Changes in ventilatory mechanics and diaphragmatic function after lung volume reduction surgery in patients with COPD

Induction of dynamic hyperinflation by expiratory resistance breathing in healthy subjects - an efficacy and safety study

New Findings

What is the central question of this study?

The study aimed to establish a novel model to study the chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD)‐related cardiopulmonary effects of dynamic hyperinflation in healthy subjects.

What is the main finding and its importance?

A model of expiratory resistance breathing (ERB) was established in which dynamic hyperinflation was induced in healthy subjects, expressed both by lung volumes and intrathoracic pressures. ERB outperformed existing methods and represents an efficacious model to study cardiopulmonary mechanics of dynamic hyperinflation without potentially confounding factors as present in COPD.

Abstract

Dynamic hyperinflation (DH) determines symptoms and prognosis of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The induction of DH is used to study cardiopulmonary mechanics in healthy subjects without COPD‐related confounders like inflammation, hypoxic vasoconstriction and rarefication of pulmonary vasculature. Metronome‐paced tachypnoea (MPT) has proven effective in inducing DH in healthy subjects, but does not account for airflow limitation. We aimed to establish a novel model incorporating airflow limitation by combining tachypnoea with an expiratory airway stenosis. We investigated this expiratory resistance breathing (ERB) model in 14 healthy subjects using different stenosis diameters to assess a dose–response relationship. Via cross‐over design, we compared ERB to MPT in a random sequence. DH was quantified by inspiratory capacity (IC, litres) and intrinsic positive end‐expiratory pressure (PEEPi, cmH₂O). ERB induced a stepwise decreasing IC (means (95% CI): tidal breathing: 3.66 (3.45–3.88), ERB 3 mm: 3.33 (1.75–4.91), 2 mm: 2.05 (0.76–3.34), 1.5 mm: 0.73 (0.12–1.58) litres) and increasing PEEPi (tidal breathing: 0.70 (0.50–0.80), ERB 3 mm: 11.1 (7.0–15.2), 2 mm: 22.3 (17.1–27.6), 1.5 mm: 33.4 (3.40–63) cmH₂O). All three MPT patterns increased PEEPi, but to a far lesser extent than ERB. No adverse events during ERB were noted. In conclusion, ERB was proven to be a safe and efficacious model for the induction of DH and might be used for the investigation of cardiopulmonary interaction in healthy subjects.

Pulmonary hypertension in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and emphysema patients: prevalence, therapeutic options and pulmonary circulatory effects of lung volume reduction surgery

The exact prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) and cor pulmonale (CP) in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is unknown, and varies considerably from 20-91%. Usually, mean pulmonary artery pressure (mPAP) does not exceed 30 mmHg, and PH is not severe. However, PH and CP are important predictors of mortality in COPD and contribute to disability in this disease. Many factors contribute to the development of PH in chronic lung disease, including reduction of the pulmonary vascular cross-sectional area due to parenchymal loss and accompanying hypoxia, effects of abnormal pulmonary mechanics due to hyperinflation, but also vascular remodeling processes. So far, PH associated with chronic lung disease cannot be treated medically. Therefore, it is indicated to treat the underlying pulmonary disease. Patients with severe PH should be referred to centers experienced in the management of PH and enrollment in clinical trials should be considered. Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) theoretically further increases pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) by reducing the vascular bed when resecting lung tissue, however, this might be compensated by better pulmonary mechanics through reduction of hyperinflation, which will be discussed in the present article.

Valve therapy in patients with emphysematous type of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD): from randomized trials to patient selection in clinical practice

In recent years a number of endoscopic methods have emerged to treat patients with severe emphysematous type of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), who are primarily symptomatic due to hyperinflation despite optimal medical management. Of these techniques, implantation of endobronchial one-way valves into targeted airways of isolated emphysematous lobes appears to be one of the most promising innovations. Results from randomized controlled trials of valve therapy for emphysema show consistent benefits in terms of lung function, exercise capacity, symptoms, and quality of life. This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of the currently available scientific data, discussion of typical treatment related side effects, and recommendations for patient selection in clinical practice.

Quantification of Improvements in Static and Dynamic Ventilatory Measures Following Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Severe COPD

Rationale: This study quantitatively measured the effects of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on spirometry, static and dynamic lung and chest wall volume subdivision mechanics, and cardiopulmonary exercise measures. Methods: Patients with severe COPD (mean FEV₁ = 23 ± 6% predicted) undergoing LVRS evaluation were recruited. Spirometry, plethysmography and exercise capacity were obtained within 6 months pre-LVRS and again within 12 months post- LVRS. Ventilatory mechanics were quantified using stationary optoelectronic plethysmography (OEP) during spontaneous tidal breathing and during maximum voluntary ventilation (MVV). Statistical significance was set at P< 0.05. Results:Ten consecutive patients met criteria for LVRS (5 females, 5 males, age: 62±6yrs). Post -LVRS (mean follow up 7 months ± 2 months), the group showed significant improvements in dyspnea scores (pre 4±1 versus post 2 ± 2), peak exercise workload (pre 37± 21 watts versus post 50 ± 27watts ), heart rate (pre 109±19 beats per minutes [bpm] versus post 118±19 bpm), duty cycle (pre 30.8 ± 3.8% versus post 38.0 ± 5.7%), and spirometric measurements (forced expiratory volume in 1 second [FEV₁] pre 23 ± 6% versus post 32 ± 13%, total lung capacity / residual lung volume pre 50 ± 8 versus 50 ± 11) . Six to 12 month changes in OEP measurements were observed in an increased percent contribution of the abdomen compartment during tidal breathing (41.2±6.2% versus 44.3±8.9%, P=0.03) and in percent contribution of the pulmonary ribcage compartment during MVV (34.5±10.3 versus 44.9±11.1%, P=0.02). Significant improvements in dynamic hyperinflation during MVV occurred, demonstrated by decreases rather than increases in end expiratory volume (EEV) in the pulmonary ribcage (pre 207.0 ± 288.2 ml versus post -85.0 ± 255.9 ml) and abdominal ribcage compartments (pre 229.1 ± 182.4 ml versus post -17.0 ± 136.2 ml) during the maneuver. Conclusions: Post-LVRS, patients with severe COPD demonstrate significant favorable changes in ventilatory mechanics, during tidal and maximal voluntary breathing. Future work is necessary to determine if these findings are clinically relevant, and extend to other environments such as exercise.

Endoscopic lung volume reduction. An American perspective

There are limited therapies for severe emphysema. Bronchoscopic treatments of emphysema were introduced to achieve the beneficial physiological changes seen in surgical lung volume reduction; however, at the present time these treatments are mostly aimed at improving quality of life and functional status in patients with emphysema. At this time, none of these minimally invasive approaches have been approved in the United States for treatment of emphysema; however, several novel interventions have demonstrated potential in early-phase clinical trials. We performed a systematic evaluation of the relevant medical literature and present herein an evidence-based review of bronchoscopic treatments for emphysema, with a focus on the current status of this technology in the United States as compared with Europe.

Effect of lung transplant and volume reduction surgery on respiratory muscle function

Lung transplantation and lung volume reduction surgery have opened a new therapeutic era for patients with advanced emphysema. In addition to providing impressive clinical benefits, they have helped us better understand how the chest wall and respiratory muscles adapt to chronic hyperinflation. This article reviews the effects of these procedures on respiratory muscle and chest wall function. Inspiratory (including diaphragm) and expiratory muscle strength are often close to normal after unilateral and bilateral transplantation, although some patients have marked weakness. After bilateral transplantation for emphysema, graft volume is normal at full inflation but remains greater than normal at end expiration, which results from structural changes in the chest wall. In contrast, patients with unilateral transplantation have a reduction in graft volume at full inflation. The mediastinum is displaced toward the graft at end expiration, which reduces the surface area of the diaphragm on the transplanted side, and it moves toward the native lung during tidal and full inspiration and toward the graft during tidal and forced expiration. Lung volume reduction produces an increase in contractility, length and surface area of the diaphragm, and increases its contribution to tidal volume; at the same time, neural drive to the muscle and respiratory load are reduced, such that diaphragm neuromechanical coupling is improved. Diaphragm configuration and rib cage dimensions are only minimally affected by the procedure. Single-lung transplantation and lung volume reduction favorably impact on the disadvantageous size interaction by which the lungs are functionally restricted by the chest wall in emphysema.

Update in Surgical Therapy for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Bullectomy for giant bullae, lung volume reduction surgery, and lung transplantation are three surgical therapies that may benefit highly selected patients with advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. In this article, each procedure is reviewed, with an emphasis on guidelines for patient selection and clinical outcomes for the practicing pulmonologist. Recent results from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial, updated International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation Registry data, and revised guidelines for patient selection for lung transplantation are discussed.

Influence of diaphragmatic mobility on exercise tolerance and dyspnea in patients with COPD

BACKGROUND

Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) present increased airway resistance, air trapping, pulmonary hyperinflation, and diaphragm muscle alterations, all of which affect pulmonary mechanics.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the influence diaphragmatic mobility has on exercise tolerance and dyspnea in patients with COPD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Fifty-four COPD patients with lung hyperinflation were evaluated to assess pulmonary function, diaphragm mobility, exercise tolerance, and dyspnea (score). Twenty healthy (age- and body mass index-matched) subjects were evaluated as controls.

RESULTS

The COPD patients presented lower diaphragmatic mobility than did the controls (36.27+/-10.96 mm vs. 46.33+/-9.46 mm). Diaphragmatic mobility presented a linear correlation with distance covered on the 6-min walk test (6MWT) (r=0.38; p=0.005) and a negative correlation with dyspnea (r=-0.36; p=0.007). Patients were then divided into two subgroups based on the degree of diaphragmatic mobility: G1 (<or=33.99 mm) and G2 (>or=34 mm). Those in G1 presented poorer 6MWT performance and greater dyspnea upon exertion than did those in G2 (distance covered on the 6MWT: 454.76+/-100.67 m vs. 521.63+/-70.82 m; dyspnea score: 5.22+/-3.06 vs. 3.48+/-2.77). The G1 patients also presented greater residual volume (in liters) and lower maximal voluntary ventilation (in % of predicted values) than did the G2 patients (266.20+/-55.30 vs. 209.74+/-48.49 and 39.00+/-14.94 vs. 58.11+/-20.96).

CONCLUSION

Diaphragmatic mobility influences dyspnea and exercise tolerance in patients with COPD.

Reduced intrathoracic blood volume and left and right ventricular dimensions in patients with severe emphysema: an MRI study

BACKGROUND

Left ventricular (LV) filling is impaired in patients with severe emphysema manifesting in small end-diastolic dimensions. We hypothesized that the hyperinflated lungs of these patients with high intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure will decrease intrathoracic blood volume (ITBV) and ventricular preload. We therefore measured ITBV, and LV and right ventricular (RV) dimensions and function using MRI techniques in patients with severe emphysema.

METHODS

Patients with severe emphysema (n = 13) and matched healthy volunteers (n = 11) were included. The magnetic resonance (MR) examination consisted of three parts: (1) evaluation of RV and LV dimensions and function and interventricular septum curvature using cine MRI; (2) quantification of aortic flow using MR phase velocity mapping; and (3) calculation of the cardiopulmonary peak transit time (PTT) from the pulmonary artery to the ascending aorta using contrast-enhanced, time-resolved, two-dimensional MR angiography.

RESULTS

There were no differences between the groups regarding age, height, or weight. In the emphysema patients, ITBV index (- 35%), LV end-diastolic volume index (LVEDVI) [- 21%], RV end-diastolic volume index (- 20%), cardiac index (- 22%), and stroke volume index (SVI) [- 40%] were lower compared to control subjects. LV and RV end-systolic volumes, LV wall mass, septal curvature, and PTT did not differ between the groups. LVEDVI (r = 0.83) as well as SVI (r = 0.82) correlated closely to ITBV index. SVI correlated closely to LVEDVI (r = 0.84).

CONCLUSIONS

LV and RV performance is impaired in patients with severe emphysema because of small end-diastolic dimensions. One possible explanation for the decreased biventricular preload in these patients is intrathoracic hypovolemia caused by hyperinflated lungs.

Lung volume reduction surgery

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been widely studied and has been available for the treatment of advanced emphysema for 10 years. This paper reviews some of the historical attempts at surgical treatment of emphysema, the physiology of LVRS, and the modern data on patient selection, risks, and benefits. Data from the National Emphysema Treatment Trial are presented in the context of the large body of case series and smaller randomized trials that have preceded that study. Future technologies of bronchoscopic lung volume reduction are also discussed.

Lung volume reduction surgery as a bridge to lung transplantation

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) improves lung function, exercise capacity, and quality of life in patients with advanced emphysema. In some patients with emphysema who are candidates for lung transplantation, LVRS is an alternative treatment option to lung transplantation, or may be used as a bridge to lung transplantation. Generally accepted criteria for LVRS include severe non-reversible airflow obstruction due to emphysema associated with significant evidence of lung hyperinflation and air trapping. Both high resolution computed tomography (CT) scan of the chest and quantitative ventilation/perfusion scan are used to identify lung regions with severe emphysema which would be used as targets for lung resection. Bilateral LVRS is the preferred surgical approach compared with the unilateral procedure because of better functional outcome. Lung transplantation is the preferred surgical treatment in patients with emphysema with alpha1 antitrypsin deficiency and in patients with very severe disease who have homogeneous emphysema pattern on CT scan of the chest or very low diffusion capacity.

Do Pulmonary Hemodynamics Change After Effective Lung Volume Reduction Surgery for Emphysema?

The improvement in lung function, exercise test, blood gas levels, and symptoms in emphysema patients after volume reduction surgery is a result of improvements in breathing mechanics. The question is, is the improvement in the condition related to pulmonary hemodynamics? Few studies have examined pre- and postoperative pulmonary pressure. This paper examines whether there is any significant change in systolic and diastolic pulmonary pressure after effective volume reduction surgery. From October 1999 to October 2002, 12 emphysema patients who underwent volume reduction surgery were studied. Systolic and diastolic pulmonary pressures were measured 2 days before surgery through cardiac catheterization and 2 days after removal of the chest tubes through Swan Ganz catheters placed in the operating room just before surgery. Patients were stable and breathed without assistance during the postoperative pressure measurement. Blood gas analysis, lung function tests, and a 6-minute walk test were performed preoperatively and 3 months postoperatively. The two sets of data were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. There was no significant change in pulmonary hemodynamics, although pulmonary function improved. The improvement in pulmonary function after volume reduction surgery is not related to pulmonary hemodynamics.

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery on left ventricular diastolic filling and dimensions in patients with severe emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Data on the influence of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on cardiac function and hemodynamics are scarce and controversial. Previous studies have focused mainly on right ventricular function and pulmonary hemodynamics. Here, we evaluated the effects of LVRS on left ventricular (LV) end-diastolic filling pattern, dimensions, stiffness, and performance, as well as pulmonary and systemic hemodynamics.

DESIGN

A prospective, open, controlled study.

PATIENTS

Patients with severe emphysema undergoing LVRS (10 patients). Patients scheduled for pulmonary lobectomy due to carcinoma (ie, the lobectomy group) served as control subjects (10 patients).

MEASUREMENTS

LV dimensions and mitral flow velocities were measured by transesophageal, two-dimensional, Doppler echocardiography, and central hemodynamics were measured by a pulmonary artery thermodilution catheter. Measurements were performed during anesthesia in the supine position, before and after surgery, without and with passive leg elevation.

RESULTS

Baseline cardiac index (CI) [- 21%], stroke volume index (SVI) [- 31%], stroke work index (SWI) [- 26%], and LV end-diastolic area index (EDAI) [- 15%] were significantly (p < 0.001) lower, whereas LV end-diastolic stiffness (LVEDS) did not differ in the LVRS group compared to the lobectomy group. The time from peak early diastolic filling to zero flow (E-dec time) [58%] and the deceleration slope of early diastolic filling (E-dec slope) [45%] were significantly higher (p < 0.01), whereas peak early diastolic filling velocity (E-max) [- 31%; p < 0.01] and the proportion of E-max vs peak late diastolic filling velocity (A-max) [ie, the E/A ratio] (- 27%; p < 0.001) were significantly lower compared to the lobectomy group. LVRS significantly increased CI (40%; p < 0.001), SVI (34%; p < 0.001), SWI (58%; p < 0.001), LV EDAI (18%; p < 0.001), E-max (44%; p < 0.01), A-max (15%; p < 0.05) and E/A ratio (28%; p < 0.01), decreased E-dec time (- 31%; p < 0.05) and E-dec slope (- 98%; p < 0.01), and had no effect on LVEDS. In the lobectomy group, surgery affected none of these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

LV function is impaired in patients with severe emphysema due to small end-diastolic dimensions. LVRS increases LV end-diastolic dimensions and filling, and improves LV function.

Anaesthesia for lung volume reduction surgery

Lung volume reduction surgery is a surgical treatment for severe emphysema that is increasing in popularity. The aim is to reverse the hyperexpansion of the lungs that leads to expiratory airflow limitation, compromises the diaphragm and chest wall mechanics, and tamponades the right ventricle. Optimal patient selection has not yet been established, but it has become clear that those patients with the most severe disease have an unacceptably high surgical mortality. The anaesthetic management of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery requires a good understanding of both the pathophysiology of the disease and the surgical procedure. It is important for the anaesthetist and the surgeon to work closely, supported by a large multidisciplinary team. Excellent analgesia is essential to a successful outcome; whether this is best provided by thoracic epidural is as yet unclear.

Effects of emphysema and lung volume reduction surgery on transdiaphragmatic pressure and diaphragm length

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To determine the effect of emphysema and lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on diaphragm length (Ldi) and its capacity to generate transdiaphragmatic pressure (Pdi).

DESIGN

Prospective clinical trial with a parallel group design.

SETTING

Laboratory investigations in normal volunteers recruited by advertisement and in emphysema outpatients being evaluated for elective LVRS.

STUDY POPULATION

Thirteen normal subjects and 13 emphysema patients matched for age and sex. Six emphysema patients underwent LVRS.

MEASUREMENTS

Ldi and maximal Pdi during static inspiratory efforts (PdiMax) were measured at three different lung volumes (LVs). Pdi during maximal bilateral phrenic nerve twitch stimulation (PdiTw) was measured at functional residual capacity (FRC). All measurements were repeated at 3, 6, and 12 months postoperatively.

RESULTS

Ldi, PdiMax, and PdiTw were lower in emphysema patients than in normal subjects at their respective LVs. PdiMax and PdiTw at FRC returned within the normal range after LVRS in emphysema patients. The relationships between PdiMax and LV or Ldi were shifted respectively to higher LV and shorter Ldi in emphysema patients relative to normal subjects, both before and after LVRS. LVRS effected craniad displacement of the diaphragm but no change in rib cage dimensions. Improvements in dyspnea and quality of life after LVRS correlated with changes in LV and Ldi but not with changes in airway caliber.

CONCLUSION

Adaptive mechanisms, consistent with sarcomere deletion, tend to restore diaphragm strength in emphysema patients at FRC, which are fully expressed after LVRS. Lung remodeling by LVRS may alter pleural surface pressure distribution, causing a sustained change in chest wall shape.

Anesthesia considerations for lung volume reduction surgery

Patient selection is of crucial importance for outcome after lung volume reduction surgery. The anesthesiologist should be involved actively in patient selection, because he or she is in charge of the treatment during the critical perioperative period. Patient history and status and results from chest radiographs, high-resolution CT scans, and catheterization of the right heart should be taken carefully into account in the patient selection process. Promising new results involving functional parameters may predict outcome objectively after lung volume reduction surgery in the future. Careful selection and preoperative preparation of patients also are important to avoid complications and keep the success rate high. The anesthesiologist's understanding of the principles involved is important for the successful conduct of lung volume reduction surgery. It is unclear if lung volume reduction surgery is superior to conventional therapy in the long run because the decline in lung function is progressive after the procedure. A multicenter trial comparing patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery with patients with emphysema who are treated conventionally hopefully will clarify this important question in the future.

Diaphragmatic shape change after lung volume reduction surgery

Diaphragmatic shape in normal patients was significantly different from shape in emphysema patients. Postoperative diaphragmatic shape in patients with good clinical outcome differed from preoperative shape and was similar to shape in normal patients. In patients with poor clinical outcome, surgery appeared to have little effect on diaphragm shape.

Effects of lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema on diaphragm dimensions and configuration

Part of the functional benefit provided by lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) may be related to improvement in respiratory muscle function resulting from changes in diaphragm dimension and configuration. To study these changes, we obtained 3D reconstructions of the muscle using spiral computed tomography in 11 patients with severe emphysema before and 3 mo after surgery, and in 11 normal subjects matched for sex, age, height, and weight. Bilateral LVRS was performed by thoracoscopy in eight patients and by sternotomy in three patients. Acquisitions were made in the supine posture at relaxed FRC, midinspiratory capacity, and TLC. On average, LVRS produced a 51 +/- 11% increase in FEV(1) and a 30 +/- 4% decrease in FRC. The total surface area of the diaphragm (A(di)) and of the zone of apposition (A(ap)) at FRC increased by 17 +/- 4% and 43 +/- 8%, respectively, but the surface area of the dome did not change. Compared with the values recorded in the normal subjects, postoperative values of A(di) and A(ap) at FRC were reduced by 11% (p < 0.05) and 24% (p < 0.005), respectively. The curvature of the dome increased at TLC in the left sagittal plane, but was otherwise unaffected by the procedure. We conclude that LVRS substantially increases A(di) and A(ap), but does not significantly improve diaphragm configuration at FRC.

Functional imaging before pulmonary resection

The evaluation of patients before lung resections requires functional imaging. We review the current role of functional imaging in the preoperative evaluation of candidates for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) and lung cancer resection. Perfusion and ventilation lung scintigraphy methods as well as computed tomography techniques used to predict postoperative lung function are presented. The areas of current investigation are also described.

Lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

Over the past decades, extensive literature has been published regarding surgical therapies for advanced COPD. Lung-volume reduction surgery would be an option for a significantly larger number of patients than classic bullectomy or lung transplantation. Unfortunately, the initial enthusiasm has been tempered by major questions regarding the optimal surgical approach, safety, firm selection criteria, and confirmation of long-term benefits. In fact, the long-term follow-up reported in patients undergoing classical bullectomy should serve to caution against unbridled enthusiasm for the indiscriminate application of LVRS. Those with the worst long-term outcome despite favourable short-term improvements after bullectomy have consistently been those with the lowest pulmonary function and significant emphysema in the remaining lung who appear remarkably similar to those being evaluated for LVRS. With this in mind, the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute partnered with the Health Care Finance Administration to establish a multicenter, prospective, randomized study of intensive medical management, including pulmonary rehabilitation versus the same plus bilateral (by MS or VATS), known as the National Emphysema Treatment Trial. The primary objectives are to determine whether LVRS improves survival and exercise capacity. The secondary objectives will examine effects on pulmonary function and HRQL, compare surgical techniques, examine selection criteria for optimal response, identify criteria to determine those who are at prohibitive surgical risk, and examine long-term cost effectiveness. It is hoped that data collected from this novel, multicenter collaboration will place the role of LVRS in a clearer perspective for the physician caring for patients with advanced emphysema.

Lung volume reduction surgery: a survey on the European experience

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the activity and evolution in the field of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) performed at surgical centers in Europe.

BACKGROUND

LVRS is a novel surgical therapy with the potential to improve lung function, exercise performance, and quality of life in selected patients suffering from severe pulmonary emphysema.

METHODS

Questionnaire addressed to 75 European thoracic surgical centers presumed to perform LVRS, and review of the literature.

RESULTS

Of 45 responding centers, 42 centers in 17 countries covering a population of 423 million reported performing LVRS. Until the end of 1998, 1,120 patients were reported to have undergone LVRS, corresponding to 2.6 patients/million inhabitants. Thirty-one of 40 centers (78%) perform the operation bilaterally. Most centers (83%) evaluate their activity prospectively. The average perioperative mortality rate of 4.1% is moderate. The most commonly utilized technique is video-assisted thoracoscopy, which is most frequently performed bilaterally. Two thirds of the centers treat patients with alpha(1)-antitrypsin deficiency, and half of the centers will consider patients with homogenous morphology of emphysema on CT scan for LVRS. Half of the centers also perform lung transplantation. The five largest centers have operated on 49% of all LVRS patients assessed by this survey.

CONCLUSIONS

LVRS is performed at few thoracic surgical centers throughout Europe, with a large variation in the operative activity between different regions. Half of the centers also perform lung transplantation. Between 1995 and 1997, the number of LVRS procedures performed per year nearly tripled but has reached a plateau since then. As five centers perform nearly half the total number of operations, an optimal exchange of knowledge with smaller centers seems important.

Evaluation of patients undergoing lung volume reduction surgery: ancillary information available from computed tomography

AIM

A number of imaging techniques have been used for the pre-operative assessment of patients for lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS). We evaluated whether data currently acquired from perfusion scintigrams and cine MR of the diaphragm are obtainable from high resolution CT (HRCT) of the thorax.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Thirty patients taking part in a randomized controlled trial of LVRS against maximal medical therapy were evaluated. HRCT examinations (n= 30) were scored for (i) the extent and distribution of emphysema; (ii) the extent of normal pulmonary vasculature; and (iii) diaphragmatic contour, apparent defects and herniation. On scintigraphy, (n= 28), perfusion of the lower thirds of both lungs, as a proportion of total lung perfusion (LZ/T(PERF)), was expressed as a percentage of predicted values (derived from 10 normal control subjects). On cine MR (n= 25) hemidiaphragmatic excursion and coordination were recorded.

RESULTS

Extensive emphysema was present on HRCT (60% +/- 13.2%). There was strong correlation between the extent of normal pulmonary vasculature on HRCT and on perfusion scanning (r(s)= 0.85, P< 0.00005). Hemidiaphragmatic incoordination on MR was weakly associated with hemidiaphragmatic eventration on HRCT (P= 0.04).

CONCLUSION

The strong correlation between lung perfusion assessed by HRCT and lung perfusion on scintigraphy suggests that perfusion scintigraphy is superfluous in the pre-operative evaluation of patients with emphysema for LVRS.

Lung function 4 years after lung volume reduction surgery for emphysema

STUDY OBJECTIVES

Current data for patients > 2 years after lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) for emphysema is limited. This prospective study evaluates pre-LVRS baseline data and provides long-term results in 26 patients.

INTERVENTION

Bilateral targeted upper lobe stapled LVRS using video thoracoscopy was performed in 26 symptomatic patients (18 men) aged 67 +/- 6 years (mean +/- SD) with severe and heterogenous distribution of emphysema on lung CT. Lung function studies were measured before and up to 4 years after LVRS unless death intervened.

RESULTS

No patients were lost to follow-up. Baseline FEV(1) was 0.7 +/- 0.2 L, 29 +/- 10% predicted; FVC, 2.1 +/- 0.6 L, 58 +/- 14% predicted (mean +/- SD); maximum oxygen consumption, 5.7 +/- 3.8 mL/min/kg (normal, > 18 mL/min/kg); dyspneic class > or = 3 (able to walk < or = 100 yards) and oxygen dependence part- or full-time in 18 patients. Following LVRS, mortality due to respiratory failure at 1, 2, 3, and 4 years was 4%, 19%, 31%, and 46%, respectively. At 1, 2, 3, and 4 years after LVRS, an increase above baseline for FEV(1) > 200 mL and/or FVC > 400 mL was noted in 73%, 46%, 35%, and 27% of patients, respectively; a decrease in dyspnea grade > or = 1 in 88%, 69%, 46%, and 27% of patients, respectively; and elimination of oxygen dependence in 78%, 50%, 33%, and 22% of patients, respectively. The mechanism for expiratory airflow improvement was accounted for by the increase in both lung elastic recoil and small airway intraluminal caliber and reduction in hyperinflation. Only FVC and vital capacity (VC) of all preoperative lung function studies could identify the 9 patients with significant physiologic improvement at > 3 years after LVRS, respectively, from 10 patients who responded < or = 2 years and died within 4 years (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Bilateral LVRS provides clinical and physiologic improvement for > 3 years in 9 of 26 patients with emphysema primarily due to both increased lung elastic recoil and small airway caliber and decreased hyperinflation. The 9 patients had VC and FVC greater at baseline (p < 0.01) when compared to 10 short-term responders who died < 4 years after LVRS.

Relationship between resting hypercapnia and physiologic parameters before and after lung volume reduction surgery in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have varying degrees of hypercapnia. Recent studies have demonstrated inconsistent effects of lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) on PaCO2; however, most series have excluded patients with moderate to severe hypercapnia. In addition, no study has examined the mechanisms responsible for the reduction in PaCO2 post-LVRS. We obtained spirometry, body plethysmography, diffusion capacity, respiratory muscle strength, 6-min walk test, and incremental symptom-limited maximal exercise data in 33 consecutive patients pre- and 3 to 6 mo post-LVRS, and explored the relationship between changes in PaCO2 and changes in the measured physiologic variables. All patients underwent bilateral LVRS via median sternotomy and stapling resection by the same cardiothoracic surgeon. Patients were 57 +/- 8 yr of age with severe COPD, hyperinflation, and air trapping (FEV1, 0.73 +/- 0.2 L; TLC, 7.3 +/- 1.6 L; residual volume [RV], 4.8 +/- 1.4 L), and moderate resting hypercapnia (PaCO2, 44 +/- 7 mm Hg; range, 32 to 56 mm Hg). Post-LVRS, PaCO2 decreased by 4% (PaCO2 pre 44 +/- 7 mm Hg, PaCO2 post 42 +/- 5 mm Hg; p = 0.003). Patients with higher baseline values of PaCO2 had the greatest reduction in PaCO2 post-LVRS (r = -0.61, p < 0.001). Significant correlations existed between reduction in PaCO2 and changes in FEV1 (r = -0.56; p = 0.0007), maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) (r = -0.46; p = 0.009), diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide (DLCO) (r = -0.47; p = 0.008), and RV/TLC (r = 0.41; p = 0. 02). Correlation existed also between reduction in PaCO2 and breathing pattern at maximal exercise: maximal minute ventilation (V Emax) (r = -0.47; p = 0.009), and tidal volume (VT) (r = -0.40; p = 0.02). The changes in PaCO2 post-LVRS showed marked intersubject variability. We conclude that LVRS, by reducing hyperinflation, air trapping, and improving respiratory muscle function, enables the lung and chest wall to act more effectively as a pump, thereby increasing alveolar ventilation and reducing baseline resting PaCO2. In addition, patients with higher baseline levels of PaCO2 demonstrate the greatest reduction in PaCO2 post-LVRS, and should not be excluded from receiving LVRS.

Effect of lung volume reduction surgery on diaphragm length in severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Lung volume reduction surgery (LVRS) has been suggested as improving respiratory mechanics in patients with severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). We hypothesized that LVRS might lengthen the diaphragm, increase its area of apposition with the chest wall, and thereby improve its mechanical function. To determine the effect of bilateral LVRS on diaphragm length, we measured diaphragm length at TLC, using plain chest roentgenograms (CXRs), in 25 patients (11 males and 14 females) before LVRS and 3 to 6 mo after LVRS. A subgroup of seven patients (reference data) also had diaphragm length measurements made with CXRs, using films made within a year before their presurgical evaluation. Right hemidiaphragm silhouette length (PADL) and the length of the most vertically oriented portion of the right hemidiaphragm muscle (VDML) were measured. Diaphragm dome height was determined from the: (1) distance between the dome and transverse diameter at the manubrium; and (2) highest point of the dome referenced horizontally to the vertebral column. Patients also underwent spirometry, measurements of lung volumes and diffusion capacity, an incremental symptom-limited maximum exercise test, and measurements of 6 min walk distance (6MWD) and transdiaphragmatic pressures during maximum static inspiratory efforts (Pdimax sniff) and bilateral supramaximal electrophrenic twitch stimulation (Pditwitch) both before and 3 mo after LVRS. Patients were 58 +/- 8 yr of age, with severe COPD and hyperinflation (FEV1 = 0.68 +/- 0.23 L, FVC = 2.56 +/- 7.3 L, and TLC = 143 +/- 22% predicted). Following LVRS, PADL increased by 4% (from 13.9 +/- 1.9 cm to 14.5 +/- 1.7 cm; p = 0.02), VDML increased by 44% (from 2.08 +/- 1.5 cm to 3.00 +/- 1.6 cm, p = 0.01), and diaphragm dome height increased by more than 10%. In contrast, diaphragm lengths were similar in subjects with CXRs made before LVRS and within 1 yr before evaluation. The increase in diaphragm length correlated directly with postoperative reductions in TLC and RV, and also with increases in transdiaphragmatic pressure with maximal sniff (Pdimax sniff), maximal oxygen consumption (V O2max), maximal minute ventilation (V Emax), and maximum voluntary ventilation following LVRS. We conclude that LVRS leads to a significant increase in diaphragm length, especially in the area of apposition of the diaphragm with the rib cage. Diaphragm lengthening after LVRS is most likely the result of a reduction in lung volume. Increases in diaphragm length after LVRS correlate with postoperative improvements in diaphragm strength, exercise capacity, and maximum voluntary ventilation.

Ventilatory mechanics and gas exchange during exercise before and after lung volume reduction surgery

Many patients with emphysema are able to meet ventilatory demands during resting conditions, but they show severe limitations during exercise. To examine the effect of lung volume reduction (LVR) surgery on exercise performance and the mechanism of possible improvement, we measured ventilatory mechanics (pulmonary resistance [RL], work of breathing [WOB], dynamic intrinsic positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEPi,dyn], peak expiratory flow rate [PEFR]), breathing pattern, oxygen uptake (V O2), and carbon dioxide removal (V CO2) at rest and during cycle ergometry in eight patients before and 3 mo after LVR surgery. Ventilatory mechanics were evaluated assessing esophageal pressure and air flow. Three months after LVR surgery, the tolerated workload was doubled when compared with the preoperative value (p < 0.0005), associated with a reduction of RL (p < 0.05), PEEPi,dyn (p < 0.005), and WOB (p < 0. 005) at comparable workloads. Maximal ventilatory capacity and maximal tidal volume (VT) increased significantly (p < 0.01). Maximal V O2 increased from 474 +/- 23 to 601 +/- 16 ml/min (p < 0. 005) and maximal V CO2 from 401 +/- 13 to 558 +/- 21 ml/min (p < 0. 005), though no significant difference at comparable workloads could be observed. In conclusion, emphysema surgery leads to an improvement of ventilatory mechanics at rest and during exercise. Higher maximal VT and minute ventilation were observed, resulting in improvement of maximal V O2 and V CO2 and exercise capacity.

Lobectomy improves ventilatory function in selected patients with severe COPD

BACKGROUND

Patients often undergo limited resection instead of lobectomy for non-small cell lung cancer because of a low preoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1). Our goal is to define criteria that will preoperatively identify a group of patients who will not lose further function after lobectomy.

METHODS

Patients who underwent lobectomy with a preoperative FEV1 of less than 80% of predicted were retrospectively identified. Data collected included preoperative and postoperative pulmonary function tests, age, sex, the lobe resected, and preoperative ventilation-perfusion scan result.

RESULTS

Thirty-two patients were included in this study. The median preoperative FEV1 was 60% of predicted (1.65 L) and the mean change in FEV1 was a loss of 7.8% after lobectomy. The patients were divided into two groups. Group 1 (n = 13) had a preoperative FEV1 of less than or equal to 60% of predicted (median, 49%; 1.35 L) combined with an FEV1 to forced vital capacity ratio of less than or equal to 0.6. Group 2 (n = 19) includes all other patients (median preoperative FEV1, 69% of predicted; 1.87 L). The mean changes in FEV1 after lobectomy were +3.7% and -15.7% for groups 1 and 2, respectively (p < 0.005). A chronic obstructive pulmonary disease index was defined and then calculated for each patient. The relationship between this index and the change in FEV1 after lobectomy for all 32 patients appears linear (r = -0.43; p = 0.015).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with a very low preoperative FEV1 and FEV1 to forced vital capacity ratio are less likely to lose ventilatory function after lobectomy and may actually improve it.