Tissue temperature transients in resting contra-lateral leg muscle tissue during isolated knee extension

Noninvasive assessment of muscle temperature during rest, exercise, and postexercise recovery in different environments

We introduced noninvasive and accurate techniques to estimate muscle temperature (Tm) of vastus lateralis (VL), triceps brachii (TB), and trapezius (TRAP) during rest, exercise, and postexercise recovery using the insulation disk (iDISK) technique. Thirty-six volunteers (24 men, 12 women; 73.0 ± 12.2 kg; 1.75 ± 0.07 m; 24.4 ± 5.5 yr; 49.2 ± 6.8 ml·kg(-1)·min(-1) peak oxygen uptake) underwent periods of rest, cycling exercise at 40% of peak oxygen uptake, and postexercise recovery in three environments: Normal (24°C, 56% relative humidity), Hot-Humid (30°C, 60% relative humidity), and Hot-Dry (40°C, 24% relative humidity). Participants were randomly allocated into the "model" and the "validation" groups. Results in the model group demonstrated that Tm (VL: 36.65 ± 1.27°C; TB: 35.76 ± 1.73°C; TRAP: 36.53 ± 0.96°C) was increased compared with iDISK (VL: 35.67 ± 1.71°C; TB: 34.77 ± 2.27°C; TRAP: 35.98 ± 1.34°C) across all environments (P < 0.001). Stepwise regression analysis generated models that accurately predicted Tm (predTm) of VL (R(2) = 0.73-0.91), TB (R(2) = 0.85-0.93), and TRAP (R(2) = 0.84-0.86) using iDISK and the difference between the current iDISK temperature and that recorded between 1 and 4 min before. Cross-validation analyses in the validation group demonstrated small differences (P < 0.05) of no physiological significance, small effect size of the differences, and strong associations (r = 0.85-0.97; P < 0.001) between Tm and predTm. Moreover, narrow 95% limits of agreement and low percent coefficient of variation were observed between Tm and predTm. It is concluded that the developed noninvasive, practical, and inexpensive techniques provide accurate estimations of VL, TB, and TRAP Tm during rest, cycling exercise, and postexercise recovery.

External muscle heating during warm-up does not provide added performance benefit above external heating in the recovery period alone

PURPOSE

Having previously shown the use of passive external heating between warm-up completion and sprint cycling to have had a positive effect on muscle temperature (T m) and maximal sprint performance, we sought to determine whether adding passive heating during active warm up was of further benefit.

METHODS

Ten trained male cyclists completed a standardised 15 min sprint based warm-up on a cycle ergometer, followed by 30 min passive recovery before completing a 30 s maximal sprint test. Warm up was completed either with or without additional external passive heating. During recovery, external passive leg heating was used in both standard warm-up (CONHOT) and heated warm-up (HOTHOT) conditions, for control, a standard tracksuit was worn (CON).

RESULTS

T m declined exponentially during CON, CONHOT and HOTHOT reduced the exponential decline during recovery. Peak (11.1 %, 1561 ± 258 W and 1542 ± 223 W), relative (10.6 % 21.0 ± 2.2 W kg(-1) and 20.9 ± 1.8 W kg(-1)) and mean (4.1 %, 734 ± 126 W and 729 ± 125 W) power were all improved with CONHOT and HOTHOT, respectively compared to CON (1,397 ± 239 W; 18.9 ± 3.0 W kg(-1) and 701 ± 109 W). There was no additional benefit of HOTHOT on T m or sprint performance compared to CONHOT.

CONCLUSION

External heating during an active warm up does not provide additional physiological or performance benefit. As noted previously, external heating is capable of reducing the rate of decline in T m after an active warm-up, improving subsequent sprint cycling performance.

Disturbance of thermal homeostasis following dynamic exercise

Recovery from dynamic exercise results in significant perturbations of thermoregulatory control. These perturbations evoke a prolonged elevation in core body temperature and a concomitant decrease in sweating, skin blood flow, and skin temperature to pre-exercise baseline values within the early stages of recovery. Cutaneous vasodilation and sweating are critical responses necessary for effective thermoregulation during heat stress in humans. The ability to modulate the rate of heat loss through adjustments in vasomotor and sudomotor activity is a fundamental mechanism of thermoregulatory homeostasis. There is a growing body of evidence in support of a possible relationship between hemodynamic changes postexercise and heat loss responses. Specifically, nonthermoregulatory factors, such as baroreceptors, associated with hemodynamic changes, influence the regulation of core body temperature during exercise recovery. The following review will examine the etiology of the post-exercise disturbance in thermal homeostasis and evaluate possible thermal and nonthermal factors associated with a prolonged hyperthermic state following exercise.

Postexercise hypotension causes a prolonged perturbation in esophageal and active muscle temperature recovery

We examined the effect of two levels of exercise-induced hypotension on esophageal (Tes) and active and nonactive muscle temperatures during and following exercise. Seven males performed an incremental isotonic test on a Kin-Com isokinetic apparatus to determine their peak oxygen consumption during bilateral knee extensions (VO2sp). This was followed on separate days by 15-min of isolated bilateral knee extensions at moderate (60% VO2sp) (MEI) and high (80% VO2sp) (HEI) exercise intensities, followed by 90 min of recovery. Muscle temperature was measured with an intramuscular probe inserted in the left vastus medialis (Tvm) and triceps brachii (Ttb) muscles under ultrasound guidance. The deepest sensor (tip) was located approximately 10 mm from the femur and deep femoral artery and from the superior ulnar collateral artery and humerus for the Tvm and Ttb, respectively. Additional sensors were located 15 and 30 mm from the tip with an additional sensor located at 45 mm for the Tvm measurements only. Following exercise, mean arterial pressure (MAP) remained significantly below preexercise rest for the initial 60 min of recovery after MEI and for the duration of the postexercise recovery period after HEI (P< or =0.05). After HEI, significantly greater elevations from preexercise rest were recorded for Tes and all muscle temperatures paralleled a greater decrease in MAP compared with MEI (P< or =0.05). By the end of 90-min postexercise recovery, MAP, Tes, and all muscle temperatures remained significantly greater after HEI than MEI. Furthermore, a significantly shallower muscle temperature profile across Tvm, relative to preexercise rest, was observed at the end of exercise for both HEI and MEI (P< or=0.05), and for 30 min of recovery for MEI and throughout 90 min of recovery for HEI. No significant differences in muscle temperature profile were observed for Ttb. Thus we conclude that the increase in the postexercise hypotensive response, induced by exercise of increasing intensity, was paralleled by an increase in the magnitude and recovery time of the postexercise esophageal and active muscle temperatures.

A three-compartment thermometry model for the improved estimation of changes in body heat content

The aim of this study was to use whole body calorimetry to directly measure the change in body heat content (DeltaH(b)) during steady-state exercise and compare these values with those estimated using thermometry. The thermometry models tested were the traditional two-compartment model of "core" and "shell" temperatures, and a three-compartment model of "core," "muscle," and "shell" temperatures; with individual compartments within each model weighted for their relative influence upon DeltaH(b) by coefficients subject to a nonnegative and a sum-to-one constraint. Fifty-two participants performed 90 min of moderate-intensity exercise (40% of Vo(2 peak)) on a cycle ergometer in the Snellen air calorimeter, at regulated air temperatures of 24 degrees C or 30 degrees C and a relative humidity of either 30% or 60%. The "core" compartment was represented by temperatures measured in the esophagus (T(es)), rectum (T(re)), and aural canal (T(au)), while the "muscle" compartment was represented by regional muscle temperature measured in the vastus lateralis (T(vl)), triceps brachii (T(tb)), and upper trapezius (T(ut)). The "shell" compartment was represented by the weighted mean of 12 skin temperatures (T(sk)). The whole body calorimetry data were used to derive optimally fitting two- and three-compartment thermometry models. The traditional two-compartment model was found to be statistically biased, systematically underestimating DeltaH(b) by 15.5% (SD 31.3) at 24 degrees C and by 35.5% (SD 21.9) at 30 degrees C. The three-compartment model showed no such bias, yielding a more precise estimate of DeltaH(b) as evidenced by a mean estimation error of 1.1% (SD 29.5) at 24 degrees C and 5.4% (SD 30.0) at 30 degrees C with an adjusted R(2) of 0.48 and 0.51, respectively. It is concluded that a major source of error in the estimation of DeltaH(b) using the traditional two-compartment thermometry model is the lack of an expression independently representing the heat storage in muscle during exercise.

Confounding factors in the use of the zero-heat-flow method for non-invasive muscle temperature measurement

This study evaluated a zero-heat-flow (ZHF), non-invasive temperature probe for in- vivo measurement of resting muscle temperature for up to 2 cm below the skin surface. The ZHF probe works by preventing heat loss from the tissue below the probe by actively heating the tissue until no temperature gradient exists across the probe. The skin temperature under the probe is then used as an indicator of the muscle temperature below. Eight subjects sat for 130 min during exposure to 28 degrees C air. Vastus lateralis (lateral thigh) muscle temperature was measured non-invasively using a ZHF probe which covered an invasive multicouple probe (which measured tissue temperature 0.5 cm, 1 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm below the skin) located 15 cm superior to the patella (T (covered)). T (covered) was evaluated against an uncovered control multicouple probe located 20 cm superior to the patella (T (uncovered)). Rectal temperature and lateral thigh skin temperature were also measured. Mean T (uncovered) (based on average temperatures at the 0.5 cm, 1 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm depths) and Mean T (covered) were similar from time 0 min to 60 min. However, when the ZHF was turned on at 70 min, Mean T (covered) increased by 2.11 +/- 0.20 degrees C by 130 min, while T (uncovered) remained stable. The ZHF probe temperature was similar to T (covered) at 1 cm and after time 85 min, significantly higher than T (covered) at the 0.5 cm, 1.5 cm, and 2 cm depths; however from a physiological standpoint, the temperatures between the different depths and the ZHF probe could be considered uniform (< or =0.2 degrees C separation). Rectal and thigh skin temperatures were stable at 36.99 +/- 0.08 degrees C and 32.82 +/- 0.23 degrees C, respectively. In conclusion, the non-invasive ZHF probe temperature was similar to the T (covered) temperatures directly measured up to 2 cm beneath the surface of the thigh, but all T (covered) temperatures were not representative of the true muscle temperature up to 2 cm below the skin because the ZHF probe heated the muscle by 2.11 +/- 0.20 degrees C during its operation.

Muscle temperature transients before, during, and after exercise measured using an intramuscular multisensor probe

Seven subjects (1 woman) performed an incremental isotonic test on a Kin-Com isokinetic apparatus to determine their maximal oxygen consumption during bilateral knee extensions (Vo(2 sp)). A multisensor thermal probe was inserted into the left vastus medialis (middiaphysis) under ultrasound guidance. The deepest sensor (tip) was located approximately 10 mm from the femur and deep femoral artery (T(mu 10)), with additional sensors located 15 (T(mu 25)) and 30 mm (T(mu 40)) from the tip. Esophageal temperature (T(es)) was measured as an index of core temperature. Subjects rested in an upright seated position for 60 min in an ambient condition of 22 degrees C. They then performed 15 min of isolated bilateral knee extensions (60% of Vo(2 sp)) on a Kin-Com, followed by 60 min of recovery. Resting T(es) was 36.80 degrees C, whereas T(mu 10), T(mu 25), and T(mu 40) were 36.14, 35.86, and 35.01 degrees C, respectively. Exercise resulted in a T(es) increase of 0.55 degrees C above preexercise resting, whereas muscle temperature of the exercising leg increased by 2.00, 2.37, and 3.20 degrees C for T(mu 10), T(mu 25), and T(mu 40), respectively. Postexercise T(es) showed a rapid decrease followed by a prolonged sustained elevation approximately 0.3 degrees C above resting. Muscle temperature decreased gradually over the course of recovery, with values remaining significantly elevated by 0.92, 1.05, and 1.77 degrees C for T(mu 10), T(mu 25), and T(mu 40), respectively, at end of recovery (P < 0.05). These results suggest that the transfer of residual heat from previously active musculature may contribute to the sustained elevation in postexercise T(es).