Evaluation of an auto-CPAP device for treatment of obstructive sleep apnoea

Auto-PAP Titration Efficacy in Obstructive Sleep Apnea: A Single-Center Experience

Introduction

Obstructive sleep apnea, often known as OSA, is a sleep-related breathing disease that, if not treated, can lead to serious disabilities or even death. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the therapy technique that is suggested for treating severe and moderate OSA. An auto/manual CPAP titration study can be used to determine the appropriate pressure that must be maintained to treat this condition. The motive of this research is to appraise the effectiveness among OSA patients for the auto-PAP titrations.

Methodology

A cross-sectional clinical prospective study was conducted at the tertiary care center. Subjects who underwent auto-PAP titration and had a diagnosis of moderate and sever OSA were included. They were evaluated for the efficacy of auto-PAP titration and other demographic features and their association with the titration efficacy. The values were compared for statistical significance.

Results

The findings of the study showed that fifty percent of the cohort showed optimal titration, forty percent showed good titration, ten percent showed suitable titration, and none fell into the unacceptable group.

Conclusion

According to the findings, using auto-PAP was associated with positive results in those with moderate and severe OSA. There is evidence to suggest that unattended auto-PAP titration is a very successful technique that might be regarded as a substitute for attended CPAP titrations. This would result in a reduction in the amount of labor required and the price.

Different Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Titration Modalities in Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome Patients

Background

Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome are mainly treated with continuous positive airway pressure. Polysomnography-guided full-night manual titration is the gold standard for continuous positive airway pressure titration, but it is cost-, time-, and effort-consuming. Alternative ways of titration are easier with less cost, time, and effort. In the era of the COVID-19 pandemic, the need to establish more safe strategies is increased.

Aim

To choose a rapid, efficient, simple, and safe method with less effort and cost in the measurement of a suitable level of positive airway pressure in the management of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome.

Methods

This study enrolled 48 adult patients who had been diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome at our sleep unit and were candidates for treatment with continuous positive airway pressure according to AASM 2008 after exclusion of other sleep-related breathing disorders. All patients underwent both laboratory full-night manual titration and auto-titration (by Prisma20A of WEINMANN medical technology, Germany). Manual titration pressure and P95 of auto-titration were obtained and compared with calculated pressures by five predictive formulas (Miljeteig and Hoffstein, Sériès, Stradling, Loredo, and Lee).

Results

Patients included in the study were 25 females (52.1%) and 23 males (47.9%) with a mean±SD of age of 49.98±10.36 years. Mean±SD of manual pressure was 10.44±2.49 cmH₂O, P95 was 10.16±2.64 cmH₂O, and calculated pressures by different equations were: Miljeteig and Hoffstein, 8.53±2.03; Sériès, 11.40±1.81; Stradling, 9.68±1.65; Loredo, 9.90±1.79; and Lee, 10.61±2.68 cmH₂O. No significant differences were reported between manual pressure and pressures of auto-titration with Sériès, Stradling, Loredo, and Lee equations (p=0.112, 0.09, 0.212, 0.213, and 0.657, respectively).

Conclusion

Auto-titration can be used as an effective alternative to manual titration with less cost and effort and is more comfortable to patients. Predictive formulas can be used instead of standard and auto-titration especially in resource-limited facilities and in pandemics.

Pressure modification or humidification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is the repetitive closure of the upper airway during sleep. This results in disturbed sleep and excessive daytime sleepiness. It is a risk factor for long-term cardiovascular morbidity. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) machines can be applied during sleep. They deliver air pressure by a nasal or oronasal mask to prevent the airway from closing, reducing sleep disturbance and improving sleep quality. Some people find them difficult to tolerate because of high pressure levels and other symptoms such as a dry mouth. Switching to machines that vary the level of air pressure required to reduce sleep disturbance could increase comfort and promote more regular use. Humidification devices humidify the air that is delivered to the upper airway through the CPAP circuit. Humidification may reduce dryness of the throat and mouth and thus improve CPAP tolerability. This updated Cochrane Review looks at modifying the delivery of positive pressure and humidification on machine usage and other clinical outcomes in OSA.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the effects of positive pressure modification or humidification on increasing CPAP machine usage in adults with OSA.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched Cochrane Airways Specialised Register and clinical trials registries on 15 October 2018.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised parallel group or cross-over trials in adults with OSA. We included studies that compared automatically adjusting CPAP (auto-CPAP), bilevel positive airway pressure (bi-PAP), CPAP with expiratory pressure relief (CPAPexp), heated humidification plus fixed CPAP, automatically adjusting CPAP with expiratory pressure relief, Bi-PAP with expiratory pressure relief, auto bi-PAP and CPAPexp with wakefulness detection with fixed pressure setting.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We used standard methods expected by Cochrane. We assessed the certainty of evidence using GRADE for the outcomes of machine usage, symptoms (measured by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS)), Apnoea Hypopnoea Index (AHI), quality of life measured by Functional Outcomes of Sleep Questionnaire (FOSQ), blood pressure, withdrawals and adverse events (e.g. nasal blockage or mask intolerance). The main comparison of interest in the review is auto-CPAP versus fixed CPAP.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 64 studies (3922 participants, 75% male). The main comparison of auto-CPAP with fixed CPAP is based on 36 studies with 2135 participants from Europe, USA, Hong Kong and Australia. The majority of studies recruited participants who were recently diagnosed with OSA and had not used CPAP previously. They had excessive sleepiness (ESS: 13), severe sleep disturbance (AHI ranged from 22 to 59), and average body mass index (BMI) of 35 kg/m2. Interventions were delivered at home and the duration of most studies was 12 weeks or less. We judged that studies at high or unclear risk of bias likely influenced the effect of auto-CPAP on machine usage, symptoms, quality of life and tolerability, but not for other outcomes. Primary outcome Compared with average usage of about five hours per night with fixed CPAP, people probably use auto-CPAP for 13 minutes longer per night at about six weeks (mean difference (MD) 0.21 hours/night, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.11 to 0.31; 31 studies, 1452 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). We do not have enough data to determine whether auto-CPAP increases the number of people who use machines for more than four hours per night compared with fixed CPAP (odds ratio (OR) 1.16, 95% CI 0.75 to 1.81; 2 studies, 346 participants; low-certainty evidence). Secondary outcomes Auto-CPAP probably reduces daytime sleepiness compared with fixed CPAP at about six weeks by a small amount (MD -0.44 ESS units, 95% CI -0.72 to -0.16; 25 studies, 1285 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). AHI is slightly higher with auto-CPAP than with fixed CPAP (MD 0.48 events per hour, 95% CI 0.16 to 0.80; 26 studies, 1256 participants; high-certainty evidence), although it fell with both machine types from baseline values in the studies. Ten per cent of people in auto-CPAP and 11% in the fixed CPAP arms withdrew from the studies (OR 0.90, 95% CI 0.64 to 1.27; moderate-certainty evidence). Auto-CPAP and fixed CPAP may have similar effects on quality of life, as measured by the FOSQ but more evidence is needed to be confident in this result (MD 0.12, 95% CI -0.21 to 0.46; 3 studies, 352 participants; low-certainty evidence). Two studies (353 participants) provided data on clinic-measured blood pressure. Auto-CPAP may be slightly less effective at reducing diastolic blood pressure compared to fixed CPAP (MD 2.92 mmHg, 95% CI 1.06 to 4.77 mmHg; low-certainty evidence). The two modalities of CPAP probably do not differ in their effects on systolic blood pressure (MD 1.87 mmHg, 95% CI -1.08 to 4.82; moderate-certainty evidence). Nine studies (574 participants) provided information on adverse events such as nasal blockage, dry mouth, tolerance of treatment pressure and mask leak. They used different scales to capture these outcomes and due to variation in the direction and size of effect between the studies, the comparative effects on tolerability outcomes are uncertain (very low-certainty evidence).  The evidence base for other interventions is smaller, and does not provide sufficient information to determine whether there are important differences between pressure modification strategies and fixed CPAP on machine usage outcomes, symptoms and quality of life. As with the evidence for the auto-CPAP, adverse events are measured disparately.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In adults with moderate to severe sleep apnoea starting positive airway pressure therapy, auto-CPAP probably increases machine usage by about 13 minutes per night. The effects on daytime sleepiness scores with auto-CPAP are not clinically meaningful. AHI values are slightly lower with fixed CPAP. Use of validated quality of life instruments in the studies to date has been limited, although where they have been used the effect sizes have not exceeded proposed clinically important differences. The adoption of a standardised approach to measuring tolerability would help decision-makers to balance benefits with harms from the different treatment options available. The evidence available for other pressure modification strategies does not provide a reliable basis on which to draw firm conclusions. Future studies should look at the effects of pressure modification devices and humidification in people who have already used CPAP but are unable to persist with treatment.

Recent Developments in the Treatment of Obstructive Sleep Apnea

Modern sleep medicine has been in existence for only 20 years and therefore has to be regarded as a comparatively recent field of specialization. For this reason it is not surprising that there are numerous new trends and developments concerning the treatment of sleep-related breathing disorders. This review focuses on developments in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) over the last 5 years.The review is based on a Medline bibliographic search using the key words 'treatment', 'obstructive sleep apnea' and 'sleep-related breathing disorders' and covers papers published since 1997, including references in these articles. In respect to conservative treatments the following important developments were found. Oral devices were shown to be effective in about 50-70% of patients with OSA, but at this stage it is not possible to predict in which patients successful treatment can be expected. As subjective compliance averages only about 50%, thermoplastic devices used as trial devices provide a reasonable alternative to reduce costs. Automatic continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) units have been shown to cut costs when used for pressure titration in severe sleep apneics during the day or when used in so-called split-night procedures in appropriate cases. Nasal CPAP has proven to be effective in children, showing higher compliance rates than in adults. The development of mouth-pieces provides the possibility of using CPAP orally, e.g. after nasal surgery. Electrical stimulation of the tongue muscles shows promising preliminary results. Nevertheless, further research in this field is necessary. In the field of surgery, the most valuable development has been tissue reduction using radiofrequency energy, which has been shown to be effective and minimally invasive. Other fundamentally new surgical techniques have not been attempted within the last 5 years; instead, development in this area appears to be defined by a combination of previously known methods (so-called multilevel surgery) and optimized methods of patient selection. Such combined surgical procedures has achieved success rates of about 70%. Taking all these developments into account, CPAP therapy remains the gold standard for treatment of patients with OSA; yet the low long-term compliance rates of 60-70% have to be regarded as a major challenge warranting further effort.

Leptin, obestatin and apelin levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggest that adipose tissue hormones are involved in the pathogenesis of obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS). The role of leptin, obestatin and apelin still needs to be established.

MATERIAL/METHODS

Ten patients with newly diagnosed OSAS (AHI >10/h and ESS >10 points) were enrolled in the study as well as ten healthy volunteers as controls. All underwent measurements for Leptin, Obestatin and Apelin in four hour intervals during diagnostic polysomnography for 24 h and the patients also three months after onset of CPAP treatment. Furthermore the HOMA-index and body composition were quantified.

RESULTS

Plasma apelin levels in the patients decreased under CPAP therapy, but showed no significant difference in patients and volunteers. We found a positive correlation to AHI, BMI in the therapy group at all observation points. Leptin plasma levels were higher in the patient group and decreased after onset of CPAP therapy. Leptin plasma levels were positively correlated to the BMI, min. 02 and AHI in the patient group before therapy. Plasma obestatin levels did not differ significantly in these three observation groups, but were partly correlated to AHI and weight in the newly diagnosed OSAS group.

CONCLUSIONS

In agreement with previous investigations, we could demonstrate a difference in leptin plasma levels between healthy volunteers and patients with newly diagnosed OSAS. Apelin decreases under CPAP therapy, but not significantly. Obestatin remains unchanged after onset of CPAP. We further found a linkage between leptin plasma levels and BMI, AHI and weight in the untreated patient group.

Pressure modification for improving usage of continuous positive airway pressure machines in adults with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

Continuous Positive Airways Pressure (CPAP) is considered to be the cornerstone of therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). However, compliance with this treatment is frequently poor, which may lead to ongoing symptoms of sleep disruption, daytime sleepiness and poor waking cognitive function. Mechanical interventions which involve changing the way that positive pressure is delivered, and the addition of humidification, might improve compliance.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of pressure level modifications and additional humidification in increasing CPAP machine usage.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Specialised Register (September 2008).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing interventions to improve compliance with CPAP usage. Control groups received fixed pressure CPAP.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors assessed articles for inclusion in the review and extracted data. We made attempts to obtain additional unpublished data from the trialists.

MAIN RESULTS

Forty-five studies met the inclusion criteria (1874 participants). Auto-CPAP (30 studies, 1136 participants): a statistically significant difference in machine usage of 0.21 hours/night (0.08 to 0.35) was observed in favour of auto-CPAP from cross-over studies. This difference is of questionable clinical significance. Pooled effect estimates from parallel group trials detected a similar sized difference for average nightly machine usage, but this was not statistically significant. Evidence from parallel group studies did not identify a statistically significant difference between pressure modes in Epworth Sleepiness Scores, but there was an overall reduction of 0.64 units with cross-over studies (-0.12 to -1.16) in favour of auto-CPAP. Parallel group studies did not identify a significant difference. More participants preferred auto-CPAP to fixed CPAP where this was measured. Bi-level PAP (six studies, 285 participants): no significant differences were observed in machine usage. One small study found no difference in preference. C-Flex (six studies, 318 participants): no significant difference was observed in machine usage. Humidification (three studies, 135 participants): there were conflicting findings between the studies. Two parallel group trials found no significant difference in machine usage, whereas a cross-over study found a significant difference.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Improvement in average machine use of auto-CPAP was superior in studies with a cross-over design; the point estimate in parallel group trials was similar, but did not reach statistical significance. It is uncertain how use of machines in study settings relates to 'real world' use. Where preference was measured participants preferred auto-CPAP to fixed pressure CPAP. Further studies are required to assess the evidence for Bi-PAP, C-Flex(TM) and humidification. The studies assembled were characterised by high machine usage in the control groups, and low withdrawal rates. Future studies need to consider the effects of treatment in participants with more mild disease, and those who struggle to accept therapy despite persistent symptoms.

Effect of air leak on the performance of auto-PAP devices: a bench study

Automatic positive airway pressure (auto-PAP) devices, used in the treatment of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), may not function optimally in the presence of an air leak. We set out to determine the magnitude of air leak that prevents auto-PAP devices from responding to respiratory events of OSA in a bench model. We simulated apnea, flow limitation, obstructive hypopnea, nonobstructive hypopnea, and snoring events of OSA with an artificial airway and a loudspeaker in a bench model connected to a commercially available auto-PAP device. Four auto-PAP devices were tested, but two of the "older-generation" devices (Tranquility and Virtuoso) did not respond to events of OSA that involved changes in flow contour; hence, we studied the effects of air leak and humidifier in the two "newer-generation" auto-PAP devices only (GoodKnight 418P, Autoset-T). When the air leak was progressively increased from baseline levels recommended by the manufacturer to levels seen clinically--5 to 7, 10, and 30 l/min--the GoodKnight 418P decreased pressure response by 56% (5.6+/-1.8 cm H(2)O, p=0.04). The pressure response of the Autoset-T, however, did not change from baseline during similar levels of air leak. The GoodKnight performed appropriately when the air leak was within 20 l/min, but the corresponding value for the Autoset was higher at 50 l/min. For both devices combined, air leak caused the pressure to drop between the device and the airway: 2.8+/-0.3 cm H(2)O at 30 l/min of air leak (p<0.001). Air leaks cause auto-PAP devices to underestimate the pressure required to treat events of OSA and to overestimate the pressure delivered at the upper airway. Physicians should be aware of performance limitations of auto-PAP devices in the presence of an air leak.

A randomized cross-over study of auto-continuous positive airway pressure versus fixed-continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

To compare the efficacy of auto-CPAP (AutoSet Spirit, ResMed) versus fixed-CPAP (S6 Elite, ResMed) in improving daytime sleepiness, health status, objective compliance and the ultimate treatment preference in patients with severe OSA.

METHODS

The study recruited 43 subjects aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed severe OSA (AHI >30/h). Patients were initially treated with either auto-CPAP or fixed-CPAP for 2 months and then crossed over after a washout period of 1 week for another 2 months.

RESULTS

The study was completed by 41 patients. Results are presented as mean (SE). Use of auto-CPAP in the first and the second month was significantly higher than that of fixed-CPAP [129.7 (9.9) and 130.5 (10.7) h vs 115.2 (9.5) and 113.2 (9.4) h, P = 0.04 and 0.01], whereas mean hourly use per night was 4.3 and 4.4 h versus 3.8 and 3.7 h, respectively. The Epworth sleepiness scores improved after 1 month in both treatments (13.4 to 8.5 and 8.2, P < 0.01 for both). The Sleep apnoea quality of life index improved in the first month in both compared with baseline [4.6 (0.2) to 5.0 (0.2) for auto-CPAP and 4.9 (0.2) for fixed-CPAP, P = 0.01 and 0.04, respectively], with no difference between the two treatments. Nine and 30 patients preferred auto-CPAP and fixed-CPAP, respectively, at the end of the trial, whereas 14 and 25 patients would have chosen the same treatments if cost had not been a consideration.

CONCLUSIONS

Auto-CPAP and fixed-CPAP were equally effective in improving symptoms and health status in patients with severe OSA. Usage was higher with auto-CPAP, but more patients ultimately chose fixed-CPAP.

Automatic Pressure Titration with APAP Is as Effective as Manual Titration with CPAP in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea

BACKGROUND

The optimal approach to initiate positive-pressure therapy in patients with obstructive sleep apnea is still debated. Current options are autotitrating positive airway pressure (APAP) or manual titration with continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). Procedures differ by parameters and by algorithms used for adapting pressure.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy of attended automatic titration in a randomized crossover study compared with manual titration over 2 nights where the sequence of the titration mode was changed. Therapy outcome was controlled after 6 weeks.

METHODS

21 sleep apnea patients were treated using manual CPAP versus automatic APAP titration. The mode used during the 2nd night was continued for 6 weeks. Cardiorespiratory polysomnography, Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), SF-36 score and compliance were assessed.

RESULTS

Apnea-hypopnea index reduction was equally effective at similar effective pressure independent of the titration mode. If APAP was applied during the 1st night, total sleep time was longer (384 vs. 331 min, p < 0.01) and sleep efficacy was higher (91 vs. 81%, p < 0.01) than after starting with manual titration with CPAP. Compliance was comparable in both groups (4.6 +/- 1.9 h). The ESS improved in both groups (from 12.9 to 6.5). SF-36 scores and therapeutic pressure did not much change.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking the sequence of titration into account, we found equal effectiveness of CPAP and APAP. Sleep quality was better with initial application of APAP - which favors attended automatic titration if only 1 titration night is possible. Both modes are comparable after 6 weeks regarding therapeutic pressure, efficacy, compliance and quality of life.

Obstructive sleep apnea - management update

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a highly significant condition based both on the high prevalence in community and significant consequences. Obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS), OSA together with hypersomnolence, is seen in 4% of middle-aged men and 2% of middle-aged women. OSA is associated with impaired quality of life and increased risks of motor vehicle accidents, cardiovascular disease (including hypertension and coronary artery disease), and metabolic syndrome. There is some evidence for the use of conservative interventions such as weight loss and position modification. CPAP remains the mainstay of treatment in this condition with high-level evidence supporting its efficacy. Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is an intrusive therapy, with long-term adherence rates of less than 70%. Dental appliances have been shown to be effective therapy in some subjects but are limited by the inability to predict treatment responders. Alternative treatments are discussed but there is little role for upper airway surgery (except in a select few experienced institutions) or pharmacological treatment. The current levels of evidence for the different treatment regimens are reviewed.

Alternative Methods of Titrating Continuous Positive Airway Pressure

Standard practice for continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment in sleep apnea and hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) requires pressure titration during attended laboratory polysomnography. However, polysomnographic titration is expensive and time-consuming. The aim of this study was to ascertain, in a large sample of CPAP-naive patients, whether CPAP titration performed by an unattended domiciliary autoadjusted CPAP device or with a predicted formula was as effective as CPAP titration performed by full polysomnography. The main outcomes were the apnea-hypopnea index and the subjective daytime sleepiness. We included 360 patients with SAHS requiring CPAP treatment. Patients were randomly allocated into three groups: standard, autoadjusted, and predicted formula titration with domiciliary adjustment. The follow-up period was 12 weeks. With CPAP treatment, the improvement in subjective sleepiness and apnea-hypopnea index was very similar in the three groups. There were no differences in the objective compliance of CPAP treatment and in the dropout rate of the three groups at the end of the follow-up. Autoadjusted titration at home and predicted formula titration with domiciliary adjustment can replace standard titration. These procedures could lead to considerable savings in cost and to significant reductions in the waiting list.

Interventions to improve compliance with continuous positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

Continuous Positive Airways Pressure (CPAP) is currently considered to be the cornerstone of therapy for sleep apnoea (OSA). However compliance with this treatment is frequently poor, which may lead to ongoing symptoms of sleep disruption, daytime sleepiness and poor waking cognitive function. Mechanical and psychological/educational interventions have been proposed to try to increase the hours of use of CPAP therapy.

OBJECTIVES

To determine the efficacy of interventions designed to increase compliance with CPAP.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Airways Group Sleep Apnoea Specialised Register (January 2004).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) assessing interventions to improve compliance with CPAP usage were considered for inclusion in the review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers assessed articles for inclusion in the review and extracted data. Attempts were made to obtain additional unpublished data from the trialists.

MAIN RESULTS

24 studies met the inclusion criteria with 1007 participants. Each of the mechanical interventions was compared with fixed CPAP alone. Auto-CPAP (13 studies): A small, significant difference was observed in compliance but this effect disappeared when we took account of the variation between the studies. There may be a subgroup of patients who respond better than others. Most participants preferred auto-CPAP to fixed CPAP where this was measured. Bi-level PAP (3 studies): No significant differences were observed in compliance. One small study found no difference in preference. Patient titrated CPAP (1 study): No significant difference was observed in compliance. Humidification(1 study): This small study found no significant difference in compliance. Educational/psychological interventions (6 studies): One small study demonstrated superior compliance in patients treated with cognitive behavioural therapy + CPAP versus CPAP alone but only after 12 weeks. In one, larger study intensive support including home visits increased hours of use. No other study demonstrated significant effects in favour of active treatment.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

The effect of Auto-CPAP in increasing hours of use in unselected patients starting this treatment remains unclear. Different pooled analyses gave conflicting results and it may be that carefully selected participants may respond more favourably than others. The evidence in support of Bi-PAP, self-titration and humidification is lacking and studies are required in these areas. There is some evidence that psychological/educational interventions improve CPAP usage. This requires confirmation in larger studies of longer duration, with rigorous follow-up. The cost-benefit ratio of such interventions requires assessment. Future studies need to consider the effects of treatment in participants who are poorly compliant. The studies assembled were characterised by high machine usage in the control groups, and low withdrawal rates making it less likely that any benefit could be demonstrated.

CPAP compliance in sleep apnea patients with and without laboratory CPAP titration

Advances in auto-adjusting positive airway pressure technology for obstructive sleep apnea now permit this treatment to be initiated outside of the sleep laboratory environment, bypassing the need for laboratory-based titration studies. Thus far, little research has addressed how such developments may affect compliance to continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). We tested the effect of laboratory CPAP exposure and technologist support in a retrospective chart review of 98 veterans with obstructive sleep apnea to determine whether patients who received standard laboratory CPAP titration complied better with CPAP than did patients who received no laboratory CPAP titration. Fifty patients underwent standard technician-attended polysomnography (PSG) with CPAP titration, and 48 patients underwent unattended PSG with no laboratory trial of CPAP (first CPAP exposure was at home). Objective CPAP compliance measures were obtained from CPAP units at follow-up visits. Attended-PSG patients wore CPAP significantly longer per night on average (5.0 hours vs 3.9 hours) and tended to wear CPAP on more nights (76.5% vs 64.2%) compared with unattended-PSG patients. These findings suggest that patients' sleep laboratory experience with CPAP and the support and education provided by sleep technologists are important factors in facilitating CPAP compliance.

Randomized Short-term Trial of Two AutoCPAP Devices versus Fixed Continuous Positive Airway Pressure for the Treatment of Sleep Apnea

We evaluated the efficacy of two different continuous positive airway pressure devices with automatic mask pressure adjustment (autoCPAP) in comparison with fixed CPAP in treating obstructive sleep apnea syndrome in 29 patients. The mean (+/- SE) apnea-hypopnea index was 46 +/- 4 per hour and the Epworth score was 14.2 +/- 0.7. Patients were treated over three consecutive 1-month periods with three regimens in random order: an autoCPAP device responding to apnea-hypopnea and snoring, another autoCPAP device responding to snoring and changes in flow contour, and fixed CPAP at the 90th pressure percentile titrated by autoCPAP over 2 weeks. Allowed pressure in the autoCPAP mode was 4 to 15 cm H2O. At the end of each treatment period, symptoms, quality of life, vigilance, and nocturnal breathing disturbances were evaluated. All three treatment modalities improved symptoms, quality-of-life domains, and apnea-hypopnea index significantly and to a similar degree. Mean (+/- SE) maintenance-of-wakefulness time increased by 4.5 +/- 1.8, 6.0 +/- 1.5, and 6.1 +/- 1.4 minutes with DeVilbiss AutoAdjust LT, AutoSet T, and fixed-pressure CPAP, respectively (p<0.001 vs. baseline, p=not significant for comparisons among the three modalities). We conclude that both autoCPAP devices were equally effective as fixed-pressure CPAP in improving major outcomes during short-term therapy of sleep apnea.

Continuous positive airway pressure treatment rapidly improves insulin sensitivity in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

The obstructive sleep apnea syndrome is typically associated with conditions known to increase insulin resistance as hypertension, obesity, and diabetes. We investigated whether obstructive sleep apnea itself is an independent risk factor for increased insulin resistance and whether continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment improves insulin sensitivity. Forty patients (apnea-hypopnea index > 20) were treated with CPAP. Before, 2 days after, and after 3 months of effective CPAP treatment, hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies were performed. Insulin sensitivity significantly increased after 2 days (5.75 +/- 4.20 baseline versus 6.79 +/- 4.91 micromol/kg.min; p = 0.003) and remained stable after 3 months of treatment. The improvement in insulin sensitivity after 2 days was much greater in patients with a body mass index less than 30 kg/m2 than in more obese patients. The improved insulin sensitivity after 2 nights of treatment may reflect a decreasing sympathetic activity, indicating that sleep apnea is an independent risk factor for increased insulin resistance. The effect of CPAP on insulin sensitivity is smaller in obese patients than in nonobese patients, suggesting that in obese individuals insulin sensitivity is mainly determined by obesity and, to a smaller extent, by sleep apnea.

Evaluation and Comparison of Tranquility and AutoSet T Autotitrating CPAP Machines

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of two autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure (auto-CPAP), the Tranquility (Respironics, Inc., Murrysville, PA, U.S.A.) and the AutoSet T (ResMed Corp., Poway, CA, U.S.A). Patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) underwent attended auto-CPAP titration with either the Tranquility or AutoSet T machine. The auto-CPAP machine was given a performance score between 0 and 9. A score of 3 or lower indicated that autotitration had to be discontinued. Sixty patients were studied, 35 patients with the Tranquility machine and 25 patients with the AutoSet T machine. The mean age was 55.4 years, whereas the mean body mass index (BMI) was 32.7. The mean respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was 37.5, and the mean arousal index before use of auto-CPAP was 41.4. The two treatment groups were comparable in age, BMI, RDI, and arousal index. The mean performance scores for the Tranquility and AutoSet T machines were not statistically different. Autotitration with the Tranquility machine had to be discontinued in 10 of the 35 patients (29%), whereas with the AutoSet T machine, autotitration was discontinued in 11 of the 25 patients (44%). Despite advances in auto-CPAP machines, there remains a large minority of patients with OSAS in whom these machines do not accomplish treatment goals. At this time, these machines are not a substitute for in-laboratory CPAP titration polysomnograms.

Continuous positive airway pressure: new generations

Automatic positive airway pressure devices are the most technologically advanced positive airway pressure devices available for use in OSA. Although heterogeneous, they have in common the ability to detect and respond to changes in upper airway resistance. Data cannot necessarily be extrapolated from one device to another, and the field is rapidly advancing. Most studies of APAP have been performed in a supervised setting, or patients have been carefully selected to have a high likelihood of OSA uncomplicated by disorders such as alveolar hypoventilation or central apnea or technical problems such as mask leaks. Studies of APAP for the diagnosis of OSA have shown that APAP can diagnose severe OSA effectively, but the diagnosis of mild-moderate OSA is less reliable. APAP devices also can be effective therapy for selected patients with OSA, with overall similar results to conventional fixed CPAP in terms of respiratory disturbances, sleep quality, nocturnal oxygenation, and daytime sleepiness and performance, with less known or other long-term outcomes. In most studies, mean treatment pressures are lower, without change in side effect profile. Compliance and preference with APAP are similar to or somewhat better than CPAP in most studies. APAP also can be used in an attended setting to titrate an effective pressure for use in long-term conventional CPAP therapy, also with similar results to CPAP in many patients. APAP devices are more expensive than CPAP devices, but the cost may be outweighed if a group of patients who can be diagnosed, treated, or titrated safely in the unattended setting can be identified. Although diagnostic and therapeutic algorithms for APAP have been proposed, the best candidates for this modality must be defined better.

Auto-CPAP therapy based on the forced oscillation technique

Autoadjusting CPAP devices (APAP) are designed to continuously adjust the positive pressure to the required levels, and thus increase treatment quality and patient compliance. The results of APAP treatment strongly depend on the control mechanism of the respective APAP device. In agreement with other working groups, we have recently shown that the forced oscillation technique (FOT) is capable of detecting incipient upper airway obstruction prior to physiological reactions such as the onset of increasing esophageal pressure swings or microarousals. Therefore we studied efficacy and acceptance of a novel APAP device controlled exclusively by FOT. 100 consecutive patients with OSAS confirmed by polysomnography (mean AHI 47.9 +/- 22.6) and daytime sleepiness (Epworth sleepiness scale, ESS 12.6 +/- 3.9) were randomized to either APAP treatment (n = 50) or conventional CPAP treatment (n = 50). Polysomnographies were performed at the second treatment night and subjective sleepiness (modified ESS) was established in the morning. The respiratory disturbance was largely normalized in both treatment groups in the second treatment night (AHI 4.7 +/- 5.3 vs. 3.7 +/- 3.4; n.s.). Both groups showed largely improved sleep profiles and had markedly reduced ESS-scores (6.6 +/- 3.6 vs. 7.0 +/- 3.4; n.s.). The mean treatment pressure during APAP was significantly lower than during CPAP treatment (6.0 +/- 2.0 vs. 9.0 +/- 1.8 mbar; p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between APAP and CPAP treatment in any parameter of efficacy or acceptance. APAP treatment with this device controlled exclusively by FOT is well accepted by the patients and permits an adequate treatment of OSAS without the need for invidiual CPAP titration.

Comparison between automatic and fixed positive airway pressure therapy in the home

We tested the hypothesis that continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) use and outcomes can be improved by an autotitrating CPAP device in patients with obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) who require higher CPAP (10 cm H2O or more). In this multisite randomized single-blind cross-over study, 44 patients (mean age, 49 +/- 10 years) were randomized to 6 weeks at laboratory-determined fixed pressure and 6 weeks on autotitrating CPAP. Average nightly use was greater in automatic mode (306 versus 271 minutes, p = 0.005); median and 95th centile pressures in automatic mode were lower (p < 0.002). Automatic CPAP resulted in better SF-36 Vitality scores (65 +/- 20 versus 58 +/- 23, p < 0.05) and mental health scores (80 +/- 14 versus 75 +/- 18, p < 0.05), but no significant difference in Epworth score (p = 0.065). During automatic therapy, patients reported more restful sleep, better quality sleep, less discomfort from pressure, and less trouble getting to sleep for both the first week of therapy and for the averaged scores for Weeks 2-6 (all p values < 0.006). Patients who require higher fixed CPAP use autotitrating CPAP more and report greater benefit from this therapy.

Insulin resistance, hyperleptinemia, and obstructive sleep apnea in Launois-Bensaude syndrome

OBJECTIVE

Launois-Bensaude Syndrome (LBS) is a very rare cause of obesity, characterized by a symmetrical accumulation of a very large number of lipomata in different regions of the body, excluding the face, the forearms, and the shanks. Obesity is known to be closely associated with insulin resistance, hyperleptinemia, and obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). We were interested in studying whether these conditions are also present in patients with obesity due to LBS with a similar frequency as in patients with "simple" truncal obesity.

RESEARCH METHODS AND PROCEDURES

We performed polysomnography and hyperinsulinemic euglycemic clamp studies and measured serum leptin in three patients with LBS and in six patients with "simple" truncal obesity, matched for sex and body mass index (LBS group, 36.39 kg/m(2); controls, 35.82 kg/m(2)).

RESULTS

Polysomnography revealed severe OSA in one LBS patient with marked "horsecollar lipomata." In the other LBS patients, no OSA could be demonstrated. The leptin levels of the two groups were comparable (LBS group, 36.39 microg/liter; controls, 37.18 microg/liter) and the insulin responsiveness index was also comparable in the two groups (LBS group, 3.47 micromol/kg. minute; controls, 3.79 micromol/kg. minute).

DISCUSSION

Patients with LBS demonstrated similar metabolic features in terms of insulin sensitivity and hyperleptinemia as patients with "simple" truncal obesity. LBS is not strictly associated with OSA.

Sleep structure correlates of continuous positive airway pressure variations during application of an autotitrating continuous positive airway pressure machine in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome

STUDY OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the relationship between sleep structure and continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) delivered by an automatic CPAP (auto-CPAP) machine in patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS).

DESIGN

Nocturnal polysomnography was performed during CPAP administration by an auto-CPAP machine (Autoset Clinical 1; ResMed; Sydney, Australia).

SETTING

Sleep-disorders center in a research institute.

PATIENTS

Fifteen subjects with newly diagnosed OSAS deserving home CPAP treatment.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

During the night, in most cases, the lowest CPAP level was recorded during a prolonged nonrapid eye movement (NREM) sleep period uninterrupted by arousals, whereas the highest level during wake-sleep transitions or NREM sleep fragmented by arousals. In four subjects, rapid eye movement sleep was always associated with increasing CPAP. Sleep efficiency was negatively correlated with CPAP variability, evaluated as the SD of the mean nocturnal CPAP level averaged epoch by epoch (r = 0.63, p < 0.02). Eighty-eight percent of rapid CPAP augmentations (increases by at least 2 cm H(2)O in less-than-or-equal 2 min) were observed during sleep-wake transitions or after arousals/awakenings (Ar/Aw); 63% of such Ar/Aw were not preceded by any detectable respiratory abnormality.

CONCLUSIONS

CPAP levels and variations during auto-CPAP application may be mainly related to sleep continuity and efficiency. The recording of a highly variable pressure during auto-CPAP administration in an unattended environment must raise the question whether the patient's sleep quality was acceptable. A poor sleep quality during an autotitration night could lead to an undesirable overestimation of the CPAP level needed for use with fixed-level CPAP machines.

Sensitivity of a simplified forced oscillation technique for detection of upper airway obstruction

The sensitivity of a simplified variant of forced oscillation technique (FOT) was studied for assessment of dynamic upper airway obstruction during nasal continuous positive airway pressure (nCPAP) therapy for obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA). The airway impedance P[FOT] was measured by FOT and the oesophageal pressure (P(oes)) was recorded during stable stage II sleep in 11 patients with OSA. The CPAP level was initially set high enough to completely abolish upper airway obstruction. To induce gradually increasing upper airway re-obstruction, the CPAP pressure was then lowered stepwise. Thirty six such manoeuvres were analysed, blind, to define the first inspiration at which upper airway re-obstruction was detectable by analysis of P[FOT](t(FOT)) and by P(oes)(t(oes)), respectively. On seven occasions t(FOT) and t(oes) occurred together, in the remaining 29 cases t(FOT) preceded t(oes) with a mean latency of 6.0+/-7.7 (0-32) breath cycles. In no case did t(oes) preceed t(FOT). FOT is a highly sensitive tool for the assessment of incipient upper airway obstruction during nCPAP therapy.

Comparison of two in-laboratory titration methods to determine effective pressure levels in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

BACKGROUND

Treatment of the sleep apnoea/hypopnoea syndrome with nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) conventionally requires a titration procedure in a sleep laboratory. The upper airway has a hysteresis phenomenon which accounts for a decrease in the effective positive pressure level once an initial effective pressure setting has been reached. The aim of this study was to quantify the difference in the initial and final effective pressure settings when the titration sleep study takes into account these possible changes in the effective pressure level.

METHODS

Eighty five patients completed the study. During a titration sleep study the pressure was increased by 1 cm H2O in a stepwise fashion until obstructive respiratory events disappeared (effective pressure 1, Peff(1)). The pressure level was then decreased by increments of 1 cm H2O until breathing abnormalities reappeared. At this time pressure was re-increased by increments of 1 cm H(2)O to normalise breathing (Peff(2)).

RESULTS

The mean (SD) value of Peff(1) was 9.5 (2.6) cm H2O. The pressure was then reduced during 0.5 (0.6) hours to reach the minimal pressure (7.0 (2.0) cm H2O). The pressure obtained after a downward titration had to be re-increased in 79 patients, the Peff(2) level being significantly lower than Peff(1) (8.9 (2.8) cm H2O, p = 0.0002), mean difference 0.6 (1.5) cm H2O (95% confidence interval 0.29 to 0.93).

CONCLUSION

Attempts to decrease the positive pressure level during conventional determination of the effective pressure level allow a significant decrease in the pressure setting. This should be taken into account in each patient who requires an in-laboratory manual CPAP titration procedure.

Accuracy of an unattended home CPAP titration in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea

Treatment of sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (SAHS) by fixed continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) requires an in-laboratory titration procedure to determine the effective pressure level (Peff ). We recently reported that one auto-CPAP machine can be used without titration study allowing Peff determination. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of an auto CPAP trial at home. A 1- or 2-wk automatic CPAP trial was done at home in 40 patients by estimating the reference pressure (Pref ) to be set and a Pref + 3 cm H(2)O/-4 cm H(2)O pressure interval. Peff was then determined according to the percentage of CPAP time that was spent </= Pref. This Peff value was set on a fixed CPAP machine for two additional weeks and a control sleep study was done. The pressure setting on fixed CPAP had to be increased by 1 +/- 1 cm H(2)O (mean +/- SD) above estimated Pref. Sleep improved with fixed CPAP, with a normalization of the apnea + hypopnea index (AHI) in 38 of 40 and resumption of diurnal hypersomnolence. CPAP compliance remained excellent (CPAP use: 6.1 +/- 1.7 h/ night) after 6.5 +/- 2.8 mo of CPAP treatment. These results indicate that auto-CPAP therapy represents a new useful and accurate way to identify conventional CPAP setting outside hospital and sleep laboratories.

Predicting effective continuous positive airway pressure

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to compare the pressure required to abolish apneas as predicted from a previously derived algorithm (Ppred) with the true effective pressure (Peff) determined during a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) titration study.

SETTING

Sleep clinic of a university hospital.

METHODS

We prospectively studied 329 patients with sleep apnea undergoing CPAP titration. The following protocol was employed. Titration began at a pressure (Ppred) calculated from a previously derived equation based on body mass index, neck circumference, and apnea/hypopnea index (AHI). If AHI at Ppred was > 10, the pressure was increased in steps of 1 cm H(2)O until AHI became < 10. If, on the other hand, AHI at Ppred was < 10, the pressure was reduced in increments of 1 cm H(2)O until AHI became > 10. The lowest pressure that abolishes sleep apnea is defined as the Peff. Paired t tests, linear correlation, and distribution of (Ppred - Peff) were used to compare Peff and Ppred.

RESULTS

Successful titration was accomplished in 276 patients (84%). Mean Ppred was similar to mean Peff (8.1 +/- 2.2 vs 8.1 +/- 2.6 cm H(2)O, respectively). There was a significant correlation between these two pressures (r = 0.73; p = 0.0001). Examination of the distribution of (Peff - Ppred) revealed that in 63% of patients, Ppred was within +/- 1 cm H(2)O of Peff; in 83% of patients, the two measures were within +/- 2 cm H(2)O; and in 95%, within +/- 3 cm H(2)O.

CONCLUSION

We conclude that pressure predicted from an algorithm based on simple anthropometric and sleep variables constitutes a good starting point for CPAP titration, allowing the optimum pressure to be achieved with only a few incremental changes.

Therapeutic use of auto-CPAP

Auto-CPAP is a new technology by which a continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) device automatically adjusts the level of mask pressure to the patient's requirements. It has been proposed with two different goals: (1) to improve treatment and (2) to perform automatic titration. The improvement of treatment involves two aspects: (a) improving treatment efficacy and (b) improving compliance with treatment. The rationale behind better treatment efficacy is that the patients' requirements vary over both the short and long term. However, there are few data in the literature showing that this is true, let alone concerning its importance and impact. Published studies fail to demonstrate better treatment efficacy with auto-CPAP compared with manually titrated conventional CPAP. The rationale behind improved compliance with treatment is that auto-CPAP should achieve the same treatment efficacy with lower nasal pressures, and thus reduce side effects and improve compliance. Again, the postulate that higher nasal pressures cause lower compliance is not supported. Published studies show variable results both on the level of pressure delivered with an auto-CPAP device (as compared with the optimal pressure used with conventional fixed pressure, but this probably depends on the definition of optimal fixed pressure) and on observed compliance with auto-CPAP. The main problem here is that most studies were not double-blinded which is critical as the end-point (i.e., patient compliance), heavily depends on the relationship between the medical staff and the patient. The aim of titration with auto-CPAP is to save on costs, as patients are treated with fixed conventional CPAP once the titration procedure is accomplished. Auto-titration can be performed either in the sleep laboratory (then the auto-titrating devices can be sophisticated and cumbersome) or in the patients' home. Published studies suggest that auto-titration can be accurately performed, but given the additional cost of the device, the necessity of supervision (albeit a less qualified supervision than with manual titration) and the failure rate, the cost-effectiveness of auto-titration remains to be established.