Immediate effects of manual hyperinflation on cardiorespiratory function and sputum clearance in mechanically ventilated pediatric patients: A randomized crossover trial

Manual and ventilator hyperinflation parameters used by intensive care physiotherapists in Sri Lanka: An online survey

INTRODUCTION

Hyperinflation is a common procedure to clear secretion, increase lung compliance and enhance oxygenation in mechanically ventilated patients. Hyperinflation can be provided as manual hyperinflation (MHI) or ventilator hyperinflation (VHI), where outcomes depend upon the methods of application. Hence it is crucial to assess the application of techniques employed in Sri Lanka due to observed variations from recommended practices.

OBJECTIVE

This study is aimed to evaluate the application and parameters used for MHI and VHI by physiotherapists in intensive care units (ICUs) in Sri Lanka.

METHODOLOGY

An online survey was conducted among physiotherapists who are working in ICUs in Sri Lanka using WhatsApp groups and other social media platforms.

RESULTS

A total of 96 physiotherapists responded. The survey comprised of three sections to obtain information about socio-demographic data, MHI practices and VHI practices. Most of the respondents (47%) worked in general hospitals and 74% of participants had a bachelor's degree in physiotherapy; 31.3% had 3-6 years of experience; 93.8% used hyperinflation, and 78.9% used MHI. MHI was performed routinely and as needed to treat low oxygen levels, abnormal breath sounds, and per physician orders while avoiding contraindications. Self-inflation bags are frequently used for MHI (40.6%). Only a few participants (26%) used a manometer or tracked PIP. In addition to the supine position, some participants (37.5%) used the side-lying position. Most physiotherapists followed the recommended MHI technique: slow squeeze (57.3%), inspiratory pause (45.8%), and quick release (70.8%). VHI was practised by 19.8%, with medical approval and it was frequently performed by medical staff compared to physiotherapists. Treatment time, number of breaths, and patient positioning varied, and parameters were not well-defined.

CONCLUSION

The study found that MHI was not applied with the recommended PIP, and VHI parameters were not identified. The study indicates a need to educate physiotherapists about current VHI and MHI practice guidelines.

Trials and tribulations of transparency related to inconsistencies between plan and conduct in peer-reviewed physiotherapy publications: A methodology review

RATIONALE

The physiotherapy profession strives to be a leader in providing quality care and strongly recognizes the value of research to guide clinical practice. Adherence to guidelines for research reporting and conduct is a significant step towards high-quality, transparent and reproducible research.

AIM/OBJECTIVE

Assess integrity between planned and conducted methodology in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and systematic reviews (SRs) published in physiotherapy journals.

METHODS

Eighteen journals were manually searched for RCTs and SRs published from 1 July 2021 through 31 December 2021. Studies were included if the journal or specific study was indexed in PubMed and published/translated in English. Descriptive statistics determined congruence between preregistration data and publication.

RESULTS

Forty RCTs and 68 SRs were assessed. Forty-three SRs included meta-analysis (MA). Of the 34 registered RCTs, 7 (20.6%) had no discrepancy between the registration and publication. Two trials (5.9%) addressed all discrepancies, 4 (11.8%) addressed some and 21 (61.8%) did not address any discrepancies. Of the 36 registered MAs, 33 (91.7%) had discrepancies between the registration and publication. Two (5.6%) addressed all discrepancies and three (8.3%) had no discrepancies. Eight SRs without MA published information not matching their registration, and none provided justification for the discrepancies.

CONCLUSION

Most RCTs/SRs were registered; the majority had discrepancies between preregistration and publication, potentially influencing the outcomes and interpretations of findings. Journals should require preregistration and compare the submission with the registration information when assessing publication suitability. Readers should be aware of these inconsistencies and their implications when interpreting and translating results into practice.

Optimization of lung ultrasound in ultrafast-track anesthesia for non-cyanotic congenital heart disease surgery

Objective

We aimed to explore the feasibility of lung ultrasound for perioperative assessment and the optimal effect of lung ultrasound in reducing lung complications during non-cyanotic congenital heart disease (CHD) surgery using ultrafast-track anesthesia.

Methods

Sixty patients were treated at Shenzhen Children's Hospital between 2019 and 2020. Of these, 30 patients in group N had an indication for extubation and ultrafast-track anesthesia after congenital heart surgery; the tracheal catheter was removed, and the patients were sent to the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU) for further monitoring and treatment. Another 30 patients were in group L and also had an indication for extubation and ultrafast-track anesthesia; in addition we compared lung ultrasound score (LUS) before and after surgery, when we found the cases that LUS ≥ 15, for whom targeted optimization treatment would be carried out. The tracheal catheter was removed after LUS <15 days before the patients were sent to the CICU. In all cases, the LUS and PaO2/FiO2 ratios (P/F) of both groups were recorded at the time of anesthesia induction (T0), before extubation (T1), and 5 min (T2), 1 h (T3), and 24 h (T4) after extubation. The incidence of pulmonary complications, LUS, and P/F were compared between the two groups.

Results

There was great consistency between LUS and radiographic findings. Comparing the data of the two groups at T2, T3 and T4, the P/F was higher and the LUS was lower in group L than in group N. The incidence of lung complications in group L (18 cases, 60 %) was lower than that in group N (26 cases, 86.7 %, χ2 = 5.46, P = 0.02); comparing LUS between T0 and T3, LUS decreased in a greater number of cases in group L (15, 50 %) than in group N (7 cases, 23.3 %, χ2 = 4.59, P = 0.032).

Conclusion

Lung ultrasonography can effectively help assess lung conditions. Optimization guided by lung ultrasound in ultrafast track anesthesia can significantly reduce postoperative lung complications.

Thoracoabdominal rebalancing is not superior to manual hyperinflation to increase the amount of pulmonary secretion removed in preterm newborns: A randomized crossover trial

Background and Aims

Respiratory physical therapy is recommended to prevent complications of accumulated secretion in mechanical ventilated infants, but no consensus about the best technique is available.

Aims

To evaluate the effects of manual hyperinflation maneuver (MHM) and thoracoabdominal rebalancing method (TRM) in preterm newborns (PTNB) for bronchial hygiene.

Methods

Single-blind randomized crossover trial with intention-to-treat analysis was carried out with 24 PTNB (<37 weeks of gestation) under invasive ventilatory support via orotracheal cannula received both interventions (MHM and TRM) with an interval of 4 h, followed by tracheal suctioning. The primary outcome was the amount of pulmonary secretion, while secondary outcomes were the response of the autonomous (heart rate, respiratory rate [RR], tidal volume [TV], and oxygen saturation [SpO2]), motor (classification of general movements), and regulatory (pain and respiratory discomfort) systems pre and postintervention.

Results

Although the amount of secretion was not different after the MHM and TRM interventions (0.10 and 0.09 g, respectively, p = 0.47), a difference was observed in the increase of SpO2 (p ≤ 0.001), and in the decrease of RR (p ≤ 0.001) for TRM. The poor repertoire pattern was predominant (23 PTNB), and it did not alter after interventions. Pain was not observed during interventions, the respiratory discomfort decreased after both interventions (p = 0.50).

Conclusion

The amount of secretion removed was similar after MHM and TRM and both maneuvers did not negatively alter the response of the autonomous, motor, and regulatory systems.