New insights into the biology of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis

Agomelatine alleviates steroid-induced osteoporosis by targeting SIRT1/RANKL/FOXO1/OPG signalling in rats

One of the major contributors to secondary osteoporosis is long-term glucocorticoid usage. Clinically used antidepressant agomelatine also has anti-inflammatory properties. Our research aimed to inspect the probable defensive effect of agomelatine against steroid-promoted osteoporosis. There were four groups of rats; group I had saline as a negative control; rats of group II had dexamethasone (0.6 mg/kg, s.c.), twice weekly for 12 weeks; rats of group III had agomelatine (40 mg/kg/day, orally), as a positive control, daily for 12 weeks; and rats of group IV had dexamethasone + agomelatine in the same previous doses combined for 12 weeks. Finally, biochemical as well as histopathological changes were evaluated and dexamethasone treatment caused osteoporosis, as evidenced by discontinuous thin cancellous bone trabeculae, minor fissures and fractures, irregular eroded endosteal surface with elevated alkaline phosphate, tartarate resistant acid phosphate (TRACP) and osteocalcin levels. Osteoprotegerin (OPG), calcium, and phosphorus levels decreased with disturbed receptor activator of nuclear factor κ B ligand (RANKL), forkhead box O1 (FOXO1), and silent information regulator 1 (SIRT1) protein expression. However, treatment with agomelatine restored the normal levels of biochemical parameters to a great extent, supported by SIRT activation with an improvement in histopathological changes. Here, we concluded that agomelatine ameliorates steroid-induced osteoporosis through a SIRT1/RANKL/FOXO1/OPG-dependent pathway.

Effect of Denosumab Compared With Risedronate on Bone Strength in Patients Initiating or Continuing Glucocorticoid Treatment

In a randomized clinical trial in patients initiating glucocorticoid therapy (GC-I) or on long-term therapy (GC-C), denosumab every 6 months increased spine and hip bone mineral density at 12 and 24 months significantly more than daily risedronate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of denosumab compared with risedronate on bone strength and microarchitecture measured by high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) in GC-I and GC-C. A subset of 110 patients had high-resolution peripheral quantitative computed tomography (HR-pQCT) scans of the distal radius and tibia at baseline and at 12 and 24 months. Cortical and trabecular microarchitecture were assessed with standard analyses and failure load (FL) with micro-finite element analysis. At the radius at 24 months, FL remained unchanged with denosumab and significantly decreased with risedronate in GC-I (-4.1%, 95% confidence interval [CI] -6.4, -1.8) and, in GC-C, it significantly increased with denosumab (4.3%, 95% CI 2.1, 6.4) and remained unchanged with risedronate. Consequently, FL was significantly higher with denosumab than with risedronate in GC-I (5.6%, 95% CI 2.4, 8.7, p < 0.001) and in GC-C (4.1%, 95% CI 1.1, 7.2, p = 0.011). We also found significant differences between denosumab and risedronate in percentage changes in cortical and trabecular microarchitectural parameters in GC-I and GC-C. Similar results were found at the tibia. To conclude, this HR-pQCT study shows that denosumab is superior to risedronate in terms of preventing FL loss at the distal radius and tibia in GC-I and in increasing FL at the radius in GC-C, based on significant differences in changes in the cortical and trabecular bone compartments between treatment groups in GC-I and GC-C. These results suggest that denosumab could be a useful therapeutic option in patients initiating GC therapy or on long-term GC therapy and may contribute to treatment decisions in this patient population. © 2022 The Authors. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research (ASBMR).

Animal Model for Glucocorticoid Induced Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review from 2011 to 2021

Clinical and experimental data have shown that prolonged exposure to GCs leads to bone loss and increases fracture risk. Special attention has been given to existing emerging drugs that can prevent and treat glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis GIOP. However, there is no consensus about the most relevant animal model treatments on GIOP. In this systematic review, we aimed to examine animal models of GIOP centering on study design, drug dose, timing and size of the experimental groups, allocation concealment, and outcome measures. The present review was written according to the PRISMA 2020 statement. Literature searches were performed in the PubMed electronic database via Mesh with the publication date set between April, 2011, and February 2021. A total of 284 full-text articles were screened and 53 were analyzed. The most common animal species used to model GIOP were rats (66%) and mice (32%). In mice studies, males (58%) were preferred and genetically modified animals accounted for 28%. Our work calls for a standardization of the establishment of the GIOP animal model with better precision for model selection. A described reporting design, conduction, and selection of outcome measures are recommended.

High fracture risk patients with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis should get an anabolic treatment first

Long-term glucocorticoid (GC) therapy induces glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis (GIOP) and its associated fractures. Most specialty organizations recommend bisphosphonates as first-line therapies based only on bone mineral density efficacy data. Effective treatment of GIOP based on head-to-head trials with fracture endpoint has not yet been established. The pathophysiologic mechanisms of GIOP that lead to the detrimental effects on bone are not yet fully elucidated. Although GCs in an early and transitory period promote osteoclastic activity, in the current paper, we outline why GIOP is in fact a disease of the bone formation and then provide the rationale for the use of bone-forming agents as first-line therapy for patients with high fracture risk in GIOP.

Prednisolone treatment reduces the osteogenic effects of loading in mice

Glucocorticoid treatment, a major cause of drug-induced osteoporosis and fractures, is widely used to treat inflammatory conditions and diseases. By contrast, mechanical loading increases bone mass and decreases fracture risk. With these relationships in mind, we investigated whether mechanical loading interacts with GC treatment in bone. Three-month-old female C57BL/6 mice were treated with high-dose prednisolone (15 mg/60 day pellets/mouse) or vehicle for two weeks. During the treatment, right tibiae were subjected to short periods of cyclic compressive loading three times weekly, while left tibiae were used as physiologically loaded controls. The bones were analyzed using peripheral quantitative computed tomography, histomorphometry, real-time PCR, three-point bending and Fourier transform infrared micro-spectroscopy. Loading alone increased trabecular volumetric bone mineral density (vBMD), cortical thickness, cortical area, osteoblast-associated gene expression, osteocyte- and osteoclast number, and bone strength. Prednisolone alone decreased cortical area and thickness and osteoblast-associated gene expression. Importantly, prednisolone treatment decreased the load-induced increase in trabecular vBMD by 57% (p < 0.001) and expression of osteoblast-associated genes, while completely abolishing the load-induced increase in cortical area, cortical thickness, number of osteocytes and osteoclasts, and bone strength. When combined, loading and prednisolone decreased the collagen content. In conclusion, high-dose prednisolone treatment strongly inhibits the loading-induced increase in trabecular BMD, and abolishes the loading-induced increase in cortical bone mass. This phenomenon could be due to prednisolone inhibition of osteoblast differentiation and function.

The ability of H1 or H2 receptor antagonists or their combination in counteracting the glucocorticoid-induced alveolar bone loss in rats

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to compare between three possible osteoporotic treatments in prevention of glucocorticoid-induced alveolar bone loss.

METHODS

Fifty adult female Wistar rats with an average weight 150-200 g were randomized into five groups: group I (control) was intraperitoneally injected with saline. The other experimental groups (II & III, IV & V) were intraperitoneally injected with 200 µg/100 g body weight dexamethasone. The experimental groups III, IV and V received intraperitoneal injection of 10 mg/kg/day pheniramine maleate (H1 receptor antagonist), ranitidine hydrochloride (H2 receptor antagonist) and concomitant doses of both H1 & H2 receptor antagonists respectively. After 30 days, the rats have been sacrificed. The mandibles were examined histologically, histochemically and histomorphometrically. The bone mineral density was measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DEXA).

RESULTS

Histopathologically the glucocorticoid group showed wide medullary cavities with wide osteocytic lacunae. These marrow cavities were reduced in the prophylactic groups (III, IV) but increased in group V. Bone histomorphometric analysis revealed improvement in static bone parameters in groups III and IV and deterioration in group V in comparison to group II. The DEXA revealed significant reduction in the bone mineral density in all experimental groups compared to the control group.

CONCLUSIONS

In a rat model, the administration of H1 or H2 receptor antagonists separately could minimize the alveolar bone loss caused by the administration of glucocorticoids while concomitant administration of both H1 and H2 receptor antagonists deteriorated the bone condition.

Bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: efficacy and tolerability

In this review, the efficacy concern relating to bisphosphonates therapy for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis is considered. Sole the randomised clinical trials that including more than 50 patients in each treatment arm were considered. This review also covered the safety of bisphosphonates in the setting of glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis with specific focus on atrial fibrillation, osteonecrosis of the jaw, upper gastrointestinal adverse events and esophageal cancer risk, atypical fractures and renal safety. These last adverse events have been selected due to the rationale of a possible additive, pathophysiologic or synergetic, deleterious effect of bisphosphonates and glucocorticoid on these organs. The available evidence for glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis treatment and management is much less important than for post-menopausal osteoporosis. However, based on randomised clinical trials with lumbar spine BMD as the primary endpoint after one year, bisphosphonates can be considered as efficacious. Alendronate, etidronate, risedronate and zoledronate prevented declines in spine BMD in adults receiving glucocorticoid. Treatment and prevention studies in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis have a short duration and have included smaller population than in post-menopausal osteoporosis. However in this setting, the safety profile of bisphosphonates in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis was good. Long-term use of bisphosphonates in patients treated with glucocorticoid might be cautiously monitored in order to prevent adverse effects.

Bone metabolism in cholestatic children before and after living-related liver transplantation--a long-term prospective study

Bone disorders are common in children with end-stage liver diseases, especially those associated with cholestasis. Abnormal hepatocyte function, disordered vitamin D metabolism and calcium-phosphorous homeostasis, malnutrition, and immunosuppressive treatment are potential risk factors of bone tissue pathology before and after transplantation. The aim of the study was to analyze the long-term effect of successful living-related liver transplantation (LRLTx) on skeletal status and bone metabolism in cholestatic children. Eighteen cholestatic children (1.4±0.5yr old; 12 females [F]/6 males [M]) qualified for LRLTx were analyzed; 16 (5F/11M) of them participated in long-term observation (V4). Serum levels of osteocalcin (OC), procollagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide (P1NP), cross-linked telopeptide of type 1 collagen (CTx), insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I), IGF-I binding protein 3 (IGFBP-3), parathyroid hormone (PTH), 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D), and 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D (1,25(OH)(2)D) were assayed before (V0) and 6mo (V1), 12mo (V2), 18mo (V3), and 4.4yr (V4) after LRLTx. Total body bone mineral content (TBBMC) and total body bone mineral density (TBBMD) were measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) at the same pattern. Before LRLTx, the OC, P1NP, CTx, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 levels as well as TBBMC and TBBMD were decreased compared with age-matched control group. The mean serum levels of 25(OH)D and 1,25(OH)(2)D were within reference ranges from V0 to V4. After LRLTx, the OC, P1NP, CTx, IGF-I, and IGFBP-3 as well as TBBMC and TBBMD reached the age-matched reference values. At V4, the level of P1NP decreased below and the PTH increased above the reference range that coincided with reduced Z-scores of both TBBMC (-1.11±1.24) and TBBMD (-1.00±1.19). P1NP and CTx, both measured at V3, correlated with IGF-I at V2 (R=0.86, p=0.014 and R=0.78, p=0.021, respectively) and PTH at V3 for P1NP and V1 for CTx (R=0.64, p=0.048 and R=0.54, p=0.038, respectively). The TBBMC changes between V0 and V4 correlated with IGF-I (R=0.68, p=0.015) and 1,25(OH)(2)D (R=0.54, p=0.025), both assayed at V1. The change of TBBMC Z-scores between V0 and V4 correlated with P1NP at V1 (R=0.69, p=0.002). The TBBMD changes between V0 and V4 correlated with CTx at V1 (R=0.54, p=0.027) and P1NP change between V0 and V1 (R=0.51, p=0.038). In short-term observation, successful LRLTx led to bone metabolism normalization triggered by probable anabolic action of IGF-I and PTH and manifested by TBBMC and TBBMD increases. In long-term horizon, moderately impaired DXA assessed bone status coincided with disturbances in bone metabolism. Bone metabolism markers, especially P1NP and CTx, appeared to be good predictors of changes in bone status evaluated by DXA.