Bronchodilators in infancy

Bronchodilator response in wheezing infants assessed by the raised volume rapid thoracic compression technique

BACKGROUND

Bronchodilator response (BDR) analyzed by the raised volume rapid thoracic compression (RVRTC) in wheezing infants is not yet well described, although bronchodilators (BD) are routine in the treatment of this population.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate BDR by RVRTC technique in infants with recurrent wheezing and compare to control group.

METHOD

Cross sectional study, 45 infants, age 56 weeks (38-67 weeks). Two groups: wheezing group (WG: history of recurrent wheezing) and control group (CG). RVRTC was evaluated, FVC, FEV_0.5, FEF₅₀, FEF₇₅, FEF_85, FEF_25-75 were measured. Salbutamol was delivered to infants and RVRTC evaluated again. BDR was determined by the increase greater than two standard deviation from the mean change in the CG.

RESULTS

In WG (n = 32) lung function was worse than in CG (n = 13): FEV_0.5: 0.0(-0.9-0.9z score) vs 0.8(0.2-1.4z score); FEF₅₀: 0.2(-0.3-1.1z score) vs 0.9(0.5-1.4z score); and FEF_25-75: 0.2(-0.5-1.1z score) vs 1.1(0.6-1.6z score), respectively, p < 0.05. Both groups had similar increase after BD. In WG 11 patients (34%) were responder and these had worse lung function compared to nonresponder (n = 21) (p < 0.05). The increase in lung function after BD in responder was higher than in nonresponder: FEV_0.5: 6.5(2.1-7.1%) vs -0.5(-2.5-0.7%), FEF₅₀: 5.1(2.7-11.7%) vs 0.4(-1.1-2.8%), FEF₇₅: 20.7(4.7-23.6%) vs -1.3(-6.4-3.9%), FEF_25-75: 9.9(3.8-16.4%) vs 0.0(-1.5-1.0%), respectively, p < 0.05.

CONCLUSION

34% WG showed BDR measured by the RVRTC. The best variables to detect BDR were FEF₇₅, FEF_25-75 and FEV_0.5. Patients with worse lung function showed better response to BD.

Short acting beta agonists for recurrent wheeze in children under 2 years of age

BACKGROUND

Wheeze is a common symptom in infancy and is a common cause for both primary care consultations and hospital admission. Beta2-adrenoceptor agonists (b2-agonists) are the most frequently used as bronchodilator but their efficacy is questionable.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effectiveness of b2-agonist for the treatment of infants with recurrent and persistent wheeze.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Relevant trials were identified using the Cochrane Airways Group database (CENTRAL), Medline and Pubmed. The database search used the following terms: Wheeze or asthma and Infant or Child and Short acting beta-agonist or Salbutamol (variants), Albuterol, Terbutaline (variants), Orciprenaline, Fenoterol

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials comparing the effect of b2-agonist against placebo in children under 2 years of age who had had two or more previous episodes of wheeze, not related to another form of chronic lung disease.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Eight studies met the criteria for inclusion in this meta-analysis. The studies investigated patients in three settings: at home (3 studies), in hospital (2 studies) and in the pulmonary function laboratory (3 studies). The main outcome measure was change in respiratory rate except for community based studies where symptom scores were used.

MAIN RESULTS

The studies were markedly heterogeneous and between study comparisons were limited. Improvement in respiratory rate, symptom score and oxygen saturation were noted in one study in the emergency department following two salbutamol nebulisers but this had no impact on hospital admission. There was a reduction in bronchial reactivity following salbutamol. There was no significant benefit from taking regular inhaled salbutamol on symptom scores recorded at home.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There is no clear benefit of using b2-agonists in the management of recurrent wheeze in the first two years of life although there is conflicting evidence. At present, further studies should only be performed if the patient group can be clearly defined and there is a suitable outcome parameter capable of measuring a response.