Norms, rules and policy tools: understanding Article 5.3 as an instrument of tobacco control governance

Tobacco policy (in)coherence in Mozambique: an examination of national and subnational stakeholder perspectives

Mozambique ranks fifth on the list of tobacco producing countries in Africa, while also being a Party to the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control (FCTC). Tobacco farming is regarded by some governments as a strategic economic commodity for export and remains deeply entrenched within Mozambique's political and economic landscape. This study uses a qualitative description methodology to identify tensions, conflicts and alignment or misalignment in policy on tobacco across government sectors and levels in Mozambique. We conducted semi-structured qualitative interviews with 33 key informants from sectors across national and subnational levels including health, agriculture, economic and commercial sectors, as well as non-state actors from civil society organizations, the tobacco industry, farmers unions and associations and individual farmers. Incoherence was present across sectoral mandates, perspectives on industry's presence in the country and regions and between FCTC provisions and informant perceptions of tobacco production as a development strategy. Despite tobacco being viewed as an important economic commodity by many informants, there was also widespread dissatisfaction with tobacco from both farmers and some government officials. There were indications of an openness to shifting to a policy that emphasizes alternatives to tobacco growing. The findings also illustrate where points of convergence exist across sectors and where opportunities for aligning tobacco policy with the provisions of the FCTC can occur.

Addressing tobacco industry influence in tobacco-growing countries

Protecting policy-making from tobacco industry influence is central to effective tobacco control governance. The inclusion of industry actors as stakeholders in policy processes remains a crucial avenue to corporate influence. This influence is reinforced by the idea that the tobacco industry is a legitimate partner to government in regulatory governance. Addressing the influence of the tobacco industry demands a focus on the government institutions that formalize relationships between industry and policy-makers. Industry involvement in government institutions is particularly relevant in tobacco-growing countries, where sectors of government actively support tobacco as an economic commodity. In this paper, we discuss how controlling tobacco industry influence requires unique consideration in tobacco-growing countries. In these countries, there is a diverse array of companies that support tobacco production, including suppliers of seeds, equipment and chemicals, as well as transportation, leaf buying and processing, and manufacturing companies. The range of companies that operate in these contexts is particular and so is their engagement within political institutions. For governments wanting to support alternatives to tobacco growing (Article 17 of the Framework Convention for Tobacco Control), we illustrate how implementing Article 5.3, aimed at protecting tobacco control policies from tobacco industry interference, is fundamental in these countries. Integrating Article 5.3 with Article 17 will (i) strengthen policy coherence, ensuring that alternative livelihood policies are not undermined by tobacco industry interference; (ii) foster cross-sector collaboration addressing both tobacco industry interference and livelihood development; and (iii) enhance accountability and transparency in tobacco control efforts.

Tobacco industry corporate social responsibility activities and other interference after ratification of a strong tobacco law in Ethiopia

BACKGROUND

Since strict new tobacco control laws were introduced in 2019 and 2020, the National Tobacco Enterprise (NTE), the main manufacturer and distributor of cigarettes in Ethiopia, strategically engaged in corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities and other tactics to interfere in tobacco control policymaking. This study systematically identified and reviewed tobacco industry activities that undermine Ethiopia's strict new tobacco control laws.

METHODS

We collated, reviewed and analysed evidence on tobacco industry CSR activities from February 2019 to November 2022 in Ethiopia, including newspapers, organisational websites, social media and government documents related to tobacco industry activities, contract agreements and other policy interference attempts.

RESULTS

NTE's CSR activities included: (1) Funding educational programmes (eg, postgraduate scholarships); (2) Community service (eg, donating COVID-19 prevention materials, providing water, sanitation and hygiene supplies); and (3) Supporting government programmes (eg, greening initiatives and training programmes). NTE facilitated CSR activities via a contract agreement with the Ethiopian government that was created when Japan Tobacco International purchased the Government's majority share in NTE. NTE subsequently partnered with the Japanese Embassy in Addis Ababa and private law firms on CSR activities. The tobacco control community stopped NTE distributing free COVID-19 prevention products in Addis Ababa but had limited impact on other identified breaches of laws prohibiting tobacco advertising promotion and sponsorship.

CONCLUSION

The new laws have not stopped NTE using multiple CSR activities to interfere in tobacco control policy. Regular monitoring of tobacco industry CSR activities to identify potential breaches is recommended. Moreover, the Ethiopian government should revise its contractual agreement with NTE to end NTE's participation in law-making processes and partnerships on illicit tobacco control.

Manejo de conflictos de interés en control del tabaco: situación en las Américas

El presente informe especial describe tanto la metodología para el cálculo del indicador sobre adopción de mecanismos eficaces para evitar la interferencia de la industria tabacalera o de aquellos que defienden sus intereses, establecido en la “Estrategia y plan de acción para fortalecer el control del tabaco en la Región de las Américas 2018-2022”, así como del estado de adopción de estos mecanismos en los países de la Región para el año 2019, y su progreso desde 2016. Se encontró que, para el 2019, de los 35 Estados Miembros de la Organización Panamericana de la Salud (OPS), 13 cuentan con normativa que establece medidas específicas al manejo de conflicto de interés para funcionarios y empleados públicos con competencia en políticas de control del tabaco. Asimismo, 7 han implementado medidas relacionadas, pero no específicas, y 14 no han implementado ninguna medida. Si bien se muestra un avance en relación con año 2016, los esfuerzos deben ser redoblados para alcanzar la meta de 20 Estados Miembros con mecanismos de identificación y manejo de conflictos de interés, establecida en la Estrategia y plan de acción. Cabe destacar que contar con normativa referida al tema no agota, ni mucho menos, concluye el cumplimiento de todas las obligaciones que emanan del artículo 5.3 del Convenio Marco de la Organización Mundial de la Salud para el Control del Tabaco. La Secretaría de OPS, en cumplimiento de lo solicitado por los Estados Miembros, desarrolló la metodología para el cálculo del indicador y sistematizó los hallazgos que son presentados.