Can a surgeon drill accurately at a specified angle?

Development and Validation of a Low-Cost Drilling Model

Background: Simulation models enable learners to have repeated practise at their own time, to master the psycho-motor and sensory acuity aspects of surgery and build their confidence in the procedure. The study aims to develop and evaluate the feasibility of a low-cost drilling model to train surgeons in the drilling task. The model targets three aspects of drilling - (1) Reduce plunge depth, (2) Ability to differentiate between bone and medullary canal and (3) Increase accuracy drilling in various angles. Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted after obtaining ethics approval. We invited Consultants in the field of Orthopaedic or Hand Surgery to form the 'expert' group, and the 'novice' group consisted of participants who had no prior experience in bone drilling. We developed a drilling simulator model made from a polyvinyl chloride (PVC) pipe filled with liquid silicone. This model cost less than US$5. An electric Bosch drill (model GBM 10 RE) with a 1.4 mm K-wire 10 cm in length (6.5 cm outside the drill) was used for drilling. The main outcomes of the study were time taken for drilling, plunge depth, ability to penetrate the far cortex and accuracy. Results: Thirty-one participants were recruited into the study, of which 15 were experts and 16 were novices. The experts performed significantly better for plunge depth (t = -3.65, p = 0.0003) and accuracy (t = -2.07, p = 0.04). The experts required 20% less time to complete the drilling tasks, but it was not statistically significant (t = -0.79, p = 0.43). Conclusions: The low-cost drilling model could be useful in training Residents in the drilling task. It will allow Residents to practise independently at their own time and assess their own performance.

Cortices of Fibula and Tibia Can Provide Landmarks for Accurate Syndesmosis Fixation Angle: Computed Tomography Validation of Angle Bisector Method

Anatomic syndesmosis reduction is necessary to restore ankle biomechanics and prevent poor clinical outcomes, but malreduction can be encountered frequently since the ideal fixation angle varies between patients and fixation levels. This study aimed to validate the angle bisector method to reveal whether it provides an accurate syndesmotic fixation angle that is patient- and level-specific. Lower extremity CT angiography of 50 consecutive patients (25 male, 25 female) without evident ankle pathology were evaluated. The average age was 52.8 (±18, range: 18-75). Lines tangent to anterior and posterior cortices of tibia and fibula were drawn in the axial plane at both 2 cm and 3.5 cm above the ankle joint line. Bisection of the angle formed between these lines was drawn and its relationship with the centroidal axis, which is proposed to be the ideal syndesmotic axis, was evaluated. The angle between the bisector line & the centroidal axis and the distance between their most lateral intersections with the fibula were calculated. The measurements were made by 3 blinded observers. Intra- and interobserver reliability analyses were conducted. The average centroidal axis-bisector angle was 2.1° ± 2.1° at 2 cm and 0.6° ± 1.3° at 3.5 cm level. The average distance to the actual syndesmosis entry point was 1.0 ± 0.9 mm at 2 cm and 0.4 ± 0.4 mm at 3.5 cm level. The values didn't show any significant difference according to gender. Intra- and interobserver reliability analysis showed excellent correlation in all parameters (interclass correlation coefficient > 0.90). Angle bisector method was found strongly reliable providing accurate direction for syndesmotic axis. It can provide a patient- and level-specific angle for the application of syndesmotic implants without increasing the fluoroscopy exposure. Its use can have a broad impact on functional outcomes of ankle injuries by decreasing the malreduction rates. Further cadaveric validation and safety studies should be conducted for possible clinical usage.

Bi-Cortical transhumeral drilling for biceps tenodesis - Is it safe?

Background

Biceps tenodesis is an effective procedure performed to treat shoulder pain originating from the long head biceps tendon. In arthroscopic biceps tenodesis unicortical drilling of the humerus is more commonly practiced as it is considered safe to the vital structures lying posterior to the proximal humerus. Many surgeons are wary of the bi-cortical approach as it poses a risk to these vital structures. The aim of this study was to establish whether bi-cortical drilling in proximal humerus is safe or not. Our second purpose was to find a safe zone (if any) for bi-cortical drilling if bi-cortical drilling is safe.

Methods

This study is a descriptive study conducted on cadaveric shoulders. Bilateral shoulders and arms of ten fresh-frozen cadavers (mean age 77.7 y) were dissected. Four landmarks in the dissected humerus were identified. They were superior margin of the bicipital groove, center of the bicipital groove, upper and lower border of pectoralis major insertion. Bi-cortical trans-humeral pinning was done in the humerus at all these points so that the pin exited through the posterior cortex of the humerus. The shortest distance between the pin and the nearest vital structure namely axillary nerve, radial nerve, articular surface of the humeral head, and cephalic vein was calculated from each fixed landmark.

Results

We established that bi-cortical drilling in proximal humerus was safe. The safe zone established for bi-cortical biceps tenodesis is at the middle of bicipital groove, which is 18.00 ± 4.02 mm inferior to the groove's upper border. The boundaries of the safe zone lie 9.39 mm superiorly and 9.40 mm inferiorly to the middle of the bicipital groove.

Conclusion

The center of the established safe zone for bi-cortical trans-humeral pinning was 18 mm inferior to the bicipital groove's upper border.

Drilling Speed and Bone Temperature of a Robot-assisted Ultrasonic Osteotome Applied to Vertebral Cancellous Bone

STUDY DESIGN

An experimental investigation of a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome applied to vertebral cancellous bone.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of various ultrasonic parameter settings on temperature in the drilling site and penetration time and determine the most suitable parameters for efficient and safe robot-based ultrasonically assisted bone drilling in spinal surgery.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

A robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome device may be safe and effective for spinal drilling.

METHODS

Sixty specimens of bovine vertebral cancellous were randomly assigned to one of six groups, which varied by mode of ultrasonic vibration (L-T and L) and feed rate (one percent [0.8 mm/s], two percent [1.6 mm/s], and three pecent [2.4 mm/s]). Maximum temperature in the drilling site and penetration time was recorded.

RESULTS

Maximum temperature in the drilling site decreased as output power increased for L-T and L modes, was significantly lower for L-T compared to L mode at each feed rate and power setting, was significantly different at feed rates of 1.6 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s and 2.4 mm/s versus 0.8 mm/s for L-T mode at an output power of 60 W and 84 W, but was not influenced by feed rate for L mode. Penetration time did not significantly improve as output power increased for both L-T and L modes, was significantly decreased with increased feed rates, but was not significantly different between L-T and L modes.

CONCLUSION

The optimal parameters for applying a robot-assisted ultrasonic osteotome to vertebral cancellous bone are L-T mode, maximum output power of 120 W, and maximum feed rate of 2.4 mm/s.Level of Evidence: 4.

Comparing the accuracy of freehand, fluoroscopically guided and aiming device-assisted drilling in veterinary orthopaedic surgery

BACKGROUND

Drilling accuracy is essential in the correct positioning of implants and avoidance of iatrogenic damage to surrounding tissues. The use of augmented drilling methods has been documented as an approach to improving the accuracy of drilling. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy of two augmented drilling methods (fluoroscopically guided and aiming device) to freehand (FH) drilling.

METHODS

Three experienced specialist surgeons and three veterinary surgeons without primary orthopaedic experience drilled into synthetic bone towards a target using the three different methods at three different angles (0°, 10° and 20°). The duration of drilling was recorded, and the accuracy of drilling was measured using photographs before and after drilling.

RESULTS

The two augmented methods were more accurate than FH drilling in synthetic bone, with the aiming device producing the greatest accuracy. Increased angulation of drilling decreased the drilling accuracy. Surgeon experience did not impact on drilling accuracy. Surgeon inexperience and augmented drilling methods both increased the time taken to drill.

CONCLUSION

The use of augmented drilling methods improved the accuracy of drilling, and surgeons should consider their use when drilling in anatomical regions where the margin of error is small.

Influence of a customized three-dimensionally printed drill guide on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in lumbosacral vertebrae: An ex vivo study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the accuracy of pedicle screw insertion (PSI) into canine lumbosacral vertebrae with custom-made three-dimensionally (3D)-printed drill guides or freehand insertion.

STUDY DESIGN

Ex vivo study.

SAMPLE POPULATION

Nineteen canine lumbosacral specimens.

METHODS

Drill guides for PSI were designed on the basis of safe screw insertion trajectories by using preoperative computed tomography (CT) and produced by 3D printing of templates. Right and left sides of the specimens were randomly allocated to two groups; 4-mm pedicle screws were inserted in L5-L6 and L7-S1 spinal segments either freehand (control group) or with custom-made drill guides (guide group). Sixty-six screws were inserted with each method. Insertion angles (α, β), bone stock, and vertebral canal breach were assessed according to postoperative CT. χ² Tests were used to compare vertebral canal breach between groups and vertebrae.

RESULTS

Breaches in the vertebral canal were less common (P < .001) when screws were placed with a guide in the guide group (9/66, 14%) than without a guide (30/66, 45%). The rate of vertebral canal breach differed at L5 (P = .021) but not at L6 (P = .05), L7 (P = .075) or S1 (P = .658). The angle of insertion (α) did not differ between specimens with and without breaches (guide, P = .068; control, P = .394).

CONCLUSION

The use of a customized 3D-printed guide generally improved the accuracy of PSI in canine lumbosacral vertebrae, although statistical significance was reached only at L5.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The use of customized drill guides may be considered as an alternative to freehand PSI in the lumbosacral area, especially for L5-L6 vertebrae.

Safe Supra-Acetabular Pin Insertion in Relation to Intraosseous Depth

In pelvic fractures, dysfunction of the pelvic ring is often stabilized with supra-acetabular pin insertion. In existing literature, there are heterogeneous indications on proper pins selection and inclinations. Therefore, this study aimed to quantify the narrowing of safe pin corridors in the transverse and sagittal planes with increments of intraosseous screw depths. A computer algorithm created cross-sections over three-dimensional pelvic reconstructions at sagittal inclinations from 45° cranial to 45° caudal in 5° increments. Templates of screw depths spanning 60-120 mm in 15 mm increments were disposed in the transverse plane from 45° medial to 45° lateral. Each intraosseous screw depth and transverse angle were evaluated for intraosseous containment to evaluate ranges narrowing with increasing screw depths. The 60-mm depth resulted in the largest sagittal range (60.9° ± 6.9°) and transverse range (27.5° ± 4.1°) at 30° caudal. Increasing depths by 15 mm resulted in ranges being significantly different from one another (p < 0.01). The sagittal plane of 20° cranial had the highest frequency of insertion for all depths, while transverse ranges were narrowed (p < 0.01). Bisecting angles were similar for sagittal planes 20° cranial to 30° caudal with an average of 27.9° ± 1.2° (p ≥ 0.115). In conclusion, while 60 mm depths can be inserted with the highest discretion, 15 mm increments in depth significantly reduce safe ranges. Screws depths above 90 mm have low frequencies of insertion, should be inserted more cranially and must be considered prone to breaching. © 2019 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 37:1790-1797, 2019.

Use of computed tomography to define a sacral safe corridor for placement of 2.7 mm cortical screws in feline sacroiliac luxation

Objectives This study aimed to define a safe corridor for 2.7 mm cortical sacroiliac screw insertion in the dorsal plane (craniocaudal direction) using radiography and CT, and in the transverse plane (dorsoventral direction) using CT in feline cadavers. A further aim was to compare the values obtained by CT with those previously reported by radiography in the transverse plane. Methods Thirteen pelvises were retrieved from feline cadavers and dissected to expose one of the articular surfaces of the sacrum. A 2.7 mm screw was placed in the sacrum to a depth of approximately 1 cm in each exposed articular surface. Dorsoventral radiography and CT scanning of each specimen were performed. Multiplanar reconstructions were performed to allow CT evaluation in both the dorsal and transverse planes. Calculations were made to find the maximum, minimum and optimum angles for screw placement in craniocaudal (radiography and CT) and dorsoventral (CT) directions when using a 2.7 mm cortical screw. Results Radiographic measurement showed a mean optimum craniocaudal angle of 106° (range 97-112°). The mean minimum angle was 95° (range 87-107°), whereas the mean maximum angle was 117° (108-124°). Measurement of the dorsal CT scan images showed a mean optimum craniocaudal angle of 101° (range 94-110°). The mean minimum angle was 90° (range 83-99°), whereas the mean maximum angle was 113° (104-125°). The transverse CT scan images showed a mean dorsoventral minimum angle of 103° (range 95-113°), mean maximum angle of 115° (104-125°) and mean optimum dorsoventral angle of 111° (102-119°). Conclusions and relevance An optimum craniocaudal angle of 101° is recommended for 2.7 mm cortical screw placement in the feline sacral body, with a safety margin between 99° and 104°. No single angle can be recommended in the dorsoventral direction and therefore preoperative measuring on individual cats using CT images is recommended to establish the ideal individual angle in the transverse plane.