A CR1 element is embedded in a novel tandem repeat (HinfI repeat) within the chicken genome

Transposable Elements as a Source of Novel Repetitive DNA in the Eukaryote Genome

The impact of transposable elements (TEs) on the evolution of the eukaryote genome has been observed in a number of biological processes, such as the recruitment of the host's gene expression network or the rearrangement of genome structure. However, TEs may also provide a substrate for the emergence of novel repetitive elements, which contribute to the generation of new genomic components during the course of the evolutionary process. In this review, we examine published descriptions of TEs that give rise to tandem sequences in an attempt to comprehend the relationship between TEs and the emergence of de novo satellite DNA families in eukaryotic organisms. We evaluated the intragenomic behavior of the TEs, the role of their molecular structure, and the chromosomal distribution of the paralogous copies that generate arrays of repeats as a substrate for the emergence of new repetitive elements in the genome. We highlight the involvement and importance of TEs in the eukaryote genome and its remodeling processes.

Transposons-Based Clonal Diversity in Trematode Involves Parts of CR1 (LINE) in Eu- and Heterochromatin

Trematode parthenitae have long been believed to form clonal populations, but clonal diversity has been discovered in this asexual stage of the lifecycle. Clonal polymorphism in the model species Himasthla elongata has been previously described, but the source of this phenomenon remains unknown. In this work, we traced cercarial clonal diversity using a simplified amplified fragment length polymorphism (SAFLP) method and characterised the nature of fragments in diverse electrophoretic bands. The repetitive elements were identified in both the primary sequence of the H. elongata genome and in the transcriptome data. Long-interspersed nuclear elements (LINEs) and long terminal repeat retrotransposons (LTRs) were found to represent an overwhelming majority of the genome and the transposon transcripts. Most sequenced fragments from SAFLP pattern contained the reverse transcriptase (RT, ORF2) domains of LINEs, and only a few sequences belonged to ORFs of LTRs and ORF1 of LINEs. A fragment corresponding to a CR1-like (LINE) spacer region was discovered and named CR1-renegade (CR1-rng). In addition to RT-containing CR1 transcripts, we found short CR1-rng transcripts in the redia transcriptome and short contigs in the mobilome. Probes against CR1-RT and CR1-rng presented strikingly different pictures in FISH mapping, despite both being fragments of CR1. In silico data and Southern blotting indicated that CR1-rng is not tandemly organised. CR1 involvement in clonal diversity is discussed.

Conversion of DNA Sequences: From a Transposable Element to a Tandem Repeat or to a Gene

Eukaryotic genomes are rich in repetitive DNA sequences grouped in two classes regarding their genomic organization: tandem repeats and dispersed repeats. In tandem repeats, copies of a short DNA sequence are positioned one after another within the genome, while in dispersed repeats, these copies are randomly distributed. In this review we provide evidence that both tandem and dispersed repeats can have a similar organization, which leads us to suggest an update to their classification based on the sequence features, concretely regarding the presence or absence of retrotransposons/transposon specific domains. In addition, we analyze several studies that show that a repetitive element can be remodeled into repetitive non-coding or coding sequences, suggesting (1) an evolutionary relationship among DNA sequences, and (2) that the evolution of the genomes involved frequent repetitive sequence reshuffling, a process that we have designated as a "DNA remodeling mechanism". The alternative classification of the repetitive DNA sequences here proposed will provide a novel theoretical framework that recognizes the importance of DNA remodeling for the evolution and plasticity of eukaryotic genomes.

Mouse chromocenters DNA content: sequencing and in silico analysis

BACKGROUND

Chromocenters are defined as a punctate condensed blocks of chromatin in the interphase cell nuclei of certain cell types with unknown biological significance. In recent years a progress in revealing of chromocenters protein content has been made although the details of DNA content within constitutive heterochromatin still remain unclear. It is known that these regions are enriched in tandem repeats (TR) and transposable elements. Quick improvement of genome sequencing does not help to assemble the heterochromatic regions due to lack of appropriate bioinformatics techniques.

RESULTS

Chromocenters DNA have been isolated by a biochemical approach from mouse liver cells nuclei and sequenced on the Illumina MiSeq resulting in ChrmC dataset. Analysis of ChrmC dataset by the bioinformatics tools available revealed that the major component of chromocenter DNA are TRs: ~ 66% MaSat and ~ 4% MiSat. Other previously classified TR families constitute ~ 1% of ChrmC dataset. About 6% of chromocenters DNA are mostly unannotated sequences. In the contigs assembled with IDBA_UD there are many fragments of heterochromatic Y-chromosome, rDNA and other pseudo-genes and non-coding DNA. A protein coding sfi1 homolog gene fragment was also found in contigs. The Sfi1 homolog gene is located on the chromosome 11 in the reference genome very close to the Golden Pass Gap (a ~ 3 Mb empty region reserved to the pericentromeric region) and proves the purity of chromocenters isolation. The second major fraction are non-LTR retroposons (SINE and LINE) with overwhelming majority of LINE - ~ 11% of ChrmC. Most of the LINE fragments are from the ~ 2 kb region at the end of the 2nd ORF and its' flanking region. The precise LINEs' segment of ~ 2 kb is the necessary mouse constitutive heterohromatin component together with TR. The third most abundant fraction are ERVs. The ERV distribution in chromocenters differs from the whole genome: IAP (ERV2 class) is the most numerous in ChrmC while MaLR (ERV3 class) prevails in the reference genome. IAP and its LTR also prevail in TR containing contigs extracted from the WGS dataset. In silico prediction of IAP and LINE fragments in chromocenters was confirmed by direct fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH).

CONCLUSION

Our data of chromocenters' DNA (ChrmC) sequencing demonstrate that IAP with LTR and a precise ~ 2 kb fragment of LINE represent a substantial fraction of mouse chromocenters (constitutive heteroсhromatin) along with TRs.

Structural and functional liaisons between transposable elements and satellite DNAs

Transposable elements (TEs) and satellite DNAs (satDNAs) are typically identified as major repetitive DNA components in eukaryotic genomes. TEs are DNA segments able to move throughout a genome while satDNAs are tandemly repeated sequences organized in long arrays. Both classes of repetitive sequences are extremely diverse, and many TEs and satDNAs exist within a genome. Although they differ in structure, genomic organization, mechanisms of spread, and evolutionary dynamics, TEs and satDNAs can share sequence similarity and organizational patterns, thus indicating that complex mutual relationships can determine their evolution, and ultimately define roles they might have on genome architecture and function. Motivated by accumulating data about sequence elements that incorporate features of both TEs and satDNAs, here we present an overview of their structural and functional liaisons.

Three-dimensional architecture of tandem repeats in chicken interphase nucleus

Tandem repeats belong to a class of genomic repetitive elements that form arrays of head-to-tail monomers. Due to technical difficulties in sequencing and assembly of large tandem repeat arrays, it remains largely unknown by which mechanisms tandem-repeat-containing regions aid in maintenance of ordered radial genome organization during interphase. Here we analyzed spatial distribution of several types of tandem repeats in interphase nuclei of chicken MDCC-MSB1 cells and somatic tissues relative to heterochromatin compartments and nuclear center. We showed that telomere and subtelomere repeats generally localize at the nuclear or chromocenters periphery. A tandem repeat known as CNM, typical for centromere regions of gene-dense microchromosomes, forms interchromosome clusters and occupies DAPI-positive chromocenters that appear predominantly within the nuclear interior. In contrast, centromere-specific tandem repeats of the majority of gene-poor macrochromosomes are embedded into the peripheral layer of heterochromatin. Chicken chromocenters rarely comprise centromere sequences of both macro- and microchromosomes, whose territories localize in different radial nuclear zones. Possible mechanisms of observed tandem repeats positioning and its implication in highly ordered arrangement of chromosome territories in chicken interphase nucleus are discussed.

Chickens possess centromeres with both extended tandem repeats and short non-tandem-repetitive sequences

The centromere is essential for faithful chromosome segregation by providing the site for kinetochore assembly. Although the role of the centromere is conserved throughout evolution, the DNA sequences associated with centromere regions are highly divergent among species and it remains to be determined how centromere DNA directs kinetochore formation. Despite the active use of chicken DT40 cells in studies of chromosome segregation, the sequence of the chicken centromere was unclear. Here, we performed a comprehensive analysis of chicken centromere DNA which revealed unique features of chicken centromeres compared with previously studied vertebrates. Centromere DNA sequences from the chicken macrochromosomes, with the exception of chromosome 5, contain chromosome-specific homogenous tandem repetitive arrays that span several hundred kilobases. In contrast, the centromeres of chromosomes 5, 27, and Z do not contain tandem repetitive sequences and span non-tandem-repetitive sequences of only approximately 30 kb. To test the function of these centromere sequences, we conditionally removed the centromere from the Z chromosome using genetic engineering and have shown that that the non-tandem-repeat sequence of chromosome Z is a functional centromere.

DNA methylation immediately adjacent to active histone marking does not silence transcription

Active promoters generally contain histone H3/H4 hyperacetylation and tri-methylation at H3 lysine 4, whereas repressed promoters are associated with DNA methylation. Here we show that the repressed erythroid-specific carbonic anhydrase II (CAII) promoter has active histone modifications localized around the transcription start, while high levels of CpG methylation are present directly upstream from these active marks. Despite the presence of active histone modifications, the repressed promoter requires hormone-induced activation for efficient preinitiation complex assembly. Transient and positional changes in histone H3/H4 acetylation and local changes in nucleosome density are evident during activation, but the bipartite epigenetic code is stably maintained. Our results suggest that active histone modifications may prevent spreading of CpG methylation towards the promoter and show that repressive DNA methylation immediately adjacent to a promoter does not necessarily repress transcription.

The intragenomic polymorphism of a partially inverted repeat (PIR) in Gallus gallus domesticus, potential role of inverted repeats in satellite DNAs evolution

We report here the molecular characterization of the basic repeating unit of a novel repetitive family, partially inverted repeat (PIR), previously identified from chicken genome. This repetitive DNA family shares a close evolutionary relationship with XhoI/EcoRI repeats and chicken nuclear-membrane-associated (CNM) repeat. Sequence analyses reveal the 1430 bp basic repeating unit can be divided into two regions: the central region ( approximately 1000 bp) and the flanking region ( approximately 430 bp). Within the central region, a pair of repeats (86 bp) flanks the central core ( approximately 828 bp) in inversed orientation. Due to the tandem array feature shared by the repeating units, the inverted repeats fall between the central core and flanking region. Southern blot analyses further reveal the intragenomic polymorphism of PIR, and the molecular size of repeating units ranges from 1.1 kb to 1.6 kb. The identified monomer variants may result from multiple crossing-over events, implying the potential roles of inverted repeats in satellite DNAs variation.