Closed-Loop Quantitative Verification of Rate-Adaptive Pacemakers

Pacemaking function of two simplified cell models

Simplified nonlinear models of biological cells are widely used in computational electrophysiology. The models reproduce qualitatively many of the characteristics of various organs, such as the heart, brain, and intestine. In contrast to complex cellular ion-channel models, the simplified models usually contain a small number of variables and parameters, which facilitates nonlinear analysis and reduces computational load. In this paper, we consider pacemaking variants of the Aliev-Panfilov and Corrado two-variable excitable cell models. We conducted a numerical simulation study of these models and investigated the main nonlinear dynamic features of both isolated cells and 1D coupled pacemaker-excitable systems. Simulations of the 2D sinoatrial node and 3D intestine tissue as application examples of combined pacemaker-excitable systems demonstrated results similar to obtained previously. The uniform formulation for the conventional excitable cell models and proposed pacemaker models allows a convenient and easy implementation for the construction of personalized physiological models, inverse tissue modeling, and development of real-time simulation systems for various organs that contain both pacemaker and excitable cells.

Development of closed-loop modelling framework for adaptive respiratory pacemakers

OBJECTIVE

Ventilatory pacing by electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve has many advantages compared to mechanical ventilation. However, commercially available respiratory pacing devices operate in an open-loop fashion, which require manual adjustment of stimulation parameters for a given patient. Here, we report the model development of a closed-loop respiratory pacemaker, which can automatically adapt to various pathological ventilation conditions and metabolic demands.

METHODS

To assist the model design, we have personalized a computational lung model, which incorporates the mechanics of ventilation and gas exchange. The model can respond to the device stimulation where the gas exchange model provides biofeedback signals to the device. We use a pacing device model with a proportional integral (PI) controller to illustrate our approach.

RESULTS

The closed-loop adaptive pacing model can provide superior treatment compared to open-loop operation. The adaptive pacing stimuli can maintain physiological oxygen levels in the blood under various simulated breathing disorders and metabolic demands.

CONCLUSION

We demonstrate that the respiratory pacing devices with the biofeedback can adapt to individual needs, while the lung model can be used to validate and parametrize the device.

SIGNIFICANCE

The closed-loop model-based framework paves the way towards an individualized and autonomous respiratory pacing device development.