Metabolism of alkyl lysophospholipid in epithelial cancer cell lines and inhibition of cell growth

Synthetic Glycosylated Ether Glycerolipids as Anticancer Agents

Glycosylated antitumor ether lipids (GAELs) are a class of synthetic antitumor ether lipids (AELs) with a sugar moiety in place of the phosphocholine found in the prototypical AEL, edelfosine. This chapter reviews the development of GAELs as antitumor agents. Studies on structure–activity relationships, mechanism of induction of cell death, metabolism, selectivity against cancer cells, toxicity, hemolysis and thrombogenic effects are discussed. The requirements for significant cytotoxic activity include a glycerol moiety, a cationic sugar other than mannose and an O- or C-glycosidic bond with either α- or β-configuration. Compounds with S- and N-glycosidic linkages are not very active. The most active GAEL to date, 1-O-hexadecyl-2-O-methyl-3-O-(2′-amino-2′-deoxy-α-d-galactopyranosyl)-sn-glycerol, displays greater in vitro activity than edelfosine, the AEL “gold standard”. The unique properties of GAELs as antitumor agents include their apoptotic-independent mechanism of inducing cell death and the ability to kill cancer stem cells. These characteristics of GAELs offer the potential for their development into chemotherapeutic agents to prevent the recurrence of tumors as well as for treatment against drug-resistant cancers.

Edelfosine and perifosine disrupt hepatic mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and induce the permeability transition

Edelfosine and perifosine are alkylphospholipids that have been intensively studied as potential antitumor agents. Apoptotic cell death caused by these two compounds is mediated, at least in part, through mitochondria. Additionally, previous works demonstrated that edelfosine induces changes in mitochondrial membrane permeability that are somehow reduced by using cyclosporin A. Therefore, the objective of the present study was not only to confirm mitochondrial permeability transition but also identify direct effects of both ether lipids on mitochondrial hepatic fractions, namely on mitochondrial oxidative phosphorylation and generation of hydrogen peroxide (H(2)O(2)) through the respiratory chain. Results show that edelfosine and perifosine inhibit mitochondrial respiration and decrease transmembrane electric potential. However, despite these effects, edelfosine and perifosine were still able to induce mitochondrial permeability transition in non-energized mitochondria. Interestingly, edelfosine decreased H(2)O(2) production through the respiratory chain. In conclusion, the present work demonstrates previously unknown alterations of mitochondrial physiology directly induced by edelfosine and perifosine. The study is relevant in the understanding of mitochondrial-target effects of both compounds, as well as to acknowledge possible toxic responses in non-tumor organs.

The antiproliferative effect of hexadecylphosphocholine toward HL60 cells is prevented by exogenous lysophosphatidylcholine

The mechanisms that account for the anti-proliferative properties of the biologically active lysophospholipid analog hexadecylphosphocholine (HexPC) were investigated in HL60 cells. HexPC inhibited the incorporation of choline into phosphatidylcholine and the pattern of accumulation of soluble choline-derived metabolites pinpointed CTP:phosphocholine cytidylyltransferase (CT) as the inhibited step in vivo. HexPC also inhibited recombinant CT in vitro. HexPC treatment led to accumulation of cells in G2/M phase, triggered DNA fragmentation and caused morphological changes associated with apoptosis. The supplementation of HexPC-treated cells with exogenous lysophosphatidylcholine (LPC) completely reversed the cytotoxic effects of HexPC and restored HL60 cell proliferation in the presence of the drug. LPC provided an alternate pathway for phosphatidylcholine synthesis via the acylation of exogenous LPC. This result contrasted with the response of HL60 cells to 1-O-octadecyl-2-O-methyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine (ET-18-OCH3) where LPC overcame the cytotoxic effects but did not support continued cell proliferation. Morphological integrity, DNA stability and cell viability were maintained in cells treated with LPC plus either antineoplastic agent. Thus the inhibition of phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis at the CT step accounts for the cytotoxicity of both HexPC and ET-18-OCH3 which is overridden by providing an alternate pathway for phosphatidylcholine synthesis via the acylation of exogenous LPC.

Analogs of alkyllysophospholipids: chemistry, effects on the molecular level and their consequences for normal and malignant cells

In the search for new approaches to cancer therapy, the first alkyllysophospholipid (ALP) analogs were designed and studied about two decades ago, either as potential immunomodulators or as antimetabolites of phospholipid metabolism. In the meantime, it has been demonstrated that they really act in this way. However, their special importance is based on the fact that, in addition, they interfere with key events of signal transduction, such as hormone (or cytokine)-receptor binding or processing, protein kinase C or phospholipase C function and phosphatidylinositol and calcium metabolism. There are no strict structural requirements for their activity. Differences in the cellular uptake or the state of cellular differentiation seem to be mainly responsible for higher or lower sensitivities of cells towards ALP analogs. Consequences of the molecular effects mentioned on the cellular level are cytostasis, induction of differentiation (while in contrast the effects of known inducers of differentiation such as 12-O-tetradecanoylphorbol-13-acetate are inhibited, probably as a consequence of protein kinase C inhibition) and loss of invasive properties. Already in sublytic concentrations, alterations in the membrane structure were observed, and lysis may begin at concentrations not much higher than those causing the other effects described. Few ALP analogs have already entered clinical studies or are in clinical use. ALP analogs are the only antineoplastic agents that do not act directly on the formation and function of the cellular replication machinery. Therefore, their effects are independent of the proliferative state of the target cells. Because of their interference with cellular regulatory events, including those failing in cancer cells, ALP analogs, beyond their clinical importance, are interesting model compounds for the development of new, more selective drugs for cancer therapy.