clinical stage was more advanced and pathological N0 was lower in NFAD than in AD. The pathology of the surgical specimens revealed that solid predominant AD was significantly more common in NFAD than in AD (p < 0.001). In both AD and NFAD, EGFR mutation was the most frequent gene alteration, followed by KRAS mutation. The frequency of EGFR mutations was significantly higher in AD than in NFAD. PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in NFAD than in AD (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

This study shows a clear difference between AD and NFAD in terms of cancer progression, pathological features of the main tumor, genetic characteristics, and PD-L1 expression.

Deep Learning Methods for Lung Cancer Segmentation in Whole-Slide Histopathology Images-The ACDC@LungHP Challenge 2019

Accurate segmentation of lung cancer in pathology slides is a critical step in improving patient care. We proposed the ACDC@LungHP (Automatic Cancer Detection and Classification in Whole-slide Lung Histopathology) challenge for evaluating different computer-aided diagnosis (CADs) methods on the automatic diagnosis of lung cancer. The ACDC@LungHP 2019 focused on segmentation (pixel-wise detection) of cancer tissue in whole slide imaging (WSI), using an annotated dataset of 150 training images and 50 test images from 200 patients. This paper reviews this challenge and summarizes the top 10 submitted methods for lung cancer segmentation. All methods were evaluated using metrics using the precision, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, and DICE coefficient (DC). The DC ranged from 0.7354 ±0.1149 to 0.8372 ±0.0858. The DC of the best method was close to the inter-observer agreement (0.8398 ±0.0890). All methods were based on deep learning and categorized into two groups: multi-model method and single model method. In general, multi-model methods were significantly better (p 0.01) than single model methods, with mean DC of 0.7966 and 0.7544, respectively. Deep learning based methods could potentially help pathologists find suspicious regions for further analysis of lung cancer in WSI.

Diagnostic utility of fine needle aspiration cytology and core biopsy histopathology with or without immunohistochemical staining in the subtyping of the non-small cell lung carcinomas: Experience from an academic centre in Turkey

INTRODUCTION

This retrospective morphological study compared the results of fine needle aspiration (FNA) cytology, haematoxylin-eosin (HE)-stained samples and immunohistochemical (IHC)-stained core needle biopsy (CNB) histology samples for primary non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) subtyping. We assessed the diagnostic utility of these methods to investigate the contribution of each method to NSCLC subtyping. We also identified the point at which NSCLC subtyping could be performed using histomorphology alone without IHC.

METHODOLOGY

Concurrent FNA and CNB specimens obtained via a single computed tomography-guided procedure and diagnosed as NSCLC in the Pathology Department of our university within 3 years were reviewed. The results of FNA samples, HE-stained biopsies and IHC-stained biopsies were compared according to subtype.

RESULTS

A total of 141 subjects were enrolled in the study. For subtyping, FNA provided an accurate diagnosis in 70 (55.1%) of 127 eligible subjects after the exclusion of 14 cases determined as not otherwise specified. CNB histology without IHC achieved a diagnosis in 53 (41.7%) of 127 subjects, which was a significant difference (P < .05). The compatibility rate between HE-stained biopsy samples and IHC-stained biopsy samples was 41.7% (53/127).

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis rates achieved using FNA, HE-stained CNB samples and IHC-stained CNB samples were 54.6% (77/141), 37.6% (53/141) and 90.1% (127/141), respectively. The subtype was identified in 55.1% of the subjects evaluated using FNA and 41.7% of subjects assessed using HE-stained biopsy samples without IHC. FNA provided a better result for squamous cell carcinoma than adenocarcinoma (55.1% vs 47.6%), but the diagnosing of adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma using HE-stained biopsy samples was similar (42% vs 41.7%).

Analysis of unexpected small cell lung cancer following surgery as the primary treatment

PURPOSE

Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is considered a systemic disease and surgery is generally not recommended to treat it. High heterogeneity within the tumor and preoperative diagnostic capabilities can sometimes fail to identify SCLC correctly, leading to a subset of unexpected SCLC patients that are diagnosed only after pulmonary resections.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of patients who were diagnosed as having SCLC only after surgery between 2008 and 2015 at a single institution.

RESULTS

A total of 125 unexpected SCLC patients were identified, including those with pure (p-SCLC; n = 76, 60.8%) and combined (c-SCLC; n = 49, 39.2%) SCLC. Highly differential diagnoses were observed between pre- and postoperative tissue examinations. Sixty-nine (55.2%) patients with postoperatively pathological-proven SCLC, including 31 with p-SCLC and 38 with c-SCLC, were diagnosed preoperatively with poorly differentiated carcinoma (n = 23), squamous carcinoma (n = 14), adenocarcinoma (n = 10), malignant cells with necrosis (n = 10), large cell carcinoma (n = 8), or carcinoid (n = 4). Also, inconsistencies between the clinical (c-) and pathological (p-) stages were found in this cohort, which were less common in patients with preoperative PET examination than those without (24.4% vs. 43.8%; p = 0.032). Multivariable analyses showed that higher p-stage (hazards ratio (HR) = 1.7349, p = 0.0025), sub-lobar resection (HR = 1.9078, p = 0.0395), and a lack of prophylactic cranial irradiation treatment (PCI, HR = 0.3873, p = 0.0057) were unfavorable prognostic factors for overall survival.

CONCLUSION

Non-resection approaches reveal an inadequate diagnosis of SCLC. PET examination facilitates the evaluation of the clinical staging of SCLC. For unexpected SCLC undergoing resection, favorable outcomes can be achieved if radical resection and postoperative PCI are performed.

Accuracy of cytology in sub typing non small cell lung carcinomas

BACKGROUND

Sub typing of non small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) has an important task in the era of molecular and targeted therapies. Differentiating between squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) and adenocarcinoma (ADC) is challenging when limited material is available in lung carcinoma. We investigated the accuracy and feasibility of sub typing NSCLCs in cytology and small biopsy material.

METHODS

Concurrent cytology and biopsy material obtained in a single CT- guided procedure in lung carcinoma over a year period retrospectively. Both materials were individually sub typed and analyzed. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) was performed. Accuracy was determined by comparing the results with IHC.

RESULTS

Total 107 of 126 cases of NSCLCs were included for analysis, where both cytology and biopsy material were adequate for interpretation. FNAC allowed tumor typing in 83 (77.6%) cases; 36 (33.6%) were ADC, 47 (43.9%) cases were SQCC and 24 (22.4%) cases diagnosed as Non-small cell carcinoma not otherwise specified (NSCLC-NOS). In biopsy, 86 cases (80.4%) were typed, among which 34 (31.8%) were ADC, 52 (48.6%) were SQCC and 21 (19.6%) were of NSCLC-NOS type. The result of Chi-square index was significant. With the aid of IHC, NSCLC-NOS reduced from 14 (13%) cases to 2 (1.9%) cases.

CONCLUSION

Cytology and small biopsy specimens achieved comparable specificity and accuracy in sub-typing NSCLC and optimal results were obtain when findings from both modalities combine. The advantage of paired specimens is to maximize overall diagnostic yield and the remaining material will be available for ancillary technique like IHC or for molecular testing. Diagn. Cytopathol. 2017;45:598-603. © 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Ten-year Single Center Experience of Pulmonary Carcinoid Tumors and Diagnostic Yield of Bronchoscopic Biopsy

PURPOSE

Bronchoscopic biopsy of pulmonary carcinoid tumors has been controversial, and no study to date is dedicated to investigate diagnostic yield or safety. We reviewed our single center experience with pulmonary carcinoid tumors over a 10-year time period and assessed the diagnostic yield and safety of bronchoscopic biopsy of these tumors.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was conducted of all bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors from January 2003 through January 2014 for patients treated at or referred to our tertiary care facility, including patient and tumor characteristics, diagnostic yield, and complications of bronchoscopy.

RESULTS

Forty-nine patients with bronchopulmonary carcinoid tumors were identified. 75.5 % of our patients were female, and the median age was 60.7 years. 85.7 % patients were white, and 53.1 % were smokers. 83.7 % had typical carcinoid tumors or tumorlets, and 85.7 % had centrally located tumors. The median tumor size was 2.0 cm. Thirty patients underwent bronchoscopy for diagnostic evaluation. 76.7 % were diagnosed via bronchoscopic biopsy. Bronchoscopic yield was calculated at 65.7 % yield, and two complications of moderate to severe bleeding occurred with no emergent thoracotomies, transfusions, or deaths. No other complications occurred from bronchoscopy.

CONCLUSION

The diagnosis of pulmonary carcinoid tumors via bronchoscopic biopsy is safe and effective, and bronchoscopy is recommended as the initial diagnostic modality for these tumors.

Impact of Recent Developments in Lung Cancer on the Practice of Pathology

Landmark events in the field of lung cancer in the past year have the potential to significantly alter the practice of pathology. Three key events are (1) approval of payment for low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer, (2) publication of an extensively revised World Health Organization classification of lung cancers, and (3) approval of immunohistochemistry based companion diagnostics by the US Food and Drug Administration. We briefly review these milestones in the context of their impact on the practice of pathology.

Roles of immunohistochemical staining in diagnosing pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Differentiating morphologic features based on hematoxylin-eosin (HE) staining is the most common method to classify pathological subtypes of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, its accuracy and inter-observer reproducibility in pathological diagnosis of poorly differentiated NSCLC remained to be improved.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We attempted to explore the role of immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining in diagnosing pulmonary squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) with poorly differentiated features by HE staining or with elevated serum adenocarcinoma-specific tumor markers (AD-TMs). We also compared the difference of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation rate between patients with confirmed SQCC and those with revised pathological subtype. Logistic regression analyses were used to test the association between different factors and diagnostic accuracy.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients who met the eligible criteria and had adequate specimens for IHC confirmation were included. Pathological revised cases in poor differentiated subgroup, biopsy samples and high-level AD-TMs cases were more than those with high/moderate differentiation, surgical specimens and normal-level AD-TMs. Moreover, biopsy sample was a significant factor decreasing diagnostic accuracy of pathological subtype (OR, 4.037; 95% CI 1.446-11.267, p=0.008). Additionally, EGFR mutation rate was higher in patients with pathological diagnostic changes than those with confirmed SQCC (16.7% vs 4.4%, p=0.157).

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosis based on HE staining only might cause pathological misinterpretation in NSCLC patients with poor differentiation or high-level AD-TMs, especially those with biopsy samples. HE staining and IHC should be combined as pathological diagnostic standard. The occurrence of EGFR mutations in pulmonary SQCC might be overestimated.

MiR-205 and MiR-375 microRNA assays to distinguish squamous cell carcinoma from adenocarcinoma in lung cancer biopsies

INTRODUCTION

Identification of adenocarcinoma (AC) and squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) histology of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in biopsies is clinically important but can be inaccurate by routine histopathologic examination. We quantify this inaccuracy at a cancer center, and evaluate the utility of a microRNA-based method to histotype AC/SCC in biopsies.

METHODS

RNA was extracted from tissue sections with greater than 90% tumor content that were macro- or micro-dissected from formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded biopsy specimens. MicroRNAs in RNA from the biopsies and from resected tumors were quantified by TaqMan reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction assays and normalized against the RNU6B housekeeping RNA. Publicly available microRNA expression datasets were examined.

RESULTS

NSCLC subtyping of small biopsy specimens by routine histopathologic examination either failed or mistyped the histology of 21% of 190 cases. Using 77 resectates, an reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction-based assay of microRNAs miR-21, miR-205, and miR-375 was developed to identify AC and SCC subtypes of NSCLC. This method identified the AC/SCC histotypes of 25 biopsies with an accuracy of 96%, and correctly histotyped all 12 cases for which the histology had been mistyped by routine histopathologic examination of the biopsy. Examination of publicly available datasets identified miR-205 and miR-375 as microRNAs with the best ability to histotype AC and SCC, and that levels of the two microRNAs in AC or SCC are unaffected by the pathologic stage of the tumor or the age or race of the patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Histotypic microRNA assays can aid the subtyping of NSCLC biopsies as AC or SCC by standard histopathologic methods.

Second ESMO consensus conference on lung cancer: pathology and molecular biomarkers for non-small-cell lung cancer

To complement the existing treatment guidelines for all tumour types, ESMO organises consensus conferences to focus on specific issues in each type of tumour. The Second ESMO Consensus Conference on Lung Cancer was held on 11-12 May 2013 in Lugano. A total of 35 experts met to address several questions on management of patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in each of four areas: pathology and molecular biomarkers, early stage disease, locally advanced disease and advanced (metastatic) disease. For each question, recommendations were made including reference to the grade of recommendation and level of evidence. This consensus paper focuses on recommendations for pathology and molecular biomarkers in relation to the diagnosis of lung cancer, primarily non-small-cell carcinomas.

Histo-cytological diagnostic accuracy in lung cancer

OBJECTIVE

The majority of patients with lung cancer are treated on the basis of a diagnosis made from the analysis of a small tumour biopsy or a cytological sample and histotype is becoming a critical variable in clinical workup as it has led to the introduction of newer biologically targeted therapies. Consequently, simply classifying cancers as small cell lung cancers or non-small cell lung cancers is no longer sufficient.

METHODS

From 2009 to 2011, a review of the histo-cytological database was conducted to identify all small biopsy and cytology specimens collected for diagnostic purposes in patients with a thoracic lesion. In total, 941 patients were studied by examining exfoliative and/or aspirative cytological samples. To establish the accuracy of these methods, cytological and biopsy diagnoses were compared with each other and with subsequent resection specimens when available. Moreover, during the diagnostic workup, we examined a validated panel of immunohistochemical markers.

RESULTS

The diagnostic concordance of pre-operative diagnoses with surgical samples was high in both cytology and biopsy samples [κ = 0.71, confidence interval (CI) = 0.6-0.81; P < 0.0001 and κ = 0.61, CI = 0.41-0.82; P < 0.0001 respectively; good agreement] but concordance between cytology and biopsy was moderate (κ = 0.5, CI = 0.43-0.54; P < 0.0001). Immunohistochemistry-aided diagnoses were definitive for histotype in 92.8% of both cytology (206/222) and biopsy (155/167) specimens.

CONCLUSION

We found that lung cancer diagnosis and subtyping of cytology and biopsy samples are highly feasible and concordant; thus, the diagnostic approach to lung cancer does not require more invasive procedures.

Lung adenocarcinoma in the era of targeted therapies: histological classification, sample prioritization, and predictive biomarkers

The arrival of targeted therapies has presented both a conceptual and a practical challenge in the treatment of patients with advanced non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLCs). The relationship of these treatments with specific histologies and predictive biomarkers has made the handling of biopsies the key factor for success. In this study, we highlight the balance between precise histological diagnosis and the practice of conducting multiple predictive assays simultaneously. This can only be achieved where there is a commitment to multidisciplinary working by the tumor board to ensure that a sensible protocol is applied. This proposal for prioritizing samples includes both recent technological advances and the some of the latest discoveries in the molecular classification of NSCLCs.

Clinical relevance of the new IASLC/ERS/ATS adenocarcinoma classification

In 2011, recommendations for a multidisciplinary classification of lung adenocarcinoma were published under the auspices of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, the American Thoracic Society and the European Respiratory Society. The review was considered necessary due to emerging data on the radiological features, genetics and therapeutic approaches to lung adenocarcinoma, all underpinned by expanding the knowledge of the pathology of this common tumour. The existing WHO classification of 2004 was not really fit for this multidisciplinary focus on the disease. This review describes the recommendations made on the reporting of surgically resected lung cancers according to their predominant pattern, and argues the case for replacing the term bronchioloalveolar carcinoma (WHO 1999 and 2004 definition) with adenocarcinoma in situ and for the introduction of minimally invasive adenocarcinoma. There is also a discussion of diagnosis of non-small-cell lung carcinomas in the small biopsy or cytology setting, a practice that was inadequately addressed in WHO 2004, yet this is much more relevant to most pathologists' daily practice because 85% or so of adenocarcinomas are never resected. Predictive immunohistochemistry, used correctly, can reduce non-specific diagnosis to less than 10% of the cases. Finally, there is an overview of the emerging data on therapeutically relevant lung adenocarcinoma genetics, considering targetable mutations that are now the focus of much activity. The clinical relevance of these changes is discussed.

Pathology and personalized medicine in lung cancer

SUMMARY Personalized medicine for patients with non-small-cell lung cancer is a reality now and its use will only increase in the future. Pathology is key in supporting this approach to treatment decision-making, by performing the most complete and accurate histological subtyping of tumors possible, supported by predictive immunohistochemistry and the assessment of relevant biomarkers. The need for these extra diagnostic steps emphasizes the importance of maximizing tissue yields from biopsy procedures. Although multiplex approaches may allow simultaneous assessment of several biomarkers, there will remain a need for different types of test (e.g., immunohistochemistry, as well as mutation testing). Next-generation technologies for DNA sequencing are a great hope for extensive genetic analysis of single samples, provided various technical and logistical problems can be solved. All such laboratory activity must be supported by high-quality internal procedures and external quality-assurance schemes.

Lung cancer genotype-based therapy and predictive biomarkers: present and future

CONTEXT

The advent of genotype-based therapy and predictive biomarkers for lung cancer has thrust the pathologist into the front lines of precision medicine for this deadly disease.

OBJECTIVE

To provide the clinical background, current status, and future perspectives of molecular targeted therapy for lung cancer patients, including the pivotal participation of the pathologist.

DATA SOURCES

Data were obtained from review of the pertinent peer-reviewed literature.

CONCLUSIONS

First-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors have produced clinical response in a limited number of non-small cell lung cancers demonstrated to have activating mutations of epidermal growth factor receptor or anaplastic lymphoma kinase rearrangements with fusion partners. Patients treated with first-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors develop acquired resistance to their therapy. Ongoing investigations of second-generation tyrosine kinase inhibitors and new druggable targets as well as the development of next-generation genotyping and new antibodies for immunohistochemistry promise to significantly expand the pathologist's already crucial role in precision medicine of lung cancer.

Precision Medicine for Lung Cancer: Role of the Surgical Pathologist

Precision medicine is altering the traditional role of the surgical pathologist in caring for patients with lung cancer. Diagnosing specific cell type is now a foundation for selecting lung cancers for predictive-biomarker testing by molecular techniques. Using conventional techniques and familiar equipment, the surgical pathologist's role goes beyond this important step and will include screening for, and possibly diagnosis of, predictive biomarkers as we illustrate for one predictive biomarker. Pathologists should embrace the innovations described at the Houston Lung Symposium but must recognize that their traditional expertise will be an important component of precision medicine for the foreseeable future.

Challenges in Implementing Personalized Medicine for Lung Cancer within a National Healthcare System

The traditional approach to the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) relied on the uniform use of cytotoxic chemotherapy. Over the last eight years, this paradigm of care has been shifting towards the use of molecularly targeted agents. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations have emerged as an important biomarker for these targeted agents and multiple studies have shown that tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) that inhibit EGFR are superior to traditional chemotherapy in patients possessing an EGFR mutation. Nationally funded health care systems face a number of challenges in implementing these targeted therapies, most related to the need to test for biomarkers that predict likelihood of benefiting from the drug. These obstacles include the challenge of getting a large enough tissue sample, workload of involved specialists, reliability of subtyping in NSCLC, differences in biomarker tests, and the disconnect between the funding of drugs and the related biomarker test. In order to improve patient outcomes, in a national healthcare system, there is a need for governments to accept the changing paradigm, invest in technology and build capacity for molecular testing to facilitate the implementation of improved patient care.

Subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma: a comparison of small biopsy and cytology specimens

BACKGROUND

There is growing evidence that lung adenocarcinoma and squamous cell carcinoma (SQCC) have distinct oncogenic mutations and divergent therapeutic responses, which is driving the heightened emphasis on accurate pathologic subtyping of non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC). The relative feasibility and accuracy of NSCLC subtyping by small biopsy versus cytology is not well established, particularly in current practice where immunohistochemistry (IHC) is becoming routinely used to aid in this distinction.

METHODS

Concurrent biopsy and cytology specimens obtained during a single procedure and diagnosed as NSCLC during a 2-year period (n = 101) were reviewed. Concordance of diagnoses in the two methods was assessed. Accuracy was determined based on subsequent resection or autopsy diagnosis (n = 21) or IHC for thyroid transcription factor 1 and p63 on a subset of cases (n = 43).

RESULTS

The distribution of definitive versus favored versus unclassified categories (reflecting the degree of diagnostic certainty) was similar for biopsy (71% versus 23% versus 6%, respectively) and cytology (69% versus 19% versus 12%, respectively), p = 0.29. When results from paired specimens were combined, the rate of definitive diagnoses by at least one method was increased to 84% and the unclassified rate was decreased to 4%. NSCLC subtype concordance between biopsy and cytology was 93%. Kappa coefficient (95% confidence interval) for agreement between methods was 0.88 (0.60-0.89) for adenocarcinoma and 0.76 (0.63-0.89) for SQCC. In pairs with discordant diagnoses (n = 7) the correct tumor type was identified with a similar frequency by biopsy (n = 4) and cytology (n = 3). Factors contributing to mistyping were poor differentiation, necrosis, low cellularity, and lack of supporting IHC. All concordant diagnoses for which verification was available (n = 57) were correct. IHC was used more frequently to subtype NSCLC in biopsy than cytology (32% versus 6%; p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Small biopsy and cytology achieve comparable rates of definitive and accurate NSCLC subtyping, and the optimal results are attained when the two modalities are considered jointly. The lower requirement for IHC in cytology highlights the strength of cytomorphology in NSCLC subtyping. Whenever clinically feasible, obtaining parallel biopsy and cytology specimens is encouraged.

The challenge of NSCLC diagnosis and predictive analysis on small samples. Practical approach of a working group

Until recently, the division of pulmonary carcinomas into small cell lung cancer (SCLC) and non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was adequate for therapy selection. Due to the emergence of new treatment options subtyping of NSCLC and predictive testing have become mandatory. A practical approach to the new requirements involving interaction between pulmonologist, oncologist and molecular pathology to optimize patient care is described. The diagnosis of lung cancer involves (i) the identification and complete classification of malignancy, (ii) immunohistochemistry is used to predict the likely NSCLC subtype (squamous cell vs. adenocarcinoma), as in small diagnostic samples specific subtyping is frequently on morphological grounds alone not feasible (NSCLC-NOS), (iii) molecular testing. To allow the extended diagnostic and predictive examination (i) tissue sampling should be maximized whenever feasible and deemed clinically safe, reducing the need for re-biopsy for additional studies and (ii) tissue handling, processing and sectioning should be optimized. Complex diagnostic algorithms are emerging, which will require close dialogue and understanding between pulmonologists and others who are closely involved in tissue acquisition, pathologists and oncologists who will ultimately, with the patient, make treatment decisions. Personalized medicine not only means the choice of treatment tailored to the individual patient, but also reflects the need to consider how investigative and diagnostic strategies must also be planned according to individual tumour characteristics.

Raman Spectroscopy for Clinical Oncology

Cancer is one of the leading causes of death throughout the world. Advancements in early and improved diagnosis could help prevent a significant number of these deaths. Raman spectroscopy is a vibrational spectroscopic technique which has received considerable attention recently with regards to applications in clinical oncology. Raman spectroscopy has the potential not only to improve diagnosis of cancer but also to advance the treatment of cancer. A number of studies have investigated Raman spectroscopy for its potential to improve diagnosis and treatment of a wide variety of cancers. In this paper the most recent advances in dispersive Raman spectroscopy, which have demonstrated promising leads to real world application for clinical oncology are reviewed. The application of Raman spectroscopy to breast, brain, skin, cervical, gastrointestinal, oral, and lung cancers is reviewed as well as a special focus on the data analysis techniques, which have been employed in the studies.

Personalized medicine for lung cancer: new challenges for pathology

Recent advances in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) therapy mean the relatively simple discrimination between small-cell and 'non-small-cell' carcinoma is insufficient to determine the best treatment for individual patients. Safety, efficacy and prescribing requirements mandate more specific subtyping of NSCLC for several new drugs: practice made difficult by the tumour heterogeneity combined with the paucity of tissue in most diagnostic samples. Immunohistochemical approaches have emerged as accurate predictors of probable tumour histotype. P63 and/or cytokeratins 5 and 6 and thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF1) are among the best predictors, respectively, of squamous and adenocarcinoma histology. Molecular characteristics may predict response to both newer molecular targeted agents and traditional cytotoxic agents. Specific mutations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene as predictors of response to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (erlotinib, gefitinib) is the first example of markers which predict response to targeted agents. Actual drug targets [e.g. thymidilate synthase (TS) - pemetrexed] or markers of the tumour's ability to repair cytotoxic drug-induced damage [e.g. excision repair cross-complementation group 1 (ERCC1) - cisplatin] may well also complement NSCLC diagnosis. This extended diagnostic requirement from increasingly limited material provided by minimally invasive biopsy techniques poses major challenges for pathology.

Suitability of thoracic cytology for new therapeutic paradigms in non-small cell lung carcinoma: high accuracy of tumor subtyping and feasibility of EGFR and KRAS molecular testing

INTRODUCTION

The two essential requirements for pathologic specimens in the era of personalized therapies for non-small cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC) are accurate subtyping as adenocarcinoma (ADC) versus squamous cell carcinoma (SqCC) and suitability for EGFR and KRAS molecular testing. The aim of this study was to comprehensively review the performance of cytologic specimens for the above two goals in a high-volume clinical practice.

METHODS

Subtyping of primary lung carcinomas by preoperative cytology was correlated with subsequent resection diagnoses during a 1-year period (n = 192). The contribution of various clinicopathologic parameters to subtyping accuracy and utilization of immunohistochemistry (IHC) for NSCLC subtyping were analyzed. In addition, the performance of cytologic specimens submitted for EGFR/KRAS molecular testing during a 1-year period (n = 128) was reviewed.

RESULTS

Of the 192 preoperative cytology diagnoses, tumor subtype was definitive versus favored versus unclassified in 169 (88%) versus 15 (8%) versus 8 (4%) cases, respectively. Overall accuracy of cytologic tumor subtyping (concordance with histology) was 93% and accuracy of definitive diagnoses 96%. For a group of patients with ADC and SqCC (n = 165), the rate of unclassified cytologic diagnoses was 3% and overall accuracy 96%. IHC was used for subtyping of 9% of those cases, yielding 100% accuracy. The strongest predictors of difficulty in subtyping of ADC and SqCC were poor differentiation (p = 0.0004), low specimen cellularity (p = 0.019), and squamous histology (p = 0.003). Of 128 cytologic specimens submitted for molecular testing, 126 (98%) were suitable for analysis, revealing EGFR and KRAS mutations in 31 (25%) and 25 (20%) cases, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cytologic subtyping of NSCLC is feasible and accurate, particularly when morphologic assessment is combined with IHC. Furthermore, routine cytologic specimens can be successfully used for EGFR/KRAS mutation analysis. Our data strongly support the suitability of cytologic specimens for the new therapeutic paradigms in NSCLC.

Accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology in the pathological typing of non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Histological typing of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has an increasing clinical relevance due to the emerging differences in medical treatment between squamous and nonsquamous tumors. However, most NSCLCs are diagnosed in an advanced stage, and the diagnosis is often obtained exclusively by cytology either exfoliative or following fine needle aspiration. We investigated the accuracy of fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) in NSCLC typing as compared with histology.

METHODS

Over the period 2000-2009, 1182 transbronchial needle aspirate or transthoracic needle aspirate samples were obtained from patients with suspicious thoracic lesions. In 474 patients, a cytological diagnosis of primary NSCLC was obtained, and 186 (39%) of them (108 transbronchial needle aspirates and 78 transthoracic needle aspirates) received a parallel or subsequent histologic diagnosis on endoscopic biopsy (112) or surgery (74).

RESULTS

At cytology, 158 (85%) NSCLC cases were typed (89 adenocarcinoma and 69 squamous cell carcinoma), while 28 (15%) were classified as NSCLC not otherwise specified. At histology, 183 (98%) cases were typed (109 adenocarcinoma, 69 squamous cell carcinoma, 3 adenosquamous carcinoma, and 2 large cell carcinoma), and only 3 (2%) were classified as NSCLC not otherwise specified. Cytological and histological typing was concordant in 137 of 156 (88%) cases (K = 0.755; p < 0.001). The positive predictive value of FNAC in typing NSCLC was 92% for adenocarcinoma and 82% for squamous cell carcinoma.

CONCLUSION

FNAC in expert hands is fairly accurate for typing NSCLC and can be regarded as an acceptable procedure for diagnostic and medical treatment planning purposes in most NSCLC cases, especially when more invasive approaches are unfeasible. In poorly differentiated and doubtful cases, the use of ancillary techniques, such as immunocytochemistry, may be required to improve the diagnostic yield.

[Sampling and search for the EGFR mutation: what's taking, when and how to test?]

Since the IPASS study, that has shown a benefit in term of progression-free survival in first line of treatment in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with activating EGFR mutations, and the restricted prescription of this treatment to the presence of these mutations, the determination of the mutational status has became necessary at the diagnosis. This research study of these mutations, present in about 10% of non-selected NSCLC, has to be preferred in case of clinical factors predictive of mutations (sex, race, tobacco status, adenocarcinoma), but don't have to be exclusive, the correlation between these clinical factors and the presence of the mutations being imperfect. Also, the research study of the EGFR mutations should be performed for patients non eligible for chemotherapy (PS>2). Molecular testing could be performed on biopsies, and also on cytology, knowing that there is a mismatch between the tumor and the metastasis for EGFR status. Samples should be prepared according to standardized protocols, avoiding fixation with Bouin. The gold-standard for molecular testing is still sequencing, but alternative targeted tests (allele-specific PCR...) seem to be more sensitive. Some immunohistochemistry tests are in development for EGFR mutations, but have to be validated on large prospective cohorts. At last, new tumoral sampling have to be performed in case of progression under gefitinib in first line, to look for acquired resistance EGFR mutations, or for other resistance molecular markers (Met amplification).

Evaluation of adjunct immunohistochemistry on reporting patterns of non-small cell lung carcinoma diagnosed histologically in a regional pathology centre

Morphological sub-classification of non-small cell carcinoma in small biopsy specimens presents difficulties for pathologists and recent advances in chemotherapy have resulted in increased pressure to more robustly differentiate between squamous carcinoma and adenocarcinoma. The results of audits examining classification of non-small cell lung carcinoma by pathologists working in a specialist team within a regional centre and the effect of introducing adjunct immunohistochemistry into the reporting pathway are presented. It is concluded that the use of a limited immunohistochemical panel substantially reduces the number of cases when a specific cell type cannot be identified or 'favoured' (34% to 6%) and that the classification obtained correlates well with that found in subsequent resection specimens. In addition the introduction of immunohistochemistry substantially reduces the variability in reporting practice between pathologists.

[Non-surgical biopsy in lung cancer: a paradigm shift]

Histological subgroups of non-small cell lung cancer have different prognosis and they require different therapeutic approaches. Accordingly, there is a clinical need in this field to supplement conventional pathological diagnostics with protein and genetic biomarkers that can help to recognize patients responsive to these therapies. Methods for subgroup classification and target identification were developed using surgical samples (surgical lung tumor specimens are available only in 20% of all lung cancer cases). The majority of lung cancer patients, however, have tumors that are irresectable at the time of diagnosis. Therefore, their diagnosis is usually based on bronchoscopically removed tissue or needle biopsy samples analyzed mainly by cytology. Because of the growing need for immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology in lung cancer diagnosis, emphasis should be given to diagnostic bronchoscopic procedures providing tissue samples. Combination of the different biopsy techniques (histology, cytology, bronchial brush, BAL, TBNA etc.), embedding the cells (preparing cell blocks) and, moreover, the availability of immunohistochemical and molecular pathological facilities are all required to set up the proper diagnosis and therapeutic strategy in human lung cancer. Strausz J, Tímár J. Non-surgical biopsy in lung cancer: a paradigm shift.

Small cell carcinoma of the lung and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma interobserver variability

AIMS

To test the hypothesis that the published morphological criteria permit reliable segregation of small cell carcinoma of the lung (SCLC) and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) cases by determining the interobserver variation.

METHODS AND RESULTS

One hundred and seventy cases of SCLC, LCNEC and cases diagnosed as neuroendocrine lung carcinoma before LCNEC had been established as a diagnostic category were retrieved from the archives of the assessor's institutes. A representative haematoxylin and eosin section from each case was selected for review. Batches of cases were circulated among nine pathologists with a special interest in pulmonary pathology. Participants were asked to classify the cases histologically according to the 2004 World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. The diagnoses were collected and kappa values calculated. Unanimity of diagnosis was achieved for only 20 cases; a majority diagnosis was reached for 115 cases. In 35 cases no consensus diagnosis could be reached. There was striking variability amongst assessors in diagnosing SCLC and LCNEC. The overall level of agreement for all cases included in this study was fair (kappa=0.40).

CONCLUSIONS

Using non-preselected cases, the morphological WHO criteria for diagnosing SCLC and LCNEC leave room for subjective pathological interpretation, which results in imprecise categorization of SCLC and LCNEC cases.

Reinventing diagnostics for personalized therapy in oncology

Human cancers are still diagnosed and classified using the light microscope. The criteria are based upon morphologic observations by pathologists and tend to be subject to interobserver variation. In preoperative biopsies of non-small cell lung cancers, the diagnostic concordance, even amongst experienced pulmonary pathologists, is no better than a coin-toss. Only 25% of cancer patients, on average, benefit from therapy as most therapies do not account for individual factors that influence response or outcome. Unsuccessful first line therapy costs Canada CAN$1.2 billion for the top 14 cancer types, and this extrapolates to $90 billion globally. The availability of accurate drug selection for personalized therapy could better allocate these precious resources to the right therapies. This wasteful situation is beginning to change with the completion of the human genome sequencing project and with the increasing availability of targeted therapies. Both factors are giving rise to attempts to correlate tumor characteristics and response to specific adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies. Static cancer classification and grading systems need to be replaced by functional classification systems that not only account for intra- and inter- tumor heterogeneity, but which also allow for the selection of the correct chemotherapeutic compounds for the individual patient. In this review, the examples of lung and breast cancer are used to illustrate the issues to be addressed in the coming years, as well as the emerging technologies that have great promise in enabling personalized therapy.

The Classification of Lung Carcinoma: Time to Change the Morphology-Based Approach?

Morphology still remains the cornerstone in lung cancer classification and always has been accompanying pathologists in their daily activity, even though several ancillary techniques have been incorporated over time to improve diagnostic, prognostic, and predictive capabilities in lung cancer. Currently, we are also faced with a global rethinking of lung cancer care, especially once novel therapy strategies have been made available on the basis of the diverse characteristics of tumors. Although morphology still remains a not easily replaceable tool for lung cancer classification, we are now challenged by the need of offering clinicians more detailed subtyping of non-small-cell lung cancer especially in event of limited diagnostic material, poorly differentiated tumors, or unresectable lesions. Close integration of improved morphology, immunohistochemistry, and molecular tests will be able to not only sharpen our diagnostic algorithms and prognostic and predictive potentialities but also get insights into several lung cancer biology issues, such as histogenesis and new classification schemes.

Refining the treatment of advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer

Metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a debilitating and deadly disease with virtually no chance for long-term survival. Chemotherapy has improved both survival and quality of life for patients with advanced disease. Overall survival of patients with metastatic NSCLC has gradually increased from 8 to 12 months over the past three decades with the introduction of new chemotherapeutic drugs and agents directed at novel targets in the cancer cell. Epidermal growth factor receptor and vascular endothelial growth factor are two such targets. Recent developments also include treatment based on histology and the use of maintenance therapy. It has been recognized that lung cancer is a very complex disease. It is common practice to include a number of scientific correlative studies in the design of clinical trials in order to determine predictive markers of benefit from treatment. This article will review the current approach to the treatment of advanced NSCLC including the use of chemotherapy and molecularly targeted agents. Future directions including the use of potentially predictive biomarkers and innovative clinical trials aimed at a more individualized approach to treatment will also be discussed.

An overview of the North American residential radon and lung cancer case-control studies

Lung cancer has held the distinction as the most common cancer type worldwide since 1985 (Parkin et al., 1993). Recent estimates suggest that lung cancer accounted for 1.2 million deaths worldwide in 2002, which represents 17.6% of the global cancer deaths (Parkin et al., 2005). During 2002, the highest lung cancer rates for men worldwide reportedly occurred in North America and Eastern Europe, whereas the highest rates in females occurred in North America and Northern Europe (Parkin et al., 2005). While tobacco smoking is the leading risk factor for lung cancer, because of the magnitude of lung cancer mortality, even secondary causes of lung cancer present a major public health concern (Field, 2001). Extrapolations from epidemiologic studies of radon-exposed miners project that approximately 18,600 lung cancer deaths per year (range 3000 to 41,000) in the United States alone are attributable to residential radon progeny exposure (National Research Council, 1999). Because of differences between the mines and the home environment, as well as differences (such as breathing rates) between miners and the general public, there was a need to directly evaluate effects of radon in homes. Seven major residential case-control radon studies have been conducted in North America to directly examine the association between prolonged radon progeny (radon) exposure and lung cancer. Six of the studies were performed in the United States including studies in New Jersey, Missouri (two studies), Iowa, and the combined states study (Connecticut, Utah, and southern Idaho). The seventh study was performed in Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. The residential case-control studies performed in the United States were previously reviewed elsewhere (Field, 2001). The goal of this review is to provide additional details regarding the methodologies and findings for the individual studies. Radon concentration units presented in this review adhere to the types (pCi/L or Bq/m3) presented in the individual studies. One picocurie per liter is equivalent to 37 Bq/m3. Because the Iowa study calculated actual measures of exposure (concentration x time), its exposures estimates are presented in the form WLM(5-19) (Field et al., 2000a). WLM(5-19) represents the working level months for exposures that occurred 5-19 yr prior to diagnosis for cases or time of interview for control. Eleven WLM(5-19) is approximately equivalent to an average residential radon exposure of 4 pCi/L for 15 yr, assuming a 70% home occupancy.

CD56: a useful tool for the diagnosis of small cell lung carcinomas on biopsies with extensive crush artefact

BACKGROUND/AIMS

The diagnosis of small cell lung carcinoma (SCLC) on bronchial biopsy is often problematical as a result of intense crush artefact. Several antibodies are now available to help in the diagnosis of SCLC and their value was assessed in this clinical situation.

METHODS/RESULTS

Twenty cases of SCLC and 10 control cases (one non-Hodgkin lymphoma, three non-small cell carcinomas, one follicular reactive hyperplasia, and five chronic non-specific inflammations) with extensive crush artefact were stained using antibodies to CD56, MNF116, thyroid transcription factor 1 (TTF-1), and CD45. All SCLCs showed strong positive staining for CD56 in 75-100% of recognisable tumour cells, even in areas where there was extensive crush artefact. Eighteen of 20 cases were positive for TTF-1 and 16 of 20 were positive for MNF116 in the tumour cells, but both of these antibodies showed little or no staining in areas of crush artefact. Control cases comprising lymphoid cells were positive for CD45 in areas of crush artefact, but all cases of SCLC were negative.

CONCLUSION

CD56, along with markers for cytokeratins-TTF-1, and CD45-are useful in the diagnosis of SCLC in biopsies with extensive crush artefact and can help confirm the diagnosis in cases where features are equivocal.

Use and abuse of lung biopsy

The lung biopsy is widely recognized as a valuable tool for the diagnosis and management of diverse pulmonary disorders. The transbronchial lung biopsy, open lung biopsy, and video assisted thoracoscopic surgery biopsy are the principal tools that have been developed for obtaining lung tissue for histopathological examination. Whereas these various types of lung biopsies are highly sensitive and specific tests available for diagnosis, they may be fraught with potential problems. This review hopes to inform the reader of the indications and limitations of the lung biopsy.

Clinical-radiological presentation and outcome of surgically treated pulmonary carcinoid tumours: a long-term single institution experience

PURPOSE

To determine the presenting features and the outcome of surgically treated pulmonary carcinoid tumours.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis of all consecutive cases with preoperatively suspected or proven pulmonary carcinoid, treated between 1964 and 1994, in order to have full 5-year survival data.

RESULTS

Seventy-three patients were retrieved, six had a postoperative histology other than carcinoid. The mean age of the 67 eligible cases was 44 years (range 17-74). There were 59 typical and eight atypical carcinoids. The most frequent presenting symptom was infection, followed by haemoptysis. Sixteen patients were asymptomatic, 15 of these had an abnormal chest X-ray, showing a solitary nodule in 13. Bronchoscopy was abnormal in almost all symptomatic patients. Bronchial biopsy results suggested a malignancy other than carcinoid in seven of eight patients whose postoperative histology was found to be atypical carcinoid. There were 40 lobectomies, 14 bi-lobectomies, nine pneumonectomies, and four limited resections. Ten patients had lymph node involvement (seven typical and three atypical). There was no correlation between the diameter of the primary tumour and the presence of nodal involvement. In particular, three of eight peripheral lesions <30 mm were found to have metastatic lymph nodes. The 5-year survival was 92% (95% in N0 versus 56% in N1-2; 92% in typical versus 67% in atypical). The 10-year survival was 84%.

CONCLUSION

The specific diagnosis of atypical carcinoid cannot be reliably made on bronchial biopsies. No relationship was found between tumour size and the presence of lymph node metastases, suggesting that radical excision with detailed lymph node sampling is as important in carcinoids as in other lung cancers. Long-term survival was excellent, nodal status and pathology (typical/atypical) were independent prognostic factors.