Calves born after embryo transfer from donors persistently infected with BVD virus

Electroporation enhances immune responses and protection induced by a bovine viral diarrhea virus DNA vaccine in newborn calves with maternal antibodies

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is one of the major pathogens in cattle. In this study, newborn calves with maternal antibodies were vaccinated with a BVDV DNA vaccine, either by conventional intramuscular (IM) injection or with the TriGrid™ Delivery System for IM delivery (TDS-IM). The calves vaccinated with the TDS-IM developed more rapidly and effectively BVDV-specific humoral and cell-mediated immune responses in the presence of maternal antibodies. Overall, the immune responses induced by delivery with the TDS-IM remained stronger than those elicited by conventional IM injection of the BVDV DNA vaccine. Accordingly, electroporation-mediated delivery of the BVDV DNA vaccine resulted in close to complete protection from clinical signs of disease, while conventional IM administration did not fully prevent morbidity and mortality following challenge with BVDV-2. These results demonstrate the TDS-IM to be effective as a delivery system for a BVDV DNA vaccine in newborn calves in the presence of maternal antibodies, which supports the potential of electroporation as a delivery method for prophylactic DNA vaccines.

Intrauterine inoculation of seronegative heifers with bovine viral diarrhea virus concurrent with transfer of in vivo-derived bovine embryos

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) has been shown to be associated with single transferable in vivo-derived bovine embryos despite washing and trypsin treatment. Hence, the primary objective was to evaluate the potential of BVDV to be transmitted via the intrauterine route at the time of embryo transfer. In vivo-derived bovine embryos (n=10) were nonsurgically collected from a single Bos tarus donor cow negative for BVDV. After collection and washing, embryos were placed into transfer media containing BVDV (SD-1; Type 1a). Each of the 10 embryos was individually loaded into an 0.25-mL straw, which was then nonsurgically transferred into the uterus of 1 of the 10 seronegative recipients on Day 0. The total quantity of virus transferred into the uterus of each of the 10 Bos tarus recipients was 878 cell culture infective doses to the 50% end point (CCID(50))/mL. Additionally, control heifers received 1.5 x 10(6) CCID(50) BVDV/.5 mL without an embryo (positive) or heat-inactivated BVDV (negative). The positive control heifer and all 10 recipients of virus-exposed embryos exhibited viremia by Day 6 and seroconverted by Day 15 after transfer. The negative control heifer did not exhibit a viremia or seroconvert. At 30 d after embryo transfer, 6 of 10 heifers in the treatment group were pregnant; however, 30 d later, only one was still pregnant. This fetus was nonviable and was positive for BVDV. In conclusion, the quantity of BVDV associated with bovine embryos after in vitro exposure can result in viremia and seroconversion of seronegative recipients after transfer into the uterus during diestrus.

Transmission of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) via in vitro-fertilized embryos to recipients, but not to their offspring

The objective was to assess the potential of Day-7, IVP zona pellucida-intact blastocysts to transmit bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) to embryo recipients. Embryos were exposed (1h) to two non-cytopathic (NCP) biotypes, either NY-1 (type 1) or two concentrations of PA-131 (type 2), washed 10 times, and transferred into recipients (two embryos/recipient) free of BVDV and its antibody. Six (30.0%) of the 20 pregnancies were lost after 30 d following transfer of the embryos exposed to the type 1 strain; none of the recipients or their 18 full term offspring seroconverted. Conversely, following exposure to the type 2 strain, 16 (51.6%) of the 31 pregnancies were lost >30 d after embryo transfer. Furthermore, 18 (51.4%) of 35 recipients receiving embryos exposed to type 2 seroconverted; 11 of those were pregnant at 30 d, but only 2 went to full term and gave birth to noninfected (seronegative) calves. Virus isolation tests were performed on single, virus-exposed, washed embryos (not transferred); 3 of 12 (25%) and 17 of 61 (28%) exposed to type 1 and type 2, respectively, were positive for live BVDV. Embryos exposed to type 2 virus had from 0 to 34 viral copies. In conclusion, a large proportion of recipients that received embryos exposed to BVDV, especially those exposed to a high concentration of type 2 virus, became infected after ET, and their pregnancies failed. However, term pregnancies resulted in calves free of both virus and antibody. Therefore, additional disinfection procedures are recommended prior to transferring potentially infected IVP embryos.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV): Epidemiologic concerns relative to semen and embryos

Artificial insemination and embryo transfer are used commonly in cattle production and exchange of germplasm between populations of cattle. If properly monitored, assisted reproductive techniques can be used to prevent the spread of infectious agents. However, these techniques potentially represent unnatural routes for transmission of diseases. Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is broadly distributed among the world's populations of cattle. Fluids, gametes and somatic cells from infected animals are likely contaminated with the virus. Thus, use of semen or embryos from infected animals could result in spread of BVDV. This paper provides an overview of the risks of transmitting this virus by AI or production and transfer of embryos and summarizes the precautions needed to prevent such transmissions of disease from occurring.

Risk assessment of transmission of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in abattoir-derived in vitro produced embryos

Bovine virus diarrhea virus (BVDV) is a pathogen of the bovine reproductive system causing reduced conception rates, abortions and persistently infected calves. Most if not all strains of BVDV are transmissible by natural mating and AI. For international trade, it is recommended that in vitro fertilized embryos be washed according to the IETS Manual. However, BVDV may not be entirely washed out, resulting in possible transmission risks to recipients. Donor cows, donor bulls and biological agents are all possible sources of contamination. The process for producing in vitro produced (IVP) embryos is complex and non-standard, and some procedures can contribute to spread of BVDV to uninfected embryos. The structure of the zone pellucida (ZP) of IVP embryos permits adherence of BVDV to the ZP. To estimate the risk of producing infected recipients and persistently infected calves from abattoir-derived IVP embryos, a quantitative risk assessment model using Microsoft Excel and Palisade @Risk was developed. Assumptions simplified some of the complexities of the IVP process. Uncertainties due to incomplete or variable data were addressed by incorporating probability distributions in the model. Model variables included: disease prevalence; the number of donor cows slaughtered for ovaries; the number of oocytes collected, selected and cultured; the BVDV status of ovaries, semen, biological compounds and its behavior in the IVP embryo process. The model used the Monte Carlo method to simulate the IVP process. When co-culture cells derived from donor cows of unknown health status were used for in vitro culture (IVC), the probability of a recipient cow at risk of infection to BVDV per oocyte selected for IVP processing averaged 0.0006. However, when co-culture free from BVDV was used, the probability was 1.2 x 10(-5). Thus, for safe international trade in bovine IVP embryos (i.e. negligible risks of transmission of BVDV), co-culture cells, if used during IVC for producing IVP embryos, should be disease-free.

Seroconversion of calves following intravenous injection with embryos exposed to bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) in vitro

Two recent studies demonstrated that a high-affinity isolate of BVDV (SD-1), remained associated with a small percentage of in vivo-derived bovine embryos following artificial exposure to the virus and either washing or trypsin treatment. Further, the embryo-associated virus was infective in an in vitro environment. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine if the quantity of a high-affinity isolate of BVDV associated with single-washed or trypsin-treated embryos could cause infection in vivo. Twenty zona-pellucida-intact morulae and blastocysts (MB) were collected on day 7 from superovulated cows. After collection, all MB were washed according to International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) standards, and all but 4 MB (negative controls) were exposed for 2 h to 10(5)-10(6) cell culture infective doses (50% endpoint) per milliliter (CCID(50)/mL) of viral strain SD-1. Following exposure, according to IETS standards, one half of the MB were washed and one half were trypsin treated. All MB were then individually sonicated, and sonicate fluids were injected intravenously into calves on day 0. Blood was drawn to monitor for viremia and(or) seroconversion. Seroconversion of calves injected with sonicate fluids from washed and trypsin-treated embryos occurred 38% and 13% of the time, respectively. Therefore, the quantity of a high-affinity isolate of BVDV associated with single-washed or trypsin-treated embryos was infective in vivo.

Evaluation of risks of viral transmission to recipients of bovine embryos arising from fertilisation with virus-infected semen

This scientific review was prompted by recent legislation to curtail the use of semen from potentially virus-infected bulls to produce embryos for import into the European Union. From studies in laboratory animals, humans and horses, it is apparent that viruses may sometimes attach to, or be integrated into, spermatozoa, although in domestic livestock, including cattle, this seems to be a rare phenomenon, and carriage of virus through the zona pellucida into the oocyte by fertilising sperm has never been described in these species. Four specific viruses; enzootic bovine leukosis (EBLV), bovine herpesvirus-1 (BoHV-1), bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) and bluetongue virus (BTV), all of which tend to cause subclinical infections in cattle, but which can occur in bovine semen, are examined with regard to the risks that use of infected semen might lead to production of infected embryos. With regard to in vivo-derived embryos, when internationally approved embryo processing protocols are used, the risks from EBLV- and BTV-infected semen are negligible, and the same is almost certainly true for semen infected with BoHV-1 if the embryos are also treated with trypsin. For BVDV, there is insufficient data on how the virus is carried in semen and how different BVDV strains can interact with sperm, oocytes and embryos. There is a potential, at least, that in vivo-derived embryos resulting from infected semen might carry BVDV, although field studies so far suggest that this is very unlikely. With regard to in vitro-produced embryos, use of semen infected with any of the four viruses, with the probable exception of EBLV, will often lead to contaminated embryos, and virus removal from these embryos is difficult even when the internationally approved embryo processing protocols are used. However, it has never been demonstrated that such embryos have resulted in transmission of infection to recipients or offspring.

Infectivity of bovine viral diarrhea virus associated with in vivo-derived bovine embryos

Early research indicated that bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) would not adhere to zona pellucida-intact (ZP-I), in vivo-derived bovine embryos. However, in a recent study, viral association of BVDV and in vivo-derived embryos was demonstrated. These findings raised questions regarding the infectivity of the embryo-associated virus. The objectives of this study were to evaluate the infectivity of BVDV associated with in vivo-derived bovine embryos through utilization of primary cultures of uterine tubal cells (UTC) as an in vitro model of the uterine environment and to determine if washing procedures, including trypsin treatment, were adequate to remove virus from in vivo-derived embryos. One hundred and nine ZP-I morulae and blastocysts (MB) and 77 non-fertile and degenerated (NFD) ova were collected on day 7 from 34, BVDV-negative, superovulated cows. After collection, all MB and NFD ova were washed according to International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) standards and exposed for 2h to approximately 10(6) cell culture infective doses (50% endpoint) per milliliter of viral strain SD-1. Following exposure, some groups of <10 MB or NFD ova were washed in accordance with IETS standards. In addition, an equivalent number of MB and NFD ova were subjected to IETS standards for trypsin treatment. Subsequently, NFD ova were immediately sonicated and sonicate fluids were assayed for presence of virus, while individual and groups of MB were placed in microdrops containing primary cultures of UTCs and incubated. After 3 days, embryos, media, and UTCs were harvested from each microdrop and assayed for BVDV. Virus was detected in the sonicate fluids of 56 and 43% of the groups of NFD ova that were washed and trypsin-treated, respectively. After 3 days of microdrop culture, virus was not detected in media or sonicate fluids from any individual or groups of MB, regardless of treatment. However, virus was detected in a proportion of UTC that were co-cultured with washed groups of MB (30%), washed individual MB (9%) and trypsin treated individual MB (9%), but no virus was detected in the UTC associated with groups of trypsin-treated embryos. In conclusion, virus associated with developing embryos was infective for permissive cells. Further, the quantity of virus associated with a proportion of individual embryos (both washed and trypsin treated) was sufficient to infect the UTC. In light of these results, an attempt should be made to determine if the quantity of a high-affinity isolate of BVDV associated with an individual embryo would infect recipients via the intrauterine route.

Different strains of noncytopathic bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) vary in their affinity for in vivo-derived bovine embryos

Washing procedures (without trypsin treatment) recommended by the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) for use on in vivo-derived embryos effectively removed a cytopathic strain (NADL) of bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) after artificial exposure. However, these washing procedures have not been evaluated using other isolates of BVDV, including representative non-cytopathic strains. Thus, the objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of the IETS procedures following artificial exposure of in vivo-derived bovine embryos to two different strains and biotypes of BVDV. One hundred and twenty-nine zona pellucida-intact (ZP-I) morulae and blastocysts (MB) and 56 non-fertile and degenerated (NFD) ova were collected 7 days following exposure to bulls from 32, BVDV-negative, superovulated cows. After collection, all MB and NFD ova were washed according to IETS standards. Subsequently, half of the MB and NFD ova were exposed for 1h to approximately 10(6)-cell culture infective doses (50% endpoint) per milliliter of viral strain SD-1, and the other half were exposed to the same concentration of CD-87. After exposure, groups of > or =3 and < or = 10 MB or NFD ova were washed using methods that met or exceeded IETS standards. Then, the washed groups were sonicated, and sonicate fluids were assayed for presence of virus using virus isolation and a reverse transcription nested polymerase chain reaction. No virus was detected in any group of MB or NFD ova that had been exposed to the CD-87 isolate. However, virus was detected in association with 50% of the groups of MB and 33% of the groups of NFD ova that had been exposed to the SD-1 isolate. Therefore, standard embryo-washing procedures recommended by the IETS are more effective for removal of some isolates of BVDV than for others. It remains to be determined if the quantity of a high-affinity isolate of BVDV associated with individual washed embryos would infect recipients via the intrauterine route. Further, it should be determined if an alternative embryo processing procedure, washing and trypsin treatment, would be more effective for removal of high-affinity isolates.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus in embryo and semen production systems

Although BVDV-free offspring have been produced from persistently infected bulls and heifers via advanced reproductive techniques, embryos and semen can potentially transmit the virus. Due to this potential for transmission, appropriate testing is necessary to ensure freedom of semen and embryos from BVDV. In the future, less constraining quality control measures may ensure freedom of embryos and semen from BVDV. These quality control measures require additional research to be validated.

Biosecurity issues associated with current and emerging embryo technologies

A variety of procedures associated with in vivo and in vitro embryo production, as well as cloning and transgenics, are in current use by both researchers and practitioners. Biohazards associated with these procedures could influence clinical proficiency and the outcome of basic research or result in unusual distribution of pathogens in populations of animals. By their nature, embryo technologies are vulnerable to contamination from numerous sources. Although pathogens can originate in the physical environments in which embryo technologies are applied, they are more likely to be introduced via animals or materials of animal origin. However, it is important to note that both the occurrence and consequences of contamination are heavily influenced by environmental circumstances. This paper represents a philosophical description of biohazards associated with three generations of embryo technologies using the cow as a model species. Emphasis is placed on sources of contamination, current or suggested preventive actions and the issue of environmental changes as they relate to the emergence of biohazards and the implementation of biosecurity measures. Some specific pathogens are discussed for illustration. In addition, details of the risks associated with introducing bovine viral diarrhoea virus in each of three generations of embryo technologies are described.

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus infections and its control. A review

Infections with bovine viral diarrhoea virus continue to plague the cattle industry worldwide. The wish to control the negative effects of the virus has lead to the development of numerous vaccines, but also of eradication schemes. In this paper, a comprehensive overview on BVDV is given: the virus and its clinical manifestations, its occurrence and economic impact, the different routes of transmission, as well as diagnostic methods and objectives. Furthermore, the two major options for BVDV control--eradication and vaccination--are discussed as well as the risk for reintroduction of BVDV after eradication.

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus: its effects on ovarian function in the cow

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) is a major cattle pathogen responsible for a spectrum of symptoms, including reproductive failure. In this paper we investigate how BVDV interacts with the ovary. The viruses' tropism for the pre-ovulatory oocyte was studied by indirect immunohistochemistry. Two monoclonal antibodies, raised against the non-structural protein NS3 and the envelope glycoprotein E2 were used to probe cryo-sections cut from the ovaries of three persistently infected heifers. NS3 and E2 antigens were widely distributed within the ovarian stroma and follicular cells. NS3 was also localised within the proportion of oocytes. Overall 18.7% of the oocyte population had detectable levels of NS3. What is more, the proportion of antigen positive oocytes remained constant (P>0. 05) throughout the different stages of oocyte maturation. In a subsequent study seven cows were challenged with non-cytopathogenic BVDV (strain Pe515: 5x10(6) TCID(50)) to determine the oestradiol and progesterone responses to an acute infection. The sensitivity of the endogenous luteolytic mechanism was also established by analysing plasma prostaglandin F2alpha metabolite (PGFM) levels following an exogenous oxytocin (50 IU) challenge. The inoculation was given 2 days before a synchronised oestrus and was timed to ensure that viraemia occurred during the initial stage of corpora luteal development. Seven cows inoculated with non-infectious culture medium served as control animals and remained BVDV naive throughout the study. The BVDV challenge was followed by leucopenia, viraemia and sero-conversion. The virus also significantly (P<0.01) reduced plasma oestradiol levels between day 6 and day 11 post-inoculation (i.e. between day 4 and day 9 post-oestrus). However, the infection did not alter (P>0.05) progesterone secretion throughout the oestrous cycle or the plasma concentration of PGFM. These data indicate that bovine follicular cells and oocytes are permissive to BVDV at all stages of follicular development. They also show that a transient fall in oestradiol secretion may accompany an acute infection. In conclusion, this work has identified two potential routes through which BVDV can reduce fertility in the cow, namely impairment of oocyte quality and disruption of gonadal steroidogenesis.

The effects of bovine viral diarrhoea virus on cattle reproduction in relation to disease control

Bovine viral diarrhoea virus (BVDV) is a major reproductive pathogen in cattle. Infection of the bull can lead to a fall in semen quality and the isolation of infectious virus in the ejaculate, while infection in the cow leads to poor conception rates, abortions and congenital defects. BVDV also reduces the animal's resistance to other respiratory and enteric pathogens. The prevalence of BVDV is primarily due to the efficiency with which the virus crosses the placenta of susceptible females. Calves that survive infection during the first trimester of pregnancy are born with a persistent and lifelong infection. These persistently infected (PI) animals represent between 1.0% and 2.0% of the cattle population and continuously shed infectious virus. The availability of reliable diagnostic ELISA and PCR techniques, which can test milk or serum samples for virus or antibodies, has simplified BVDV surveillance and improved the prospects for control. Although PI animals are the principal vectors within and between herds, they can be readily identified and removed. By contrast, cows carrying a PI foetus are particularly problematic. These animals have been compared to 'Trojan Horses' because they are virus-negative and antibody-positive but they deliver PI calves. In general, acutely infected cattle are much less efficient vectors but infections at the onset of puberty have resulted in a localised and persistent infection within the testes. Under these circumstances, virus shedding into the semen may remain undetected. Transmission of BVDV can be controlled through vaccination or eradication. BVDV vaccine technology has been developing over the past 30 years, but currently available vaccines are still of the conventional inactivated or attenuated sort. In general, vaccination has not been applied with sufficient rigor to make a significant impact on the level of circulating virus, unlike the national and regional eradication programmes established in areas such as Scandinavia, Austria, the Netherlands and Scotland. Eradication confers the added advantage of improved herd health; however, it also creates a susceptible cattle population that needs to be protected by stringent biosecurity. In this article, we discuss how BVDV influences reproductive function, the potential for viral transmission during breeding and the measures that must be taken to avoid the spread of infection to susceptible cattle populations via semen, embryos, culture fluids and infected cows.

Susceptibility of bovine naked 2- and 4-cell embryos and hatched blastocysts produced in vitro to infection with noncytopathogenic bovine viral diarrhea virus

To investigate the susceptibility of early bovine embryos to noncytopathogenic bovine viral diarrhea virus (NCP BVDV), 2- and 4-cell embryos produced in vitro from which zona pellucida had been removed by pronase treatment, and hatched blastocysts were exposed to 10(6) TCID50/m/ of NCP BVDV No. 12 strain. The virus was detected in all embryo samples immediately prior to cultivation but not in the medium. After 24-hr culture, the virus was isolated from four media and two embryo samples in four experiments in the blastocyst group, and the viral antigen was demonstrated in the cytoplasm of the embryo cells by the immunofluorescent technique. By contrast, no virus was recovered from, or viral antigen detected in samples from the 2- and 4-cell embryo group in any of the experiments, even though they were exposed to the virus after removal of the zona pellucida. These findings suggest that 2- and 4-cell embryos are unlikely to be susceptible to NCP BVDV, but that blastocysts are capable of being infected with the virus. hatched blastocyst, noncytopathogenic bovine viral diarrhea virus.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus: its effects on estradiol, progesterone and prostaglandin secretion in the cow

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is a major cattle pathogen responsible for a spectrum of symptoms, including reproductive failure. This study was designed to establish the effects of BVDV infection on estradiol, progesterone and PGF2alpha secretion in the cow. Seven BVDV-free cows were challenged with non-cytopathogenic BVDV (strain Pe 515: 5x10(6) tissue culture infected dose50) so that peak viremia occurred during the initial phase of luteal development in a synchronized estrous cycle. Ovulation was also synchronized in 7 sham-infected animals. Within 2 wk of inoculation, viremia, leukopenia and serum neutralizing antibodies were recorded in all of the BVDV-infected cows but not the sham-infected animals. Between Day 4 and Day 9 post estrus the BVDV-infected cows had significantly (P<0.01) lower plasma estradiol levels than the sham-infected animals. However, the BVDV infection did not alter rectal temperatures, plasma progesterone concentrations or PGF2alpha secretion 17, 18 and 19 d post estrus. These data highlight a potential causal link between BVDV viremia, endocrine dysfunction and poor fertility in the cow.

Epidemiological features and economical importance of bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV) infections

Infections with bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV) are widespread throughout the world. Although the prevalence of infection varies among surveys, the infection tends to be endemic in many populations, reaching a maximum level of 1-2% of the cattle being persistently infected (PI) and 60-85% of the cattle being antibody positive. Persistently infected cattle are the main source for transmission of the virus. However, acutely infected cattle as well as other ruminants, either acutely or persistently infected, may transmit the virus. Transmission is most efficient by direct contact. However, as infections have been observed in closed, non-pasturing herds, other transmission routes seem likely to have some practical importance. Differences in BVDV prevalence among regions or introduction of virus in herds previously free of BVDV are often associated with particular epidemiological determinants such as cattle population density, animal trade and pasturing practices. However, on a few occasions there have been no obvious explanations for infection of individual herds. Estimates of economic losses due to BVDV infection vary depending on the immune status of the population and the pathogenicity of the infecting virus strains. Introduction of the infection into a totally susceptible population invariably causes extensive losses until a state of equilibrium is reached. Infection with highly virulent BVDV strains causing severe clinical signs and death after acute infection gives rise to substantial economical losses. At an estimated annual incidence of acute infections of 34%, the total annual losses were estimated as US$ 20 million per million calvings when modeling the losses due to a low-virulent BVDV strain. At the same incidence of infection, the losses due to a high-virulent BVDV strain were estimated as US$ 57 million per million calvings. Low-virulent BVDV infections caused maximum losses at an incidence of 45%, whereas high-virulent BVDV infections caused maximum losses at an incidence of 65%. Thus, cost-benefit analyses of control programs are highly dependent on the risks of new infections under different circumstances and on the strains of the virus involved.

Distribution of viral antigen in uterus, placenta and foetus of cattle persistently infected with bovine virus diarrhoea virus

The tissue distribution and cellular localisation of bovine virus diarrhoea virus (BVDV) was investigated in the uterus, placentomes, intercotyledonary foetal membranes and foetal organs of three persistently infected (PI) pregnant heifers. The uterus and ovaries of a non-pregnant PI heifer were also included in the study. Cryostat sections were examined using immunohistochemical techniques and monoclonal antibodies against BVDV. A double immunofluorescence technique was used to identify BVDV positive cells that also showed staining for either the leukocyte common antigen CD45 or the cytoskeletal filament vimentin. BVDV antigen was detected in all the organs examined, and was present in both epithelial and non-epithelial cells. In all organs many of the virus-positive cells also showed reactivity for vimentin. In the foetal liver and spleen a small, scattered population of virus-positive cells showed reactivity for CD45. A few cells showed reactivity both for BVDV antigen and for CD45 in the placentomes and intercotyledonary foetal membranes. In contrast to earlier reports, only scattered cells in the foetal part of the placentomes, the cotyledons, showed reactivity for BVDV antigen. However, in the chorion of the intercotyledonary foetal membranes, a larger proportion of the trophoblast cells showed reactivity for BVDV, especially the binuclear trophoblast cells. In the uterus, pregnancy appeared to favour virus replication, as the section from the pregnant heifers showed much stronger staining and a higher proportion of viral antigen-positive cells than sections from the non-pregnant PI heifer.

Immunohistochemical evidence for the localization of bovine viral diarrhea virus, a single-stranded RNA virus, in ovarian oocytes in the cow

Bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) is a single-stranded RNA virus responsible for enteric disease and reproductive failure in cattle. The virus can pass vertically from cow to fetus, causing abortion, birth of malformed calves, and calves born with persistent and life-long infections. In this study, we investigated the tropism of BVDV in ovarian tissue from persistently infected animals. Three heifers persistently infected with BVDV were euthanatized and their ovaries were recovered. A specimen of each ovary was taken (n = 6) for virus isolation, and the remaining ovarian tissue was stored at -70 C. Cryosections (6 microm) cut from each ovary were analyzed for the presence of BVDV antigens by indirect immunofluorescence. The immunofluorescent analysis employed two monoclonal antibodies, WB103 and WB162, previously raised against the nonstructural protein NS3 and the envelop glycoprotein E2, respectively. High titers (6.97 +/- 0.17 log10 tissue culture infective dose50/ml) of BVDV were recovered from 6/6 ovarian samples; NS3 and E2 were widely distributed within the ovarian stroma, the cumulus cell population, and the oocytes maturing in primordial, primary, and secondary follicles. Overall, 362/1,939 (18.7%) of the oocytes contained BVDV antigens, and there was no significant (P > 0.05) difference in the proportion of BVDV-infected oocytes recorded within the primordial (227/1,247, 18.2%), primary (122/630, 19.4%), and secondary (13/62, 21.0%) follicle populations. Although the developmental potential of the infected oocytes could not be established in the present study, we conclude that bovine oocyte and the cumulus cells are susceptible to BVDV infection.

Bovine viral diarrhea virus replication in bovine follicular epithelial cells derived from persistently infected heifers

Bovine follicle fluid and oocytes surrounded by follicular epithelial (FE) cells were collected from ovaries of two heifers persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV). BVDV was present in the follicle fluid at a higher titer than in serum. The oocytes were matured in vitro under culture conditions of 39 degrees C in humidified air containing 5% CO2. In vitro fertilization was performed after 24 hr in culture (the day of insemination was defined as day 1), and culture was continued through day 10. BVDV was present in the culture medium at titers of 10(2.25) to 10(3.25) TC(I)D50/0.1 ml. The virus was also detected in FE cells collected on day 10. Viral antigen was demonstrated in the cytoplasm of FE cells by the indirect immunofluorescence technique. However, no BVDV was detected in the embryos on day 10. These findings suggested that the oocytes or embryos were unlikely to be infected with BVDV, but that the FE cells were infected with BVDV and supported virus replication in cattle persistently infected with BVDV.

Association of bovine embryos produced by in vitro fertilization with a noncytopathic strain of bovine viral diarrhea virus type II

In the first experiment, heifers were infected experimentally with bovine viral diarrhea virus type II (BVDV-type II, strain CD87; characterized by high morbidity and mortality). Subsequently, in vitro fertilized embryos were produced from oocytes collected on Day 4, 8, and 16 post infection. In a total of 29 heifers, the infectious virus was detected in 55% of the samples of the follicular fluid, in 10% of the oviductal cells, in 10% of the uterine flushes and in 41% of the in vitro fertilized embryos. The highest number of embryos associated with the virus was detected in the group of animals slaughtered on Day 8 post infection (58%). The amount of the virus (10(1.5-2.0) TCID50/mL) associated with the washed single embryos generated from oocytes of heifers 8 and 16 d post infection was sufficient for disease transmission by intravenous inoculation to the seronegative recipients (6/15). In the second experiment, uninfected oocytes were exposed in vitro to BVDV (10(5) TCID50/mL) in the maturation medium and then fertilized and cultured prior to viral assay. Virus was detected in 4 of 7 samples containing embryos but not in samples of embryos produced from the control group of uninfected oocytes. The presence of BVDV in the IVF system did not affect embryonic development in vitro. In conclusion, it appears that BVDV-type II has the ability to be transferred with oocytes through the IVF system, resulting in infectious embryos with normal morphological appearance which may have a potential for disease transmission.

Embryo transfer from donor cattle persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus

This study was done to examine the reproductive efficiency of embryo transfer donors that were persistently infected with bovine viral diarrhea virus (BVDV) and to determine the potential for vertical or horizontal transmission of BVDV during embryo transfer from persistently infected donors. The reproductive inefficiency of 7 different persistently infected donors was evident by consistent failure at superovulation and/or fertilization. Washing of embryos according to the reccommendations of the International Embryo Transfer Society (IETS) prevented the adherence of BVDV to embryos and to unfertile and degenerated ova, as determined by virus isolation and polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay. In addition, a normal, BVDV antibody seronegative and BVDV-negative calf was born following transfer from a PI donor to a seronegative recipient.

Epidemiology of bovine viral diarrhea virus

Prevalence studies around the world show that BVDV is widespread in most cattle raising countries. There are significant differences, however, in prevalence between areas, probably the result of differences in cattle population structure and management practice. Direct contact with PI animals is probably the most important method of transmission of infection; however, field studies have shown that some limited spread of infection also occurs in the absence of PI animals. This may be due to contact with acutely infected animals or contact with other species infected with BVDV. Different ways of indirect transmission such as contaminated needles and equipment have been proven experimentally, and indirect transmission is considered to have some importance. If a PI animal is introduced directly into a dairy herd, most animals will be infected within a few months. On many occasions, however, a herd gets infected by other means than direct introduction of PI animals. In these cases, the infection is often spread to only a few animals after which the infections stops. The infection is then reinforced when PI animals are born. Slow and hence prolonged spread of infection in herds without PI animals also has been described, but the mechanism is not fully understood. Family lines of PI animals delivering PI calves are fairly common and can cause the infection to continue for several years. The clinical manifestations, acute BVDV, reproductive disorders, birth of malformed, weak and undersized calves, unthrifty PI animals, and mucosal disease often appear within certain periods. Large variation, however, can occur between herd outbreaks due to variation in virulence of the BVDV strain, housing of the cattle, and variation in transmission patterns. The extensive transmission of infection from PI animals makes different surveillance methods possible. Thus testing of a screening sample of a few young stock of antibodies and determination of antibody titer in bulk milk will often give good indication of presence of PI animals in herds not using BVDV vaccines. In herds using killed vaccine, determination of antibody titers among few young stock can show the presence of PI animals. The high incidence of infection combined with all the different damages that are seen after BVDV infection cause huge economical losses, which on a national level in the UK and Denmark (i.e., areas with widespread occurrence of infection) has been calculated as between 7 and 27 million pounds (between $11 and $42 million) per million calvings. Epidemiologic studies are important as a basis for selection of control strategy. Because of the variation in epidemiology between geographic areas, evaluation of a control strategy in an area preferentially should be based on epidemiologic studies in the same area.

Border disease in sheep

The current knowledge on border disease in sheep is reviewed. This is a congenital and teratogenic disorder induced by pestivirus. The history, etiology, epidemiology, clinical aspects, and pathologic lesions at postnatal and intrauterine infections (as well as in congenitally affected animals), pathogenesis, immunity, diagnosis, and control and prevention of the syndrome are discussed.

Pathogenesis of intrauterine infections with bovine viral diarrhea virus

BVDV shares with other Pestiviruses the ability to cross the placenta of pregnant host animals. The effects of fetal infections are complex and depend on a number of factors, e.g., age of the zygote/embryo stage, no infection seems to occur. During the last one third of gestation the infection is terminated by the ontogeny of the fetal immune system. This leaves a window of susceptibility during early stages of fetal development allowing establishment of viral persistence and/or the development of a number of fetopathologic effects. Additionally, fertility problems and abortions are observed. Calves that are born immunotolerant to BVDV and persistently viremic display a wide variety of abnormalities. However, there is an unknown proportion of calves born without any clinical signs indicative of persistent infection. The time of fetal infection during the first stages of pregnancy seems to play a crucial role with respect to the lesions induced. Generally, early infections seem to induce less damage compared with late infections, suggesting an indirect, possibly immune-mediated pathogenesis. Additionally, direct virus-cell interactions may play a role. Few data exist about the influence of differences in viral virulence on fetal pathology. Likewise the role of the viral target cell range is not clear.

Early reproductive loss due to bovine pestivirus infection

Bovine pestivirus infection has been mainly recognized as the cause of mucosal disease, a syndrome which occurs sporadically in weaned and adult cattle as a late sequel to foetal infection during the first 3-4 months of gestation. Infection has also been associated with the occurrence of congenital malformations, especially of the central nervous system. Following the development of improved diagnostic and research techniques, pestivirus has now been shown to be associated with significant early reproductive loss including fertilization failure, embryonic mortality and abortion. The principal determinant of the outcome of in utero infection in the bovine is the age of the conceptus when infection occurs.

Characterisation of antisera raised against species-specific peptide sequences from scrapie-associated fibril protein and their application for post-mortem immunodiagnosis of spongiform encephalopathies

Transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE), such as scrapie or Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease (CJD), are fatal neurodegenerative diseases of the central nervous system caused by a yet unidentified virus. They are accompanied by a brain specific amyloidosis, during which a host coded protein irreversibly aggregates to form the scrapie-associated fibrils. The diagnosis of TSE relies on histopathological detection of spongiform lesions, on electron microscopical detection of fibrils, or on the immunological detection of SAF protein, which is the most specific diagnostic marker. In order to improve the diagnosis of TSE, we developed a protocol for rapid tissue fractionation and enrichment of SAF protein which subsequently allows the specific detection of SAF protein by western blotting and immunodetection. Using some new antisera raised against synthetic peptides with sequences specific for the hamster, sheep, cattle and human SAF protein, several samples can be diagnosed for TSE within 24 hours, starting with only 10-100 mg of brain tissue from different species.