A novel vasopressin peptide lowers blood pressure through decreases in cardiac output

Role of spleen in integrated control of splanchnic vascular tone: physiology and pathophysiology

Aside from its established immunologic and hematologic functions, the spleen also plays an important role in cardiovascular regulation. This occurs through changes in intrasplenic microvascular tone, as well as through splenic neurohormonal modulation of the renal and mesenteric vascular beds. Splenic regulation of blood volume occurs predominantly through fluid extravasation from the splenic circulation into lymphatic reservoirs; this is controlled by direct modulation of splenic pre- and postcapillary resistance by established physiologic agents such as atrial natriuretic peptide (ANP), nitric oxide (NO), and adrenomedullin (ADM). In addition to physiologic fluid regulation, splenic extravasation is a key factor in the inability to maintain adequate intravascular volume in septic shock. The spleen also controls renal microvascular tone through reflex activation of the splenic afferent and renal sympathetic nerves. This splenorenal reflex not only contributes to the physiologic regulation of blood pressure, but also contributes to the cardiovascular dysregulation associated with both septic shock and portal hypertension. In septic shock, the splenorenal reflex protectively limits splenic extravasation and potentially promotes renal sodium and water reabsorption and release of the vasoconstrictor angiotensin II; this function is eventually overwhelmed as shock progresses. In portal hypertension, on the other hand, the splenorenal reflex-mediated reduction in renal vascular conductance exacerbates sodium and water retention in the kidneys and may eventually contribute to renal dysfunction. Preliminary evidence suggests that the spleen also may play a role in the hemodynamic complications of portal hypertension via neurohormonal modulation of the mesenteric vascular bed. Lastly, the spleen itself may be a source of a vasoactive factor.

Design and synthesis of potent, highly selective vasopressin hypotensive agonists

We report here the solid-phase synthesis and vasodepressor potencies of a new lead vasopressin (VP) hypotensive peptide [1(beta-mercapto-beta,beta-pentamethylenepropionic acid)-2-0-ethyl-D-tyrosine, 3-arginine, 4-valine, 7-lysine, 9-ethylenediamine] lysine vasopressin, d(CH(2))(5)[D-Tyr(Et)(2), Arg(3), Val(4), Lys(7), Eda(9)]LVP (C) and 21 analogues of C with single modifications at positions 9 (1-13), 6 (14), 2 (16-20) and combined modifications at positions 6 and 10 (15) and 2 and 10 (21). Peptides 1-13 have the following replacements for the Eda residue at position 9 in C: (1) Gly-NH(2); (2) Gly-NH-CH(3); (3) Ala-NH(2); (4) Ala-NH-CH(3), (5) Val-NH(2); (6) Cha-NH(2); (7) Thr-NH(2); (8) Phe-NH(2); (9) Tyr-NH(2); (10) Orn-NH(2); (11) Lys-NH(2); (12) D-Lys-NH(2); (13) Arg-NH(2). Peptide 14 has the Cys residue at position 6 replaced by Pen. Peptide 15 is the retro-Tyr(10) analogue of peptide 14. Peptides 16-20 have the D-Tyr(Et) residue at position 2 in C replaced by the following substituents: D-Trp (16); D-2-Nal (17); D-Tyr(Bu(t))(18); D-Tyr(Pr(n)) (19); D-Tyr(Pr(i)) (20). Peptide 21 is the retro-Tyr(10) analogue of peptide 20. C and peptides 1-21 were evaluated for agonistic and antagonistic activities in in vivo vasopressor (V(1a)-receptor), antidiuretic (V(2)-receptor), and in in vitro (no Mg(2+)) oxytocic (OT-receptor) assays in the rat, and, like the original hypotensive peptide, d(CH(2))(5)[D-Tyr(Et)(2), Arg(3), Val(4)]AVP (A) (Manning et al., J. Peptide Science 1999, 5:472-490), were found to exhibit no or negligible activities in these assays. Vasodepressor potencies were determined in anesthetized male rats with baseline mean arterial blood pressure (BP) maintained at 100-120 mmHg. The effective dose (ED), in microg/100 g i.v., the dose required to produce a vasodepressor response of 5 cm(2) area under the vasodepressor response curve (AUC) during the 5-min period following the injection of the test peptide, was determined. The EDs measure the vasodepressor potencies of the hypotensive peptides C and 1-21 relative to that of A (ED = 4.66 microg/100 g) and to each other. The following ED values in microg/100 g were obtained for C and for peptides 1-21; C 0.53; (1) 2.41; (2) 1.13; (3) 1.62; (4) 0.80; (5) 1.83; (6) 1.56; (7) 2.12, (8) 2.58; (9) 1.40; (10) 0.88; (11) 0.90; (12) 0.85; (13) 0.68; (14) 0.99; (15) 1.05; (16) 0.66; (17) 0.54; (18) 0.33; (19) 0.18; (20) 0.15; (21) 0.14. All of the hypotensive peptides reported here are more potent than A. Peptides 20 and 21 exhibit a striking 30-fold enhancement in vasodepressor potencies relative to A. With a vasodepressor ED = 0.14, peptide 21 is the most potent VP vasodepressor agonist reported to date. Because it contains a retro-Tyr(10) residue, it is a promising new radioiodinatable ligand for the putative VP vasodilating receptor. Some of these new hypotensive peptides may be of value as research tools for studies on the complex cardiovascular actions of VP and may lead to the development of a new class of antihypertensive agents.

A comparison between haemodynamic effects of vasopressin analogues

Some analogues of arginine vasopressin (AVP) reportedly possess hypotensive properties, and two such peptides are Cys(1)-Tyr(2)-Phe(3)-Val(4)-Asn(5)-Cys(6)-Pro(7)- d-Arg(8)-Gly(9)-NH(2) (VD-AVP) and d(CH(2))(5)-Cys(1)- d-Tyr(Et)(2)-Arg(3)-Val(4)-Asn(5)-Cys(6)-Lys(7)-Lys(8)-ethylenediamine(9) (TA-LVP). In the present investigation we examined the effects of TA-LVP (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/kg/min), VD-AVP (0.3, 1.0 and 3.0 microg/kg/min) and AVP (1.0, 3.0, 10 ng/kg/min) on haemodynamics, blood volume (BV) and plasma troponin levels in anaesthetised rats. Infusion of TA-LVP significantly ( P<0.05) reduced blood pressure (-45+/-3%; n=8; mean +/- SEM), mean circulatory filling pressure ( P(mcf); -41+/-3%), and cardiac output (CO; -59+/-4%). The reduction in CO at a lower dose of TA-LVP was due to reduced venous tone, while at higher doses the reduction was predominantly the result of reduced BV (-35+/-4%). The large decrease in BV during the infusion of TA-LVP, substantially increased resistance to venous return (50+/-11%), which was the main contributor in reducing CO. Administration of AVP significantly increased blood pressure (41+/-4%) and arterial resistance (98+/-16%) without any impact on P(mcf) and BV, while significantly reducing CO (-26+/-5%). Infusion of VD-AVP did not produce hypotension, but produced a modest but significant reduction in CO (-18+/-5%) and insignificant but moderate increases in peripheral resistance (30+/-12%) and resistance to venous return (28+/-8%). Plasma troponin levels were not affected by any of the peptides. The hypotensive action of TA-LVP was due to a reduction in CO as a result of a reduced pre-load, while the pressor effect of AVP increased after-load sufficiently to impede flow, reducing CO. VD-AVP was devoid of any hypotensive effects, suggesting that V(2)-vasopressin receptors are most likely to play a limited role in the control of cardiac and vascular function in these animals.