1
|
Weng Z, Yang Y, Wang X, Wu L, Hua S, Zhang H, Meng Z. Parentage Analysis in Giant Grouper ( Epinephelus lanceolatus) Using Microsatellite and SNP Markers from Genotyping-by-Sequencing Data. Genes (Basel) 2021; 12:genes12071042. [PMID: 34356058 PMCID: PMC8304347 DOI: 10.3390/genes12071042] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/03/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Pedigree information is necessary for the maintenance of diversity for wild and captive populations. Accurate pedigree is determined by molecular marker-based parentage analysis, which may be influenced by the polymorphism and number of markers, integrity of samples, relatedness of parents, or different analysis programs. Here, we described the first development of 208 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) and 11 microsatellites for giant grouper (Epinephelus lanceolatus) taking advantage of Genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), and compared the power of SNPs and microsatellites for parentage and relatedness analysis, based on a mixed family composed of 4 candidate females, 4 candidate males and 289 offspring. CERVUS, PAPA and COLONY were used for mutually verification. We found that SNPs had a better potential for relatedness estimation, exclusion of non-parentage and individual identification than microsatellites, and > 98% accuracy of parentage assignment could be achieved by 100 polymorphic SNPs (MAF cut-off < 0.4) or 10 polymorphic microsatellites (mean Ho = 0.821, mean PIC = 0.651). This study provides a reference for the development of molecular markers for parentage analysis taking advantage of next-generation sequencing, and contributes to the molecular breeding, fishery management and population conservation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhuoying Weng
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
| | - Yang Yang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
| | - Xi Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
| | - Lina Wu
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
| | - Sijie Hua
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
| | - Hanfei Zhang
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
| | - Zining Meng
- State Key Laboratory of Biocontrol, Guangdong Province Key Laboratory for Aquatic Economic Animals, School of Life Sciences, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China; (Z.W.); (Y.Y.); (X.W.); (L.W.); (S.H.); (H.Z.)
- Southern Laboratory of Ocean Science and Engineering, Zhuhai 519000, China
- Correspondence:
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Gebrehiwot NZ, Strucken EM, Marshall K, Aliloo H, Gibson JP. SNP panels for the estimation of dairy breed proportion and parentage assignment in African crossbred dairy cattle. Genet Sel Evol 2021; 53:21. [PMID: 33653262 PMCID: PMC7923343 DOI: 10.1186/s12711-021-00615-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/23/2020] [Accepted: 02/17/2021] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Understanding the relationship between genetic admixture and phenotypic performance is crucial for the optimization of crossbreeding programs. The use of small sets of informative ancestry markers can be a cost-effective option for the estimation of breed composition and for parentage assignment in situations where pedigree recording is difficult. The objectives of this study were to develop small single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) panels that can accurately estimate the total dairy proportion and assign parentage in both West and East African crossbred dairy cows. METHODS Medium- and high-density SNP genotype data (Illumina BovineSNP50 and BovineHD Beadchip) for 4231 animals sampled from African crossbreds, African Bos taurus, European Bos taurus, Bos indicus, and African indigenous populations were used. For estimating breed composition, the absolute differences in allele frequency were calculated between pure ancestral breeds to identify SNPs with the highest discriminating power, and different combinations of SNPs weighted by ancestral origin were tested against estimates based on all available SNPs. For parentage assignment, informative SNPs were selected based on the highest minor allele frequency (MAF) in African crossbred populations assuming two Scenarios: (1) parents were selected among all the animals with known genotypes, and (2) parents were selected only among the animals known to be a parent of at least one progeny. RESULTS For the medium-density genotype data, SNPs selected for the largest differences in allele frequency between West African indigenous and European Bos taurus breeds performed best for most African crossbred populations and achieved a prediction accuracy (r2) for breed composition of 0.926 to 0.961 with 200 SNPs. For the high-density dataset, a panel with 70% of the SNPs selected on their largest difference in allele frequency between African and European Bos taurus performed best or very near best across all crossbred populations with r2 ranging from 0.978 to 0.984 with 200 SNPs. In all African crossbred populations, unambiguous parentage assignment was possible with ≥ 300 SNPs for the majority of the panels for Scenario 1 and ≥ 200 SNPs for Scenario 2. CONCLUSIONS The identified low-cost SNP assays could overcome incomplete or inaccurate pedigree records in African smallholder systems and allow effective breeding decisions to produce progeny of desired breed composition.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Netsanet Z. Gebrehiwot
- Centre for Genetic Analysis and Applications, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 Australia
| | - Eva M. Strucken
- Centre for Genetic Analysis and Applications, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 Australia
| | - Karen Marshall
- International Livestock Research Institute and Centre for Tropical Livestock Genetics and Health, Nairobi, Kenya
| | - Hassan Aliloo
- Centre for Genetic Analysis and Applications, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 Australia
| | - John P. Gibson
- Centre for Genetic Analysis and Applications, School of Environmental and Rural Science, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351 Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sanarana YP, Maiwashe A, Berry DP, Banga C, van Marle-Köster E. Evaluation of the International Society for Animal Genetics bovine single nucleotide polymorphism parentage panel in South African Bonsmara and Drakensberger cattle. Trop Anim Health Prod 2020; 53:32. [PMID: 33230675 DOI: 10.1007/s11250-020-02481-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/14/2020] [Accepted: 11/11/2020] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
A panel of 200 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) have been recommended by the International Society for Animal Genetics (ISAG) for use in parentage verification of cattle. While the SNPs included on the ISAG panel are segregating in European Bos taurus and Bos indicus breeds, their applicability in South African (SA) Sanga cattle has never been evaluated. This study, therefore, assessed the usefulness of the ISAG panel in SA Bonsmara (BON) and Drakensberger (DRB) cattle. Genotypes of 185 ISAG SNPs from 64 BON and 97 DRB sire-offspring pairs were available, all of which were validated with 119,375 SNPs. Of the 185 ISAG SNPs, 14 and 18 in the BON and DRB, respectively (9 in common to both breeds), were either monomorphic, exhibited at least one discordance between validated sire-offspring pairs, or had poor call rate or clustering issue. The mean minor allele frequency of the 185 ISAG SNPs was 0.331 in the BON and 0.359 in the DRB. The combined probability of parentage exclusion (PE) was the same (99.46%) for both breeds, while the probability of identity varied from 1.61 × 10-48 (BON) to 1.11 × 10-54 (DRB). Fifteen (23.4%) and 32 (33%) of the already validated sire-offspring pairs for the BON and DRB, respectively, were determined by the ISAG panel to be false-negatives based on a threshold of having at least two discordant SNPs. In comparison to sire discovery using the 119,375 SNPs, sire discovery using only the ISAG panel identified correctly 44 (out of 64 identified using the 119,375 SNPs) unique sire-offspring BON pairs and 62 (out of 97 identified using the 119,375 SNPs) unique sire-offspring DRB when all sires were masked. Five BON and three DRB offspring had > 1 sire nominated. This study demonstrated that the use of the ISAG panel may result in incorrect exclusions and multiple candidate sires for a given animal. Selection of more informative SNPs is, therefore, necessary in the pursuit of a low-cost and effective SNP panel for indigenous cattle breeds in SA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yandisiwe P Sanarana
- Department of Animal and Wildlife Science, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa. .,Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production, Irene, Pretoria, 0062, South Africa.
| | - Azwihangwisi Maiwashe
- Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production, Irene, Pretoria, 0062, South Africa
| | - Donagh P Berry
- Department of Animal and Wildlife Science, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa.,Teagasc, Animal & Grassland Research and Innovation Center, Moorepark, Fermoy, Co. Cork, Ireland
| | - Cuthbert Banga
- Agricultural Research Council-Animal Production, Irene, Pretoria, 0062, South Africa
| | - Este van Marle-Köster
- Department of Animal and Wildlife Science, University of Pretoria, Hatfield, Pretoria, 0002, South Africa
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Buchanan JW, MacNeil MD, Raymond RC, Nilles AR, Van Eenennaam AL. Comparison of economic returns among genetic evaluation strategies in a 2-tiered Charolais-sired beef cattle production system1,2. J Anim Sci 2018; 96:4076-4086. [PMID: 30053023 PMCID: PMC6162591 DOI: 10.1093/jas/sky286] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2018] [Accepted: 07/11/2018] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
The objective of this study was to estimate economic returns and costs associated with 4 scenarios of genetic evaluation that combine genotypes, phenotypes, and pedigree information from a vertically integrated purebred (PB) and commercial (CM) beef cattle system. Inference was to a genetic evaluation for a production system producing Charolais terminal sires for 10,000 CM cows. The first genetic evaluation scenario, denoted PB_A, modeled a genetic evaluation in which pedigree information and phenotypes are available for PB seedstock animals. Scenario PB_H contained the same information as PB_A with the addition of 25K density (GeneSeek Genomic Profiler LD) single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) genotypes from PB animals. Scenario PBCM_A contained pedigree records and phenotypes from PB and CM cattle. Scenario PBCM_H contained phenotypes, pedigree, and genotypes from the PB and CM animals. Estimates of prediction error variance, (co)variance, and selection index parameters were used to estimate accuracy of selection candidates (rTI) and genetic gain resulting from selection on an economic index in US dollars (ΔG). Annual costs and incomes were used to determine the 30-yr cumulative net present value (CNPV) per CM calf resulting from selection in these genetic evaluation scenarios. Adding genotypes and CM production phenotypes to genetic evaluation increased the rTI of selection candidates and ΔG across all 4 scenarios. Scenario PBCM_H produced the highest annual ΔG in the PB herd at US$11.91 per head. Including CM phenotypes and parentage testing in the genetic evaluation increased the time to breakeven from 12 yr in PB_A to 19 years in PBCM_A after accounting for the cost of that information. Adding CM phenotypes and genotypes increased the breakeven time from 12 yr in PB_H to 18 yr in PBCM_H. Scenario PB_H produced the highest 30-yr CNPV per slaughtered CM calf at US$371.16. These results using field data indicate that economically relevant rTI and ΔG can be realized by adding 25K SNP genotypes and CM phenotypes to genetic evaluation, but the additional cost of that data significantly delays the economic return to the enterprise.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justin W Buchanan
- Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, CA
- J. R. Simplot Land and Livestock, Grand View, ID
| | - Michael D MacNeil
- Delta G, Miles City, MT
- Animal, Wildlife and Grassland Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|