Otter diet changes in a reservoir during a severe autumn drought

Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra) are known to make extensive use of reservoirs in the Iberian Peninsula, where they forage preferentially on small-size fish (10–20 cm). We hypothesized that the usual consumption of small-size fish by otters in reservoirs is not due to prey size preference, but rather to a higher level of difficulty in capturing larger prey. We studied otter diet in a reservoir that experienced an abrupt drop in stored water caused by an unusually severe drought. We compared relative prey size, hunting success, and diving times between the year of the drought (2017) and two standard rainfall years (2015 and 2016). Otters ate a similar proportion of small and large fish during the drought instead of predominantly eating small fish. Mean diving time during the drought was similar to that of the standard climatic years, indicating a similar physiological cost of capture between small and large fish. Otters had higher hunting success in the drought year (89%) than in the standard years (63%) regardless of prey size. This suggests a higher level of catchability of both fish size classes during the drought as the water level was lower. Results suggest that the usual consumption of small-sized fish by otters in reservoirs could not be related to preference or relative abundance but rather to the difficulty of capturing large-size fish when water levels are high.

A molecular approach to identifying the relationship between resource use and availability in Eurasian otters (Lutra lutra)

In South Korea, the Eurasian otter (Lutra lutra (Linnaeus, 1758)), a semi-aquatic carnivore, is found mainly in lower order streams that tend to have a low abundance of preferred prey fish species. To investigate the relationship between resource use and availability, we used DNA barcoding to identify otter diet items in 24 otter spraints (faeces) from 16 sites along the Nakdong River basin from 4 to 6 June 2014. At these sites fish availability was assessed using scoop nets and casting nets. Fish formed the bulk of otter diet, which included also frogs, mammals, and reptiles. By DNA barcoding (success rate: 72.38%), we identified 79 prey items from 105 bone remains. The diet comprised mostly fish, but frogs, mammals, and reptiles were also identified. The fish fauna and otter diet composition differed significantly. Across the study sites, members of the Cyprinidae dominated in netted samples, but occurred less frequently in otter diet. Because most Cyprinidae are fast swimmers, otters also fed on benthic fishes and frogs, suggesting limited foraging flexibility in otters and specialization on more slowly moving prey.

Predation on Amphibians May Enhance Eurasian Otter Recovery in Southern Italy

Mediterranean freshwaters undergo extreme seasonal variation in water flow, which, exacerbated by water withdrawal for agriculture or hydroelectric purposes, may affect fish communities and thus prey availability for semi-aquatic predators, such as Eurasian otter Lutra lutra. To investigate the role played by food availability on the ongoing recovery of an otter population at the southernmost limit of its Italian range, we assessed otter diet by the analysis of 357 spraints collected from 2014 to 2017 on eight rivers, and both fish and amphibian availability by, respectively, electrofishing and visual encounter surveys. Fish and amphibians formed the bulk of otter diet, the latter resource contributing as much as fish to otter diet in spring. Use by otters of both fish and amphibians depended only fish availability, suggesting that amphibians constituted an alternative resource to be exploited in conditions of fish shortage. Accordingly, electrofishing showed that fish biomass may barely be sufficient to sustain the current otter population. ATR-FT-IR spectroscopy allowed to point out for the first time the occurrence of amphibian eggs in otter spraints, although the co-occurrence of anuran bones did not allow to discriminate between direct and passive predation. Overall results indicate that the expansion or even survival of this small otter population may depend on the effective management of water resources and reinforcement of fish assemblages.

Food abundance and diet variation in freshwater turtles from the mid-Murray River, Australia

Consumers usually respond to variations in prey availability by altering their foraging strategies. Generalist consumers forage on a diversity of resources and have greater potential to ‘switch’ their diet in response to fluctuations in prey availability, in comparison to specialist consumers. We aimed to determine how the diets of two specialist species (the eastern long-necked turtle (Chelodina longicollis) and the broad-shelled turtle (Chelodina expansa) and the more generalist Murray River short-necked turtle (Emydura macquarii) respond to variation in habitat and prey availability. We trapped and stomach-flushed turtles, and compared their diets along with environmental variables (turbidity, macrophyte and filamentous green algae cover, and aquatic invertebrate diversity and abundance) at four wetlands in north-central Victoria. Diets of E. macquarii differed from those of both Chelodina species, which overlapped, across all four sites. However, samples sizes for the two Chelodina species were too small to compare among-wetland variation in diet. Dietary composition of E. macquarii was variable but did not differ statistically among sites. Emydura macquarii preferentially selected filamentous green algae at three of the four sites. Where filamentous green algae were rare, total food bolus volume was reduced and E. macquarii only partially replaced it with other food items, including other vegetation, wood, and animal prey. Many turtles at these sites also had empty stomachs. Thus, filamentous green algae may be a limiting food for E. macquarii. Although E. macquarii has previously been described as a generalist, it appears to have limited ability to replace filamentous green algae with other food items when filamentous green algae are rare.

Anthropogenic areas as incidental substitutes for original habitat

One speaks of ecological substitutes when an introduced species performs, to some extent, the ecosystem function of an extirpated native species. We suggest that a similar case exists for habitats. Species evolve within ecosystems, but habitats can be destroyed or modified by natural and human-made causes. Sometimes habitat alteration forces animals to move to or remain in a suboptimal habitat type. In that case, the habitat is considered a refuge, and the species is called a refugee. Typically refugee species have lower population growth rates than in their original habitats. Human action may lead to the unintended generation of artificial or semiartificial habitat types that functionally resemble the essential features of the original habitat and thus allow a population growth rate of the same magnitude or higher than in the original habitat. We call such areas substitution habitats and define them as human-made habitats within the focal species range that by chance are partial substitutes for the species' original habitat. We call species occupying a substitution habitat adopted species. These are 2 new terms in conservation biology. Examples of substitution habitats are dams for European otters, wheat and rice fields for many steppeland and aquatic birds, and urban areas for storks, falcons, and swifts. Although substitution habitats can bring about increased resilience against the agents of global change, the conservation of original habitat types remains a conservation priority.

Diet of the otter Lutra lutra in an almost pristine Portuguese river: seasonality and analysis of fish prey through scale and vertebrae keys and length relationships

The seasonal diet and size of fish prey of the otter Lutra lutra were studied in an almost pristine river of North Portugal (Paiva river) through the analysis of spraints collected during 1 year. To identify Iberian freshwater fish species (Salmo trutta, Micropterus salmoides, Lepomis gibbosus, Luciobarbus bocagei, Cyprinus carpio, Carassius auratus, Pseudochondrostoma polylepis, Achondrostoma arcasii, and Iberocypris alburnoides) consumed by the otter keys based on scales and vertebrae were first developed and tested. Both keys allowed identification of all fish species, although three Cyprinidae species could not be discriminated (P. polylepis, A. arcasii, and I. alburnoides). Regression equations were calculated to estimate the dimensions of preyed fish. Highly significant linear relationships were obtained for the standard length versus vertebrae measurements, for all fish species, except for C. carpio. Fish was the predominant prey category in autumn and winter, but the otter also preyed on amphibians, reptiles, mammals, and birds, particularly during spring and summer. In general, the otter consumed high proportions of small size fish (3–12 cm for the three indiscriminate Cyprinidae, 3–9 cm for C. carpio, and 6–12 cm for S. trutta).