CLINICAL RESULTS OF ARTHROLYSIS USING POSTERO-LATERAL APPROACH FOR POST-TRAUMATIC CONTRACTURE OF THE ELBOW JOINT

Effect on muscle strength of the upper extremities after open elbow arthrolysis

Background

Open elbow arthrolysis manipulates tendons and soft tissues surrounding the elbow and may lead to strength decline after the operation. We hypothesized that strength of elbow and wrist motions and handgrip could be compromised after the procedure and that the strength recovery pattern may differ between men and women and between the dominant and nondominant side.

Methods

This was a prospective cohort study. We monitored 32 patients with post-traumatic elbow stiffness who underwent open arthrolysis between June 2014 and December 2014. All patients underwent standardized postoperative physical therapy. Preoperative and postoperative isometric strength were measured by a handheld dynamometer. Mayo Elbow Performance Score (MEPS) and arc of motion (AOM) were also analyzed.

Results

Mean follow-up was 26.13 months. Significant improvement was noticed in mean AOM (from 46° to 127°) and MEPS (from 67.97 to 96.86). No significant decline was noted in isometric strength at the last follow-up day. The strength ratios between men and women showed no significant difference from postoperative day 7 to the last follow-up day. At all follow-up assessments, isometric strength showed no significant difference between the dominant and nondominant side.

Conclusions

AOM and MEPS achieved significant enhancement after open elbow arthrolysis. The procedure did not lead to isometric strength decline. Postoperative gain of strength was proportional to the baseline strength level of each muscle group, and men had a more prominent gain of strength than women during the entire follow-up. Dominance had no effect on postoperative strength recovery.

Open elbow arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow contracture

BACKGROUND

Post-traumatic contracture is a common complication after elbow trauma. If conservative therapy fails to restore adequate elbow motion, arthrolysis is indicated. The purposes of this study were to evaluate the clinical outcome of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic elbow contracture and to determine factors influencing the outcome.

METHODS

Twenty-seven patients with post-traumatic elbow contracture were followed-up after open arthrolysis for at least 12 months. Before surgery, the mean limitation in extension was 30 and the mean maximum flexion was 83 degrees. A posterior surgical approach was used in 18 patients, and a lateral approach was employed in nine patients. Using the posterior approach, the fibrotic posterior capsule was excised and the ulnar collateral ligament was split. Both the anterior and posterior capsules were released with a lateral approach.

RESULTS

The mean flexion increased from 83 degrees to 121 degrees, but the mean extension improved little from -30 degrees to -26 degrees. The mean flexion-extension arc increased from 53 degrees to 95 degrees. According to the elbow evaluation score by the Japanese Orthopaedic Association, both pain and function scales improved significantly. By Hertel's subjective evaluation, the results were good in 13 patients, fair in ten patients, and poor in four patients. Twenty-three patients (85 percent) were satisfied with the results, but four were not satisfied because of residual contracture. These poor results were related to severe soft tissue trauma, residual displacement of intra-articular fragments, and recurrence of heterotopic bone formation.

CONCLUSIONS

Tendon lengthening of stiff triceps, accurate reduction of intra-articular fragments, and sharp epiperiosteal resection around the heterotopic bones are essential procedures of open arthrolysis to restore adequate motion in post-traumatic elbow contracture.

Open arthrolysis for post-traumatic stiffness of the elbow: results are durable over the medium term

We present a retrospective study of 25 patients treated by open arthrolysis of the elbow for post-traumatic stiffness. The mean follow-up was for 7.8 years (5 to 10.8). The range of movement of the elbow, pain scores and functional outcomes were recorded pre- and postoperatively. An improvement in the mean range of movement from 55 degrees (0 degrees to 95 degrees ) to 105 degrees (55 degrees to 135 degrees) was obtained in our patients at one year. This improvement was maintained over the mean follow-up period of 7.8 years (5 to 10.8). Improvement in pain, function and patient satisfaction was recorded in 23 of the 25 patients at final follow-up. On the basis of this study, we believe that the results of open arthrolysis for post-traumatic stiffness of the elbow are durable over the medium term.

Elbow interposition arthroplasty in children and adolescents: long-term follow-up

A long-term follow-up was made of 12 elbows operated upon between 1971 and 1986, with more than 20 years' follow-up, in nine males and three females, age at the time of surgery between 10 and 19 years . Eight right and four left elbows were involved, and there were three aetiological causes. Seven cases were sequelae of elbow fractures, of which five were supracondylar and two were of the olecranon. There were four cases of juvenile rheumatoid arthritis and one was post-osteomyelitis. The surgical technique involved a modification made by Vainio of MacAusland's technique (wider resection of the osseous ends and total covering of the bloody surfaces) [5, 9]. After extirpating the tissue blocking the joint, we proceeded to remodel the distal humerus in a wide V shape, the proximal end of the ulnar and, if necessary, the radial head. The proximal end of the ulna was sectioned transversely. All surgery was carried out sub-periosteally. Then, an interposition material was placed in one piece and sutured over the distal humerus and cut ends of the ulna and radius. The articular ends were brought together, and the capsule was closed using equidistant stitching, as is the skin. A small compression bandage was applied, and the arm was immobilised with a collar and cuff sling, with the forearm flexed to slightly less than a right angle. In ten cases, the interposition material was fascia lata grafts; in one case, skin graft and in one case, Gelfoam graft. Early rehabilitation began when post-operative pain allowed. Follow-up ranged from 25 to 32 years. Pre-surgical movement ranged between 90 degrees and 120 degrees of flexion and 30 degrees and 90 degrees of extension. Post-operative range varied between 90 degrees and 150 degrees of flexion. The five cases of full pre-operative ankylosis achieved between 90 degrees and 150 degrees of flexion and between 0 degrees and 70 degrees of extension. The total range of motion at the latest follow-up varied from 35 degrees to 150 degrees . Patients who were able to perform flexion of 120 degrees or more were considered to be excellent, those between 90 degrees and 119 degrees were graded good, from 60 degrees to 89 degrees fair and those 59 degrees or less poor. The ability to attain a hand to mouth position requires a mobility of 120 degrees . We obtained excellent results in two patients, good results in three, fair results in four and poor results in three. The fascia lata was used in 83% of cases, obtaining excellent to good results in five patients (41%). Elbow interposition arthroplasty has its indications in children and adolescents where arthrodesis or total joint replacement cannot be performed.

Treatment of bilateral elbow dislocation using external fixation with motion capacity: a report of 2 cases

Bilateral elbow dislocation is a rare injury and only 11 cases are described in the literature, including 8 patients with isolated ligamentous and 3 patients with an additional osseous injury. We present 2 cases of bilateral posterior elbow dislocations treated with a bilateral hinged elbow fixator with motion capacity to allow for early physiotherapy. Both patients had a high-energy trauma with one who fell off a ladder from a 5 m height and the second from a mountain bike injury during off-road biking. All extremities were neurovascularly intact. In the operating room, severe instability was detected in all 4 elbows: after closed reduction in 3 elbows and open reduction in 1 elbow for a Mason type 4 fracture of the radial head that was internally fixed using fine threaded implants, an elbow fixator with motion capacity was applied in all 4 elbows for a period of 6 weeks. One year after surgery, the active range of motion was 0/10/140 degrees of extension and flexion on the right and 0/0/130 degrees on the left side. The second patient achieved 0/0/125 degrees and 0/10/130, respectively. Pro- and supination was full in both patients. All 4 elbows were stable and there were no radiologic signs of degenerative changes at the 1 year follow-up. Treatment of bilateral elbow dislocation using external fixation with early motion capacity allows for active physiotherapy although maintaining joint stability, thus minimizing complications normally associated with the injury. Using this method resulted in an excellent clinical outcome for both patients.