Potential mechanisms for the genesis of Cenozoic domal structures on the NE Atlantic margin: pros, cons and some new ideas

The mild compressional structures of Cenozoic age on the passive margins bordering Norway, the UK, the Faroes and Ireland have been the subject of much discussion in the literature. Nevertheless, their origin remains enigmatic. Candidate mechanisms must be able to explain the generation of sufficient stress to cause deformation, the episodic nature of the structures and why they developed where they did. We examine these mechanisms and conclude that multiple causes are probable, while favouring body force as potentially the most important agent.

The geometry and setting of the structures are incompatible with gravitational sliding and toe-thrusting, probably the commonest ‘compressive’ structuring around the Atlantic margins. A passive mode of origin featuring drape or flank sedimentary loading probably emphasized some of the structures, but cannot be invoked as a primary mechanism. Likewise, reactivation of basement structure probably focused deformation but did not initiate it. Far-field orogenic stress from Alpine orogenic phases and from the West Spitsbergen–Eurekan folding and thrusting is also examined. This mechanism is attractive because of its potential to explain episodicity of the compressional structures. However, difficulties exist with stress transmission pathways from these fold belts, and the passive margin structures developed for much of their existence in the absence of any nearby contemporaneous orogeny. Breakup and plate spreading forces such as divergent asthenosheric flow have potential to explain early post-breakup compressional structuring, for example on the UK–Faroes margin, but are unlikely to account for later (Neogene) deformation.

Ridge push, generally thought to be the dominant body force acting on passive margins, can in some circumstances generate enough stress to cause mild deformation, but appears to have low potential to explain episodicity. It is proposed here that the primary agent generating the body force was development of the Iceland Insular Margin, the significant bathymetric-topographic high around Iceland. Circumstantially, in Miocene times, this development may also have coincided with the acme of the compressional structures. We show that, dependent on the degree of lithosphere–asthenosphere coupling, the Iceland Plateau may have generated enough horizontal stress to deform adjacent margins, and may explain the arcuate distribution of the compressional structures around Iceland.

Assuming transmission of stress through the basement we argue that, through time, the structures will have developed preferentially where the basement is hotter, weaker and therefore more prone to shearing at the relatively low stress levels. This situation is most likely at the stretched and most thermally-blanketed crust under the thickest parts of the young (Cretaceous–Cenozoic) basins. Although several elements of this model remain to be tested, it has the potential to provide a general explanation for passive margin compression at comparatively low stress levels and in the absence of nearby orogeny or gravitational sliding.

The formation of non-volcanic rifted margins by the progressive extension of the lithosphere: the example of the West Iberian margin

Non-volcanic margins such as the West Iberian margin exhibit certain characteristics, such as a deficit of synrift igneous rock, a zone of exhumed subcontinental mantle in the continent–ocean transition and an apparent extension discrepancy. These observations can be explained as a consequence of the progressive extension of the lithosphere above relatively cool mantle. The evolving rheological stratification of the lithosphere controls the style of extension at different lithospheric levels at different times; extension is probably heterogeneous at all stages, with lower crustal and upper mantle boudinage controlling the patterns of thinning and mantle upwelling early in the rift history, and complete crustal embrittlement and mantle serpentinization controlling the formation of late-stage detachment faults. Extension in the brittle crust is via multiple phases of faulting, with a general focusing of extension towards the incipient ocean.

The lack of melt is explained by a combination of heterogeneous extension of the lower lithosphere and a cool subcontinental geotherm. The extension discrepancy may in places be controlled by depth-dependent stretching of the crust through lower crustal boudinage, but may also simply be the result of incomplete recognition of the entire polyphase faulting history. The latter seems to be the case for West Iberia.

Evidence for all these processes can be found at the West Iberian rifted margins as well as those preserved and partially exposed in the Alps.

Continental lithospheric thinning and breakup in response to upwelling divergent mantle flow: application to the Woodlark, Newfoundland and Iberia margins

Depth-uniform stretching is not the dominant deformation process for thinning continental lithosphere leading to breakup; it cannot explain the observed depth-dependent lithosphere stretching and mantle exhumation at rifted continental margins. Depth-dependent lithosphere thinning, in which stretching of the lower crust and lithosphere mantle greatly exceeds that of the upper crust, has been observed at many non-volcanic and volcanic rifted continental margins including conjugate margin pairs. Passive continental margins show a paucity of brittle deformation in the upper crust during continental lithosphere thinning leading to breakup and sea-floor spreading initiation. A new model of rifted continental margin formation has been developed that assumes that deformation and thinning of continental lithosphere leading to breakup occurs in response to an upwelling divergent flow field within continental lithosphere and asthenosphere, and that this deformation evolves into sea-floor spreading. The new model successfully predicts depth-dependent stretching of continental margin lithosphere for both non-volcanic and volcanic margins and mantle exhumation at non-volcanic margins, both of which are observed, but are not explained, by existing depth-uniform continental lithosphere stretching models. The new model provides a balance of extensional strain, supplies an explanation for the paucity of synrift brittle deformation, and offers a simple transition from prebreakup lithosphere thinning to sea-floor spreading. The observed diversity of rifted continental margin structure and width of the ocean–continent transition can be explained by variability in the form of the upwelling divergent flow field. The new upwelling divergent flow model of continental lithosphere thinning leading to continental breakup successfully predicts the observed bathymetry and margin geometry for the most recent segment of sea-floor spreading initiation in the Woodlark Basin in the western Pacific, and the observed bathymetry and free air gravity anomaly for the Newfoundland and Iberian margins.